Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of raising the minimum wage
Negative effects of raising the minimum wage
Negative effects on minimum wage
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effects of raising the minimum wage
UNIT 2 WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
Analyze what happens when a higher minimum wage is enacted (raising a price floor on the price of labor). Will the number of workers hired change? Why? What might be an unintended consequence of a higher minimum wage law designed to help low-income workers?
Enacting a minimum wage, or setting a price floor, above the market equilibrium price can impact the labor market. The supplier will not sell labor below the designated price floor; and, businesses are mandated to pay their workers at least the price floor established by the government. If the minimum wage is set above the market equilibrium price, the number of people seeking for a job would be greater than the jobs available in the market. In other words, there would be a surplus of labor.
When the price floor is set above the market equilibrium price the costs of production will raise thus increasing the price of goods or services. In order to reduce the costs of production, businesses would have to hire fewer workers and this would leave a surplus of workers in the market. Setting the price floor does not create more jobs; instead, the surplus of laborers creates unemployment.
…show more content…
Raising the minimum wage sounds ideal if the workers would keep their jobs. Another consequence due to the price floor is that businesses reduce workers’ benefits, cut working hours, eliminate training, and put out of work to their employees. Finally, a small business might be driven into bankruptcy since they won’t afford to pay the wages established by the government. When small businesses fail, big corporations are the only winners because the can afford to pay their workers above the market equilibrium
Minimum wage is a topic that has been popping up since the 1980s. From whether we should lower it, or even raise it, but now in the 2000s minimum wage has been the center of attention more than ever. There are two sides to this topic of minimum wage; whether it creates more jobs or does not create jobs. Those who argue that raising minimum wage will create more jobs will have a rebuttal which is that it does not only cause the loss of jobs but that it would make things much worse and vice versa for those arguing raising minimum wage will cause loss of jobs. There will be two authors representing opposite views, Nicholas Johnson supporting minimum wage will not cost jobs with his article “ Evidence Shows Raising Minimum Wage Hasn’t Cost Jobs”
Understanding how the minimum wage level functions to affect poverty in a given society is crucial for informing policy in a number of important areas. Indeed, examining the link between poverty and the minimum wage is necessary for policy-makers working to establish sound economic policy as well as labour and social advocacy groups seeking to ensure the minimum wage is at a level sufficient to ensure workers can meet their most basic and fundamental needs. Readers should be concerned with the link between the minimum wage and levels of poverty because poverty is a particularly significant and impactful social issue. High rates of poverty can both negatively impact the economy, as well as contribute to a host of negative social issues. At the same time, there may be questions regarding the impacts to poverty associated with the minimum wage. Research which better clarifies this link is particularly important. For these reasons, investigating the link between the minimum wage and poverty is essential. This essay will provide a summary of two academic journal articles investigating the link between poverty and the minimum wage. Each summary will discuss the particular focus of researchers, the contribution of the study, the methodology employed by researchers, as well as their findings and conclusions. Finally, the essay will conclude with a brief commentary regarding the relevance of these articles to the larger topic, as well as their effectiveness in promoting learning.
The minimum wage is a price floor, creating a surplus of labor. When workers work for less than minimum wage, they are working "under the table" which is illegal. Abolishing the minimum wage would have a great impact on both the employee and the business owner, and have an overall effect on the economy. The minimum wage being abolished would greatly benefit the employee. It would give unskilled and unqualified workers, such as teenagers, college students, interns, and part time workers, the opportunity to be hired, with no discrimination or ranking system....
The minimum wage is denoted in the graph above as W_min and the equilibrium wage rate as W^*. In the absence of the minimum wage, the free market demand and supply forces would equilibrate the labour market at E^* where the quantity of labour demanded equals the quantity of labour supplied. A minimum wage is said to be binding because when it is implemented, no one is legally allowed to pay wages below W_min and this leads to a surplus of labour in the market. At the minimum wage level, W_min , which is higher than the free market equilibrium wage rate, more workers are willing to offer their labour and so the quantity of labour supplied increases to S_min. But at the minimum wage level, quantity of labour demanded, D_min decreases at the marginal cost of labour to a firm increases. As a consequence, the distance D_min to S_min shown in the above graph is a surplus of unemployed labour in the labour
In order to keep the economy from fluctuating too far from equilibrium, the federal government sets price floors on goods and services. This tool, known as a price floor, initializes a minimum wage at which laborers can sell their labor to employers. Typically, the minimum wage depends on rising or falling productivity. It also reflects the inflation rates and the average income needed to reach the standard of living. Standard of living is thought to be improved with a minimum salary making the average level of comfort and self- sufficiency easily obtainable.
