What Would the World Be Like Without Happiness?

1325 Words3 Pages

What would the world be like without happiness? Would someone miss being happy if they never experienced it and if a choice was given would you alter your chosen happiness? These are all questions nozick intends to answer with his direction of happiness as well as his machine. Nozick talks about emotions and how they affect our world. He also talks about how emotionless people tend to be better off, so what would happen if we chose to pick neither of his choices. Would we better off or would we be worse off? This question will depend on whether or not Nozicks arguments are flawed, if they are than it would not make sense to choose either one. According to Nozicks experiments happiness is not all people consider when they live their lives because if it was just happiness than they would be content with the small amount of happiness they get. If Nozicks arguments are proven to be flawed, then I would choose to rebuff both while creating my own choice of how I would desire to experience my happiness.
The first point Nozick makes is that happiness is not all people think about, in fact it is only a part of it. He demonstrates this by considering two lives with the same amount of happiness in them. However one slopes continuously upward to increasing happiness as time goes on while the other life slopes continuously downward. The interesting aspect of this experiment is that all though both have the same amount of happiness, the way you reach your happiness will be the deciding factor. Despite the equal amount of happiness, the first option is obviously the more desirable life. Both lives have their perspective highpoints as well as their low points. For instance the ability to grow your happiness is an amazing theory however you wil...

... middle of paper ...

...nts he refers to. The first experiment is a mathematical scenario which offers oneself to choose whether they would take a life that offers an increasing slope of happiness or if they would take a decreasing slope of happiness. He states that people will choose life A because it is more promising and that people will have something to live for. His second experiment is the experience machine, which is a machine that is hooked up to oneself that relays good virtual experiences that causes one to be happy. The flaw to that is whether this machine is connected all the time because if not than the happiness will not be continuous. Either way both experiments had their highs and lows however I decided that it was better to choose neither experiment because both are depressing in some way which is why I choose to live an unexpected life with sporadic moments of happiness.

Open Document