Following the death of President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1945, Vice President Harry S. Truman was next in line to take over presidency. He was automatically faced with one of the most challenging decisions a President has ever had to make. Adolf Hitler’s Nazi empire has been defeated, and now the new chief executive had to come up with a plan to end the war with Japan. Often people come to the conclusion that Truman decided to drop the bomb, but like Davidson and Lytle state, there were many factors and many people that influenced the development and dropping of the atomic bomb. In order to really get a good grasp of how and why the bomb was dropped, and whether it was a justified decision, we must know the background of the events that took …show more content…
place. In his diary President Truman wrote, “I have to decide Japanese strategy – shall we invade Japan proper or shall we bomb and blockade.
That is my hardest decision to date.” This shows a Truman had a sense of humanity and was having contradictive feelings toward what he should do to handle the situation. He had the stress of being a new President and how everyone was looking towards him to make a decision to end the war. After Truman discovered the development of the atomic bomb he described it as a “fire destruction prophesied in the Euphrates Valley Era, after Noah and his fabulous Ark.” In reality, this was the first time a nuclear weapon had been used on a city; no one really had an idea about how the radiation was going to have long lasting effects and how many people were going to suffer. Truman was told that Japan was prepared to fight back till the end and had no plans to surrender and yet his original plan wasn’t to harm any unnecessary civilians in Japan. Truman had ordered the bomb to be dropped on a “purely military” target, so that “military objectives and soldiers and sailors are the target not women and children.” I believe his decision to unleash the atomic bomb on Japan was justified. He demanded Japan to surrender unconditionally but when their government failed to respond, Truman had no alternate but to authorize the use of the atomic bomb before Japan decided to bomb us …show more content…
again. In July 1945, Leo Szilard—the father of the atomic bomb—sent a petition to President Truman signed by many other atomic scientists. In the petition they asked for the President to seriously reconsider using the deadly weapon on Japan because of the moral implications and the mass destruction it would cause. He had developed the bomb just as a precaution against Nazi Germany, and didn’t see a reason for it to be used against Japan unless the terms imposed on Japan were “made public in detail and Japan knowing these terms has refused to surrender.” Which did happen because Truman mentions in his diary on July 25th, 1945, “we will issue a warning statement [known as the Potsdam Proclamation] asking the Japs to surrender and save lives…” He reached out to Japan and gave them an ultimatum: to surrender or [which was clearly stated] they would face "prompt and utter destruction." I think that is a straightforward warning and since Japan had already bombed the Pearl Harbor, at least they were still getting a chance to surrender and save their citizens lives; instead they decided to ignore the warning, which was the cause of their own defeat. Truman had to justify why the bomb was dropped since he was the President although it wasn’t solely his decision.
He defended the atomic bombings by saying it was a repayment to Japan for bombing the Pearl Harbor without any warning and to shorten the agony of the war to save young Americans. In reality the decision to drop the bomb was not a single act but as the outcome of many organizational routines. There were so many groups, such as the military, navy, scientists, etc. that played a role in influencing the President. When using Davidson and Lytle’s models to understand the decision to drop the bomb, we can see that there was a clash between the scientists and soldiers that prevented efficient and safe research. The soldiers were concerned with the safety of the information, and wanted to progress slowly, but the scientists were concerned with the speed of their research. Another interesting fact is the critical details about the actual dropping of the bomb. First of all, one man did not drop a nuclear bomb by himself. Obviously, someone pressed the button, and flying a plane alone is difficult as well, much less flying a plane into an enemy territory in breaking daylight with the most powerful bomb inside. So, the decision to drop bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not a singular event in history nor was it a single persons decision, but rather it was the culmination of a long and complex web of people and events; it’s not possible to know everything by applying
just one model, because that would be like only hearing one side of the story which will make you overlook other crucial factors. There are many theories to why the bomb was dropped including: it was the fastest way to end the war, it was a way to justify the costs of the Manhattan Project, to terrorize/impress the Soviets, and as a response to the Pearl Harbor. Their could be partial truth in all of these theories but the fact that the bomb was dropped will never change, instead each model from Davidson & Lytle brings to surface a different reason for WHY the plan to drop the bomb was executed. Honestly it wasn’t really a choice between wrong and right, it was typically a choice between the lesser of two evils. Both countries had their people killed, and this was the intelligent rational choice at the given moment with the information that was available. At that time majority of the military strategists agreed with Truman’s decision, but now that the facts of the war are slowly being uncovered over time; like the long-term effects of the bomb and how the Japanese culture has changed people tend to blame Truman for everything. We need to look at the fact, that during Truman’s presidency, Germany and Japan both surrendered which ending World War II, and that was a huge phenomenon. It’s really easy to say that the bombing of Japan was wrong… but would you have said the same thing back then if it had saved your father, husband, son, etc.?
