The people of England had very little clue that a Civil War was upon the actions of the King and Parliament did not seem like all that big of a deal, until all the events were put together. From 1625 when Charles I inherited the crown to 1642 when the Civil War started , many different factors affected the growing tension in England. Parliament and the King has some opposing ideas and they did not want to set aside their differences and work together as normal. Both disobeyed many morals and laws which put the whole country on edge. Parliament pushed the limits on their power which caused the Civil War. Parliament did so because they were hungry for power, they debated between themselves and acted in corrupt ways.
Parliament forced things
…show more content…
One of the main reasons that caused Parliament to become divided was vote to pass the Grand Remonstrance. The Grand Remonstrance was another set of demands having to do with the bishops and ministers. The demands, “Narrowly passed by just 159 votes to 148”(Trigger 1). This is an extremely close vote that clearly shows that members Parliament had contradicting views. This would cause the people of Parliament to become more angry and therefore more irritable when it comes to other problems. Another topic that caused unease in Parliament was religion. Parliament consisted of lots of different people who, naturally, would have different religious opinions. There were lots of disagreement when it came to religion. One example is that “Some MP’s wanted to get rid of Archbishop Laud’s reforms. Others wanted to get rid of bishops. Others even wanted to abolish the church of England”(Trigger 4). These many options caused all the people in Parliament to be on edge, not wanting to be the one to cause a fight, but they still wanted to voice their opinions. Again, this caused Parliament to become very irritable, which would lead to later issues. As war became to get closer and closer, yet another issue arose that caused a disagreement in Parliament. Some of the members of Parliament began to focus on King. After the laws were passed by Long Parliament, “Some …show more content…
One way that Parliament acted in a corrupt way was that they refused to give Charles I the money in the first place. Normally, “Parliament voted to give the monarch the income from custom duties for life”(Stage 1). But in King Charles I’s case, he was only granted one year, which they thought would cause him to regularly call on parliament (Stage 1). This was a dishonest way for Parliament to act, because they forced him to something that other monarchs had never done before. This of course, would anger King Charles I. Another time that Parliament acted corruptly was when they passed a law, so that they could legally arrest two of Charles main advisors. This eventually lead to advisor the Earl of Strafford to, “Instead of being put on trial, a law was introduced which simply declared he was guilty of treason…[he] was then executed”(Source A??). Parliament just passed a law saying that they could execute Stafford. This is very unfair because usually the King and Parliament would have to work together to create laws, and Parliament just created a few that were completely against the King. This would anger the King greatly and cause more anger to be piled up, just waiting for the civil war to break out. Yet another time when Parliament acted corrupt is when they were called upon during the Short Parliament. During Short Parliament, members were asked to urgently
One monarch who faced limited royal power due to his relationship with parliament was Henry IV. This uneasy relationship was mainly down to the fact that Henry was a usurper, and was exacerbated by his long periods of serious illness later in his reign. Parliament was thus able to exercise a large amount of control over royal power, which is evident in the Long Parliament of 1406, in which debates lasted from March until December. The length of these debates shows us that Henry IV’s unstable relationship had allowed parliament to severely limit his royal power, as he was unable to receive his requested taxation. A king with an amiable relationship with parliament, such as Henry V, and later Edward IV, would be much more secure in their power, as taxation was mostly granted, however their power was also supported more by other factors, such as popularity and finances. Like Henry IV, Henry VI also faced severely limited power due to his relationship with parliament.
With any new monarch’s ascension to the throne, there comes with it changes in the policies of the country. From Elizabeth’s new council, to Henry’s documented polices and even to William the Silent’s inaction in response to threats were all policies that needed to be worked out by the new rulers. This group of rulers all had something in common; they chose to let their people make their religious preference solely on their beliefs but they all differed in their ways of letting this come about. This was monumental for the time period in which they lived, but it was something that needed to be done to progress national unity.
The Anglican Church and the English government were closely related to each other; the king not only ruled the country, but was the head of the church as well. Therefore, disobeying the church meant that people also acted against the king[i]. Like governmental organization, the Church of England was based on a hierarchal structure. It favored powerful bishops, ornate services and liturgies, and allowed people to personally observe the religion. During King Charles I’s reign, royal and elite citizens of England largely composed the Church of England[ii]. These close connections between the church and the state allowed for much corruption to take place[iii].