Minimum wage workers are enthusiastic about Obama’s plan, but small businesses and the unemployed are not so happy about it. This proposal however is a binding price floor, which is a price minimum, in this case, established by the government. This will incentivize more people to search for work while disencouraging firms to hire new workers or even maintain their current ones. This is an example of a surplus. A surplus is “A situation in which quantity supplied is greater than quantity demanded” (Mankiw 7-1c). In this case, quanti...
Another government-imposed price is the floor price. The floor price is the opposite of the ceiling price. Floor prices are usually set above the EP and benefit the producers. An example of this is shown in the agriculture industry. Since farming is so competitive, prices between farmers are always being lowered. These lowered prices result in many farmers going broke, because they can’t afford to stay in business. By using floor prices, the farmers will have to charge an amount by which they can profit and not have to worry that their competitor has a lower price.
Raising the minimum will end up hurting Americans more than helping them. The people that are for raising minimum wage are people who believe that increasing minimum wage can help those people who are unskilled and need an income they can live on. Yet, raising minimum wage would do the opposite and make employers have to fire people who earn minimum wage, because they can't afford the higher wages. People need to realize that increasing the minimum wage would hurt people more than help them. In the end increasing minimum wage would result in some people being let go, for the reason, businesses can't afford paying them minimum wage anymore.
For many years it has been a matter of conventional wisdom among economists that the minimum wage causes fewer jobs to exist than would be the case without it. This is simply a matter of price theory, taught in every economics textbook, requiring no elaborate analysis to justify. Were this not the case, there would be no logical reason why the minimum wage could not be set at $10, $100, or $1 million per hour.
A price floor is a legally set minimum price for a good or service (Tragakes 92). This is an example of government intervention. The minimum price is set above the equilibrium price in order to reduce quantity demanded. The governments of England and Wales have decided to set a price floor for alcohol. The result will be a surplus or, in other words, an excess in supply of alcohol. Alcohol has a very price inelastic demand. The price elasticity of demand is a measure of the responsiveness of the quantity of a good demanded to the changes in its price (Tragakes 47). This price floor in England and Wales has had an effect on the sales of alcohol as illustrated in the following diagram:
Younger applicants are less likely to obtain a job due to the inexperience. With an increase of wage, it is true it may attract more applicants but it does not guarantee a job. If the minimum wage exceeds the market wage, which is determined by supply and demand, this would cause employee to have hours cut or even terminated. Expressing statistically in a pros and cons argument, “In a survey of 1,213 businesses and human resources professionals, 38% of employers who currently pay minimum wage said they would lay off some employees if the minimum wage was raised to $10.10.” (Unknown, n.d.) With every 10 percent increase in the minimum wage, this leads to a 1 to 3 percent decrease in employment of low-skilled workers, which ultimately leads to a rise in unemployment. If hours are not cut and employees are not let go, businesses would be forced to fall. Minimum wage is not considered a livable affordable wage this is a problem for unskilled, uneducated people straining to start a career, or feed a family. To fix that problem the government would raise the wage to ignorantly short-term fix a problem, causing a long-term issue of inflation. Increasing minimum wage causes the worth of the dollar to decrease and ultimately causing inflation and rise of prices in all
... it. Another example imagine three competing coffee shops. All three need to make a certain profit margin to stay in business and make their effort worthwhile. Then they all three coffee shops will lower their prices as much as possible while still covering that necessary profit margin. If one of the shop tries to charge more, customers will simply go to the competitor shops. Wages are prices of labor, so the minimum wage is a price control. Like any price control, it has a ripple effect prices of other services and goods have to compensate. When an employer's labor costs go up, he has to lay off workers and/or increase the prices of what he sells.
Lipsey and Chrystal (2015) state that “an effective floor price may well lead to an excess supply [of labour]-in this case, unemployment.” This can be due to the fact that some firms will not be able to afford the floor price set by the government and they are vulnerable to ‘offshoring’ jobs to distant countries where the unskilled labour is cheaper. The diagram below shows how there should be an excess supply of labour if the government were to impose a national minimum wage above the current equilibrium, as they plan to increase the minimum wage to £7.50 in April 7017. When there is an excess supply in a market the theory of competitive markets suggests that prices would fall until the competitive price is met, however wages cannot simply ‘fall’ if legislation does not allow
This essay will mainly focus on employers and employees. The graph below shows that an imposition of a minimum wage would likely cause an increase in unemployment. In this case, because the NLW is higher, it is forecasted to have a negative impact on employment
In the long run, a binding price floor will cause market entrance in perfectly competitive markets, which results in an increase in the supply. This is represented as an outward move/change of the supply curve as firms (dairy farmers) are able to sell their product (dairy product) above the average total cost, which in turn generates an economic profit. Since prices cannot fall, the economic profits may not fall to the normal, causing continued firm entrance and more surpluses which may make the price floor impossible to maintain in the long