Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Napoleon's defeat
The downfall of Napoleon Bonaparte
Fall of Napoleon Bonaparte
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Napoleon's defeat
Napoleon first started out as a soldier, then moved to Director, then to First Consul, then crowned himself Emperor.The French accepted this because he led the French army against France’s enemies and the army was the only thing that the French could show. While he was Emperor he blocked all presses so that no one could spread rumors about him. His downfall was due to his greediness. He tried to defeat Russia. Russia has never been defeated and Napoleon believed he could beat one of the best nations in the world. He lost due to the freezing cold weather, but that wasn’t it. Russia’s technique of Scorched Earth did not allow the French to be self-efficient. Even though Napoleon had dominant defeats against the French enemies, he was still a …show more content…
tyrannical leader because he fought Russia one of the largest powers in the nation, he Cope d’etat, and he took a lot of territories. Napoleon demonstrated that he was a tyrant when he tried to take over Russia.
Russia had probably the most land in Europe and was the most powerful. Napoleon was so power thirsty that he didn't think of the fact that Russia has never been defeated. It wasn’t just the Russian military, it was also Russia’s seasons. According to PBS,”the blazing heat of the Russian summer began to take its toll. Soldiers fell from exhaustion,sickness, and desertion.” The summer in Russia was deadly that after two months 150,000 of Napoleon’s soldiers were dead. Napoleon thirst for power killed 150,000 soldiers in only two months. The French army was so dominant due to them being self-sufficient. When the French invaded Russia the Russians burned the cities the French invaded so that the French could not rely on the food that is in the Russian cities. Napoleon’s ridiculous idea of taking over Russia showed he was a tyrannical …show more content…
leader. . Napoleon Bonaparte Coup D’etat, taking a country over illegaly. Napoleon became the most powerful person in France. According to the Library of Washington,” The Coup d’état established Napoleon as First Consul of France. Napoleon quickly became powerful.” The Coup D’etat didn’t just make Napoleon the First Consul of France, it also led up to Napoleon crowning himself to be Emperor. The only reason the French accpeted him was because he won many battles against France’s enemies. After he lost the Battle of Waterloo and the war against Russia they tried to erase everything he did. It was only the battles that he won that made him popular, but his tyrannical ways brought him to his downfall. If Napoleon didn’t have his tyrannical ways than he wouldn’t have become Emperor. He wouldn’t have the desire to fight all those battles. He wouldn’t have been Emperor. It was the power that France loved. Napoleon’s personality and kindness toward the citizens wasn’t the reason for his popularity, it was his tyrannical ways in war and in the spot of a leader that created his popularity. The other decisions that made him tyrannical leader was taking over a bunch of the continent of Europe. Now taking over land could just be a matter of gaining some land but not half a continent. According to the textbook it says,” He forced Austria and Prussia to sign peace treaties that benfited the French, and Russia then formed an alliance with France. He ruled over two countries which are Netherlands and Spain. He forced the Kingdom of Italy and the Papal states into alliances.” Controlling two huge countries and forcing four nations/countries into alliances is insane. Napoleon was the most tyrannical leader in that time period. He was so power thirsty that he pretty much conquered Europe besides Great Britain and Russia, otherwise he controls Europe. Only tyrants can control half a continent as large as Europe. Napoleon could’ve have been the only leader that has taken over half a country. If this is true Napoleon is a die hard tyrant who would do anything to conquer the whole world. His tyrant ways lead to his downfall though. He felt that it was a good idea to invade Russia. He invading Russia in the summer of 1812. According to PBS,”As the days passed, the blazing heat of the Russian summer began to take its toll. Soldiers died, even before the first battle, from exhaustion, sickness, and dessertion. There were already 150,000 slodiers dead.” Napoleon didn’t realize how big of a mistake it was to invade Russia. The French were self-efficient which is what made the military dominant. The Russians countered that by burning the cities/towns that they fled so the French army couldn’t be self-efficient. According to PBS,” As Napoleon’s army entered the city on September 14, they found it almost deserted. That night, Mosc. ow began to burn.” The Russians would do anything, even burn what is called the “holy city”, to win the battle. Napoleon ended up retreating but much of his army was killed. Napoleon as the tyrant he was made a terrible decision which was attacking a country that has never been beaten in war. He wanted all of Europe to be under his control. Napoleon was a filthy tyrant who took a ton of land, Coup D’etat, and tried to take over Russia.
