Lawrence vs. Texas: The Fight for Sexual Privacy

764 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Texas vs Johnson case

Texas, and many other states have always had controversies when it came to criminalizing sodomy. By definition, it is sexual intercourse involving anal or oral copulation. Sodomy was an offense that was added to the list of others in 1943. Thirty years later, it passed a law containing the “Homosexual Conduct” law, which banned both oral and anal sex, only when done with another person of the same sex. This law was enforced in public areas but rarely in private residency. In the past, the court at one point did approve the “privacy” rights for both married and unmarried heterosexuals and pregnant women, according to The New York Times. Many law cases in the past have dealt with this issue before, for example; Bowers vs. Hardwick which resulted the involvement of a police officer who had encountered a gay couple having sex in a private residence. One case that its momentous decision in 2003 overturned Bowers involving sexual privacy, personal self-respect, intimate relationships, and shifting views of family in America is called Lawrence vs. Texas. Lawrence who was born on August 2, 1943 …show more content…

In April 2002, Texas’s highest criminal court, The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, refuses to hear Lambda Legal’s appeal. In July 2002, Lambda Legal request U.S. Supreme Court to review the constitutional regarding The “Homosexual Conduct” law. The case presents the high court with two independent Constitutional claims that Lambda Legal urges to review: 1) Equal protection 2) Rights of privacy and liberty. December 2002, U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear the case. In January 2003, Lambda Legal files its brief urging U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Texas’s “Homosexual Conduct” law. March 2003, Lambda Legal presents oral arguments before U.S. Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the Texas “Homosexual Conduct”

Show More
Related

  • Supreme Court Case Romer v. Evans

    1494 Words  | 3 Pages

    The opinion of the court was held by Justice Kennedy, in that the Colorado amendment was held unconstitutional on the basis that it violated the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment on the United States Constitution. Kennedy argued the amendment singles out a specific group in which, it would make it so only homosexuals cannot receive the protective rights that are available to anyone else. This idea makes homosexuals unequal to everyone else because they are not guaranteed the same protection that anyone else could get if they needed it. Furthermore, the amendment burdens the homosexual community by not allowing them to seek protection against discrimination though the use of legislation. Additionally, Kennedy claims “In and ordinary case, a law will be sustained if it can be said to advance a legitimate government interest…” (632) By this he means that a law will be considered valid as long as it has a ...

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Rape Shield Laws

    636 Words  | 2 Pages

    Saunders states that Rape Shield laws are in place to protect victims of sexual assaults and rapes during a criminal trial. They prevent defendants to bring fourth evidence of the victim’s sexual history, orientation or past relationships (Saunders, 2014). Rape can be a very emotional and embarrassing ordeal; it’s very private and personal and can be hard to deal with for years to come. As with many victims of crime especially sexual offenses there are advantages and disadvantages to each new law that is implemented. This paper is designed to analyze the advantages and disadvantage of the Rape Shield Laws.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Obergefell V. Hodges

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    Abstract On June 26, 2015 a divided Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case Obergefell v. Hodges that same-sex couples could now marry nationwide. At the time of the split ruling there were 9 supreme court justices, 5 of the justices were Republicans, and the remaining 4 were Democrats. In high profile cases it is except that the justices will vote along party lines. When the 5-4 ruling was reveled by the following statement. “It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right (Corn,2015).” written by

    Read More

  • Against Consent Searches

    1530 Words  | 4 Pages

    Schneckloth v. Bustamonte is a decidedly pro-order case because it qualifies another excuse police can raise to search a citizen. It asserts that an individual can verbally waive their Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures so long as this waiver is not coerced by a government official. The Court goes on to decide that it is not required for suspects to demonstrate knowledge of these rights before waiving them. The blow to liberty interest is put most elegantly in Justice Marshall's dissent when he writes, "I have difficulty in comprehending how a decision made without knowledge of available alternatives can be treated as a choice at all." This precedent that a citizen may make a decision to waive their rights without knowing of the alternative, in this case maintaining the Fourth Amendment's protections, is perfectly legitimate is dangerous for liberty interests in a world where order-seeking policemen seek to take advantage of uninformed citizens. It is a terrible matter of policy. The logic in reaching this conclusion is no better. It is an argument fraught with weak reasoning and dangerous interpretations of the Constitution.

    Read More

  • Conformity and Rebellion in Two Kinds, by Amy Tan and The Ones Who Walk Away

    770 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout American history, we have seen the United States become more progressive in their social issues, such as the abolishment of slavery, women’s suffrage, and the Civil Rights Movement. But as time has passed, we have encountered another group that is being discriminated against: homosexuals. Some states try their best to give equal rights to homosexuals so that they are respected as equally as everyone else. But in many states, such as Kansas and Arizona, private companies and businesses are given the right to turn down homosexual couples if it interferes with their religious beliefs. These two states also included places like hospitals where homosexuals can be denied from medical attention. These laws are very inhumane and are very hurtful to a large population of people today. But what if the people in states such as Kansas and Arizona think it is okay to have these laws instilled?