The first reason on why Truman made the right decision was because the atomic bomb ultimately helped to prevent the deaths of American troops. There would have been over 100,000 losses during the first stage of the attack against Japan, leading to over one million casualties of just Americans during the defeat of Japan(Tucker 1). Although there is no way to confirm the amount of predicted deaths, any amount of American deaths would have been avoided with the use of the atomic bomb. Comparing a million predicted deaths of Americans to the 140,000 (±10,000) that were actually killed in the Hiroshima bomb(Faragher 4), the decision implementing the bomb was executed in the correct way.
The war was coming to a victorious conclusion for the Allies. Germany had fallen, and it was only a matter of time until Japan would fall as well. Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson was at the forefront of the American war effort, and saw atomic weaponry as a way out of the most monumental war ever. As discussed in Cabell Phillips’ book, The Truman Presidency: The History of a Triumphant Succession, Stimson was once quoted as saying that the atomic bomb has “more effect on human affairs than the theory of Copernicus and the Law of Gravity” (55). Stimson, a defendant of dropping the bomb on Japan, felt that the world would never be the same. If the world would change after using atomic weapons, could it possibly have changed for the better? One would think not. However, that person might be weary of the biased opinion of White House personnel. He or she should care more for the in depth analytical studies done by experts who know best as to why America should or should not have dropped the atomic bomb. As more and more evidence has been presented to researchers, expert opinion on whether or not the United States should have dropped the two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki has also changed. More and more researchers seem to feel that the atomic bomb should never have been used (Alperovitz 16). Despite several officials’ claims to enormous death estimations, an invasion of Japan would have cost fewer total lives. In addition, post atomic bomb repercussions that occurred, such as the Arms Race, were far too great a price to pay for the two atomic drops. However, possibly the most compelling argument is that Japan would have surrendered with or without the United States using the atomic bomb. In defiance of top...
This investigation assesses President Harry Truman’s decision to drop atomic bombs on both Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It will determine whether or not his decision was justified. This investigation will scrutinize the reasons that made Harry Truman feel inclined to drop atomic bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Preventing further casualties along with the desire to end the war are two argumentative points that will be analyzed to determine if they were strong enough to justify the dropping of the atomic bombs. Excerpts from Truman’s memoirs and a variety of different titles were consulted in order to undertake this investigation. Section C will evaluate two sources for their origins purposes values and limitations. The first is a book titled The Invasion of Japan written by John Stakes in 1955. And the second is a book titled Prompt & Utter Destruction written by J. Samuel Walker.
Upon reading “Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs Against Japan” by J. Samuel Walker, a reader will have a clear understanding of both sides of the controversy surrounding Truman’s decision to drop atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. The controversy remains of whether or not atomic bombs should have been used during the war. After studying this text, it is clear that the first atomic bomb, which was dropped on the city of Hiroshima, was a necessary military tactic on ending the war. The second bomb, which was dropped on Nagasaki, however, was an unnecessary measure in ensuring a surrender from the Japanese, and was only used to seek revenge.
According to document A, President Truman believed that it was his duty to protect and save American lives And that's exactly what he did. If we did not go through with the atomic bomb, then we would have had to get Japan to surrender another way, yeah we could have put up an economic blockade and continuously bombed them like Admiral William Leahy wanted to do in in document A. Or we could have invaded and lost many more lives in the process, the war would have dragged on costing more American lives and more money for the United States.
Decisions are the hardest thing to make, especially considering how Harry Truman decided to drop the US Atomic bombs onto Okinawa and Iwo Jima. The role of ending the war with Japan was in his hands, but it would require releasing the most horrendous weapon ever known. However, there was some controversy over Truman’s decision. Some people say that it was unnecessary to use the Atomic bombs, such as the Federal Council of Churches and the Christian Faith. They stated that: “As American Christians, we are deeply penitent for the irresponsible use already made of the atomic bomb.
Historian Robert James Maddox starts the debate by siding with Truman and states that he made the right decision in dropping the bomb. Maddox uses several influential meetings, speculations and the presidents’ personal opinions on the situation to defend his statement. Some examples he uses include, Japanese military power and mentality, saving American lives, and unconditional surrender. In short, because the use of the atomic bomb occurred, the Japanese military lost their lust to fight to the end, countless lives were saved, and Japan surrendered. Therefore, although many Japanese lives were lost in the conflict the right decision was made by Harry Truman to authorize the usage of the bombs.
