Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequences of gun control
Mental illness and gun essays
Consequences of gun control
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consequences of gun control
When irresponsible parties get ahold of a firearm or weapon, conflict is sure to follow. An irresponsible party could be the licensed weapon holder themselves or anyone else in their household, such as a child or spouse, that is not permitted to use that weapon. Conflicts that ensue after an irresponsible party use a firearm/weapon can be either interpersonal, intrapersonal, or both. In order to prevent such conflicts from occurring, certain precautions must be made. If precautions aren’t taken, irresponsible parties will use weapons incorrectly or for the wrong reasons.
Irresponsible parties can take many forms, including the licensed weapon holder themselves, children, and other household members. Though they’re legally permitted to carry
…show more content…
Interpersonal conflict refers to any conflict that occurs between 2 or more people (or groups of people). An example of an interpersonal conflict that can occur between a licensed weapon holder and another party would be if the permit holder used their weapon to go on a mass killing spree and injure/kill innocent bystanders at a shopping mall. The licensed weapon holder would be acting irresponsibly and recklessly in such a situation. Children can also be involved in an interpersonal conflict when they happen across a licensed firearm and accidentally discharge the weapon at another person. Intrapersonal conflict is any conflict that takes place within the person (i.e. a mental struggle between right and wrong). Suicide is a common tragedy that occurs when an irresponsible party uses a firearm/weapon while they’re dealing with an intrapersonal conflict. An irresponsible licensed weapon holder will use their weapon to take their life because they lost their job, for example, and have no way to make ends meet for their family, and because they’re irresponsible they will fail to consider the repercussions of their action. A child, while handling a weapon that belongs to someone else, may discharge the weapon against themselves accidentally since they’re not responsible enough to know how to use a firearm/weapon correctly. Sometimes an intrapersonal …show more content…
I believe if a few modifications are made, that we can lessen the amount of tragedies that occur. One modification that can be made would be a stricter firearm/weapon permit application process. According to Officer Jay, an officer in the state of New York, mental examinations used to be required in order to get a firearms license and this was to ensure the competency and sanity of the applicant. However, the mental examination was attacked by companies like the NRA (National Rifle Association) and eventually removed (Jay, 2015). If the mental examination was reapplied to the application process, it could protect against mentally unstable people using weapons irresponsibly. Another modification that can be made would be harsher punishments for weapon owners that allow their child to access their weapon. According to News 21, “More than 1,100 children and teens were killed by a gun that accidentally discharged” and “For every U.S. soldier killed in Afghanistan during the 11 years of war, at least 13 children were shot and killed in America.” I believe if there’s a harsher punishment for the parents of children that use firearms, that they will be deterred from leaving their weapons in unsecure locations. I also feel that punishments
Guns are not the trouble, people are. The United States is #1 in world gun ownership, and yet is only 28th in the world in gun murders per 100,000 people. The number of unintentional fatalities due to firearms declined by 58 percent between 1991 and 2011 Based on these facts, one can see the guns not the causes of gun violence. moreover, civilians who get permits take gun safety courses and have criminal background...
Opposing sides have for years fought over the laws that govern firearms. For the purposes of this paper "Gun Control" is defined as policies enacted by the government that limit the legal rights of gun owners to own, carry, or use firearms, with the intent of reducing gun crimes such as murder, armed robbery, aggravated rape, and the like. So defined, gun control understandably brings favorable responses from some, and angry objections from others. The gun control debate is generally publicized because of the efforts of the Pro-Gun Lobby or the Anti-Gun Lobby.
Mercy Saltzman reports that “having a gun in the home also increases the risk that incidents of domestic violence will result in homicide.” He goes on to point out “family and intimate assaults involving firearms are twelve times more likely to result in death than non-firearm related assaults” (Saltzman 3043-47). In lieu of these statements, one can see the present danger of keeping a firearm in a household. Another reason to mandate the registration of handguns is because guns and criminals are not a healthy combination. When angry criminals are let out of jail, they often seek revenge.
Hence, gun control is a frequently discussed controversial topic in American politics. Although the Second Amendment prevents the federal government from completely banning guns in America, limited restrictions are allowed on the distribution and possession of firearms. Certain groups of people such as criminals, the mentally unstable, and soldiers dishonorably discharged from the military are prohibited from possessing or interacting with firearms (Flynn). These restrictions are enforced by background checks in some states, on both a state and federal level. However, gun laws vary from state to state and are often not thorough enough; the background checks are flawed due to lack of information and misinformation, and guns can easily end up in the hands of criminals and malevolent individuals.
For many years, America has witnessed mass shootings within it’s borders. In 2015 alone, there were 372 mass shootings (Oldham). The question most Americans are faced with is: do we need more gun control or is gun control the problem? With more gun control, it can be made mandatory that protective devices are used on firearms to prevent accidental harm. Gun control creates mandatory laws such as the requirement for an individual to pass a background check before he/she is permitted to purchase a firearm. Gun control has also been proven to prevent suicides due to the increased difficulty of obtaining a firearm. Those who believe that gun control is the problem claim that by removing one 's firearms, you are endangering them to threats that
have shown the firearm homicide and suicide rates in the US are several times higher than that of any other industrialized country” (Towers 2). The automatic reaction people have to mass shooting is talking about gun control and mental illness policies. Every time a mass shooting occurs both the people and the government go crazy trying to find a solution yet there is no solution. The United States needs to set up mental illness awareness programs to decrease the number of mass shootings.