    Read More

  • Lawrence V. Texas

    1308 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the case Lawrence v. Texas (539 U.S. 558, 2003) which was the United States Supreme Court case the criminal prohibition of the homosexual pederasty was invalidated in Texas. The same issue has been already addressed in 1989 in the case Bowers v. Hardwick, however, the constitutional protection of sexual privacy was not found at that time. Lawrence overruled Bowers and held that sexual conduct was the right protected by the due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. The effects of the ruling were quite widespread and led to invalidation of the similar laws throughout the United States that tried to criminalize the homosexual activity of adults which were acting in privacy. The case attracted much of the public attention and quite a large number of briefs were filed in the cases.

    Read More

  • Snyder V Phelps Case Study

    1047 Words  | 3 Pages

    Overviewing the case of Snyder v. Phelps it could be easily misconstrued about who was at fault morally rather than coming to a conclusion according to federal law. From thoroughly investigating the case it is infact accurate that Fred Phelps and his following a Westboro Baptist Church based in Topeka,Kansas focus and actively execute their ideas about God’s supposed hatred for the United States,and their tolerance of homosexuals.Particularly, the congregation focuses on homosexuality within the military and exercises their opinion by protesting their public opinion alongside military funerals to get their point across.

    Read More

  • The History of LGBT rights in California

    1340 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Do you know what the Gays did to me now? They took away my right to vote!”

    Read More

  • Judicial Restraint And Judicial Activism?

    1818 Words  | 4 Pages

    On June 26, 2015, The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage is a fundamental right in the decision on Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health, et al. This controversial decision overturned the law of more than 17 states. In the 5-4 decision, Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan voted with the majority and Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas and Alito were dissenting. At the heart of the controversy is the philosophy of judicial restraint and judicial activism. Was the Obergefell decision an example of judicial activism? Certainly, because it declared state laws banning same-sex marriages as unconstitutional. The Court’s decision, which was based on precedent and interpretation of the Constitution, was just.

    Read More

  • The Fourteenth Amendment

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    For some background, this case escalated to the Supreme Court since several groups of same-sex couples from different states, sued state agencies when their marriage was refused to be recognized. As it escalated through appeals, the plaintiffs argued that the states were violating the Equal Protection clause and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Equal Protection, according to the Constitution refers to the fact that, “any State [shall not] deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…” (23). The opposition of this case was that, 1) The Constitution does not address same-sex marriage as a policy, and 2) The sovereignty of states regarding the decision. Ultimately, and according to the Oyez project, the Court held that “[the Amendment] guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, and that analysis applies to same-sex couples,” and therefore, same-sex marriage is a fundamental liberty.

    Read More

  • The Fourteenth Amendment and Equality Under the Law

    776 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...regnancy, the Supreme Court decided that within the Fourteenth Amendment existed a fundamental right to privacy as the amendment guarantees liberty. Embedded in the Fourteenth Amendment?s right to privacy is the right to homosexuality and homosexual behavior.

    Read More

  • Banning the Death Penalty

    530 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Any last words?” is the sentence that is given to the people who are about to be put to death.

    Read More

  • Transgender Rights in America

    890 Words  | 2 Pages

    Humans have established their own rights in society for many, many years now. However, because some humans differ from the norms that are built in society, they are shunned and denied their rights until they conform to society’s norms. There has been numerous groups of people who have been denied their rights in America. African Americans, immigrants, Native Americans, and gays have been isolated simply because that is the way that they were born into this world and others do not find them “normal”. There is another group that has also been mistreated though; people who identify themselves as transgendered. A good portion of society is unknowingly misinformed about these kinds of people.

    Read More

  • Abortion, Public Policy, & Texas

    1028 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1973, in what has become a landmark ruling for women’s rights, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of a woman’s right to an abortion. Ever since, individual states have adopted, altered, and/or mutilated the edict to fit their agendas – Texas included. However, the decision made by the justices in Roe v. Wade didn’t set clear cut, inarguable demarcation lines, which has allowed the fiery debate to consume the nation. Rather than establishing a legal ruling of what life is, or is not, the Supreme Court has remained silent on the issue.

    Read More

  • Anti Sodomy Law

    2345 Words  | 5 Pages

    Governing through crime is what the United States has been dealing with for many years. Defined in Governing through Crime, that governing through crime is responding to threats to people or property using the criminal law or the criminal justice system (Simon 5). There are many laws in which the United States has governed through crime; the one that sticks out is an anti-sodomy law. Anti-sodomy laws define certain sexual acts as crimes. Those sexual acts were deemed ‘unnatural’ or ‘immoral.’ The ‘unnatural’ acts included anal and oral sex and bestiality; these laws were enforced upon homosexual couples. Anti-sodomy laws are a relevant topic today because of some states wanting to expand access to marriage. The government wanted to control how the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer (LGBTQ) community was allowed to practice their sexual acts (Phelps 686). Anti-sodomy laws were against the LGBTQ community and the community is still being discriminated against by them denying access to marriage.

    Read More

More about Lawrence vs. Texas: The Fight for Sexual Privacy

Open Document