The question has been asked, “Did Christianity plagiarize Mithraism?” Many have suggested that because Mithraism pre- exist Christianity approximately 600 years, that perhaps Christianity copied Mithraism. On the other hand, many believe that although there are some similarities, that Christianity is a religion of its own and does not copy Mithraism. This essay will present the meaning of syncretism. It will analyze the narratives of Mithras and Jesus, and form an opinion to whether or not Christianity duplicated Mithraism.
There have been several claims that Mithraism and Christianity are similar. Some of these resemblances are the virgin birth. According to Mithraism, Mithras was born from a virgin mother just as to Christianity where Jesus was born to a virgin mother named Mary. Another comparison is the birth date December 25. In relation to Mithraism, Mithras was born on December 25 and that a ceremony took place on this date in celebration of Mithras’ birth. Likewise, with Christianity, Jesus was born on the 25th of December and in celebration of his birth was also held called Christmas. In addition, the sign of the cross; in accordance with
…show more content…
Mithraism, it was believed that Mithras died on the cross, so as Jesus as per Christianity. Then there are the twelve disciples. Consistent with Mithraism, Mithras had twelve disciples same as Jesus (“Mithras and Jesus”, n.d.). However, at the same time, there are some differences between Mithraism and Christianity, for instance, Mithras was recognized as a non- human; not born on earth, in contrast, Jesus was identified as human who was born on earth. Another difference is in the rituals. Christianity worships one God, while Mithraism idolizes multiple deities. Last, even though Mithraism and Christianity worship on Sunday the reasons differed. For Mithraism, the term Sunday was derived from the sun god Mithras. For Christianity Sunday was the day gathering in order to give respect to the day Jesus rose from death (Booth, 2011). Syncretism refers to the blending or mixing of systems for example religion, cultures, or philosophies. Syncretism takes place when new ideas are introduced and blended in the existing idea; whereas, plagiarism is a legal act of stealing someone else writing or ideas. For example of this concept can be found in the music industry. Artists often will take music from another artist and infuse it into his or her newly created music. This concept is known as sampling. This practice is well known but is accompanied by legal obligation such as copyrighting laws. If all laws are obeyed, then plagiarism becomes a non- issue. Unfortunately, Mithraism and Christianity emerged during a time where legal obligations like copyright laws did not exist or any other laws for the matter. So the questions becomes is syncretism considered plagiarism?
The word syncretism is derived from the modern Latin word syncretismus, drawing on Greek word synkretismos, meaning "a union of communities" ("Syncretism", n.d.). According to the thesaurus at infoplease.com ("Synonyms for Syncretism", n.d.) the word syncretism is synonymous with words like union, unification, and infusion and is related to subjects such as religion, philosophy and cultural. Whereas, the word plagiarism, which is derived from the words plagiarius, which is Latin for abductor and plagiare, which means to steal (Rajeev, 2012). As stated by inoplease.com the word plagiarism ("Synonyms for Plagiarism”, n.d.) is compared to words like infringement, stealing, copying and is related to subjects such as writing, language, and
thoughts. In examining the evidence, the two religion do share similarity; however, there are differences. This leads me to conclude that this is not a case of copying, which implies equivalence or exact duplication, in turn would signify plagiarism. However, it does show that there are things that may have been borrowed from one belief to another, suggestion syncretism. In conclusion, in the opinion of this writer, evidence proves that Christianity did not plagiarize Mithraism; instead Christianity syncretize Mithraism.
The four fundamental claims of the Catholic Intellectual Tradition, Human beings exist in a relation to a triune God, God’s presence in the world is mediated through nature and reality, faith and reason are compatible, the dignity of the human being is inviolable and therefore the commitment to justice for the common good is necessary. However, the great books in the Catholic Intellectual tradition show that they represent these fundamental claims in a broad distinctive way. This essay will show that these readings better represent one of the fundamental claims, human beings exist in a relation with a triune God, from the view point of three great books from the bible, Genesis, Exodus and the Gospel of Matthew. The Bible clearly supports the
The main idea of deSilva’s work is to “recover the ideology of the early Christians.” His ultimately goal for recovering the ideology of the early church is improve the contemporary Church. deSilva carefully analyzes the Scriptures through the four core values, stated in the title of his book: honor, patronage, kinship and purity. Each of these values deSeilva devotes chapters to. deSilva gives cultural structure to the New Testament analysis and seeks the ancient Judaic and Greco-Roman cultural contexts.
Renard, John. Islam and Christianity: theological themes in comparative perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011. Print.
There are many similarities and differences between Judaism, Christianity and Islam. There are also many differences that separate the three major religions of the world. This paper will delve into all three of them.
Church History in Plain Language is written by Bruce L. Shelley. This work focuses on the history of Christianity from 6 B.C. to the current period. It covers some of Christianity’s greatest events, theologians, and the various subsection of Christianity. Other than the events leading up to the death of Jesus, I had very little knowledge of Christianity’s history. After reading through the book, I have gained understanding on the Christian Councils, scholasticism, Christendom, and modern trends of Christianity.
