Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Class stratification in modern society
Social class and inequality
Social class and inequality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Where We Stand: Class Matters is an exploration of the class system in the United States and how it intertwines with other crucial themes of today's society like racism, sexism and feminism. Author Bell Hooks emphasises throughout her book the argument that class is an uncool topic to talk about, ignored by mass media, avoided in the private and public dialogue, feared by wealthy and poor. In this book, Hooks focuses on the harm done by such silences and on the consequences that the American capitalist system has on its population at a behavioural as well as psychological level, always focusing on how different social, racial and gender groups are affected by the same system. Each chapter is written as a self-sufficient essay, dealing with …show more content…
a different but related theme, and always getting to the conclusion that the United States need to implement policies to create participatory economics as an alternative economic system to consumer capitalism. Some of the main topics tackled in the text are the role of mass medias, the birth and proliferation of the drug industry, the so-called 'culture of accumulation', greed, feminism and the rise of the new black elite, discriminatory practices in the real estate market The first four chapters of the book are deeply personal, they focus on Hook's personal experience being raised in a family of 'poor agrarian southern black landowners living under a regime of racial apartheid' (p.17). Each family member is described in their personality and in their attitude towards key concepts such as money and race. Furthermore, the importance of the education she received at home thanks to inspiring figures like her grandmother in regards to respecting and identifying with the poor, sharing resources, communalism and working hard are stressed not only in these first chapters but throughout the whole text. Another factor identified by the author as responsible for shaping her economic perspective and lifestyle is the Christian church, which provided values to resist greed and promote solidarity with the poor. These first chapters flow naturally as narrative and cultural critique of the American society, and introduce the readers to a number of themes which reoccur many other times in the following pages. Because every chapter is designed to stand on its own and can be read separately from the rest of the book, reading the entire collection can result in a repetitive experience. In addition to that, some readers may not feel fully involved in the story because it is so personal. For example, great importance is given to religion as an element fostering positive attitude towards discriminated social groups; although this might be appreciated by those readers who share this view, for many others of a different belief or who are not religious at all it might be hard to be feel involved so excessive focus on religion might not provide added value to Hooks's argument. One of the most important themes the book deals with is the role of mass media in the American society.
The author sees medias of all kind (television, newspapers, the Internet...) as covering a negative role especially in the United States, where they extend the values of the ruling class to all other social groups, while creating and broadcasting a negative image of the poor as parasites, predators exploiting the resources provided by the wealthy because of their laziness. Widespread embrace of 'hedonistic consumerism' (p.60) by all people is something Hooks sees as the cancer of American society today. It's a system which has tragic consequences both psychologically and behaviourally on the poor as personal value is considered to depend on material ownership. The desire to be wealthy is seen as the only meaningful aspiration, and the failure to satisfy one's material longings triggers psychological torment and …show more content…
envy. The author condemns the medias' role in creating negative stereotypes about the poor aimed at disempowerment of the whole class, while promoting self-destructive habits like gambling. The worst consequence of this culture of accumulation identified by the author is the drug business it creates in poor black neighbourhoods especially among the youngest, a business which gives disadvantaged people the financial possibilities to buy luxury items they wouldn't normally be able to access. The sections of the book dedicated to this theme are particularly intense as the author, because of her humble origins, feels personally involved. She bases her arguments against the rich on a number of rich individuals she states to have interviewed and they way they view their own class position, and on the testimony of one of the richest men in this society' (p.77) who she has also apparently interviewed but won’t identify. This daring individual admitted that 'what he liked most about his shift from the middle-class to the ruling wealthy elite was the power over others it gave to him, that he could make them do things they ordinarily would not do'. Another central theme the books focuses on is greed and excess. The author directly addresses the 'american dream' as one of the factors responsible for the spread within the new generations of individualism, narcissism, need for material objects. She identifies technological advancement, progress and money itself as further elements leading to greed: the more one's income increases, Hooks states, the more one risks to become excessively protective of their own wealth. Obsessing on accumulation is what leads our society to constantly higher levels of individualism and class segregation. Once again, Hooks focuses on the processes triggered by this consumer capitalist system in poor black areas, like increased violence between minorities which were once united in solidarity, growing illegal drug business, and the loss of real values. This section of the book is without any doubt the most painful to read: the reader is forced to reflect on some of the most worrying social issues of our time as the author urges families of all classes and races to break the silence around money management in households. The chapter about feminism is, for the casual reader, not the easiest. Previous knowledge is necessary to follow Hooks in her historical digression on the liberation and the revolutionary movements. It's a dense and deeply theoretical digression. Nevertheless, the chapter is interesting and informative, and provides crucial information for understanding the current inequality between wealthy and poor black women. Particularly interesting is Hook's argument that as rich women got liberated thanks to the feminist movement and are now able to engage in paid work (even if still under-payed compared to their male counterparts), another group of disadvantaged women got did not gain the same freedom and got trapped by domestic work in the homes of those same women who are now able to take part in the labour market. The author's thesis that rich women want equality with men of their class rather than with their exploited and oppressed sisters depicts the internal collusion which led to the destabilisation of the feminist movement. Related to feminism and its internal division is the so-called 'new black elite'.
