Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of knowing foreign cultures through literature in Jhumpa Lahiri
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Jhumpa Lahiri’s short story, “WHEN MR.PIRZADA CAME TO DINE”, tells a tale of the interactions of an Indian family (living in Boston) and their Bengali friend who comes to spends most of his time in their house. The story is narrated by the Indian daughter, Lilia, and revolves around the Bangladesh Liberation War (1971). Lahiri’s writing makes the assumption that the leader is ignorant of the events in this story and forms her character to respond to this idea; she uses her characters to represent aspects of American society, to show that it is too egocentric and lacks understanding and concern for other ethnicities and countries. Lahiri uses her main character, Lilia, to represent the mindset of a majority of Americans and the reader. Despite …show more content…
Lahiri introduces the topic when Lilia’s father asks “what is she learning” (Lahiri 616). What they learn is “American history” and “American Geography”, and “this year and every year… we began studying the Revolutionary War” (Lahiri 616). The repetition of “American” reinforces the idea of the self-centered attitude of American culture, they are not learning about the history of other countries, or where they are located. Lahiri also points out the redundancy with the learning of the American Revolution. The keep learning the same American centered history again and again, when they could be learning about other countries. The egotistical attitude of the American education system revels itself again when the teacher, Mrs. Kenyon, catches Lahiri reading and learning about Pakistan. Seeing the book was not affiliated with Lilia’s upcoming report on the Revolution, the teacher says “I see no reason to consult it” (Lahiri 619). The teacher serves as representative of the American education, and we see a repression of a search for knowledge and understanding of a different nation. Lilia is trying to gain an understanding of another culture and its history, but because it’s not about America she
Deborah Ellis’ novel Parvana gives the audience an awareness of how being literate is a struggle in Afghanistan but how experiences, society and the people that surround Parvana can educate one’s mind logically. The story exemplifies the experiences of daily life growing up as a female in a country embroiled with civil war. Parvana may be put in a position where she is unable to obtain a formal education however; this didn’t deter her from being educated about life lessons, maturity and morals. The author intends on sharing with the audience that even though there are many obstacles for Parvana she still
Naeem Murr's novel, The Boy, is a story about a boy that is put into foster homes all of his life. This boy is exposed to all different kinds of influences that affects his life in a negative way. These are the things that cause the argument in the story; is the boy evil or not?
In Woman on the edge of time the main character Connie is a downtrodden mexican-american woman who has struggled against economic hardship to make something of herself only to end up in a mental institution. She is very cynical and not very likeable. When she first arrives in the future world she is shocked by how backwards everyone is living, how her grandparents did when she was a child. She doesn’t understand there values because they are so different from everything that connie grew up knowing. Connie is unlikeable because the intent of the novel is to win you over the way that connie her self is won over by luciente wether she is a figment of Connies imagination or a person from the future of society. We are Connie, Marge Piercy wants to win you over to her way of thinking about the world. Being a revolutionary at heart Marge Piercy encourages you to question anything and everything. She attempts to undo through Luciente the way of thinking society has instilled in connie from the beginning. Since we are connie she wants to encourage us to question any type of authority that attempts to influence the way you see the world.
In her novel The Daughter of Time Josephine Tey looks at how history can be misconstrued through the more convenient reinterpretation of the person in power, and as such, can become part of our common understanding, not being true knowledge at all, but simply hearsay. In The Daughter of Time Josephine claims that 40 million school books can’t be wrong but then goes on to argue that the traditional view of Richard III as a power obsessed, blood thirsty monster is fiction made credible by Thomas More and given authenticity by William Shakespeare. Inspector Alan Grant looks into the murder of the princes in the tower out of boredom. Tey uses Grant to critique the way history is delivered to the public and the ability of historians to shape facts to present the argument they believe.
Lahiri, a second-generation immigrant, endures the difficulty of living in the middle of her hyphenated label “Indian-American”, whereas she will never fully feel Indian nor fully American, her identity is the combination of her attributes, everything in between.
Mukherjee begins her essay with an exposition of her and her sister’s story. She uses repetition in order to emphasize the main differences between the two. For example, she states, “I am an American citizen and she is not. I am moved that thousands of residents are finally taking the oath of citizenship. She is not.” This line is used to set up her subject. She is stating that she is an immigrant whose dream was to envelop the American culture, while her sister does not believe that she should be assimilated into it. The use of repetition also appeals to her audience, Americans, by capturing their attention. Many Americans are nationalistic, if not jingoistic, and believe that America is the greatest country in the world. The notion that others do not feel this way may intrigue them, or potentially offend them, causing them to read on in attempt to find flaws within her argument.
Jhumpa Lahiri in The Namesake illustrates the assimilation of Gogol as a second generation American immigrant, where Gogol faces the assimilation of becoming an American. Throughout the novel, Gogol has been struggling with his name. From kindergarten to college, Gogol has questioned the reason why he was called Nikhil when he was a child, to the reason why he was called Gogol when he was in college. Having a Russian name, Gogol often encounters questions from people around him, asking the reason of his name. Gogol was not given an Indian name from his Indian family or an American name from the fact that he was born in America, to emphasize that how hard an individual try to assimilate into a different culture, he is still bonded to his roots as the person he ethnically is.
