Who Is Responsible For The Deaths Of Romeo And Juliet

Secondary characters play a very significant role in William Shakespeare’s famous love tragedy Romeo and Juliet, several secondary character influence the outcome of the play. The characters that are proven to be the most responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet are Lord Capulet, Friar Lawrence, and Tybalt.

One of the individuals who is at fault for the death of both Romeo and Juliet is Friar Lawrence. Due to his own particular obliviousness, everybody imagines that Juliet is dead. Had Friar Lawrence not given Juliet the poison she would never have been placed in such a sensitive situation, which lead her to her death. Friar Lawrence second enormous slip up was giving Friar John a letter carrying important life or death information

to send Romeo. Due to bad timing, this letter had not been delivered, which was one of the reasons as to why Romeo and Juliet took their own lives. The failure of delivering the letter is shown through this specific quote which Friar John mentions, "I could not send it, - here it is again, - Nor get a messenger to bring it thee, so fearful they were of infection" (5.2.14-16. Indicating Friar Lawrence's poor basic leadership once more, this quote superbly demonstrates how he is in charge of the passing of Romeo and Juliet, by picking somebody so untrustworthy as Friar John to send such an essential message.
Friar Laurence's additionally ought to have known better to not trust Friar John with that letter.He is exceptionally thoughtless, on the grounds that he just discloses to Friar John how vital the letter is after he returns from Mantua.In the tomb scene, Friar Lawrence tries to help Juliet before fleeing, when he says, "Stay not to question, for the Watch is coming; come, go, good Juliet, I dare no longer stay" (5.3.158-159) however he is still more worried about himself, rather than Juliet, which brings about her death.

In the first place, the Capulets are at fault for Romeo's and Juliet's death since they are unsupportive, uncaring and uptight.

The Capulets needed to repudiate Juliet when she conceded she would not like to marry Paris. For instance, This is on account of he had arranged Juliet to get married to a man named Paris who was nothing indistinguishable as Juliet. In the event that the father of Juliet would've just listened to her, at that point nothing would have turned out badly, Friar wouldn't have thought of the arrangement and Romeo could have got married to Juliet, however rather Lord Capulet overlooked Juliet and took choices into his own hands when it comes Juliet's marriage. That is the reason I think Lord Capulet is the purpose behind the demise.

Lady Capulet stops caring about what her daughter wants. If she had listened to Juliet then she would not have plotted to get out of the wedding. But however, her uncaring ways led her to ignore the wishes of Juliet. But by not even taking her feelings into consideration, she forces Juliet into seeking a way out of the

marriage.

Tybalt is responsible e of the passing of Juliet and Romeo since he's irritable, hot-headed, and unreasonable.

To start, Tybalt has the urge to murder Romeo, for reasons, at the ball. For instance, “This, by his voice, should be a Montague. Fetch me my rapier, boy. What, dares the slave to come hither, covered with an antic face, to fleer and scorn at our solemnity? Now, by the stock and honor of my kin, to strike him dead I hold it not a sin” (1:5:56­61).Romeo had done nothing to outrage Tybalt at the ball. On the off chance that Tybalt so hot-headed that he would execute in light of the fact that Romeo is a Montague. On the off chance that Tybalt was not all that rash, at that point Romeo would not have killed Tybalt making him get ousted driving Juliet to poison h herself. Next, Tybalt has as of late asserted Mercutio's life, is as yet attempting to inspire Romeo to battle him. For instance, “Thou, wretched boy, that did consort him here, Shalt with him hence” (3:1:131­132).Tybalt is continually searching for a reason to battle Romeo ever in the event that it takes killing somebody to summon him. Tybalt did not drive Romeo to correct retribution upon him, at that point Romeo would not have been ousted and not have been compelled to sneak into the city to recoup Juliet, whom he thought had passed on. At last, Tybalt is attempting to get Romeo to battle with him in the streets of Verona. For instance, “Boy, this shall not excuse the injuries that thou hast done me;

therefore turn and draw” (3:1:65­66). Tybalt acting irrational is forcing Romeo to set his fate up in the path of disaster On the off chance that Tybalt had understood that Romeo had done nothing to make him detest him so much then it would not have constrained Romeo to kill Tybalt making Juliet be constrained into making an arrangement whose result is resulting in their deaths.

In William Shakespeare's play, Romeo and Juliet, the individual’s who is to blame for the passing of Romeo and Juliet is Friar Lawrence, Capulet, and Tybalt. They make many bad choices throughout the play; choices that are unforgivable. When they made such terrible choices, they inevitably doomed Juliet to her death, therefore leading to Romeo taking his life too.