Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of third party presidential candidates
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of third party presidential candidates
Introduction How do voters make their choice when they don't like anyone on the ballot? Throughout the previous elections, voters have either had a preference for one candidate over the other, if not they voted for the candidate based on their party affiliation. However, in this upcoming election both candidates, Trump and Clinton, have shown the lowest favorability ratings in history. As a result, this forces voters to cast their vote not based on preference, but rather vote based on rejection over choice, vote for third parties, or simply not vote at all in this election. Rejection Over Choice Study by behavioral scientists has shown that when humans are presented with a list of bad choice they reject the choices they dislike the most and eventually come down to one single answer. This same situation will most likely be seen in this upcoming election. Voters will vote by rejecting rather than choosing based on preference. As a result, this might prove to be quite beneficial because voters who choose by rejection are most likely going to be more deliberate. The more deliberate they are the more of an accurate decision they will be able to make by disregarding party affiliation, unimportant information, or any rumors about the candidate. Thus, this is one of the ways voters across the nation may choose to vote in this election if neither …show more content…
candidate is appealing to them.(Krishna,Sokolova) Third Parties When neither candidate from the major parties are appealing to voters, voters will most likely go and cast their vote for other third party candidates as a protest vote in order to send a message to high political elites that they prefer neither of the two candidates.
As a result, they will cast their vote to third parties in order to feel morally correct and to not sacrifice anything in return. Although casting for third party candidates will not be much of a difference to the overall election, it will, however, send out a message to the whole nation of how Trump and Clinton are both bad candidates for the
presidency.(Roller) No Vote Already the voter turnout for presidential elections is between 40%-50%. And now with the upcoming election voters will most likely prefer to not vote because neither candidate is appealing to them. As a result, decreasing the voter turnout even more. Voters will convince themselves to not cast their vote by knowing that either way a bad candidate will be chosen for the presidency. Therefore, might as well just not waste time to go, and cast my vote for either Trump or Clinton. Conclusion Based on previous presidential election voters were able to cast their vote based on preference or party affiliation. However, since both Trump and Hillary both have the lowest favorability ratings in presidential elections, voters will most likely set out to cast their vote based on other strategies. For example, voting based on rejection over choice, voting for third parties, or to not vote at all in this election.
Under the process of the Electoral College, a member of the general electorate casts a vote for the candidate in the set party but since there’s no federal law that requires elector to vote for their set candidate. The elector doesn’t have to cast a vote for the initially agreed candidate. However, twenty-nine states and the district of Columbia have states law that bounds electors to casted their vote to whichever party thy have pledged to but still there are 21 states in the union that have no control. Therefore, despite the outcome of a state’s popular vote, the state’s elector have the freedom to vote in whatever manner they so choose to without any legal repercussions (Kimberling, 2000). Even in the states with the laws, the repercussion is slim to nothing. For example, during the 2000 elections, Barbara Lett-Simmons was an electoral from the District of Columbia in the Democratic party and see didn’t cast a vote for presidential candidate President Al Gore when she was supposed to. She didn’t have any repercussion but it calls doubt from the American people in the electoral college because if the vote isn’t going to the candidate in which it supposed to be then why is there even an electoral college. So since the electors of the electoral college isn’t going to vote for the candidate in which they pledge to then faithless electors show the
Contrary to what may seem logical, majority votes under a compulsory voting system do not necessarily represent accurate opinion. Rather, compulsion encourages apathy, characterized by “a lack of concern, enthusiasm or interest” ("Definition of Voter Apathy"). In essence, voter apathy “occurs when voters decide that they really don’t care who wins or loses” ("Definition of Voter Apathy") due to “a general feeling that a person’s vote doesn’t matter or even a distrust in regards to how the election is actually being run” ("Definition of Voter Apathy").
The United States of America is often touted as the guiding beacon of democracy for the entirety of the modern world. In spite of this tremendous responsibility the political system of the United States retains some aspects which upon examination appear to be significantly undemocratic. Perhaps the most perplexing and oft misunderstood of these establishments is the process of electing the president and the institution known as the Electoral College. The puzzle of the Electoral College presents the American people with a unique conundrum as the mark of any true democracy is the citizens’ ability to elect their own ruling officials. Unfortunately, the Electoral College system dilutes this essential capacity by introducing an election by
Voting is at the center of every democratic system. In america, it is the system in which a president is elected into office, and people express their opinion. Many people walk into the voting booth with the thought that every vote counts, and that their vote might be the one that matters above all else. But in reality, America’s voting system is old and flawed in many ways. Electoral College is a commonly used term on the topic of elections but few people actually know how it works.
In addition, it isn’t feasible for a voter to comprehend the numerous offices and candidates in an election and how informed do voters need to be, in order for them to be confident in their choice. However, with the removal of straight-ticket voting, voter turnout may decrease, but the vote quality will increase due to an improved versed decision and in addition, an increase in the chance of a professional holding a government position. There are no excuses for voters to not be informed because there are various resources that determine an individual preferred political candidate. Through the use of the internet, websites offer political quizzes that matches a voter's beliefs with a candidate. For example, Isidewith.com is an online website that asks the participant various question about concerning issues in politics such as, abortion, , environmental, economic, and domestic policy issues. Based on the results, it will give the participant selections on the candidates that closely relates to their beliefs.
