Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Structure of the us court system essay
Structure of the us court system essay
Traits of battered woman syndrome
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In this 1917 short story, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters accompany their husbands to a house where a man named John Wright has been strangled to death. The two women sympathize for the prime suspect of the murder, Minnie Wright after they find evidence in the house that Minnie might not have been treated well by her husband. In “A Jury of Her Peers,” by Susan Glaspell, Minnie Wright’s actions against her husband are justifiable as he is the reason why she lives a joyless life with no hope of relief or release.
It is very hard to justify any harmful act against anyone, let alone murder; however, the botched knitting and dead canary found in Minnie’s house suggests that a history of severe abuse may have clouded the happiness and prosperity of her
…show more content…
and her husband’s marriage. For this reason, it is easy to realize Minnie’s motive for the murder. The story is set in the early 1900’s when there is very little means of entertainment or distractions; therefore, all anyone really has are the people around them to pass the time of day. It is clear that John Wright is not at all the most ideal person to be around, as Mrs. Hale described him as “‘…He was a hard man, Mrs. Peters. Just to pass the time of day with him—.’ She stopped, shivered a little. ‘Like a raw wind that gets to the bone.’” (Glaspell 291). Minnie’s life slowly deteriorates as her husband forces her to live in complete darkness and solitude by robbing her of everything that brings her joy; including her friends. The struggles that this woman endures cannot be realized by many; she is essentially confined in her house with only the company of the cold man she calls her husband. The women express the guilt they feel for not recognizing what poor shape Minnie was in from her marriage and how much she really needed moral support from them. Mrs. Hale says, “‘I stayed away because it weren’t cheerful—and that’s why I ought to have come…I don’t know what it is, but it’s a lonesome place, and always was. I wish I had come over to see Minnie Foster sometimes’” (Glaspell 290). If Mrs. Hale explained how the misery of the house repulsed her to the point where she could not even go to visit her childhood friend, then it is only imaginable the kind of disgust Minnie felt for her life. With John Wright physically absent for the majority of the days and emotionally absent for the remainder of them, Minnie is forced to turn to another outlet to bring her happiness.
Her canary becomes the thread that she holds onto her sanity with; in fact, the two women discuss how Minnie relates to the bird in many ways, they are both “…real sweet and pretty”, but also “kind of timid and—fluttery.” One could even say that Minnie depends on the bird as a friend, her only friend; therefore, when the man that causes her all this pain destroys the only light in her life by strangling her bird, Minnie perhaps hits her breaking …show more content…
point. There is no doubt that Minnie is mistreated and lives an empty life; she has a reason to be angry and vengeful.
From a young age one is taught that it is never okay to take someone else’s life; however, in Minnie’s case, her husband had already taken so much of her life that it is justified for her to settle that score. Minnie’s marriage is so detrimental that it changes her; Mrs. Hale explains, “‘I think maybe that’s why she kept so much to herself. I s’pose she felt she couldn’t do her part; and then, you don’t enjoy things when you feel shabby. She used to wear pretty clothes and be lively—when she was Minnie Foster, one of the town girls, singing in the choir. But that—oh, that was twenty years ago’” (Glaspell 287). With her isolated behavior, shattered spirit, and melancholy attitude Minnie shows symptoms of having a legitimate mental disorder called Battered Woman Syndrome (BWS). An Associate Professor of Clinical Law at New York University, Holly Maguigan explains that “…there are support systems available to women who suffer from a situation of domestic violence and BWS. It’s worth noting, also, that the laws of many states account for violent outbursts by BWS victims.” Everyone has a right to defend themselves and make a joyful life for themselves, it is easier now in this day in age for a woman to take control of her own life since today women and men are supposedly treated as equals. However, back in the twentieth century, this was not the case; women were seen
