Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Summary of resurrection
Essays about reincarnation
Common views on reincarnation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There is much belief that when humans die their lives are not yet over. They will live on as something else or they will live as their spirit/ soul. How is it though, that people would be able to live on in an afterlife because once you’re dead you cease to exist? There are three common explanations to how there is an afterlife. The first, near death experiences take place when someone is close to death and can either feel the soul separate from the body, or are able to see what is known as the “white light”. The second, reincarnation which occurs when someone passes on and has a second chance at life as either someone different or a whole new organism is general. The third, resurrection, the way Jesus rose from the dead, happens when someone confirmed dead return to life. Each one of these theories for life after death has a series of truths behind them, however, which one is considered the most reasonable truth? This paper will analyze each theory and conclude with the best answer possible why people should believe in the afterlife.
The first theory, described by a man by the name Raymond A. Moody Jr. who was a medical
…show more content…
Ian Stevenson decided to dedicate most of his life finding evidence on it (Rachels & Rachels pg.46). He would ask children at a young age if they remembered their earlier life. In some cases, the parents of these children would set out to find the remaining members of the child’s past family. According to Dr. Stevenson this was enough evidence to conclude that reincarnation was true. However, a red flag about his interactions with the children is for one most children are story tellers and there are many who were able to meet with the past family before Dr. Stevenson’s investigation (Rachels & Rachels pg.47). Therefore, there are doubts of reincarnation because there has never been proof of someone returning back to life as someone
In this paper, I will discuss the Final Argument in Plato’s Phaedo. In this argument Socrates concludes, “Then, Cebes, beyond question, the soul is immortal and imperishable, and our souls will truly exist in another world (Plato, 1689).” This argument may be the most convincing of his arguments about the afterlife, but the way in which he comes to his conclusion that the soul is immortal and indestructible is flawed, and because of this, I find that Plato’s final argument is not sound and lacking validity. I feel this argument is an unsound, deductive argument. In order to show evidence of this, I will examine how Plato reached his conclusion.
The Christian worldview emphasizes on one absolute God who is eternal and sacred. The origins that Christians follow is written in Genesis 1, proclaiming God spoke and created the world. God then created man in the image of God.
At the most basic level of subconscious thought, every living animal possesses a desire to stay alive. Usually, this instinct lays dormant, although in dire situations, we can be led to do unexpected things. In addition to this subconscious drive, there is a socially constructed motivation for fearing death. Thanks to the pervasive nature of religion throughout history, much of humanity has, at some point or another, feared the prospect of eternal damnation and torture during one’s life after death. Although not every religion has a negative aspect of the afterlife, or even any semblance of an afterlife at all, those religions which do contain some such construct receive much more attention in this regard. Throughout history, many academics have countered people’s irrational fear of the unknown by noting that there is no definitive evidence to prove the existence of such a postmortem experience. According to Lucretius, this fundamental fear of death is completely speculative, and wholly illogical; he argues that we have no reason to fear death because there is nothing after death. What makes Lucretius’ argument so significant, is not how he counters religion, but how he bases it upon his own revision of atomism. It is because of this foundation of logical thought that Lucretius’ writing on the nature of death can still be thought of as a sound hypothesis.
This observation raises the awareness about how vicious the cycle of life and death is. Furthermore, how their relationship is ever occurring and seems unlikely to stop. This clarification that Socrates gives presents an even more realistic reason for believing that the soul persists. Because if the soul did not persist, then where would it go if not to replace its opposite? This line is based off of the thought of also assuming that all things in existence will stay in existence. In conclusion, Socrates opposites argument uses familiar examples and logic to justify why the soul persists
Everyone will die, but not everyone will live, we as humans tend to fear death simply because it’s the unknown. Some people dedicated their whole life to believing one such as religion, where as others simply avoid the discussion out of fear. But in Socrates and Chuang Tzu case they discuses it all the time, they study the conception of the body and soul. This essay will focus on the idea of afterlife including both views of the philosophers and focus on the theories, which are significantly more comforting to those awaiting death.
Immortality is one of mankind’s major apprehensions, and even though it has been mainly restricted to religious customs. People have different opinions about immortality. Everybody defines immortality differently. For some people it is the survival of the astral body resembling the physical body, for others the immortality of the immaterial soul and lastly the resurrection of the body. Basic definition of immortality is the unknown continuation of a person’s existence, even after death. Immortality primarily referred to soul as it like it does not die when the human body dies, but since they both well connected together, when the body dies, soul dies too; therefore, immortality does not exist.
...ers guide their subjects to having memories of past life. There will always be those that will deny the evidence that is shown to their face, it is up to each individual to accept or reject the evidence provided. Based on the research provided through Ian Stevenson, a psychiatrist, and the arguments presented, reincarnation cannot fully be rejected.
