Why Did Martin Luther Wrote The Book Of The Apostles

396 Words1 Page

Martin Luther was a professor. He was a great theologian. His interpretation or view of the books of the Bible is more due to his theological reservations rather than historical investigation of Cannon. Everything that did not fit in to doctrine of sola gratia and sola fide did not appeal to him. Therefore, he rejected the books of Hebrews, James, Jude and Revelation though he changed his mind latter. As some of you have mentioned Luther argues an apostle did not write the book of James, but in other cases he says it was the word of the apostle. He even cites it as authoritative teaching from God (Large Catechism, 1V 122-24) and describes James as “ a good book, because it sets up no doctrines of men but “vigorously promulgates the law of God” (LW 35: 395).
Since I became a pastor every time I read a particular text to prepare a sermon I read it with a different perspective. As you may know the liturgy rotates between years A, B, and C so …show more content…

I understand the struggle Martin Luther faced, the challenges he encountered translating the Bible so that common people can read. He wants to convey the message of hope to people who had no hope.
I asked once Professor Wengert when he spoke at our synod assembly, as a translator of the Book of Concord what he thinks about Luther using such terrible language like calling Pope swine (pig) etc. He mentioned during his time perhaps that is the only way he could get the attention of the people in higher authority. It made some sense.
It is hard for me to understand Martin Luther and his circumstances, but he convinced me enough to become a Lutheran after reading many of his writings. His love for scripture is so fascinating. He wrote so many hymns to praise God. “A might fortress is our God” one of his hymns I hear it everyday and it gives me goose bumps. I am a big fan of Luther’s

Open Document