not heard, and a woman could not take it upon herself to stand up and leave her husband. Minnie was by no means independent, she was the property of her husband and there were no questions asked about it. With that being said, since Minnie does not have the ability to get herself out of her toxic situation, she takes it upon herself to kill the man who is at fault. Even when the two women finally unfold the murder while their husbands are investigating upstairs, they choose not to share what they have learned because they know that Minnie’s actions were necessary. Both Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters understand the struggles of being a woman in that time period. Women were not nearly given the privileges the men were given and they began to realize that this is especially true for Minnie as she did not have any children to ease her time with her oppressive husband; the only relief she did have, such as her bird, was taken from her. She longs to be free and the only long-term escape she can see is to rid him from her life altogether. Therefore, it is clear to see that Minnie takes the necessary steps to improve her life, which is a right that everyone has. This contributes to the strong theme of feminism throughout the story; there is a mutual understanding between the three women. This unspoken relationship can be seen when Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters find the dead canary in Minnie’s basket, “And then again the eyes of the two women met—this time clung together in a look of dawning comprehension, of growing horror. Again their eyes met. And just then there was a sound at the outside door. Mrs. Hale slipped the box under the quilt pieces in the basket, and sank into the chair before it” (Glaspell 291). Contrary to the passive, unintelligent stereotype of the women of that time period, Mrs. Peters reveals her inner strength when she defies her husband by withholding evidence that is important to the case. Instead of following their husbands lead, as they have their entire lives, the women choose to shift their loyalties to Minnie since they relate to what she is going through on many levels. The women know the struggles of oppression in their society, so they opt to protect Minnie and set her free from the twenty miserable years she has paid to this harsh man. In doing this, they show that when it comes down to it, the bond of sisterhood is in fact stronger than that of marriage. It is also ironic that in the male-dominated world of the law, the women are the ones who find the crucial evidence to the case and then conceal it. The men do not suspect anything of the women as they mock them; Mr. Henderson says, “Mrs. Peters doesn’t need supervising. For that matter, a sheriff’s wife is married to the law” (Glaspell 294). However, Mrs. Peters does not agree with this, she not only rejects the way the men think of her, but also the way the men think of Minnie’s actions. This power to reject the men’s opinions and ideas further reiterates the strong feminism theme. In conclusion, Minnie Wright’s actions against her husband are justified as his lack of regard for her throughout their marriage is responsible for the joyless life she lives. John Wright is so detrimental to Minnie’s mental and emotional health that she does not even know who she is anymore. By taking the best years of her life, and destroying the very last bit of happiness she has to hold onto, he makes her drastic decision to resort to murder not only necessary but understandable.
Minnie Wright, John’s wife, is the main suspect. This time, Sheriff Peters asked to bring his wife Mrs. Peters, the county attorney George Henderson, and his neighbors Martha and Lewis Hale to the crime scene. He intended for Lewis Hale, Mr. Henderson and him to solve the case. While Lewis Hale tells the group the details of how John Wright was found, Mrs. Peters and Martha Hale begin looking around the house to judge the state of the crime scene. Before even looking for evidence, Lewis Hale says “Oh, well, women are used to worrying over trifles” (160) to the dismay of Martha Hale and Mrs. Peters. Martha Hale notices that the Wrights’ house was unkempt and sad-looking, which was strange because Minnie Wright used to be a cheerful and meticulous homemaker. Again, Lewis Hale dismisses this as an inconsequential detail, stating that Minnie was just not a good homemaker, even though his wife Martha already told Mr. Henderson that “farmers’ wives have their hands full” (160). A few moments later, the men explore the house, but not before Mr. Hale ironically questions “But would the women know a clue if they did come upon it?” (161). The women began to
In A Jury of Peers by Susan Glaspell, the story revolves around the sudden death of John Wright. There are five characters that participate in the investigation of this tragedy. Their job is to find a clue to the motive that will link Mrs. Wright, the primary suspect, to the murder. Ironically, the ladies, whose duties did not include solving the mystery, were the ones who found the clue to the motive. Even more ironic, Mrs. Hale, whose presence is solely in favor of keeping the sheriff s wife company, could be contributed the most to her secret discovery. In this short story, Mrs. Hale s character plays a significant role to Mrs. Wright s nemesis in that she has slight feelings of accountability and also her discovery of the clue to the motive.