Both depict betrayal between members of the same group: class elites in both feminist and black liberation movements distorted the meaning of liberation to protect their own interests which, in this case, is status. The fact that class-based civil rights struggle destroyed solidarity between black people is a central topic in the book. Hooks describes how racism hit wealthy blacks too, who moved into white neighbourhoods, adopted typical white lifestyles and started hiring white underlings as a form of revenge for what they had to go through during the segregation years. The fact that the new wealthy black left the black poor behind is repeatedly attacked by the author, who insists that social mobility doesn't mean betraying those on the bottom. If this is true for mobility of the black population, then it is also true for women's mobility in society. The same concept is used by the author when analysing poverty among white people, an issue purposefully ignored by medias in the United States, who regularly seem to forget that the majority of the poor population is constituted of white
people. Possibly the most effective chapter in the book is the one dedicated to the real estate market and its interconnection with racist discriminatory practices. It's a compelling part of the book with vivid details of racist practices by home sellers, landlords, co-op boards, and it analyses critical episodes like the flight of the whites from neighbourhoods where black population rapidly increases over time, and the gentrification of poor neighbourhoods in big cities. The personal involvement in these practices is described in a way that brings the reader closer to understanding a corrupted system like the one in force in the USA. The last two chapters of the book, 'Crossing Class Boundaries' and 'Living Without Class Hierarchy', work as a summary of the author's arguments and political theories already explained in more detail throughout the book. The main focus is once again on Hooks's personal experience; the narration introduces the reader to intimate and sometimes distressing episodes of her social status advancement, to her determined personality which played a central role in bringing her where she is today. Once again, the relationship with some her relatives is used as an example of the possible dynamics occurring within families in which one member manages to cross class boundaries. Hooks stresses the importance of meaningful solidarity with poor people, which is only possible through a willingness to critically consider where each of us stands within global class hierarchies and to challenge class inequalities through our action. Furthermore, according to Hooks, real social justice requires an 'ongoing consideration of class shaped by a recognition that interdependency sustains the life of the planet' (p.130) The final part of Where We Stand: Class Matter provides a number of policies which, if implemented, would foster the creation of a more equal society; for example Hooks talks about redistribution in organised as well as unorganised sharing, the abolishment of 'projects' in which poor black people live today, the creation of an emotional culture which would change people's opinion on getting and giving, providing affordable education so that everybody has the opportunity to progress in life. Reading the book results in a pleasant experience, the language used is far from the economic jargon most commonly used by other authors in this field, rather it is simple and easily understandable, making the book accessible to a wide range of readers. Published in 2000 in the United States, this text engages in a passionate discussion over a topic often purposefully ignored and avoided by mass medias and political figures. The author's goal is to expose the inconsistent behaviour of wealthy white liberals who claim to be in favour of a multicultural society but, in practice, only want to protect their interests and wealth; Hooks wants to show how today's society is affected by a number of negative stereotypes created to disempower certain social classes, and to destroy these stereotypes by providing new information on the actual socio-political situation in the States. One of her main arguments is that the American society is not in fact as classless as we are often led to believe; social classes still exist and upgrading from a low to a wealthier one is much harder than it seems.