Eventhough a country wants more land, they don’t take over most of a continent. Eventhough the people accepted him as Emperor, it was because he could win battles, not because he was a great leader. If he wasn’t a good military leader than he wouldn’t be the Emperor because there was nothing else to like about him. He was a power thirsty tyrant who would do anything to conquer
land.
He turned the French against Europe and took over central Europe. He was well known for being a genius and could often sway the tide in his favor in a variety of ways. In 1812, the French invaded Russia, but it led to a change of fate. His army won by moving into the outskirts of Moscow, but it was an empty victory. Cold and worn down, his "Grande Armée" was forced into a painful retreat through the freezing Russian weather.
Bonaparte Betrayed the Revolution ‘Bonaparte betrayed the revolution.’ Do you agree with this statement? Justify your answer to the question. Napoleon Bonaparte’s attitude towards the French Revolution is one that has often raised questions. That the revolution had an influence on Bonaparte’s regime cannot be denied – but to what extent?
Napoleon Bonaparte, an unparalleled military commander who conquered most of Europe around the early 1800’s, invaded Russia in 1812, who was under the rule of Tsar Alexander at the time, lost three quarters of his Grande Armee which was composed of soldiers from all over Europe totaling 600,000 soldiers. This part of history is the most talked about and studied military campaign even today by scholars and military school alike. Napoleon’s invasion of Russia in 1812 was a extraordinary expedition that shocked the French Empire to its foundation and led to its eventual collapse just a year later. This Historiographic comparative
He was a big supporter of the revolution and the Directory and served them well. According to the Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia of January, 2013: “Napoleon’s remarkable early success was in part a matter of good fortune and in part the product of an unconquerable will and energy that took the maximum advantage of every political and military opportunity” (Rollyson). He was a brigadier general for the revolution, but was imprisoned when Jacobins were taken out of power and Thermidorean was sent into it. He however was soon released. With many great victories in Egypt and a powerful marriage, he was a very known and liked man. Napoleon was able to overthrow the Directory in 1799. Napoleon was a great leader and settled the chaos of the revolution down. He was able to restore France’s relationship with the Roman Catholic Church and the Pope in 1801. He proclaimed himself supreme Emperor of France in 1804. He also gave religious freedom to Protestants and Jews. He also published the Napoleonic Code/Civil Code of 1804. This code established political and legal equality for all adult men; therefore, religion no longer had a prejudice in court or people of authorities. With this code; however, he restricted the freedom of speech and freedom of the media. Throughout his career, he expanded France’s borders to the size of an empire. The only reason Napoleon was not able to take all of Europe
... It is important to understand that since France had just exited a revolution, it was pretty fragile; one big mistake and France might have ended up in another one. Napoleon was not only a child of both the French Revolution and the Enlightenment, he was also a very intelligent person. His cunning and wits led him to be one of the greatest, if not the greatest, enlightened despots of all time. Works Consulted (none of the above).
One last mistake that most people could call Napoleon’s greatest, would be his invasion of Russia. When Czar Alexander I stopped complying with Napoleon’s demands with the Continental System, putting heavy taxes on French luxury products, and refusing to let Napoleon marry a sister of his, Napoleon thought that it was time to put Russia back in his place. With this idea in place, Napoleon gathered a huge amount of troops from all around Europe, which first entered Russia on June 24, 1812. A quote from Sutherland states that “It was the most diverse European army since the Crusades”. History experts expect that at least 450,000 Grand Armée soldiers and maybe even 650,000 ended up crossing the Niemen River to fight the Russians on the other side (approx. 200,000).
