Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mexican revolution history
Mexico revolution essays
Mexican revolution history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Mexican revolution history
Michael Tomczak
HST 163WI
11/1/2014
Why Francisco Madero Should be Removed from Power
Francisco Madero, the current president of Mexico, has really screwed up Mexico. He’s weak,
spineless, and has no idea what he is doing in his precedency. He is a narcissist and he must be
removed from power. Mexico will not stand for any of his screw ups and let alone be any best
interest to the U.S. Mexico needs a president who has honor, who is prepared, who can be
trusted, and most importantly, will stop at nothing to solve all the conflicts that are currently
resulting in udder chaos in Mexico. A president is supposed to care a lot for the safety of his/her
country and citizens.
Francisco Madero is a sham who has no honor. According to Christopher
…show more content…
Minster, in his biography on Francisco Madero, Madero tried to cheat his way into becoming president in the 1910 election.
Madero thought that he could easily become president just because of his last
name, where he came from, and his rebellious ways. Note that none of those factors will
make anyone president. He and Porfirio Diaz were both running for president at this time. Diaz
promised that there would be free elections and Madero formed an anti-reelectionist party to
challenge Diaz. But, the funny thing is that when Diaz came into power in 1876, Madero said
that he would not seek re-election. Apparently, Madero lied to us all. Madero’s campaign was a
disaster, even though his campaign really sold out with all the copies of his book The
Presidential Succession of 1910, his newspaper articles, and all the Mexicans that heard his
speeches, he and most of the anti-reelectionists were arrested because Diaz believed that Madero
and his group of anti-reelectionists were going to make plans of plotting armed insurrection,
which is a violent uprising against the government. Diaz won this election and then, here’s where
Madero has no honor, since Madero comes from a wealthy family; he got bailed out of jail by
using his father’s money. After he was bailed out, he crossed the border into Texas to set up
…show more content…
an armed revolution, which Diaz thought right about when he had Madero arrested. So now we all know that Diaz made the right decision and that he should be the rightful president of Mexico. Do we want a fake president? Do we want a president with no honor? Francisco Madero is unprepared to be president.
Madero is the one who started the Mexican
Revolution. The purpose for this revolution was to overthrow Porfirio Diaz so that Madero
would become the president of Mexico. Let’s get one thing straight, this revolution proved to be
a huge success but, a straight-up tragedy for Madero. Madero did become president because of
this revolution, it did overthrow Porfirio Diaz who then died in exile, but at the same time we all
have to realize that this was a huge mistake made by Madero. The reason the revolution being a
straight-up tragedy for Madero is because of the way that he handled the whole revolution.
According to an article called “The Mexican Revolution 1910-1920”, Madero’s revolution
proved to be a success in overthrowing Diaz and his regime, but his victory in overthrowing Diaz
was only the beginning of the conflict that would arise in Mexico. Madero seemed to forget a
few things or he just wasn’t paying attention. He failed to note that revolts broke out, and Huerta
treacherously assassinated his brother. This is only creates more chaos for Mexico to deal with.
