In the mid to late 18th century, the Great Awakening influenced many American colonists (and Europeans) to strengthen their ties to religion. The popularity and influence of evangelical christianity grew as younger presbyterian New Light ministers preached a message of repentance rather than predestination. Some newer ministers within the colonies believed in inclusiveness among races. Presbyterian Minister Jonathan Barber preached christianity to the Native Americans known as Mohegans. Samson Occom was a product of the Great Awakening. In A Short Narrative of My Life, the Mohegan Presbyterian Minister gives readers a brief glimpse into the first forty five years of his life. In the text, Samson reflects on a timeline of his childhood, through …show more content…
He tells us of Ministers such as Jonathan Barber that forcibly taught him the English language which opened the path for him to read The Bible. As Samson became acquainted with the New Testament, he “had an uncommon Pity and Compassion” for the other Mohegans (590). Occom blossomed while attending a preparatory school owned by his mentor, Eleazar Wheelock, in Connecticut. Following his studies, Occom found himself with the Montauk Indians on Long Island. Inspired by The New Testament, Occom aspired to be a shepherd for his people; he wished to follow in the footsteps of Jesus Christ and lead his people to salvation via education. In the story, he notes, “I used to wish I was capable of Instructing my poor Kindred. I used to think, if I could once Learn to Read I would Instruct the poor Children in Reading,-and used frequently to talk with our Indians Concerning Religion” (590). As a proper sheppard, he educated the Montauk children and taught them to read. Occom intended to save his fellow Indians from themselves; evidence to this could be found in Occom’s sermons. For example: in his magnum opus, “A Sermon at the Execution of Moses Paul”, he addressed his fellow Natives and pleaded that they abandon the sin of drunkenness, “...for this sin we are despised in the world, and it is all right and just, for we despise ourselves more; and if we do not regard ourselves, who will …show more content…
Wheelock convinced him to travel to Europe on a mission to collect funds needed to open a college that would accept both Indians and Whites equally. Occom agreed and entrusted his family to Wheelock. Occom’s two year mission was a great success. After returning from Europe with the appropriate funds, Occom’s negative inclinations toward white people would only continue to grow. In The Betrayal of Samson Occom, author Bernd Peyer discusses how Occom faced disloyalty in the years following his written narrative at the hand of his trusted mentor, Mr. Wheelock. “He found that his family, whom he had entrusted to Wheelock's care during his trip to England, was living in destitute conditions.” Furthermore, Occom’s two year mission to Europe proved to be pointless as Wheelock rerouted the accumulated funds for the Indian school and founded Dartmouth College as an all white Christian school. Undoubtedly, this upset Occom. The book “Early Native American Writing: New Critical Essays” features a letter from Occom to Wheelock, “...your having so many White Scholars and so few or no Indian Scholars gives me great Discouragement - I verily thought once that your Institution was Intended Purely for the poor Indian” (Jaskoski 47). Wheelock had used Occom. In fact, Wheelock’s opinion of Occom only ever revolved around how useful he was as an Indian. Wheelock even admitted that his great plan for Indian missionaries exploited their superior ability at converting
He is paid much less than other missionaries and takes on tasks that others would not. He believes that this is predetermined and there is nothing that he could have done better. "So I am ready to say, they have usd us thus, because I Cant Instruct the Indians so well as other Missionaries, but I Can assure them I have endeavours to teach them as well as I how-but I must Say, I believe it is because I a poor Indian. I Can 't help that God has made me So; I did not make my self So.-”
Edwards died roughly 20 years before the American Revolution, which means he was a British subject at birth and death. Edwards believed that religion is tied to nations and empires, and that revivals were necessary in history. Edwards’ belief in revivals began what is known as The Great Awakening. Edwards’ purpose in ministry was the preaching that God is sovereign, but also loving towards his creation. Since God is sovereign, Edwards claimed that God worked through revolutions and wars to bring the message of the gospel (Marsden, Jonathon Edwards, 4, 9, 197). Edwards’ most known sermon Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God was preached to revive the demoralized congregations. The congregations of New England had low memberships within different churches, and competition from denominational pluralism was stagnant (Lukasik, 231). Getting the colonists to return back to God was the mission and purpose of The Great Awakening. Through this, Edwards hoped that this movement will foster a great increase in learning about God (Marsden, Jonathon Edwards,
much about many of the local native beliefs. But he has also learned of death, hatred,