bell hooks reveals that she can only characterize the world as a place where you either have money to spend or you don’t (433). In college, she recollects how her professors and peers reinforced through countless
Growing up in The United States, people are given this idea of an American Dream. Almost every child is raised to believe they can become and do anything they want to do, if one works hard enough. However, a majority of people believe that there is a separation of class in American society. Gregory Mantsios author of “Class in America-2009” believes that Americans do not exchange thoughts about class division, although most of people are placed in their own set cluster of wealth. Also political officials are trying to get followers by trying to try to appeal to the bulk of the population, or the middle class, in order to get more supporters. An interesting myth that Mantsios makes in his essay is how Americans don’t have equal opportunities.
Gregory Mantsios advocates more on the struggle to proceed from one class to another in his essay-“Class in America”. Mantsios states that, “Class standing has a significant impact on our chances for survival....
They frequently kill stories they dislike and in other ways inject their own preferences.” (p. 61). Michael informs the reader how it is rare to see media portray attention to those who are poor and who are undergoing financial instability. In Mass Media: For the Many, by the Few, the author, Michael Parenti, persuades the reader by providing a variety of facts to support his claim. This article is persuasive because it has valid resources to convince that the media is mostly ran by higher corporations. After reading his writing, I was able to see that the media does not illustrate every side to every story. There is much more to nation/world issues than just rich politics, and private
Social class has always been a controversial issue in America. This idea, that individuals are defined by their wealth, is explored by Jeannette Walls in her memoir, The Glass Castle. Walls shows, through a manifold of personal anecdotes, how growing up in a dysfunctional household with financially inept parents affected her and her siblings. Growing up in this environment, Jeannette was exposed to a very different perception of the world around her than those of higher social status. However, despite the constant hardships she faced, Walls makes it clear that a lower social status does not define an individual as inferior to those in a higher class.
Because it is very credible, emotionally appealing, and slightly academically based, bell hooks's essay "Keeping Close to Home: Class and Education" is an essay that I consider to be very touching. While arguing in her essay that the rich class and the working-class should come to respect and understand each other, bell hooks employs three elements of argument: ethos, pathos, and logos. With her usage of ethos, hooks relates her experience as an undergraduate at Stanford. Providing an experience from a time before she went to Stanford, hooks uses pathos to inspire the audience. However, hooks uses logos by appealing to the readers' logic. These readers are the working-class and the privileged, the audience of her book: "Ain't I a Woman: black women and feminism." Relying mostly on ethos, hooks uses the three elements of argument to express her belief that students should not feel the pressure to replace their values with others' values. Because hooks feels strongly about her belief, she argues that a university should help students maintain the connection with their values, so people of different communities will feel neither inferior nor superior to others but equal.
Mantsios believes that Americans do not like to talk about the different classes, whether it is about the upper, middles or lower class. He outlines four myths that are widely held about class in the United States. Myth one the united states is fundamentally a classless society, myth two we are, essentially a middle class nation. Most Americans have achieved relative affluence in what is widely recognized as a consumer society. Myth three we are all getting richer. Each generation propels itself to greater economic well-being. And myth four, everyone has an equal chance to succeed. Requires no more than hard work sacrifice and perseverance (Mantsios).