Mr. Hale describes Mrs. Foster as being “queer” or strange. It is know that people in highly stressful situations can behave in a manner that is considered inappropriate such as laughing at a funeral and perhaps Minnie Foster is in such a situation that mental she is struggling to believe what has happened. She may also be in a state of shock causing peculiar behavior and a lack of judgement. Furthermore, the possible motive that Minnie Foster killed her husband over him killing her bird is weak. Mrs. Hale remembers Mrs. Foster as being a normal girl who people adored and yet how could such a normal person commit murder over the death of a bird. Perhaps the bird had died and she simply had not had time to bury the bird. Minnie Foster’s behavior suggest she was in shock over the death of her husband causing her to act strange not because she killed her husband and further the weakness of the suggested motive that she killed Mr. Foster because he killed her bird jumps to a conclusion without clear
“All oppressed people seize whatever weapons they can to fight oppression.” This statement,by John Lowe, proves to be an important aspect of the theme in the short story, A Jury of Her Peers. In this case, the weapon that Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters seize is silence. By keeping their silence, they are withholding what the men want most, which is to find evidence that leads them to know that Mrs. Wright was the murderer. The motives for the murder of Mr. Wright in the short story, A Jury of her Peers, are elaborated throughout the use of flashbacks, an oppressive tone, and omniscient third-person point of view.
Mrs. Hale reminisced on how cheerful Minnie was before she got married to Mr. Wright and told Mrs. Peters that he probably killed the bird. Then Mrs. Peters told Mrs. Hale about a childhood experience. Her pet was killed by a boy and if she was not being held back she confessed she would have hurt him. Both women were sympathetic towards Mrs. Wright’s plight and hid the dead canary.
As the jury, you all have come to the conclusion that my client, Minnie Wright, is guilty of murder, but this crime was not premeditated, it was a crime committed while Minnie was unaware, and in a psychotic episode. Minnie Wright was a lively and carefree spirit before her husband John Wright entered her life, and everything changed for the worse. He kept her from her friends by moving her to a more isolated location, and kept her from calling people, because John Wright did not approve telephones due to the noises they made, and lastly he even went as far as killing her main source of social interaction, her little canary. These factors affected Minnie’s mental health, and she soon broke into a episode of insanity, unknowingly killing her
The House was like her bird’s birdcage she wasn’t allowed out unless told to come out. Mrs. Wright lived a very lonely life. Her husband Mr. Wright was emotionally distant from her. Mr. Wright made her go crazy by killing her precious bird. The reason the house symbolizes isolation was because all Mrs. Wright did was stay in the house and do Housework all day which was pretty normal for a woman to do back in that time period. The bird cage is symbolic for Minnie and her life. She’s was caged just like her pet bird. Mr. Wright caged her from the outside world and since they had no children or telephone in the home to get in touch with anyone on the outside world all she had was him. The bird was symbolic because of the way that it sang. When the bird will sing it will remind Minnie of her old life from when she was young and sang in the choir. The death of the bird was symbolic. “No, Wright wouldn’t like the bird-a thing that sang. She used to sing. He killed that, too”. Mrs. Wright lost it completely when her bird was killed because that was her only source of love, life, and freedom she use to have. Her husband had killed all the joy around her and the last straw for her was when he snapped that bird’s neck, and just as symbolically, he got a taste of his own medicine when she slipped that rope around his neck. Lastly, The Quilt is symbolic because it plays a role in the play. The women notices how the quilt is sewn poorly which means to them Mrs. Wright felt real guilty of killing her husband that she couldn’t sew
Susan Glaspell’s story “Trifles” does not explicitly show that Mrs. Wright killed Mr. Wright. However, the story is filled with symbolisms indicating that she was the murderer. Mrs. Wright was physically absent in the play so the conversation between the two female characters reveal information regarding Minnie. The story is set on a early 20th century household mirroring the life of women around that period. Early then divorce was uncommon and often looked down upon by many. Mrs. Wright kill her husband because she was exhausted from her husband’s oppression and lost control over herself when her husband killed her bird.
When America branched out from England, we continued the mindset of men being the dominant and women being lesser. Slowly over the years, women have been fighting for a higher role in societies eyes. Susan Glaspell expressed how she felt about societies mindset on women in a short story “A Jury of Her Peers”. This story is about a woman, Minnie, who is accused of murdering her husband. A group of officials, a witness and their wives went to the crime scene to find evidence. While they are trying to piece together what had happened, Glaspell shows many different ways women were looked down upon, whether it was disguised in jokes, blatant statements, or just the men’s carelessness.
