When we think of God, we associate good, light, force, and entity. Basically every good thought or anything associated with good is directed towards God. Likewise, when we think of the Devil, we automatically think of evil, and darkness. Every negative thought and bad emotion is linked with the Devil. This thought process is similar to the notion of dualism. The literal definition of dualism is the division of something conceptually into two opposed or contrasted aspects, or the state of being so divided. For example, concepts of dualism would be good v. bad, ying v. yang, light v. dark, and purity v. impurity.
When asked the question, “What is the opposite of God?” most would answer the devil. Although these are two opposing forces and scripture always mentions a righteous one referring to God, while the other one is evil referring to the Devil, this view would be controversial to orthodox thinkers. For starters, in order for God and Satan to be two opposing forces, they would first have to be equals. Their equality would be equals in all sense meaning their force, qualities and powers are the same. For many orthodox thinkers they would clearly deny this. For them, God is above Satan in every way possible. God and Satan cannot be equals. So when asked the question again, “What is the opposite of God?”, the correct answer would be “No God” because that would be the true opposite of God. “The opposite to force is not another force, but the absence of force”. In other words, the opposite of God is the absence of God.
One proponent for dualism was the Gnostics. This group promoted the concept of dualism by stating that reality is broken down into two “equal and opposite forces of good and evil”. In addition, the Gnostics used the...
... middle of paper ...
...ood v. evil, light v. dark, basically God v. Satan. However in every battle, the humans are merely pawns between these two forces. Although this is based on a dualistic view, orthodox thinkers would disagree. No entity especially Satan is equal to God. Although Satan is a fallen angel, the Devil still carries out God’s will when God allows him to. Basically, “the creation of God is good, but fallen.”
Works Cited
1. Wheeler, K. "Heresy Handout: A Convenient Guide to Eternal Damnation." N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Dec. 2013. .
2. McDonald, James. "The Cathars: Cathar Beliefs." The Cathars: Cathar Beliefs. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Dec. 2013. .
3. Slick, Matt. "Gnosticism." What Is Gnosticism? Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry, n.d. Web. 20 Dec. 2013. .
This thesis is shown by John Hick in his article Evil and Soul-Making. As Hick explains, humans already exist in God’s image but have “not yet been formed into the finite likeness of God . . . Man is in the process of becoming the perfected being whom God is seeking to create. However, this is not taking place – it is important to add – by a natural and inevitable evolution, but through a hazardous adventure in individual freedom . . . this involves an accumulation of evil as well as good” (Hick 1-2). In other words, humanity is slowly progressing toward a world in which evil does not exist, as implied by the term “finite likeness of God,” but in order to reach that state, we must first deal with acts of evil, in order to learn what good truly is. On a personal level, this is known as soul-builder
Good, is portrayed by God, and evil seems to be what fate has in store for the
Even though evil is very real it has no existence of its own. Evil is an absence of something, it is not a “thing” itself. Evil is a lot like cold which is the absence of heat. So evil can be nothing without something.
Smart, Ninian. "Blackboard, Religion 100." 6 March 2014. Seven Dimensions of Religion. Electronic Document. 6 March 2014.
Mann, Mark Grear. “Religious Pluralism.” Philosophy of Religion. Ed. Thomas Jay Oord. Kansas City: Beacon Hill Press, 2003. Print.
New Revised Standard Version. New York: American Bible Society, 1989. Print. The. Russell, Eddie.
"EXPLORING THEOLOGY 1 & 2." EXPLORING THEOLOGY 1 2. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 May 2014.
Otto, Rudolf. The Idea of the Holy. Trans. John W. Harvey. New York: Oxford UP, 1958. Print.
Everett F. Harrison, editor-in-chief, Baker’s Dictionary of Theology. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Book House, 1960, pg. 356.
The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume XI Copyright © 1911 by Robert Appleton Company by K. Knight Nihil Obstat, February 1, 1911. Remy Lafort, S.T.D., Censor Imprimatur. +John Cardinal Farley, Archbishop of New York
Livingstone, E.A., ed. 1997. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. 3 ed. Ed. the late F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone. New York: Oxford University Press, USA.
Eastman, Roger. The Ways of Religion: An Introduction to the Major Traditions. Third Edition. Oxford University Press. N.Y. 1999
Reese, William J., Emily Dykman, Michael Lopez-Kaley, and Laura Nettles. Christian Theology: Scripture, Tradition, and Practice. Kearney, Neb.: Morris Pub., 2012. Print.
The third term is diabolic dualism is almost the same as dualistic, but is more elaborate and is seen as personified evil. The personified evil it can creep into our consciousness, in our thoughts and could make suggestions or to give us ideas, and it starts mixing with our thoughts that not belong in our consciousness.
Lutzer, Erwin. The Doctrines That Divide: a Fresh Look at the Historic Doctrines That Separate Christians. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1998.