Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What we need to know about white mans burden
Mahatma Gandhi's effort to take independence
Salt march gandhi essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What we need to know about white mans burden
During the 19th century, many countries were going through industrialization leading to cheaper goods and increased output. Due to this, many European countries needed materials in order to keep up with the pace of industrialization. Materials in these European countries were finite and they eventually had to move to other countries in order to obtain their materials. Colonies were formed in order to obtain more resources. The mother countries relied on the colonies for natural resources in order to maintain the newly made industries. One idea used in order to justify colonization was the “White Man’s Burden”. This idea stated that it was the duty of the “superior” power (being the European countries), to spread their ways of life to the “inferior” …show more content…
Kipling says that it is the White man’s “burden” to send their men to these weaker countries in order to shape up these “half-devil and half-child” people. One country that was affected by colonization was India. In 1757, the British owned East India Company took power of India and from then on, India became one of Britain’s most important colony. India provided a source of cotton and tea along with an abundance of material materials. In 1857, after a century of smooth ruling, the Sepoy Rebellion happened. The Indian soldiers rebelled against the East India Company because the Muslim and Hindu soldiers who weren’t allowed to eat beef and pork had to bite the caps off their rifle cartridges which were made out of beef and pork fat. This was the first of many rebellions to come. India was able to gain independence through constant resistance and rebellions to further counteract colonization. The lingering effects of colonization in India are problems between India and Pakistan, After the Sepoy Rebellion, many acts of rebellion and resistance happened in …show more content…
“A Congress consists of from five hundred to one thousand of the political leaders of all parts of India”. By the 20th century, new Indians were on board with the idea of self rule and decolonization from Britain. As Henry Cotton states “There is at the present moment a New India rising before our eyes, a nation in the real sense of actual formation, with common sentiments of interest and patriotism”. It is stated here that India finally has what it takes to become a independent nation without British rule. In 1921, Mahatma Gandhi took leadership of the Indian National Congress. He conducted campaigns of civil disobedience in India such as boycotting British made goods. One of his most famous acts of civil disobedience was the Salt March in 1930. The Salt March took place due to Britain’s monopoly on salt. Britain imposed high taxes on the salt and Gandhi wanted to protest against it. This led to Gandhi walking 241 miles from his base to to a village called Dandi in order to make salt with Britain’s taxes. Many Indians joined along the way and it was the first time many Indians got together in an act of civil disobedience. It was a victory for India as the Gandhi Irwin Pact was signed in
One country that had imperialism was India. By the mid-1880s, the British East India Company controlled three fifths of India. The cause of British domination was that the land was very diverse and the people could not unite and that the British either paid local princes or used weapons to get control. Positive effects of imperialistic rule in India were that the British set up a stronger economy and more powerful industries. They built roads and railroads. British rule brought peace and order to the countryside. They revised the legal system to promote justice for the Indians regardless of class. Indian landowners and princes, who still owned territory grew rich from exporting cash crops such as cotton and jute. The British introduced the telegraph and the postal system as a means of communication. These improvements and benefits from British rule eventually lead to Indian nationalism. The exposure to European ideas caused an Indian nationalist movement, the people dreamed of ending Imperial ...
Not only did the inequality and separation of the Indian society frustrate the citizens of India, but the imperialism Britain had upon them as well. In the early 20th century, Indian nationalists wanted to take a stand against the British rule and make India independent. The British created unfair laws that created a nationalist movement in India to regain their freedom. He believed that there should not be a Caste System because of one’s birth.
The Effects of British Imperialism in India One could approach this topic from two points of view: the British and the Indian. One could choose either party and find very different opinions. When British colonizers first arrived in India, they slowly gained more and more control in India through many ways, the most prominent being trade and commerce. At first, they managed India’s government by pulling the string behind the curtain. However, soon they had acquired complete rule over India, converting it into a true British colony.
In order to understand colonization, it is important to consider the background of the events leading up to colonization. In Spain for instance, the re-conquest of Grenada as well as the search for new trade routes are important events that lead up to colonization. In England, the Civil War between parliament and the monarchy affected colonization as well. The living situation for people in the Holy Roman Empire was deemed not good enough for future generations. The dynamics and developments in Spain, England, and the Holy Roman Empire were all important to the colonization of the New World.
British imperialism on India had many positive and negative affects on both the mother country, Britain and the colony, India. Many people would argue which effects were more prominent in these countries and some would agree that they were equal. But in both cases there were actually both.
The EIC had important allies, which is the reason that the Hindus and Muslims failed. This rebellion did have an important impact though. Rebellion leaders were punished, the EIC was banned from ruling India, and the Queen’s Proclamation was created. Through several movements, India worked towards gaining their independence, even though it was a lot harder than expected. In 1885, Indian liberal nationalists formed the Indian National Congress.