Bell hooks covers an abundance of issues through different class, race, gender and nation. In her article ‘Feminism A Movement to End Sexist Oppression’ she begins by discussing the oppression of mainly black women who are in a lower class. Hooks discusses if men become associated with the feminist movement it would mainly affect the upper class and middle aged white women while just scratching the surface for working-class and poor women. In the recent article ‘Representing Whiteness in the Black Imagination’ bell hooks discusses the oppression about the racism faced by black people. I find it that this article is more non-intersectional because we are only talking about black people in general. We can only assume that hooks is discussing racism faced by poor black people because they were servants. Further into the article however hooks does focus on African Americans and we read upon what their impression of the white man could be. Hook also looks as students and how racism occurred in one of her class discussions. Finally, we look at the view of two black women and how they faced racism. The first woman was Njeri from ‘Every Good-Bye Ain’t Gone and how her grandfather was run over by 2 white guys. The second woman was Sethe from ‘Beloved’ by Morrision and how she killed her young because she didn’t want them to grow up in a world of terror. I found it that hooks did not say specifically who she is talking about like in her article ‘Feminism A Movement to End Sexist Oppression’ but is targeting the topic of racism all
Karl Marx, one of the founding fathers of Sociology defines class as “those who share common economic interests, are conscious of those interests, and engage in collective action which advances those interest” (Hammond and Chaney, 2012, p.39). The Tortilla Curtain, by T.C. Boyle gives a glimpse of how people from different social classes live, interact and pursue the “American dream.” “Differential association” is a theory that discusses the “distance within the social space,” where social interactions will occur most likely between people who are socially close and relatively infrequently between those who are socially distant (Prandy. 215). It is very apparent in the story that there are separations between classes by the way the author uses the “ wall” as a symbol of such separation. The Tortilla Curtain shows the divide between those who live within the “wall” and those on the outside. Among many social issues discussed in The Tortilla Curtain, social class is one issue that is prominent throughout Boyle’s
Weber, Wright and Tilley each contribute various theories to that can be applied to inequality and stratification within the contemporary United States. Reaching back to Weber’s work on class, status and parties, it is clear that this class is still a relevant concept even today. Weber views the class stratification system as a segmented structure, broken down into the simple components of class, status and party which in turn relate to power within a capitalist society. He defined “class situation” in relation to the following conditions (1) "have in common a specific causal component of their life chances in so far as (2) this component is represented exclusively by economic interests in the possession of goods and opportunities for income,
In our current society, it is acceptable to talk about race or gender. However, when it comes to the subject of class, people tend to tense, and are uncertain as to where they stand. At one time in history money afforded prestige and power, however now, money is a large part of our society and tends to rule many peoples lives. In the book Where We Stand: Class Matters, by bell hooks, she describes a life growing up in a family who had nothing, to now becoming one of America’s most admired writers. She wrote this book because she wanted to write about her journey from a working class world to class-consciousness, and how we are challenged everyday with the widening gap between the rich and the poor. In her book, hook’s describes a life dominated by the haunting issues of money, race, and class.
Paul Krugman, in his article “The Death of Horatio Alger” suggests that social mobility among classes in the United States is becoming more difficult by the day. Krugman explains that the idea of the American Dream and moving from class to class was once semi easily attainable; but is now seemingly impossible. Although America is thought of as a classless society, the country has a whole is moving into a caste society run by the rich.
According to Schwartz-Nobel, America will lose as much as 130 billion in future productive capacity for every year that 14.5 American children continue to live in poverty (Koppelman and Goodhart, 2007). Sadly the seriousness of poverty is still often clouded by myths and misunderstandings by society at large. This essay studies the issue of poverty and classism in today's society.
People in America often suffer from poverty and the treatment that comes with it, throughout their everyday lives. The question raised is why are poor individuals dehumanized by high structures of power? Some people with a higher income feel like they have a choice and a real recourse to justice rather than a lower class individual. They also believe that they are entitled to the world and their opinion matters because of their financial status versus someone who doesn’t have material things. Lessin’s and Deal’s film , Natasha Trethewey’s Memoir, and Bell Hooks’ excerpts, depicts that the poor are often dehumanized and neglected by structures of power, such as the government and media, because of their lack of money and education, however some of structures of power are ignorant to how the lives of poor people really are.
Diana Kendall. “Framing Class, Vicarious Living and Conspicuous Consumption”. Colombo, “Rereading America”. Bedfords/St.Martin. Boston, New York, 2010. 330-348