Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Russian revolution in 1917
Impact of lenin in russia
Impact of lenin in russia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Russian revolution in 1917
labor shortages were bringing down the economy, which caused less productivity in industries. Workers were leaving the cities to become farmers in order to grow their own food. War Communist was introduced in an effort to gain control of the economy and aid in establishing a structured socialist economy.
Lenin was considered one of the foremost revolutionary leaders of the 20th century. Lenin was portrayed as a ruthless and cruel leader, but it was Lenin’s clarity of vision would ultimately guide the Bolsheviks to power. His vision of the future for Russia and the USSR was not so clear. Although he was a revolutionary leader he was not a politician, and his legacy would contribute to the political and ideological, division that led the
Following the Chinese Revolution of 1949, China’s economy was in ruin. The new leader, Mao Zedong, was responsible for pulling the economy out of the economic depression. The problems he faced included the low gross domestic product, high inflation, high unemployment, and high prices on goods. In order to solve these issues, Mao sought to follow a more Marxist model, similar to that of the Soviet Union. This was to use government intervention to develop industry in China. In Jan Wong’s Red China Blues, discusses Maoism and how Mao’s policies changed China’s economy for the worse. While some of Mao’s early domestic policies had some positive effects on China’s economy, many of his later policies caused China’s economy to regress.
During the 19th century, Russia was experiencing a series of changes with its entire nation and society overall. The government was trying to adapt themselves to them at the same time. It was not an easy time period for Russia whatsoever. Vladimir Lenin helped change this.
Throughout the 19th century, capitalism seemed like an economic utopia for some, but on the other hand some saw it as a troublesome whirlpool that would lead to bigger problems. The development of capitalism in popular countries such as in England brought the idea that the supply and demand exchange systems could work in most trade based countries. Other countries such as Russia thought that the proletariats and bourgeoisie could not co-exist with demand for power and land, and eventually resorted to communism in the early 20th century. Although many different systems were available to the countries in need of economic change, a majority of them found the right system for their needs. And when capitalist societies began to take full swing, some classes did not benefit as well as others and this resulted in a vast amount of proletariats looking for work. Capitalists societies are for certain a win-loss system, and many people did not like the change from having there society changed to a government controlled money hungry system. On the other hand, the demand for labor brought the bourgeoisie large profits because they could pay out as much as they wanted for labor.
The Communist Government faced some political and economic challenges in the years 1917-28, with the Civil War leading to economic collapse, mass poverty and political crisis. The Communist Government tried to introduce measures to solve these problems, but with every solution there was more political and economic challenges.
In order to establish whether Lenin did, indeed lay the foundation for Stalinism, two questions need to be answered; what were Lenin’s plans for the future of Russia and what exactly gave rise to Stalinism? Official Soviet historians of the time at which Stalin was in power would have argued that each one answers the other. Similarly, Western historians saw Lenin as an important figure in the establishment of Stalin’s socialist state. This can be partly attributed to the prevailing current of pro-Stalin anti-Hitler sentiments amongst westerners until the outbreak of the cold war.
Both were to attempt to practically apply their respective ideologies whilst attempting to deal with a plethora of prevailing conditions such as internal resistance and civil war, economic collapse and foreign invasion. This paper will examine the similarities and differences between both the ideologies, and the actual economic and political practice, of Lenin and Stalin's beliefs. A significant historiographical issue to be aware of in the comparison of Lenin and Stalin is that between the two, Lenin was by far the greater political theorist and ideologue and yet had much less effective time, 6 years, to put his ideas into practice.... ... middle of paper ...
Lenin made a series of policies throughout the beginning of the Revolution and through his short time in public office that came to be collectively known as ‘Leninism’. There were many things that influenced Leninism, such as Karl Marx. Lenin had read Karl Marx and his...
Every human being leaves an impact on this world. The historical record is full of important people, leaders, thinkers, villains. However, it is rare that a person’s legacy affects as many people as the legacy of Joseph Stalin. Stalin was the tyrannical dictator of the Soviet Union from 1924 to 1953. He was supposed to be the spiritual heir of the first leader of the Soviet state, Vladimir Lenin. In reality, Stalin proved to be a very different personality who forever changed our perception of the idealistic theories developed by Karl Marx and his followers. After Stalin, our ideas of Socialism and Communism were never the same.