Napoleon Betrayed the Revolution In order to investigate the claim that ‘Napoleon betrayed the revolution’, it has to be determined what is the French revolution? And what are the revolutionary ideals that Napoleon allegedly betrayed? If Napoleon betrayed the Revolution, then he betrayed the ideals of liberty, equality and fraternity. However, if Napoleon did not betray the revolution, he consolidated the revolutionary ideals.
Napoleon Bonaparte restored stability and leadership in France but at a costly expense. The Napoleonic wars devastated the economic structure of France. Due to inflation incurred because of the wars French currency became vulnerable. Since all of France's money was going into the army it put the state into great debt. The wars and ultimate defeat also put France in a crisis regarding foreign trade. All of these factors contributed in crippling France economically during and after the Napoleonic wars. The Napoleonic wars was an attempt for France to assert itself as a force to be reckoned with among Europe. However in doing this they were forced to substitute this new found nationalism with a non-existent economic system. Wherever Napoleon's campaigns took him he was forced to topple monarchies using the only way he knew how; force. This force was his army which was built by using all of France's resources and money. As a result of the Napoleonic wars France's economic growth was stunted and inevitably sent them into a recession.
French Revolution brought a great number of great ideas, but ideas are not beneficial unless they are realized and stabilized. The man to stabilize the concepts of French Revolution was Napoleon Bonaparte. He started out as an Italian general and ended up being one of the greatest historical figures. First, Directors requested Napoleon's support while organizing a coup d'etat. Then, Bonaparte fought Britain in order to benefit France. Lastly, he was called to help creating a new constitution and ended up as the First Consul of France. At home, he ruled using flattery, but also he strongly resisted the opposition. Napoleon is a pro-revolutionist because he denied all the privileges of the aristocracy, created a new constitution, and also established the Napoleonic Code.
Reasons for Napoleon's Success · One of Napoleon's great strengths as leader was the devotion of his men. His soldiers adored him. · Despite his generally unprepossessing appearance, when he wished to charm he could quickly win over anyone he met, however initially hostile they might be. Within a couple of days he had completely captivated the officers and crew of Bellerophon taking him to St. Helena in 1815, much alarming the British government.
Two authors, General Carl von Clausewitz and Brett James, show similarities in reasons why Napoleon lost this campaign to Russia. Napoleon believed that after a few quick victorious battles, he could convince Alexander to return to the Continental System. He also decided that if he occupied Moscow, the Russian government would crumple and ask for peace. " A single blow delivered at the heart of the Russian Empire, at Moscow the Great, at Moscow the Holy, will instantly put this whole blind, apathetic mass at my mercy." pg 6, 1812 Napoleon's Defeat in Russia.
Napoleon’s military career is what eventually led to his prominence. Napoleon began his military career above most of the other men his age. He rapidly made his way through the ranks eventually gaining a great support system. As the directory leaned more and more heavily upon the military, a coup d’état developed. Because of his military expertise, he immediately became first consul of France. The empire of France was soon to grow once Napoleon was in reign. In the 1790s the French army was near one million men, an advantage in the Austrian wars as well as future ventures. Wars raged with other European countries in the early 1800s. Napoleon was able to beat the continental coalition, thus gaining territory for France. France annexed some of Italy but also controlled states such as Spain, Holland ...
Was Napoleon Bonaparte the Saviour or the Destroyer of the Ideals of the French Revolution?
Misused intelligence and underestimated opponents were at the heart of Napoleon?s downfall. This was clearly shown at Moscow when the Russians outwitted him by using their scorched earth policy and not meeting him in battle as they agreed. With careful planning, the Russian invasion could have gone a lot better and maybe not have led to Napoleon?s downfall.
Napoleon had to retrieve from Russia under attacks by Russian peasants and horsemen on those who fell behind. His army also suffered from cold and hunger, since the Russians destroyed all food supplies. The takeover of Moscow by Napoleon proved to be useless, and in the long run, destroyed a large part of his army. Alongside these historical events, Tolstoy describes the different classes of Russian society in terms of their participation in the war and what kind of an impact war had on their lives. In the beginning of the novel, the Russian aristocratic class, which was in the czar’s circle, wanted Russia to participate in the war.