Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on Alexander the great
A paragraph on the great alexander
An essay on Alexander the great
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on Alexander the great
Following the conquest of the mighty Persian Empire and the death of King Darius, Alexander set out to consolidate his kingdom. However, he now has his mind on a bigger prize, India. Alexander reached the Indus River, the gateway to India, in spring 326 B.C. When he arrived, he met up with Hephaestion, whom he had sent ahead to ready the river crossing. The Indus River is one of the largest Rivers in India, second only to the Ganges. It is no small task to move an army across such a large river, but Alexander had a brilliant solution. He would have Hephaestion construct a pontoon bridge, which is a bridge constructed out of boats that the Macedonians could rope together, creating a rather quick solution to the problem. Entering the Punjab Region, or the land of five rivers, Alexander was greeted by a prince named Taxiles, who controlled a large section of land east of the Indus. Taxiles welcomed Alexander with open arms, seeking to ally with him against his rival Porus. They immediately became great friends, and many gifts were exchanged between them. Alexander rested his army for a short time at Taxilia, the largest city between the Indus and the Hydaspes and owned by Alexander’s new ally. Alexander would …show more content…
Secondly, he led a small group of cavalry up and down the western bank of the river. This served two purposes, they were able to survey the terrain to look for a potential crossing point, but more importantly, Porus’ cavalry on the other side of the river, being paranoid about a secret crossing, would mirror their movements. Alexander did this every night for several weeks. Eventually, the Indians stopped shadowing their movements on the opposite banks. They had become used to the Macedonians doing this every night and therefore had been lulled into a false sense of security. This is going exactly as Alexander
Alexander adopted Persian governing practices, but he had little use for Persian culture. According to his Greek biographer Plutarch, he considered himself "a governor from God and a reconciler of the world." He hoped that Greek culture would, through his actions, permeate all of Asia, inspiring its peoples to pursue virtue, excellence, and truth. This heroic idealism blended with practicality in his plan to develop the Tigris, Euphrates, and Indus rivers as commercial waterways linking all of Asia These undertakings promised to be long and difficult, however, and Alexander was an impatient man. His soldiers' unwillingness to proceed past the Indus was a great disappointment to him, for which he compensated by throwing his own festivals and celebrations. Alexander showed early leadership qualities. When King Phillip invaded Thrace, he left Alexander in charge of Macedonia at the age of 16. During his father's absence, one of the Thracian tribes, the Maedi, rebelled. Alexander was able to mobilize an army and put down the rebellion. In 336 B.C, Alexander's father was assassinated, putting Alexander on the throne at the age of 20. Shortly after this, Alexander left Macedonia with his armies to put down rebellions in the countries of Illyria, Thrace and Greece, all of which had previously been conquered by King Phillip. Alexander then moved his armies into Asia Minor and began to conquer the peoples there. Among the countries conquered by Alexander were Syria, Phoenicia and
The first reason why Alexander lll wasn’t great is because he didn’t show concern for others. In document B it states “Porus’ elephants were now boxed in, and the damage
Darius had an advantage over Alexander the Great, he had more troops, better resources, and he chose the battle field. Although Darius had the advantage he was not as smart as Alexander. Alexander had good communication with his troops; he planned according, in addition he was well organized before the battled. He did not stray away from his plan he stuck to it. Alexander troops were heavily armed they moved in formation, and they were shield with their long spears they stayed close together and moved in formation. In addition he did not have all his troops engaged in the battle at once he planned an awesome attack strategy that won him and his troops the war.
He was a heavy drinker of wine and when he drank, he became very aggressive with an uncontrollable temper. These drunken states led to irrational decisions and questionable events [Foner and Garraty]. The obsession he had with constructing a name for himself led him to not being able to accept criticism. When he is confronted with criticism, he becomes spiteful, ill-mannered and harsh. Alexander was also known to have an erratic temper with impassioned outbursts. These outbursts could lead to the most tragic outcomes. For example, Alexander murdered Cleitus during a drunken rage outburst
Alexander the Not so Great:history through Persian eyes by Prof Ali Ansari Paragraph 1 Page
iples of war. By taking the path around the main Greek force they succeeded in both maneuvering and surprising the Greeks. By taking the small path around the pass they moved their forces into a position that gave their vast numbers an advantage over the Greeks; an advantage they did not have fighting head on. The Persians also caught the Greeks by surprise by taking the small path around. Even thought the Greeks had stationed a small force there, they had not planned heavily on the Persians finding and using the path.