Vladimir IIyich Lenin was one of the biggest influences on Stalin and the way he would come to rule the Soviet Union. “In 1922, with Lenin’s strong support, Joseph Stalin was appointed to a newly created post: general secretary (Kort 152).” After Stalin took this position he began appointing loyal allies to key government positions. There was a series of purges from within the party to eliminate careerists who were there for personal advancement. This would end up playing a major role for every regime afterwards but Stalin took it to a new level by killing off anyone who he felt could beat him. Lenin then denounced him saying that he had too much power but it was too late because he died and Stalin started eliminating his competition to become the leader. “Stalin was the only Bolshevik sitting on the Central Committee, the Politburo, the Orgburo, and the Secretariat, the party’s four main power centers (Kort 152).” Lenin gave him too much power and seemed to finally notice when it eventually became too late. Trotsky and Stalin never really seemed to be friends; however, they were both friends of Lenin wh...
In western society, one of the greatest misconceptions about Vladimir Lenin is that he was a ruthless killer that wanted to exploit his people and ruled the Soviet Union with an iron fist. He is often compared to the infamous Joseph Stalin, his successor. While Stalin was a killer who cared little for his people, Lenin wanted to liberate the people that he claimed were being oppressed; the Proletariat or the working class people. He sought to demolish the Bourgeoisie who were the rich factory owners and spread the wealth out amongst the masses. Due to the fact that he died in 1924 three years after the establishment of the USSR, his legacy has been greatly twisted into that of a murderer. It was twisted even further in the post World War 2 years in the west as the war time alliance between the USA and the USSR soured. Whether he is perceived as good or bad, the revolution he commanded in the former Russian Empire had a profound effect on the rest of the world.
Vladimir Lenin was a theorist and communist philosopher during the Russian Revolution and a serious follower of many of the Marxist ideals. He is remembered as one of the greatest revolutionaries in history for many reasons, first being, founding and leading the Bolshevik Party. This contribution led to the creation of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic, which marked the beginnings of the Soviet Union. Lenin later became leader of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, or USSR. While in power he implemented the “New Economic Policy” and oversaw major social reform.
The economic stagnation led to the frustration of the workers because of low payments, bad working conditions, inefficiency, corruption and any lack of incentive to do good work. There were lots of frustrations among the workers in the working field who begin to express their feeling and emotions towards the soviet government. Also, the soviet people were frustrated over the lack of consumer goods which resulted into the collapse of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe.
In his speech, the 144 times Khrushchev talks about Vladimir Lenin or Leninism, it is always about his the communist ideology, a positive way Lenin ruled, or a negative quote Lenin said about Stalin having power. In the beginning of his speech he reminds the audience about their feelings toward Lenin and his ability to rule: “The great modesty of the genius of the Revolution, Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, is known. Lenin always stressed the role of the people”, “Lenin never imposed his views upon his co-workers by force.”, “Lenin resolutely stood against every attempt aimed at belittling or weakening the directing role of the Party”. These quotes emphasize to the audience how Vladimir Lenin was a true communist who believed in equality, liberation, and classlessness; but, they were also used because Khrushchev understood how highly his audience thought of Lenin. His audience’s thoughts about Lenin, combined with repeating and stressing his name near positive words, creates positive memories of a better time and a sense of patriotism for the communist party and communist ideology. This is important because it catches the audience’s attention, making them want to
According to most historians, “history is told by the victors”, which would explain why most people equate communism with Vladimir Lenin. He was the backbone of Russia’s communist revolution, and the first leader of history’s largest communist government. It is not known, or discussed by most, that Lenin made many reforms to the original ideals possessed by many communists during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. He revised Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles’ theories to fit the so-called ‘backwardness’ of the Russian Empire. Lenin’s reforms were necessary to carry out a socialist revolution in Russia, and the contributions he made drastically changed the course of history. It can be assumed that, the Soviet Union would not have been as powerful if it was not for Lenin’s initial advocacy of violence and tight organization.
Vladimir Lenin became the first leader of Soviet Union and was the first communist revolutionary who played a major role in the Russian Revolution. The socialists began the Russian Revolution and created The Socialist Revolutionary party. This created two different groups and ideas; The Bolsheviks and Mensheviks. The Bolsheviks (Reds) won the October Revolution in 1917, led by Lenin. Lenin exemplified the revolution as a seizure of political power by working class. Few years into the revolution, Lenin made some changes. Lenin realized that Russia lacked industry and had to modernize. So, he created the New Economic Policy. If one could travel back in time to early Soviet Russia they would want to go back in time during Vladimir Lenin’s reign because his New Economic Policy