The two party system has encouraged the idea that voting for anyone who is not ‘blue’ or ‘red’ is a wasted vote. This can be seen in the lack of votes that 3rd party candidates are getting, for example in 2012 between the three third party candidates there was a total of 1,570,767 votes.(IVN) This could be because only a little more than half of the voting age population actually voted. (GMU) Or it could be to the lack of media coverage that they get. Third party candidates, or any candidate for that matter need to get at least 5% of the vote in a general election to get equal ballot access and federal funding like the two big parties. Another reason this idea of a wasted vote comes through is because no one knows what these other parties stand for they just hear what people on CNN, MSNBC, or Fox News say about them. For instance the libertarian party has been deemed nothing more than a bunch of pot smoking hippies just because they want to legalize marijuana. The big media outlets don’t look at the party as a whole and find one unpopular opinion they have and bash it into the skulls of their viewers as the truth.
The United States is a privileged country with freedoms and opportunities many countries strive to achieve. People come into the United States in hopes to obtain these rights and make a better life for themselves; they strive to achieve “The American Dream.” Citizens are given the chance to vote, speak their mind, and live according to their desires without prejudice. However, the same government that promises hope has flaws that frustrate the American people; the Electoral College is one topic of debate. Many feel this system is a safe way to regulate who leads the country, while others feel that issues should be left to popular vote.
The author argues that without the use of an Electoral College that every vote by an American citizen would still create a big outcome in the election for a candidate. Instead of telling electors who citizens wished to cast their vote for, citizens would be able to really vote for the candidate in which they feel will be most effective for the country. The author believes that the Electoral College has soiled our elections and that we should make a better way in which we can make the elections more efficient and equal for each and every citizen in
As the United States of America gets older, so does the presidential election voting system. The argument to change this method of voting has been becoming more and more popular as the years go on. It has been said that the Framers of the Constitution came up with this method because of the bad transportation, communication, and they feared the public’s intelligence was not suitable for choosing the President of the United States. Others say that the Framers made this method because they feared that the public did not receive sufficient information about candidates outside of their state to make such a decision based on direct popular vote. My research on this controversial issue of politics will look into the factors into why the Electoral College exists and if it is possibly outdated for today’s society. It will look into the pros and cons of this voting system, and it will explore the alternative methods of voting such as the Direct Popular vote. Many scholarly authors have gathered research to prove that this voting system is outdated and it does not accurately represent the national popular will. Many U.S. citizens value their vote because they only get one to cast towards the candidate of their choice in the presidential election. Based on the Electoral College system their vote may possibly not be represented. Because of today’s society in the U.S. the Electoral College should be abolished because it is not necessary to use a middle-man to choose our president for us. It is a vote by the people, all of us having one voice, one vote.
Americans do not vote for their presidential or vice-presidential candidate. Instead, they indicate their preference of candidate. Whichever candidate gets a plurality of the vote in a state gets all the Electors for that state. Each state's number of Electors is based on the number of Representatives and Senators it has in Congress. Once a candidate gets a plurality, the Electors vote in the "Electoral College" (a sort of caucus in their state six weeks after the election) for that candidate. So a candidate who gets just one more vote than the other in a given state wins all the votes from that state. Notably, although it is called a College, the Electoral College is a process administered by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). It is not a particular place (NARA 1).
Despite the objective desire that your vote won't turn a decision, you may, in the same way as other of us, vote at any rate, and for different reasons. A few people are glad for the exertion they put into being educated and included. Others vote out of a feeling of obligation or because of their faith in the estimation of vote based
Every year millions of Americans go out to vote in the United State’s presidential election. Although, as many do not understand, the American government still use a system of electoral college which focuses on representation based on location and not majority choice. In this New York Times editorial written by The Editorial Board, the author worked to persuade American voters to change the current voting system. They appealed to a great variety of ethos and logos that gave good supporting evidence to strengthen the argument throughout.
Despite being the constant underdog and loser in major elections third parties make some significant contribution to the political spectrum in the United States. Third Party Agendas are taken serious by the Democratic and Republican Parties and specific pieces of the Third Party Agendas are sometimes adopted by the two major parties. Third parties give discontented voters other alternatives. The Republican and Democratic Parties have been known to operate in similar styles and third parties give the voter the opportunity to express their discontent. The third parties in the United States are policy advocates and often are more specific about were they stand ideologically. Often the Republican and Democratic Parties try and take a moderate approach to political issues, and third parties are more conservative or liberal when it comes to political issues. Also, third parties tend to do exactly the opposite when their agenda concerns social issues. Then there is the ?spoiler factor? a Third Party Candidate can collect enough votes to change the outcome of a Presidential Election.
In America, political candidates go against one another in a process known as an election in which citizens vote for the next person who "best" fits the position. In addition, there are various amounts of debates on whether a citizen should be compelled to vote. Although some argue if citizens should be required by law to vote, there are exceeding an amount of disadvantages.