Under the reign of Elizabeth I, England enjoyed a period of religious toleration. However, near the end of her reign, a growing religious minority, the Puritans, became increasingly critical of her policies, believing that she was still too close to Catholicism. These grievances were magnified when Elizabeth's successor, James I, a devout Anglican, proved to be far less tolerant and tactful. Furthermore, James was accused of abusing his royal authority by attempting to undermine Parliament. The growing tension between Anglicans and Puritans worsened under James' son, Charles I, who repeatedly angered a Parliament in which the House of Commons had gained a significant Puritan influence. In response, the Puritans, led by Oliver Cromwell, called for a reformation of the church, including the abolition of the Anglican Book of Common Prayer and a ban on bishops voting in the House of Lords. When Charles attempted to dispel the situation by arresting five Commons leaders, loyalties in the country split and the English Civil War began.
the aftermath of the Protestant reformation. In England, after the establishment of the separate Anglican church of England there were many protestant groups left in England still in conflict. These groups all tried to push and pull parliament in their favor -- which ultimately made it so that nothing could be done. These conflicts even came to the point of bloody civil wars and suffering on both sides of the fighting. Parliament ultimately decided to stop these wars by creating religious Act of Toleration (1689) for the non-conformist protestants.
Political and social causes launched the Civil War as the most significant causes of the war. Representing the conflicting opinions of the people, government decisions and social movements/ideas clashed. Problem after problem accumulated until violence ruptured. With no other option to resolve the conflicts, for America, the Civil War was inescapable.
However, the parliament did argue with him over the issues of money and religion. Therefore, in 1629 he ordered the dissolution of the parliament for the next 11 years, also known as the period called the Eleven Years Tyranny. So the king ruled England for 11 years without the support of the parliament. When Charles attempted to reform the Church of England, many people resented. Due to his firm belief in the “divine right of kings,” Charles ordered to persecute them.
They wanted more control, more men and money for their armed forces and projects. Over time it was clear what changes were working and for the better and which were not. In England 1640s there was a civil war between Charles I and parliament which opened the way for new demand for political participation. In 1688 when parliament overthrew James II it insisted William and Mary the new king and queen agree to the Bill of Rights. The seventeenth century rulers were successful which created the political and economic conditions for their critics to
During this time, the Magna Carta was written and signed. This limited the power of the king and he had to earn approval by the lords before he could make a decision. It also made it so a law can only be passed if it doesn’t go against the Magna Carta. It also implies religion by helping with giving the Church full rights that allows
The fact that support for reform was generally concentrated in small areas meant that there was no realistic chance of any sort of uprising occurring as in France, because there wasn't consistent support for reform across the whole country. The main reason why parliamentary reform failed in its objectives from 1780 to 1820 was the fact that those in parliament, who were realistically the only collective group of individuals who would bring about reform, would only legislate for its own reform under threat. The simple fact of the matter was that the different groups arguing for reform did not threaten Parliament, as they did not wield a large support base and used different methods to achieve their different goals.
Charles I was disliked by many of his people because he was trying to change the church to be more catholic, as opposed to being protestant before. Oliver Cromwell was a puritan and had very strong feelings about his religion. Cromwell & others took the view that Parliament had a say in government while Charles thought he had a divine right. In 1623 he took England to war with Spain and then parliament used this as one reason to bring a charge of treason against him. Another large reason Charles had much opposition is because he lacked money and had to tax the people heavily to make up for the fact that parliament refused to support him or give him money. He also took peoples land without compensation to use for warfare.
The English Civil War started as a conflict between Parliament and Charles over constitutional issues; it fired its way to its conclusion through the growing religious division in England. The monarch was supported by the aristocracy, landowners, and by the adherents of the Anglican "high church," which retained the ceremonies and hierarchy so despised by the Puritans. The Parliamentary cause was supported by the middle class, the Puritans, and the radical Protestants. The king's forces roundly beat the Parliamentary forces for almost two years and the Parliamentary cause seemed all but lost.
The Civil War had begun. The states were at war with each other. " This dividing battle between the North and the South was unavoidable. The Civil War was caused by economic, political and moral problems.
Here the nobles forced the king to sign the Magna Carta. The Magna Carta eventually led to the rise of Parliament. Parliament, a place where nobles could have their opinions heard, separated into two houses. One house had the nobles and people in the higher clergy, while the other had knights and burgesses. The way they have split Congress today closely resembles the way Parliament was split back then. The Senate represents the nobles, while the House of Representatives resembles the knights and the burgesses. In 1265, the nobles and Simon de Montfort rebelled against the young King Henry III. Soon the nobles scheduled the first meeting of Parliament, which was held in London. Parliament’s main purpose was to pass or veto laws and to decide on allowing taxes or not. All in all, Magna Carta and Parliament were the first step to representative government and the way we govern our country
The period leading up to the Civil War was a period of great change. In 1603, James I was crowned king and this was the first time that England, Scotland and Ireland all had the same monarch. These were very different countries in terms of their main religion. In the past, these religious divisions had resulted in the Gunpowder Plot (1605). In addition, there were many tensions between Parliament and Charles’ predecessor king James I. During James I’s reign, the king suspended Parliament for 10 years between 1611 and 1621. This did not leave a good state of affairs for his son Charles I to inherit when he was crowned king in 1625.