Today in the United States many people argue over the fact of guns being legal or illegal. There are people using guns for personal safety and there are others who use them for crimes, as well as for other situations. Firearm deaths in the United States have slowly been decreasing from year to year with all these bills getting passed to promote a safer country than ever before. Guns are the main weapon for youth suicide, school shootings, and for committing murder. In 2010 there were 2,711 infants, child, and teenage firearm deaths. As in school shootings and in committing murder, studies show shooters often had multiple, non-automatic guns, shootings were planned, most youth tell before shooting, shooters have a history of being bullied or threatened, shooters have mental issues, and shooters have done suicidal gestures before (Gun Control with School Shootings). Although there are people who use guns for murdering, there are also those who oppose guns being used without the proper requirements. 85% of all respondents to the survey supporting requiring states to report people to national background-checks systems who are prohibited from owning gu...
Gun control recently has rapidly become an even further controversial topic due to violent acts against the public by troubled individuals. How were these attacks allowed to happen? As stated in Framing Health Matters article, “In the United States, popular and political discourse frequently focuses on the causal impact of mental illness in the aftermath of mass shootings.” (.1) This issue unfortunately remains so overlooked that media sources only offer it attention after a tragedy. Not to mention the impact these situations have on the society. No normal person decides to harm people solely due to the fact that they can obtain a weapon easily. To be able to move forward with these irrational decisions the
Crime rate in the United States has been at an all-time high in the past few years. According to the Mass Shooting Tracker, there have been 372 mass shootings in the US in 2015, killing 475 people and wounding 1,870. According to the gun violence archive, 13,286 people were killed in the US by firearms in 2015, and 26,819 people were injured. As you can see, 2015 was a big year with gun violence in the United States and since then nothing has changed, to this day we are still seeing these statistics for death by guns in the United States. Instead of the government focusing on gun control laws, I believe that they should look at different alternatives. Some of these alternatives could be to register citizens with aggressive mental disabilities and emotional instabilities and increase research for effective treatments and cures because in most of these cases the shooters have been found to have a mental disability. We can also abolish gun-free zones apart from schools, banks, mass transit hubs, hospitals, and government buildings so that concealed carry is legal in these zones. The government can enforce stricter punishments for crimes committed with a deadly weapon and more laws protecting citizens who are forced to use a firearm in self-defense. So, in the case of a civilian using
“Children younger than three have gotten a hold of guns and shot someone at least 59 times in 2015”; a trend first reported by Christopher Ingraham add the Washington Post in October. A solution to this would be proper gun storage; adults owning a gun must be more aware of the fact of toddlers or children being at the risk of obtaining weapons and causing mischief. They should place their firearm in a safe place where a child cannot reach it or find the way to create themselves or anyone else an injury or further tragedy, including unwanted accidents. For example “Caroline Starks was two years old. Her 5-year-old brother was playing nearby with his birthday present: a.22-caliber Cricket rifle.
Mass shootings have become a common occurrence in the United States society and have brought our society's safety debate to the attention of American politics. Both sides of the debate agree that we need more safety precautions but neither side can officially agree on what is to be done. What can we do about the raging number of mass shootings? There is no definite solution for mass shootings but there are precautions the United States can take to try to overcome the overwhelming number of mass shootings occurring. Gun Control is a major topic in the debate of how we can keep our society safer but how is what remains a mystery but we can start with altering the second amendment, and having stronger gun laws and background checks.
Gun violence in America is a public health crisis, which needs to be recognized and changed by legislatures, and the voting American. As conscious Americans, we need to vote for changes to gun laws that would improve background checks nation-wide, make firearm registration mandatory, restrict the sale of assault weapons and weapon modifications that give the shooter military-grade fire power, and invest in gun-safe technology and safe firearms storage designs. This type of technology will help prevent criminally oriented people from accessing guns, and will help prevent the accidental deaths of many children by guns. This essay will explain the reforms needed to help ensure Americans can still exercise their 2nd amendment right of owning firearms, and preventing the unnecessary deaths of many Americans at the same time.
Specific Purpose Statement: To persuade my audience that each individual must take responsibility for his or her own actions. The must not blame guns for problems caused by people. .
Perhaps raising the age limit to purchase guns since a majority of the recent killers were in their late teens to about late 20’s. Another possible solution is to have those who own guns to always have an ID with them showing that he or she owns a gun. The biggest solution is to lower the amount of guns available in the US to citizens. In David Auerbach’s article “The Gun Debate Won’t be Won With Statistics”, Auerbach makes a comment that “States with more firearm laws tend to have fewer shooting fatalities.” By lowering the number of fire-arms available to the public, that means that less people will be able to have a gun in their home and that results in having a low homicide rate. When purchasing a gun, one feels more powerful knowing that he or she is in possession of a war weapon, if limiting that power one will not feel the need to shoot because of irrational decisions made for having power from owning a gun. Recognizing that states with more gun laws have had less fatalities it is time for the government to set those laws in action all across the United States. As extreme as the idea may sound to some, allowing the government to have control over stricter gun laws in the country is a much better solution than giving Americans even more freedom to allow more guns to civilians. The American society must open their eyes to the positive side of
If we can change the mindset of an individual, it will be less likely that they will think about killing. Mel Robbins, CNN Commentator stated that “changing our attitudes, the treatment options we offer and the laws for holding the mentally unstable and mentally ill for treatment just might.” If we can hold stricter rules about the release of the mentally unstable, it can reduce mass shooting crimes immensely. If we have stronger laws about the mentally unstable, it will help keep them from obtaining the assault