It should also be noted that this revolution was a very selfish act made my Madero
considering the fact that many of his maderistas died by the attacks of Diaz’s regime when the revolution was in open revolt. It didn’t seem like Madero showed any sympathy to any of his maderistas that were killed. And when he became president, it didn’t seem like he gave any credit to his recruits that helped him overthrow Diaz in the revolution. Madero better be careful because there are those who are conspiring against him. There are those that have lost all their hopes for him as well. Do we want a president who doesn’t pay attention to any of the chaos breaking out? Do we want a president who starts conflicts but doesn’t try or do anything to solve them? And do we want a selfish president because it’s quite clear that he just started the Mexican Revolution for his own selfish gain. Madero had the most to gain from the revolution. Nothing but udder chaos has occurred since Madero became president. According to Suzanne Barbezet in her biography on the Mexican Revolution, up to the point where Madero became president, the revolutionaries had a common goal, but with Madero as president, their differences became quite obvious. Zapata and Villa have been fighting for social and agrarian reform, while Madero is only interested in making political changes. Currently, Zapata claimed the Plan de Ayala, which is a plan that is predicted to redistribute land among the poor. It’s no secret either that he and his followers are conspiring against Madero. It’s also obvious that they don’t want Madero as the president of Mexico either. The way that they rose up against Madero and his government is easy to see that they are against Madero. Felix Diaz is the right choice as president of Mexico. He is the leader of the Porfirian party. He may not have the same talents his Uncle Porfirio, but he has the potential of being the best candidate for the position as the president of Mexico. More people should believe that Felix Diaz can do a better job than Francisco Madero can ever do. The only thing that everyone should think about is how Francisco Madero really screwed up Mexico. He can’t be trusted, he was never meant to be a president, and he doesn’t have what it takes to be president. There is a lot of chaos and conflicts that he has still done nothing about. It’s very clear that his presidency so far has been quite unimpressive. Mexico needs a man like Felix Diaz to be president. If Felix Diaz isn’t the answer to Mexico’s problems then who is? It’s definitely not Francisco Madero. Citations http://latinamericanhistory.about.com/od/presidentsofmexico/a/fmadero_3.htm http://gomexico.about.com/od/historyculture/a/mex_revolution.htm http://www2.ups.edu/faculty/jlago/fl380/source3_02.htm
...he lower class had their agenda on mind, and even disrupted the campaign of Allende in order to do so. Allende was then forced to deal with situations he should never have had to, thus hurting his political status with the working class because he could never deliver the results they wanted all the time.
This documentary called “The Storm that Swept Mexico”, talks about one of the most important events in Mexican history which was the Mexican revolution which started on 1910 and lasted for about 10 years. At first this video starts talking about how Mexico lost a major part of their land in Mexican American war. The states that Mexico lost were Arizona, Texas, New Mexico, and California in 1848, by president Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna. Moreover, another war mentioned was the one Mexico had against France called “Battle of Puebla”. After this atrocious war Mexico had 20 years of peace until the Mexican revolution in 1910 took place. This very interesting video dragged my attention due to the fact that it explains precisely every important figure that was involved in such a big movement. Furthermore, in this fascinating video I learned a lot of interesting facts about Porfirio Diaz. For example, he is the president that lasted 30 years in power, and was the president number thirty to rule Mexico. Another interesting fact about this iconic figure is that his period as Mexican president was called the “Porfiriato”
...r had embraced a counterrevolution of economic and political order. The greatest symbolism of the fall of the government under Salvador Allende was the return of repression on the workers at the mill.
Madero called for retirement of Diaz in carefully chosen words, “General Diaz knows perfectly well that his retirement from the presidency would be a benefit to the country…that leaving it free to form a new government in accordance with its aspiration and its needs” (21).
Death of course by assassination planned by El Jeffe’s forces that was skillfully carried out to make it look like a tragic accident. Of course it was no coincidence to anyone, it was meant by Trujillo to intimidate potential followers of the ever rising rebellion. Their fight to the end showed how they were proud and willing to fight for the better life and brake the chains of living in oppression. They proved they would not tolerate living miserably under an unjust government and this was truly inspiring. This is a genuine and desirable trait that they held strongly, and it gained them due respect and honor.
The Porfirio Diaz first had good intentions for Mexico. He at first bettered Mexico exponentially in his first few years. His main goal for the government was to be more industrial. He thought that agriculture didn’t matter as much as industry. The only problem was that most of the people living in Mexico depended on the agriculture. Diaz was well aware of the problem and ignored the people’s needs. Eventually his popularity started to drop. People where then looking for anyway to take him out of office. Once he realized that his presidency was being threatened; he did everything in his power to ensure he won. That is; until “People started noticing that he was rigging elections” (Source b2).
Following the assassination of Madero and the assumption of power by Huerta in 1913, he returned to join the opposition under the revolutionary Venustiano Carranza. Using "hit and run" tactics, he gained control of northern Mexico, including Mexico City. As a result, his powerful fighting force became "La Division Del Norte." The two men soon became enemies, however, and when Carranza seized power in 1914, Villa led the rebellion against him.