However much Islam and Christianity would seem to share common ground, the discussion is not complete without noting the parallels between this two that have taken center stage. Some of the remarkable differences as they try to answer deep life complexities arise in the areas of religious practices by both their adherents and the clergy (Dorothy 13-28). “There is also a stark contrast to the belief system subscribed to, means of salvation, scriptures”. The most prominent difference present concerns the belief of life after death and practices of depicting the metaphysical
God’s written law is something that is and should be continuously turned, to not only when Christians find themselves in need, but also throughout in one’s daily life. The four gospels tell to story of Jesus’ life and his teachings he gave while on the earth making it possible for there to be a true example of Christ-like faith. The proposition that there are differences in the story of Jesus and in his teachings seems to question the basis upon which the Christian faith is found upon. Rather than proclaiming the gospels as falsehoods because on the differences they possess, by analyzing the differences in the context of the particular gospel it can be understood that the differences are not made by mistake, rather as a literary device. While
For the layman, familiarity with the major religions stems from the stories that are associated with them. Using the narratives that are derived from the sacred texts is the most prominent way in which our society identifies the Western religions. The Jewish tradition is best correlated to stories like the Exodus and the parting of the Red Seas, for example, as are the many tales of the miracles of Jesus connected to Christianity. This essay will present narratives as an easy method of providing the basic groundwork for the Western religious traditions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam because of their simplicity and easily transmittable nature. Furthermore, narratives impart many of the rules, laws, and moral fundamentals for these faiths, and are used by religious writers as a novel method of initiating discussion or providing a parallel for other narratives.
The first two parts of the book discuss the kind of theological-historical perspective and ecclesial situation that determines the form-content configuration of Revelation. The first section attempts to assess the theological commonality to and differences from Jewish apocalypticism. Fiorenza focuses of the problem that although Revelation claims to be a genuinely Christian book and has found its way into the Christian canon, it is often judged to be more Jewish than Christian and not to have achieved the “heights” of genuinely early Christian theology. In the second part of the book, Fiorenza seeks to assess whether and how much Revelation shares in the theological structure of the Fourth Gospel. Fiorenza proposes that a careful analysis of Revelation would suggest that Pauline, Johannine, and Christian apocalyptic-prophetic traditions and circles interacted with each other at the end of the first century C.E in Asia Minor. She charts in the book the structural-theological similarities and differences between the response of Paul and that of Revelation to the “realized eschatology”. She argues that the author of Revelation attempts to correct the “realized eschatology” implications of the early Christian tradition with an emphasis on a futuristic apocalyptic understanding of salvation. Fiorenza draws the conclusion that Revelation and its author belong neither to the Johannine nor to the Pauline school, but point to prophetic-apocalyptic traditions in Asia Minor.
“Christianity, along with all other theistic belief systems, is the fraud of the age. It serves to detach the species from the natural world, likewise, each other. It supports blind submission to authority[control of the masses].”(Zeitgeist 2007) In this essay, we will explore the different roots of religion and the plagiarism that Christianity and a number of different religions have committed.
It's thought that Jesus of Nazareth was born in springtime. A Pope, Julius I, chose December 25th for the celebration of his birth in the 4th century -- to include a Christian element in the long-established mid-winter festivals.
Having no previous knowledge on the Druze religion, curiosity lead to an investigation of the Druze faith as well. Further research exposed this author to a number of equally unique religious movements that are currently considered to be heretical sects. Among these many heresies, this author will investigate the Waldensians (Christianity) and Sufis (Islam). Overall, this paper will give an overview of each faith's scripture and history as well as how it compares to the faiths they have either derived from or share similarities to. From there, we will be able to determine what exactly the differences are between a heretical sect and a religion that bares similarities to other
There are many religions today that people worship and adapt into their daily lives are their creed. Some may have a lot of gods, while some only have one god. But three of these religions are considered as the major religion practiced by most people in the world today. Although different in some senses in terms of history and other teachings, they all have things in common that most of their followers do not seem to realize. The similarities are very important to understand each religion better and be able to determine which parts they vary. In this paper, I like to discuss the similarities found in the three major monotheistic religions of Judaism, Islam and Christianity.
At the first glance, Islam and Christianity appear to have nothing in common, however; as you go beyond the surface, they appear to have many similarities such as their beliefs of God, their beliefs of life after death, their holy scriptures, and their prayers. These religions, although two entirely different beliefs, share a similar origin. Like many other religions, they both claim to be the one and only true way to God. In order to truly see and understand their similarities, one must date back to the rise and birth of Christianity and Islam. Throughout the course of this essay, I will compare the many facets that show the alikeness between these two growing religions.
In this essay, written in 1952, Russell starts off by giving a brief history of evolution of the monotheistic tradition of Jews and how Islam and Christianity followed suit. He then goes on to refute many of the arguments that theologians present when faced with the burden of proving Go...