Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argumentative essay for establishing zoos or not
Zoos are bad for animals
Zoos:Pros or Cons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argumentative essay for establishing zoos or not
A modern question in today's age, are zoos bad for the animals. There are facts from both sides of this argument. They are not capturing the animals from the wild anymore they are born and raised in the zoos. They use antidepressants to keep the animals happy from being in a pen. Zoos are bad for animals in the fact of keeping them penned up and not letting them be free.
They need to be free in wild where they belong they were put there for a reason and that reason is really important. Its proven that animals don't do well in zoos and if the zookeeper's really cared they wouldn't treat the animals like they do. My claim was zoos are bad for animals and do humans no good, i said that its proven that animals don't do well in zoos and the only people that don't realize this is the zookeepers themselves. It won't necessarily save their lives but will make them more happy and not so depressed. This can make them stressed out and sick. And
…show more content…
they would need to ask the visitors what they have learned to find out if they actually gain something from this. You don't learn from zoos.
With the technical advancement we have today there are other ways to help children learn. And when the children are there they aren't going to the zoo to learn they are there to look at the animals there are close to 40 websites where you can not only learn about the animals but learn how to read, some websites even have videos where you can learn. This applies to my claim because i think that zoos are bad for animals and with the cameras and drones we have now we can literally watch these animals in their natural habitat. Sometimes kids can't even see the animals when they are there because the animals are sleeping with the drones we can see what they do when they sleep and where without harming them nor disturbing them. If we do this it will send the non hurt and non injured animals back to their natural place, Also if we come to this i feel like an animal expert on a video telling the kids what the animal is doing and what is going on will be more factual than them trying to pick it all up on their
own. Zoos on the other hand are good for animals that won't make it in the real world and need to be tended to. A Injured or are born in the zoo so they don't know any better of zoo animals are either I. This one doesn't apply to my claim as much as it is a counterclaim and is saying that not all animals need to be put in the wild and if they were they wouldn't make it in the wild more than a day. It makes the zoos look better and is not harming the animal it is helping them by giving them a chance to live and helps them. Both sides have equal facts and reason to argue but in the final answer, zoos are bad for animals. Animals need the wild plain and simple.
Have you ever seen an animal sitting in a cage all alone with nothing to do. Well, zoos are trying to change that fact. They will allow the animals to live in an environment that is like their home. Many people don't realize this, but zoo are keeping and breeding these animals because they would not survive in the wild alone. In the three passages, ¨The Stripes Will Survive,¨ ¨The Zood Go Wild from No More Dodos,¨ ¨Our Beautiful Macaws and Why They Need Enrichment.¨ All of these articles present one claim, that is that the role of zoos is no longer to keep animal, but to protect them.
Considering the many challenges animals face in the wild, it is understandable that people may be eager to support zoos and may feel that they are protective facilities necessary for animal life. In the article “ Zoos Are Not Prisons. They Improve the Lives of Animals”, Author Robin Ganzert argues that Zoos are ethical institutions that enrich the lives of animals and ultimately protect them. Statistics have shown that animals held in captivity have limited utilitarian function resulting in cramped quarters, poor diets, depression, and early death for the animals thus, proving that Zoos are not ethical institutions that support and better the lives of animals as author Robin Ganzert stated (Cokal 491). Ganzert exposes the false premise in stating
Keeping animals locked in cages, bored and cramped up in such a small space is an awful sight to show the children. It creates an image in the little minds of children that animals are to be treated like they don’t matter. They say Zoos are a place where children can learn about the wild, exotic animals, but in reality it doesn't teach them anything only that they are meant to be caged up, which is wrong. Also, it is really painful to see the animals bored and lonely, so why should people keep letting them do this to these beautiful creatures. Animal captivity for entertainment should end to let them go to their rightful home.
...re not met. Animals are living beings that deserve rights and respect, and being kept in a zoo does not meet these standards. People need to realize that animals are worthy of some of the privileges we receive. Endangered species can ultimately be saved by us, if we support their natural habitats and fight the people who kill them. “Significantly, we object to human captivity for one reason only, that humans have a right to freedom, or just ought to be free. Why shouldn’t this be the case with non-humans too?” (Bostock). Zoos should not be supported because they are violating animal rights.