“You will be with me today in paradise,” Jesus Christ told this to the thief on the cross while they were dying. However, can people believe that there is truly life after death? In many different religions there are different perceptions of life after death. For example in the Buddhist religion, the Buddhist people believe that life is practice for death. Professor Brown, of California State University of Northridge stated, “The Buddhist people cultivate positive, happy virtuous states of mind and abandoning non-virtuous, harmful, suffering states of mind.” This teaching is mirrored by Christianity teachings as well. Professor Brown also stated, “Death is an opportunity for great spiritual achievement if one is prepared and remembers one’s spiritual practices and beliefs and understandings during the death process.”
Murray, David Christie. Reincarnation, Ancient Beliefs and Modern Evidence. London, England: David & Charles, 1981
Life after death is a topic of controversy in which Bertrand Russell and John Hick discuss the idea of whether it is possible to have life after death. Russell addresses his argument against the idea through his brief essay titled “The Illusion of Immortality” (1957). In addition, Hick also discusses the topic through his work “In Defense of Life after Death” (1983) of why life after death is a plausible idea. In this paper, I will be discussing Russell’s argument against the belief of life after death. As well, I will also be addressing the opposing view by explaining Hick’s argument in defense of life after death.
Imagine a world where death means the end of ourselves as we know, without any trace of who we were. The question of life after death is one that is very difficult to prove on either side of the argument, especially with numerous theories of an afterlife competing against the worlds ever growing knowledge of the human body. While some religions may say that an afterlife exists due to the suggestion of it in the respective religions holy book or teachings, these sources can be questionable to some one who does not follow the same belief. Likewise, someone who is devoted to a religion or belief may not be willing to except the fact that there is simply no life after death as science has not been able to prove it. Because of religion being such
First of all, what is a body? Some say that a body is, like I said before, a lump of skin, muscles, bones, and other materials. Some say it is more than that. These people agree that the body is made up of skin, muscles, bones, etc., but they think the whole essence of personhood is in the body. They don’t believe in souls or minds, and they think that biological processes are the only processes that take place in a body. And when these processes cease to take place, death occurs, and since, to these people, a person is a body, life ends, and that is it. There is no after life, because there is nothing other than the body, and the body is gone. It is very true that biological things happen in your body, but are there other things that happen too?
“Reincarnation [ree-in-kahr-ney-shuh n], noun, the belief that the soul, upon death of the body, comes back to earth in another body or form.” (Reincarnation. (n.d.). Throughout history, many people have claimed to have experienced reincarnation and told of his or her past life in detail. Some describe family members, places, and events vividly, while others bare birthmarks that correspond with the trauma he or she endured. From the ancient Druids to the new age religion of Theosophy, reincarnation continues to be credulous, regardless of evidence. Many believe that complete enlightenment and self-knowledge will end the cycle of reincarnation.
Do human beings live only once, or are we granted the opportunity to return after death and experience many different lives? The question of reincarnation has been examined for thousands of years and has been embraced in various degrees by numerous religions. Scientists speculate that even the people who lived during the New Stone Age (10,000B.C.E - 5,000B.C.E.) believed that once a person died, their journey had not yet concluded. Because ideas about a society that lived so long ago are frequently not concrete and can be difficult for present day culture to grasp, many scholars point towards Hinduism as being one of the earliest religions to offer explanations of reincarnation. Hinduism, originating sometime during the fourth millennium BCE is the most ancient of the surviving great religions. The adoption of the belief of rebirth can be found in Hindu scriptures dating around 600 BCE As time progressed, suggestions of reincarnation began to be found in Buddhism, Taoism, Judaism, and Christianity. While this is certainly not a complete list, or a statement that each of these religions embraces and in turn teaches the theory of rebirth, it does shed light to the fact that among very diverse beliefs and lifestyles there is a great desire to know what happens after death. In addition to the search about what transpires posthumously, many people see reincarnation as an explanation for many of the great questions about life. Such as, why is there suffering in the world? is there a meaning to life? How can child prodigies be explained? and are memories about past lives valid? Following is a discussion of how the theory of rebirth can answer some of life's most difficult questions and provide supportive evidence coll...
I believe that what happens after death can be different for everyone depending on what they believe. My personal belief is that there is heaven and hell and that there is life after death. I think that one of the first things that happens when you die is that you get to see your loved ones again that passed before you. Then after that you get judged and will either go to heaven or you will go to hell. The ones who go to heaven will be able to watch over their family and protect them and after a while they get a chance to be reincarnated. Carr (2006) said the belief in reincarnation is the belief that the soul or spiritual essence of a person is reborn after death in one or more successive, bodily existences. I believe that we can come back in different forms it does not have to be as a human again, we can as comeback as an animal. Some people like Carr (2006) say that we can also come back as a vegetable, now I personally do not believe this but some people might.