The Pilgrims were also eager to experience new religious freedom from the state-ran church of Great Britain. This helped them build vibrant faithful communities in the New World. However, many individuals came to work not for God and were not all believers. After the establishment of the Church of England, other religions were inhibited. Everyone was expected to follow one religion and to believe in one religion. This led to a sense of stability from a political perspective because everyone practiced the same religion. However, instead of being a positive force for religious belief, it created spiritual dryness among believers. Individuals weren’t feeling anything spiritual or divine and it created a lack of relationships with individuals and their religion. The First Great Awakening arose at a time when people in the colonies were questioning the role of the individual in religion and society. It began at the same time as the Enlightenment, an insight that emphasized logic and reason and stressed the power of the individual to understand the universe based on scientific laws. Similarly, the Great Awakening had influenced individuals to rely more on a personal approach to redemption than the church and doctrine. There was national hunger for spiritual freedom and had wise and moral leadership. These convictions led to a spiritual revival in the colonies known as the Great Awakening. However, little did the colonists know that this spiritual movement would aid in their separation form Britain and lead to independence in the long
The Great Awakening was a spiritual movement that began in the 1730’s in the middle colonies. It was mostly led by these people; Jonathan Edwards, a congregational pastor in Massachusetts, Theodore J. Frelinghuysen, a Dutch Byterian Pastor in New Jersey; Gilbert Tennent, a Presbyterian Pastor in New Jersey; and George Whitefield, a traveling Methodist Preacher from New England. The most widely known leader was George Whitefield. At the beginning of the very first Great Awakening appeared mostly among Presbyterians in Pennsylvania and in New Jersey. The Presbyterians initiated religious revivals during these times. During this time, they also started a seminary to train clergyman. The seminary’s original name was Log College, now it is known as Princeton University. In the 1740s the clergymen of these churches were conducting revivals throughout that area. The Great Awakening spread from the Presbyterians of the middle colonies to the Congregationalist (puritans) and Baptist of New England.
Occom is also blatantly honest when describing the situation of the Poor Indian Boy and his English master, that the boy was beat because he was an Indian. This is horrifically honest, on the part of Occom. Very few people had the knowledge and ability to write of these instances, however, Occom used his education to get this out into the public. And while Occom is not the unbiased source most desired, he does voice the side of the story not often revealed.
People of all groups, social status, and gender realized that they all had voice and they can speak out through their emotional feels of religion. Johnathan Edwards was the first one to initiate this new level of religion tolerance and he states that, “Our people do not so much need to have their heads filled than, as much as have their hearts touched.” Johnathan Edwards first preach led to more individuals to come together and listen. Than after that individual got a sense that you do not need to be a preacher to preach nor you do not need to preach in a church, you can preach wherever you want to. For the first time, you have different people coming together to preach the gospel. You had African American preaching on the roads, Indian preachers preaching and you had women who began to preach. The Great Awakening challenged individuals to find what church meets their needs spiritually and it also let them know about optional choices instead of one. The Great Awakening helped the American colonies come together in growth of a democratic
The Americans settled all over the United States and in the 1820s began showing interest in the West because of trade with Asia. Certain leaders were sent out on missions' to "help" better the lives of the Indians and Mexicans. When the white settlers first came to West they viewed the Indians and Mexicans as savages. They did not think of them as human because their lifestyle was unsuitable, or rather different then their own. The only way that they could tolerate them was to try and change their way of living. They attempted to convert them into the Christian religion, to change the way they ate, what they ate, how they ate it, the way they dressed, teach them English, etc. "The object of the missions is to convert as many of the wild Indians as possible, and to train them up within the walls of the establishment in the exercise of a good life, and of some trade, so that they may be able to provide for themselves and become useful members of civilized society."1
He was a man whose very words struck fear into the hearts of his listeners. Acknowledged as one of the most powerful religious speakers of the era, he spearheaded the Great Awakening. “This was a time when the intense fervor of the first Puritans had subsided somewhat” (Heyrmen 1) due to a resurgence of religious zeal (Stein 1) in colonists through faith rather than predestination. Jonathan Edwards however sought to arouse the religious intensity of the colonists (Edwards 1) through his preaching. But how and why was Edwards so successful? What influenced him? How did he use diction and symbolism to persuade his listener, and what was the reaction to his teachings? In order to understand these questions one must look at his life and works to understand how he was successful. In his most influential sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”, Jonathan Edwards’ persuasive language awakened the religious fervor that lay dormant in colonial Americans and made him the most famous puritan minister of the Great Awakening in North America.