Imagine walking into a deserted town, exhausted from the scorching rays of the sun. It becomes more and more difficult to muster up the last ounce of energy to take another step, and eventually you drop to the ground. In this example setting is enhanced in a way that a tone of hopelessness for the character is developed. First, the setting is developed in a manner that places a hardship on the character. Furthermore, the town is devoid of life ensuring that any help to the character is out of the question and the sun itself is creating the hardship for the character. Similarly, Juan Rulfo uses the setting of his novel, Pedro Páramo, in order to influence the tone, which ultimately leads to his purpose of writing the novel. Comala, the location where the events of the novel takes place, is depicted in a way that parallels Purgatory, while the timeline is distorted so that the barriers between past and present are distorted, for the purpose of creating an intended effect on the reader.
to America with grace and compassion. This story by Jhumpa Lahiri, is an allegory establishing an identity with using symbolic meaning between two cultures that intersect. The themes throughout the story refer to immigrant experiences, the conflict of cultures, the contrast of assimilation and the connection between generations. The Namesake, opens the worlds of emotions Ashima experiences, while straddling her two worlds. This story of identity allows readers to travel with Ashima on an intimate journey through her life as an immigrant.
The author of the story was born in 1967 in London, and soon after she moved to Rhode Island in the United States. Although Lahiri was born in England and raised in the United States and her parent’s still carried an Indian cultural background and held their believes, as her father and mother were a librarian and teacher. Author’s Indian heritage is a strong basis of her stories, stories where she questions the identity and the plot of the different cultural displaced. Lahiri always interactive with her parents in Bengali every time which shows she respected her parents and culture. As the author was growing up she never felt that she was a full American, as her parents deep ties with India as they often visited the country.
The broad and diverse education in America allowed Khandra to broaden her views and give her the freedom that she wanted. She was able to learn about many different views and cultures which she would not be able to learn about in her home country, Syria. In college, Khandra learns much more about the world. The book states, “Khandra felt as if she were standing atop two earth plates grinding as the moved in different directions. The one directly under her was the view of Islam she’d grown up knowing.
In “My Two Lives” Jhumpa Lahiri talks about her hardship growing up in America coming from two different cultures. At home she spoke Bengali with her parents, ate with her hands. According to Jhumpa’s parents she was not American and would never be. This led her to become ashamed of her background. She felt like she did not have to hide her culture anymore. When Jhumpa got married in Calcutta she invited her American friends that never visited India. Jhumpa thought her friends would judge from being part of the Indian culture and isolate her.However her friends were intrigued by her culture and fascinated. She felt like her culture should not be hidden from her friends anymore, and that coming from an Indian-American culture is unique. Jhumpa believes that her upbringing is the reason why she is still involved with her Bengali culture. Jhumpa says“While I am American by virtue of the fact that I was raised in this country, I am Indian thanks to the efforts of two individuals.” Jhumpa means that she is Indian, because she lived most of her life and was raised here. In the story Lahiri explains that her parents shaped her into the person she is. Growing up coming from two different cultures can be difficult, but it can also be beneficial.
Some people believe that opposites attract. Others believe that people who are more similar will have a better relationship. Some prefer relationships with older people, and some prefer them with younger people. Jhumpa Lahiri, author of the short story collection Interpreter of Maladies, explores the dynamic of relationships in her works. In her short story “Interpreter of Maladies” a married woman confesses a secret to a man she barely knows. In her story “This Blessed House” a couple fights over the religious relics they find in their new home. While one reads Lahiri’s stories, a theme begin to emerge that shows the woman of the relationship behaving like an adolescent and the man behaving like her father due to the internalized idea of
Lahiri Jhumpa was born in July 11, 1967 in London, England. She is known for being a novelist and short-story writer where she has received an National Humanities Medal (2015) and Pulitzer Prize. Her parents ,both educators, was devoted to informing Lahiri of her East Indian culture and also to have pride in who she is. Which is why she is also a political activist for those are can not fight for themselves (Encyclopædia Britannica). Inspiring from her influence for social change is a texted called A Temporary Matter that takes place in dining room that is filled with secrets is where Lahiri unravels the heartbreak that troubles the married couple Shoba and Shukumar.
...shown through Lenny’s point of view. Prior the partition, Lahore was a place of tolerance that enjoyed a secular state. Tension before the partition suggested the division of India was imminent, and that this would result in a religious. 1947 is a year marked by human convulsion, as 1 million people are reported dead because of the partition. Moreover, the children of Lahore elucidate the silences Butalia seeks in her novel. The silence of survivors is rooted to the nature of the partition itself; there is no clear distinction as to who were the antagonists. The distinction is ambiguous, the victims were Sikhs, Hindus, and Muslims, and moreover these groups were the aggressors, the violent. The minority in this communal violence amongst these groups was the one out-numbered. This epiphany of blame is embarked in silence, and roots from the embodiment of violence.