The difference between right and wrong is not always perfectly clear. A long-standing part of cultures across the world, zoological and animal parks have been around for hundreds of years. While in the past concerns and issues regarding the ethical problems zoos seem to impose were less prominent, in recent times the rise of animal rights activist groups and new generational values have influenced the way people view these parks. Critics believe that zoos are an unnatural habitat for animals and force them to live in captivity, having a negative impact on their health. Yet, there are still many remaining who fully support zoos, citing business and educational reasons. Some supporters even acknowledge the ethical problems zoos face, but choose
Zoos have been very controversial lately with debate about animal cruelty and speculations shifting around the industry, so what is the truth about zoos? Zoos are known to be a safe area for animals and humans, entertain individuals and be a safe containment for endangered animals. Knowing this information it’s factual to say that this sounds like the perfect place for animals and humans, and they are.
In conclusion, I hope one day all the zoos will be shut down, so that the animals can live their life in their natural habitat so suffering will go away and they will not be put into misery. So I think animals should not be put in
There are many places where people can go to see live animals such as aquariums, zoos, and safari parks. A pleasant way to define a Zoo is to call it “an establishment that maintains a collection of wild animals”. (Google def) Another way to say that is a facility in which animals are “enclosed in cages for public exhibition”. I believe zoos are ethical; however, changes need to be made to eliminate problems I have discovered. In this argumentative essay, I will be arguing the ethics of zoos and certain problems that need to be addressed that people are not aware of. Zoos are great places to take the family out for the day to have entertainment; however, problems such as captive breeding, length of life, and animal stress need to improve.
There is no clear winner in this argument, with all sides having a say in whether or not zoos are relevant in todays society. But one thing is for sure: many would argue that zoos have brought humans and animals closer together for the good and the bad. Works Cited The "Zoos". Animal Cruelty -. N.p., n.d. Web.
This does not change it as zoos are here as conservation and education; we are here to save the animals, and make more people aware of the situation at hand. I believe that we shouldn’t turn our heads or back to problems that zoos are suffering, going through misunderstanding or beliefs of what others say. This means propaganda, misinformation, or organizations; for example, PETA, should not matter on what actions we are to make. We have a job to do for these animals, and this world; because if we don’t take that first leap, then we have not just lost the fight but we have lost the
Even though some zoos have an endangered species exhibit with the intention of protecting and rehabilitating animals, many do not do an adequate job of protecting the animals. Zoos have been harmful to the very animals they have sworn to protect. Animals in captivity often suffer from anxiety, boredom and other severe issue related to prolonged confinement. Most animals are unable to thrive in small enclosure with unnatural weather and climates. For example elephants are known to walk as far as 30 miles per day, but the association of Zoos and aquariums only require a space the measures $0 feet by 45 feet, which is about the size of a three car garage, to house these large animals. (peta.org) the drastic difference in the amount of space their allowed ...
Some people may argue that zoos protect animals and species under this polluted world, however, do animals in zoos really need our “help”? Yes, but surely not that many. According to Captive Animals Protection Society (CAPS), 79% of animals in United Kingdom zoos and over 70% of elephants in European zoos are wild-caught. It seems that zoos need them rather than they need zoos.
I believe that wild animals should not be kept in captivity. All around the world there are zoos that hold endangered species and wild animals. I do not believe we should have zoos and that we should shut down all of the zoos and release all of the wild animals that are held within them. It is unnatural and unlawful for wild animals to be kept in a zoo. Animals were born in the wild so why do we take them out of it to put them on display?
As if that alone isn’t enough to prove that zoos are cruel and unfair, there are many professionals and experts who gravely look down upon zoos, too. Delcianna Winders, director with the PETA foundation, said “Renowned oceanographer Jean-Michel Cousteau reported that he was forever changed after witnessing a captive dolphin commit suicide by ramming his head into a tank wall.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Zoos are an unsuitable environment for wild animals and should, therefore, be abolished. Firstly, zoo animals are kept in a very confined area compared with their vast natural habitat. Secondly, breeding programmes are far less successful than zoos claim. Thirdly, zoo animals are exposed to many diseases and other dangers.