The Second Great Awakening swept through the United States during the end of the 18th Century. Charles Grandson Finney was one of the major reasons the Second Great Awakening was such a success. Finney and his contemporaries rejected the Calvinistic belief that one was predetermined by go God to go to heaven or hell, and rather preached to people that they need to seek salvation from God themselves, which will eventually improve society has a whole. Finney would preach at Revivals, which were emotional religious meetings constructed to awaken the religious faith of people. These meetings were very emotional and lasted upwards of five days. Revivalism had swept through most of the United States by the beginning of the 19th Century. One of the most profound revivals took place in New York. After the great revival in New York Charles Finney was known ...
In the early 1700's spiritual revivalism spread rapidly through the colonies. This led to colonists changing their beliefs on religion. The great awakening was the level to which the revivalism spread through the colonists. Even with this, there was still religious revivalism in the colonies. One major reason for the Great Awakening was that it was not too long before the revolution. The great awakening is reason to believe that William G Mcloughlin's opinion and this shows that there was a cause to the American Revolution.
The Great Awakening was a superior event in American history. The Great Awakening was a time of revivalism that expanded throughout the colonies of New England in the 1730’s through the 1740’s. It reduced the importance of church doctrine and put a larger significance on the individuals and their spiritual encounters. The core outcome of the Great Awakening was a revolt against controlling religious rule which transferred over into other areas of American life. The Great Awakening changed American life on how they thought about and praised the divine, it changed the way people viewed authority, the society, decision making, and it also the way they expressed themselves. Before the Great Awakening life was very strict and people’s minds were
In essence, the Great Awakening was a religious awakening. It started in the South. Tent camps were set up that revolve around high spirited meetings that would last for days. These camp meetings were highly emotional and multitudes of people were filled with the Spirit of God. These meeting, were sponsored mainly by Methodist, Baptist, and Presbyterians, and met social needs as well as spiritual needs on the frontier. Since it was hard for the Baptist and Methodist to sustain local churches, they solved the problem by recruiting the non educated to spread the word of God to their neighbors. The camp meetings eventually favored "protracted meetings" in local churches.
In the essay, “The Second Great Awakening” by Sean Wilentz explains the simultaneous events at the Cane Ridge and Yale which their inequality was one-sided origins, worship, and social surroundings exceeded more through their connections that was called The Second Great Awakening also these revivals were omen that lasted in the 1840s a movement that influences the impulsive and doctrines to hold any management. Wilentz wraps up of the politics and the evangelizing that come from proceeding from the start, but had astounding momentum during 1825.The advantage of the Americans was churched as the evangelizing Methodists or Baptists from the South called the New School revivalist and the Presbyterians or Congregationalists from the North that had a nation of theoretical Christians in a mutual culture created more of the Enlightenment rationalism than the Protestant nation on the world. The northerners focused more on the Second Great Awakening than the South on the main plan of the organization.
Though for a time there were missionaries who encamped in the tribal land, opening up schoolhouses and teaching the Indians proper education in hopes that they could one day succeed in finding a career, these schools were eventually closed. Blackbird clearly recognizes this inadequacy and seeks to rectify the situation by speaking out at the 1855 Council of Detroit. Afterwards, Blackbird recalls writing in an article about “how our educational fund, $8000 per annum had been handled and conducted for nearly twenty years, and yet not one Indian youth could spell the simplest word in the English language,” (44). Despite the fact that he should have had ample funds for college provided by the United States government and how he lived on the absolute bare minimum to get by, Blackbird can not finish his schooling for fear of starving death without enough money for both food and an education. The tribe had high hopes for Blackbird’s brother, William, an aspiring priest, but he was murdered before his ordination by men who were angered that an Indian was as esteemed as they were and because he had been counseling the tribes on their land treaties. Despite not believing this conspiracy at first, Blackbird comments that “Yet it may be possible, for we have learned that we cannot always trust the American people as to their integrity and