...Morelos seemed at a permanent stalemate. Carranza knew that he could never fully take Mexico while Zapata was still alive and in charge of his army. To rid himself of his enemy, Carranza devised a trap. A letter had been intercepted in which Zapata invited a colonel of the Mexican army who had shown leanings toward his cause to meet and join forces. This colonel, Jesús Guajardo, under the threat of being executed as a traitor, pretended to agree to meet Zapata and defect to his side. On Thursday, April 10, 1919, Zapata walked into Carranza's trap as he met with Guajardo in the town of Chinameca. There, at 2:10 PM, Zapata was shot and killed by federal soldiers, and as the man Zapata hit the ground, dead instantly, the legend of Zapata reached its climax. Carranza did not achieve his goal by killing Zapata. On the contrary, in May of 1920, Álvaro Obregón, one of Zapata's right-hand men, entered the capital with a large fighting force of Zapatistas, and after Carranza had fled, formed the seventy-third government in Mexico's history of independence. In this government, the Zapatistas played an important role, especially in the Department of Agriculture. Mexico was finally at peace.
Trujillo use of violence and challenge of political authority demonstrated that from the very beginning he created an insurgency regime within his military ranks that oppressed his country. Which 30 years later, his own military generals and freedom fighters will be the very ones to end his reign. To this very day, some of the Dominican people whether living in the United States or Dominican Republic are hesitate to talk about it, but are glad that it is in the past and
Porfirio’s role in the revolution was to maintain dictatorial rule over Mexico after becoming president and to defeat Madero along with his forces, including Villa and Orozco. He resigned after his troops were defeated at the Battle of Juárez in 1911 and went to Europe.
The history of political instability in Mexico and its need for revolution is very complex and dates back to the colonization of Mexico by the Spaniards in the 1500s. However, many aspects of the social situation of Mexico when the Revolution broke out can be attributed to the thirty-year dictatorship of President Porfrio Diaz, prior to 1911. The Revolution began in November of 1910 in an effort to overthrow the Diaz dictatorship. Under the Diaz presidency, a small minority of people, primarily relatives and friends, were in ...
...n Morelos. Zapata secured the town and then cut off the road to Mexico City. A week later Diaz realized he was in trouble and fled Mexico for Europe. After he left a provisional President and a large army that was led by General Victoriano Huerta. Soon after Diaz left Mexico, Zapata took Cuernavaca, the capital of Morelos, and he then rode to Mexico City where he met Madero, where he was declared President. The victory, however, was only the beginning of the problem that would come in Mexico. (www.tamu.edu.htm, Encarta 98)
...country made by its wounds, he believed that no matter the political failures the country had, the Mexican Revolution was a cultural success (Fuentes, 1995).
The Mexican Revolution began November 20th, 1910. It is disputable that it extended up to two decades and seized more than 900,000 lives. This revolution, however, also ended dictatorship in Mexico and restored the rights of farm workers, or peons, and its citizens. Revolutions are often started because a large group of individuals want to see a change. These beings decided to be the change that they wanted to see and risked many things, including their lives. Francisco “Pancho” Villa and Emiliano Zapata are the main revolutionaries remembered. These figures of the revolution took on the responsibility that came with the title. Their main goal was to regain the rights the people deserved. The peons believed that they deserved the land that they labored on. These workers rose up in a vehement conflict against those opposing and oppressing them. The United States was also significantly affected by this war because anybody who did not want to fight left the country and migrated north. While the end of the revolution may be considered to be in the year of 1917 with the draft of a new constitution, the fighting did not culminate until the 1930’s.
The main causes of the revolution were the corrupt way in which the country was run, the large role the US played in the running of Cuba and the poor treatment & conditions the lower class Cubans lived with. The leader before the revolution was a man named Fulgencio Batista, who came into power via a coup. He suspended the Constitution, effectively establishing a dictatorship, and increased the Cuban dependency on the US. Batista allowed the US to build casinos, reaping the profits from the casinos and from the growing drug trade. He ignored crimes, allowing many drug dealers to continue under the condition that he got a share of the profits. He, a select group of friends, and businessmen from the US, grew richer and richer while the lower class of Cuba were poor and suffering. The people of Cuba saw this corruption and resented it, causing a gaping rift between leader and people.