To choose whether or not it was morally sound to use the atomic bomb, we must first examine the background as to what circumstances it was dropped under. In 1945, American soldiers and civilians were weary from four years of war, yet the Japanese military was refusing to give up their fight. American forces occupied Okinawa and Iwo Jima and intensely fire bombed Japanese cities. But Japan had an army of 2 million strong stationed in the home islands guarding against Allied invasion. After the completion of the Manhattan Project, For Truman, the choice whether or not to use the atomic bomb was the most difficult decision of his life. First, an Allied demand for an immediate unconditional surrender was made to the leadership in Japan. Although the demand stated that refusal would result in total destruction, no mention of any new weapons of mass destruction was made. The Japanese military commander Hideki Tojo rejected the request for unconditional s...
Under President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s administration the atomic bomb was being developed. After Roosevelt died, his vice president Harry Truman was appointed President of the United States. Truman was never informed about the bombs development until an emergency cabinet meeting (Kuznick 9). Truman had to make the fatal decision on whether the bomb was to be dropped on Japan. With the idea of going to war, Truman had to think about the lives of the thousand American soldiers. The American soldiers had begun using the method of island hopping, because the bomb was not available. The idea of dropping a bomb was that the war itself could possibly end in its earliest points. The dropping of the atomic bomb could also justify the money spent on the Manhattan Project (Donohue 1). With a quote by Franklin D. Roosevelt “This will be a day that will live in infamy”, Pearl Harbor was a tragic day for Americans. The United States had lost many soldiers, which they had claimed that they will eventually get revenge. The alternates of dropping the bomb was also discussed at the Interim Committee. The American government was trying to get an invitation response from the Japanese government. If the United States did not drop the bomb and ‘Operation Downfall’ ha...
Why did the United States drop the Atomic Bomb? The atomic bomb is the subject of much controversy. Since its first detonation in 1945, the entire world has heard the aftershocks of that blast. Issues concerning nuclear weapons sparked the Cold War. We also have the atomic bomb to thank for our relative peace at this time due to the fear of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD).
A huge proponent to the use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and August 9 of 1945 was President Harry Truman. Although they value the ideas and contributions out in by the committee they choose, the president ultimately has the last say on war time decisions. It just so happens that President Truman wanted to drop the bomb. President Truman believed that Japan's leaders would not surrender to the terms outlined in Potsdam meeting. He saw it fit to drop the bombs and end all doubt.
There were many arguments and factors as to if Truman decided correctly and if the United States should have dropped the bombs. There were many disputes supporting the bombing. Some being the Japanese were warned early enough, it shortened the war, and it saved many Americans lives. There are also voluminous quarrels against the United States bombing the Japanese. Some of these are the bombing killed innocent Japanese civilians who did not deserve it, the Japanese was about to surrender before we bombed them, and the United States only blasted the Japanese because of racism toward them. Though there are many valid reasons for and against the bombing, there is still much controversy today whether president Truman made the right decision.
The dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan were ethical decisions made by President Harry Truman and the United States government. By the time of the atom bomb was ready, the U.S. had been engaged in military conflict for over four years and lost over 400,000 soldiers. Truman claimed, "We would have the opportunity to bring the world into a pattern in which the peace of the world and our civilization can be saved" (Winkler 18). The bomb was aimed at ending the war immediately and avoiding prolonged battle in the Pacific Theater and the inevitable invasion of Japan. President Truman hoped that by showing the Japanese the devastating weapon the U.S. possessed, that the war could be brought ...
There are many people who oppose the use of the atomic bombs; though there are some that believe it was a necessity in ending the war. President Truman realized the tragic significance of the atomic bomb and made his decision to use it to shorten the agony of young Americans (“Was the Atomic Bombing”). The president knew of the way the Japanese fought. They fought to the death and they were brutal to prisoners of war. They used woman and children as soldiers to surprise bomb the enemy. They made lethal weapons and were taught to sacr...
Both sides of the war had suffered tremendous losses and the numbers would have continued to grow over the course of the war. By choosing to drop the atomic bomb on Japan, I believe the lives saved in the long run outweigh the initial number of lives lost. There is no way to put a price of one human life against another, but the total number of deaths prevented could have been multitudes compared to the hundred thousand killed in the atomic blasts. From the numbers alone, I support President Truman’s utilitarian