“Jury of her Peers,” by Susan Glaspell is a story of what can happen when a person is pushed too far. The protagonist, Minnie Wright, is an isolated and hopeless woman. She’s being held in jail, awaiting trial, after a neighbor found her in her home with her husband dead upstairs. A group of people arrive at the Wright house looking for evidence for a motive. Among the group is Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters who are here with their husbands. As the men go upstairs to investigate the crime scene, they are left to also look for evidence. Mrs. Hale starts to notice strange things, like sugar container being left open, and only half of the table being wiped down. As the women continue looking, with some interruption of their husbands, they also discover
"A Jury of Her Peers", written in 1917, is a short story by Susan Glaspell, loosely based on the 1900 murder of John Hossack. It is seen as an example of early feminist literature because two female characters are able to solve a mystery that the male characters cannot. They are investigating the murder of farmer John Wright. The men tell the women to just busy themselves around the house while they go and do the “real work.” Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters, the sheriff's wife, use their deductive skills and knowledge about housework to conclude what had happened to Mr. and Mrs. Wright, also known as Minnie Foster. A skill the men couldn’t use or take into account.
In “A Jury Of Her Peers” by Susan Glaspell, a father and son from town came in to the Wright household and found Mr. Wright dead in his bedroom. The men find his wife in the living room sewing a quilt without a care in the world, aware of her husband’s death. Although Mrs. Wright does not initially appear capable of murder because of her nonchalant demeanor, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale conclude she strangled her husband to death as evidenced by the mangled canary corpse, unhinged birdcage, and the crazily sewn quilt patch.
Minnie Foster was a happy, carefree young woman living without the burdens and constraints of marriage. While gathering items to bring to her in prison, Mrs. Hale describes to Mrs. Peters how Minnie used to be 30 years ago: “She used to wear pretty clothes and be lively, when she was Minnie Foster, one of the town girls singing in the choir” (1129). Later, Mrs. Hale expresses regret for not visiting Minnie more often, and mentions a white dress Minnie used to wear for the choir. This white dress may represent the innocence of Minnie’s earlier life, before she became the cold, lonely Minnie Wright, wife of John Wright. Any joy that Minnie Foster used to experience, she apparently no longer enjoyed as Minnie Wright. As Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters discuss the whereabouts of the canary, Mrs. Hale reminisces about Minnie Foster: “She used to sing real pretty herself”
Hale and Mrs. Peters in this short story, as they turn to an anomalous form of community justice. As mentioned previously, Mrs. Peters is the wife of the sheriff, and she behaves as such—abiding to the law always and nervously reacting when Mrs. Hale tries to verbally justify Minnie’s behavior as they uncover evidence in the kitchen. Mrs. Peters’s demeanor changes after Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale lock eyes and “h[o]ld each other in a steady, burning look in which there [i]s not evasion or flinching. Then Martha Hale’s eyes point… the way to the basket in which [i]s hidden the thing that would make certain the conviction of the other woman” (Glaspell 299). In this instant of community and shared awareness Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters simultaneously choose to flout men and traditional law and do justice their way. By hiding the dead canary, the most damning piece of evidence that Minnie is the killer in a court of law by establishing a motive, they rewrite the definition of justice and disassociate it from law. Their new definition is one that specifies what a peer is further to include gender and situation and considers trifles when making a decision. Mrs. Hale has an effective and amusing way of communicating this idea when she says “the law is the law—and a bad stove is a bad stove” (Glaspell 293). “without saying so explicitly, she proposes and equality of values and perspectives: the patriarchal, abstract
Looking at this essay by Susan Glaspell “ Trifles”, I found this essay very unusual where we see a very strong story about a couple, where John Wright is murder in his house by Minnie Wright. This is a case where I can say it is very unfamiliar, where it reflect the crime scene of revenge from Minnie, based on the fact that John write murder her wife canary and living the bird on the kitchen. This could be the reason or the main purpose on why she murders her husband John; this is a very weird or unusual crime scene. This scene make me think why and how this could be a reason to snap and drive that person to the limits in order to kill someone, but in this case to murder a member of their own family. Later on this case I understand that Mrs.