Altogether, Napoleon could count on nearly 700,000 men of 20 nationalities of whom more than 600,000 crossed the border. Grown far beyond its original intended size, the army was difficult to assemble and hard to feed. Between Tilsit and Moscow, there lay over 600 miles of hostile barren countryside. Because of lack of supplies and the difficulty to feed the large army, Napoleon's plan was simple: bring about a battle, defeat the Russian army, and dictate a settlement. Apparently neither he nor his soldiers, who cheerfully began crossing the Nieman River, thought beyond the immediate goal.
Alexander’s first battle came when he was only sixteen. Philip, his father had gone away on a campaign and left Macedonia u...
Alexander was Great because of his leadership. When Alexander went into battle, he used lots of complicated strategies to win. Due to the teachings of Aristotle, he was a force to reckoned with. One example comes from Doc B.The battle was set in India, against a king named Porus. He had more than 30 elephants under his control. The one thing that separated them was a shallow river. The document tells us that he would “Take his cavalry to various positions along the river bank where he would create a clamor… This went on for quite a time until Porus no longer reacted” Alexander used great strategy to outsmart his enemy.
Darius’ first attempt at capturing Athens was a complete failure from the beginning. He sent an army around the northern coast of the Aegean Sea. However, a storm destroyed his supply ships, forcing him to turn back. Two years later Darius tried again. He sent a large army and fleet of about 200 ships directly across the Aegean Sea to seize ...
Alexander the great is known as one of the most ruthless and greatest leaders the world has ever seen. In less than ten years, Alexander conquered cities from Greece all the way to modern day India. Not only did he defeat and conquer cities throughout the known world, but Alexander would also leave his mark spreading and influencing Greek society wherever he went. His leadership and conquests united the East and the West as a whole like no one up to that point had done before. His impact on culture and society when meshing his Greek background with his conquered cities became something truly unique. In 323 B.C. when Alexander passed away, he not only left behind a vast thriving empire, but also a legacy that would be remembered throughout history.
Then, Alexander turned his eye toward India. The first major battle was the siege of the Sogdian Rock. This was won with the use of volunteers who climbed the cliffs under the fortress. Upon hearing this news, the defenders quickly surrendered. In the winter of 327-326 BC, Alexander led campaigns against several clans from the Indian hills, again defeating them. He then fought Porus in the battle of Hydaspes. Alexander was so impressed by Porus’ bravery in battle that he was named as satrap of his own kingdom. At this point, Alexander’s army, exhausted by the years of fighting and afraid of the facing other powerful Indian armies, refused to march any further east. Alexander instead turned south, conquering the Malli clans. Following this, Alexander marched back through
"The Conquests of Alexander the Great - 336-300 BC." Concise Atlas of World History, Andromeda. London: Andromeda, 1997. Credo Reference. Web. 17 May 2011.
Alexander was brought up admiring Homeric heroes, and was inspired by their emotional impulses. Alexander wanted to be seen as braver than brave, the mostly kingly of kings, and the greatest of all generals. Alexander wanted to identify with mythical and divine conquerors, such as Dionysus. Anaxarchus, a Greek philosopher whom accompanied Alexander at the school of Democritus, said that Alexander had better claims to be a god than Dionysus and Heracles, due to Alexander’s grand accomplishments. Alexander was inspired by Homer’s hero Achilles, and his aspiration for greatness – he even saw himself as a reincarnation of this Homeric hero. Alexander’s desire to explore west Egypt hailed from his mystical belief in his destiny, whereas others argue that it was an attempt to strengthen his position with his new subjects. Callisthenes – the official historian – said that it was due to Alexander’s “thirst for glory because he heard Hercules and Peruses had gone there before him” and he wanted to emulate these Homeric heroes. He was motivated by Homeric ideals such as personal achievement and glory, accomplished largely in warfare. Alexander’s siege of Aornus was carried out because Hercules had failed a similar attempt, and Arrian wrote that Alexander crossed the Gedrosian Desert because “no one else with an army had done so successfully” (Anab.
Alexander began his military campaign and his rule much where his father left off. Whether or not it was his aim, this created a sense of normality for the men that was part of his father’s regime. Alexander’s position as a warrior-king who stood side-by-side among his men also served to create respect among his peers. Gradually, as Alexander conquered more Persian land, he began to adopt the policies of Persian rulers. Alexander’s change in policy extended beyond just political roles, he gave consideration to the local gods in many of the lands that he conquered. Eventually, Alexander brought people in from the conquered nations to serve under him.