Under British rule in India, the British were harshly oppressive and only interested in exploiting products from India for their own use, causing many Indians to become extremely poor. They became so oppressed they were on the verge of violent civil disobedience, when Gandhi appeared to negotiate with the British threw non-violent tactics such as sit-ins and hunger strikes. The people were supportive on Gandhi and were set to become violent if anything happened to him. Things were resolved without violence.
There is no doubt that British imperialism had a large impact on India. India, having previously been an group of independent and semi-independent princedoms and territories, underwent great change under British administration. Originally intended to consolidate their hold on India by establishing a population that spoke the same language as their rulers, the British decision in the 1830s to educate Indians in a Western fashion, with English as the language of instruction, was the beginning of a chain of events, including a rise in Indian nationalism, that led to Indian resentment of British imperialism and ultimately to the loss of British control over India.
Although there are many other important factors, the main cause of the rise of imperialism was most certainly economic. The Age of Empire, by Eric J. Hobsbawn, provides an interpretation of New Imperialism. Hobsbawn calls imperialism “a natural by-product of the international economy” (Sherman pg 177). He is basically saying that imperialism is dependent on the rivalries of competing industries, which continually drive the international economy. Hobsbawn also dictates the need for external markets. The Industrial Revolution created many products that needed markets, thus creating a need of colonies. Hobsbawn believed that the overproduction of the Industrial Revolution and the Great Depression could be solved. He also realized that many businessmen knew that they could make a large profit off of China’s large population. For example, if every one of the three hundred million Chinese purchased one box of tin-tacks the businessmen knew that there would be a huge profit, consequently increasing the desire for colonization of weaker countries.
In an effort to help free India from the British rule, Mahatma Gandhi once again contributed to a protest against salt taxes, known as the Salt March. This protest advocated Gandhi’s theory of satyagraha or nonviolent disobedience as the nation came together on March 12, 1930 to walk the 241 mile long journey to the shores of Dandi to attain salt. Although some Indians criticized Gandhi for not achieving direct independence from the Raj or British rule, Gandhi’s execution of the Salt March helped to create a stronger nation for the Indians to live in. Gandhi motivated the Indians to act robustly against the injustices of the salt taxes through nonviolent means. This caused Gandhi to create a temporary compromising pact between Gandhi and the British viceroy over the turmoil created by the salt taxes.
There is no doubt that British imperialism had a large impact on India. From positive affects to negative affects, British colonized India. It all started around the 1600’s when the British East India Company entered India. Only as traders, they entered what was known as the Mughal Empire. Around the 1757 Battle of Plassey the Mughal empire fell (Carrick) and it was only a matter of time until the British Raj took their once in a lifetime chance.
The Scramble for Africa occurred because as the slave trade ended, capitalists saw Africa as a continent that they could now exploit through legitimate trade. European capitalists have found new ways to make money off the continent. With greater exploration of the continent, even more valuable resources were found. The encouragement of legitimate trade in Africa brought Europeans flocking to colonize Africa. Africa lost their independence, and along with it, their control over their natural resources.
Colonization can be defined as the action or process of settling among and establishing control over the indigenous people of an area. Many European countries took part in colonization during the age of imperialism, by doing this these countries used their superiority to dominate the economic, political, and cultural life of the weaker nation being colonized. The age of imperialism came at a time after the Industrial Revolution when European nations were seeking new sources of raw materials and markets to sell manufactured products, colonization solved this problem. Industrialized countries of the west sought to expand their economies by obtaining raw materials from their colonies which could be transported back to factories, turned into manufactured goods, and shipped back to the colonies markets for sale. During
Whilst the growth of Indian nationalism put considerable pressure on the Raj, historians offer many interpretations as to the fundamental cause of Independence. Gandhi’s non-cooperation movement and subsequent campaigns meant that nationalism began to appeal to the masses and helped establish a broad based movement for Independence. However, the British were always able to supress the nationalist movements, through reform or by using force, up to the Quit India movement of 1942. British involvement in the Great War and particularly the Second World War placed them in a weaker position economically, whilst the social and political expectations of the Indian people were changing, which strengthened nationalism and discontent.
... march from Ahmedabad to the coastal town of Dandi. This salt march was organized in protest of the Salt Act that gave the British the monopoly of salt production and distribution. Another reason for the salt march was “by encouraging all Indians to defy the Salt Laws by manufacturing and selling salt themselves, Gandhi argued, Indians could collectively challenge the authority of the Raj“(Lakey and Tedla). Initially, Gandhi assumed that he would be arrested as soon as he set out on the 24 day 240 mile march as he had informed the British government that he would be breaking the law. But when he was not arrested, he continued his march and more than 10,000 people joined him. on 5 April 1930, Gandhi picked up the salt and broke the law.