Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Colonial resistance to British policies
Consequences of British imperialism
How was thomas paine role of the decleration of independence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Colonial resistance to British policies
Everyday we go through our lives with a sense of freedom and liberty in America. Although this freedom feels secure and everlasting there was time in our history that wasn’t similar. Before the United States of America, the east coast of this country was made up of many colonies. These colonies were extensions of the British reigns. During this time period the goals of every country were to expand land overseas and have the most gold in their treasury. These goals can be defined by the word mercantilism. As these colonies in North America further developed and established themselves independently without the help of Britain they began to feel more entitled and slowly became frustrated with the economic policies pushed on them by Britain. As …show more content…
acts such as the Intolerable Acts, Stamp Acts, and Tea Acts presided over the economy tensions grew higher and higher. Now, many colonists were eager to secede from their mother country and become independent politically, economically, and socially. This sparked a series of battles that are extremely important to our American history. The revolutionary war was waged by the colonists. I believe that the colonists were justified in waging war with Britain because of the unfair treatment imposed on them legally and the violence ensued upon them leading up to the declaration of war. To start off Britain was imposing ridiculous taxes and legal inquisitions on the colonies that could be deemed unconstitutional.
The mother country taxed the colonies without any representation in parliament. This is where the popular sentiment “no taxation without representation” originated from. John Dickinson, a Pennsylvania politician noted that the Stamp Act was “...unconstitutional and… destructive to the liberty of these colonies.” (Document 2) The Stamp Act was one of many acts applied to the colonies that raised excessive amounts of revenue for the British Crown and unjustly depleted the economy of the colonies. The British Crown viewed the colonies as their property, existing simply to make them money. As the colonies furthered developed they became tired of existing to benefit a distant mother country. They were eager to establish themselves and develop a working economy that could possibly flourish into an independent body. At the Second Continental Congress on July 5th, 1775 Thomas Jefferson wrote that the colonies are being “...reduced to the alternative of choosing an unconditional submission to the tyranny of irritated [British officials].” (Document 5) The colonies were tired of being unconditionally controlled from someone so distant physically and metaphorically. Because of the tyranny and economic strain constantly opposed on the colonies their justification to wage war in order to obtain freedom was …show more content…
justified. The British Crown also imposed violence on the colonies at times of dissent.
Although it can be debated by historians, the bottom line is that lives of colonists were lost at the Boston Massacre. It is made clear that “soldiers fired into the crowd,” leading to the conclusion that “several people were dead and more were wounded.” (Document 3) Colonists grew enraged and felt cheated of their liberties more than ever after violence ensued. They now no longer just felt economically betrayed by their mother country, but they felt physically betrayed. Because of this anti-British spirits were high in the colonies. Thomas Paine furthered America’s anger towards Britain's violence when he pointed out the Battles Of Lexington and Concord. He notes that “No man was a warmer wisher for a peaceful settlement than myself, before the fatal nineteenth of April, 1775 [the battles at Lexington and Concord, Massachusetts, occurred on this day], but the moment the event of that day was made known, I rejected the hardened, sullen tempered [King of England] forever.” (Document 6) The violence that the British Crown ensued upon the colonies made them eager to separate themselves completely. Their people blood on the soil they cultivated enraged them enough to wage a war for their own freedom. I believe the colonists were justified in waging war because of the violence expressed towards them by the British
Crown. Overall we can thank the colonists who waged war many years ago for the lives we live today. Without these liberty fighters and patriots it is possible that America would not exist, and would simply be apart of the British Crown. The colonists made it evident in the Declaration of Independence that “Great Britain is a history of injuries and usurpations,” because of this they fought for their freedom and declared war on Great Britain. (Document 7) I believe that the colonists were justified in their waging of war due to the unfair legal impositions forced on them by the British, and because of the violence ensued by the British.
From 1754-1763, Britain fought the French and Indian war. Although Britain had won the war, they still had a lot of war debts to pay off. Britain turned to the colonies to pay off their debts by taxing them. The taxes angered the colonists because they believed it violated their rights. Benjamin Franklin had initially proposed the Albany plan of Union to unite the colonies, however this law was rejected by all of the colonial governments. It wasn't until after all of the British laws and taxes that the colonies would unite and write the Declaration of Independence.
The British were facing economic difficulties after the French and Indian war; therefore, they passed taxes on the colonies to help repay the debt. Initially, the British introduced the Sugar Act in 1764. The colonists did not approve of the British taking control over them. The colonists opposed the Sugar Act because they had to pay three cent tax on sugar. In addition, the Sugar Act increased the taxes on coffee, indigo, and wine. This act was the start of colonist frustration. Subsequently came the Stamp Act the following year in 1765. The Stamp Act was the mind changer for many colonists known as the Patriots. The Patriots started forming as a result of England enforcing acts. The patriots believed the colonies should go to war and separate
When the colonies were being formed, many colonists came from England to escape the restrictions placed upon them by the crown. Britain had laws for regulating trade and collecting taxes, but they were generally not enforced. The colonists had gotten used to being able to govern themselves. However, Britain sooned changed it’s colonial policy because of the piling debt due to four wars the British got into with the French and the Spanish. The most notable of these, the French and Indian War (or the Seven Years’ War), had immediate effects on the relationship between the colonies and Great Britain, leading to the concept of no taxation without representation becoming the motivating force for the American revolutionary movement and a great symbol for democracy amongst the colonies, as Britain tried to tighten their hold on the colonies through various acts and measures.
The colonists were in every right, aspect and mind, not only justified but also it was about time that they stood of and actually take action against the British. The choice of going to war with them, was the only choice that they had. All diplimatical options that they had ceased to stand a chance against the tyrant Britain. From the very beginning when the colonists felt upset against their mother country and the way that they went about the law making, up until the beginning of the war, they tried all diplimatical options that they had, by sending letters, you name it. When they didn’t work then they had no other means but to declare war.
During this entire period the British were starting to make attempts to intimidate the colonists in hopes to end the rebellions. It seemed that the more and more England tried to scare the people, the angrier they got. The tactics obviously didn't work, but instead pushed the colonists even further into standing up against Britain. The British soldiers in America were told not to entice violence, and especially not to kill anybody.
About one-third of the colonists were patriots who were ready to take any means necessary to fight for independence for their country. The patriots were so passionate about their cause that they would torture or even kill loyalists or indifferent people. Because of this strong passion, the colonists had much more to gain then the British had to lose. The British had other colonies and other forms of export and import to create a profit, but if the Colonists lost they would have lost their independence and freedom.
In this political philosophy the colonies had originally made a charter with the king who set a custom that he was to provide for the defense of the colonially while each colony maintained the right to legislative self-rule. Jefferson would state, “the addition of new states to the British Empire has produced an addition of new, and sometimes opposite interests. It is now therefore, the great office of his majesty to resume the exercise of his negative power, and to prevent the passage of laws by any one legislature of the empire, which might bear injuriously on the right and interest of another” (A Warning to the King: Thomas Jefferson, “A Summary View of the Rights of British-America”, Green, p. 234). In other words, for Americans to preserve the true ancient British constitution, it was vital to establish that parliament did not have authority over them, because they could never be required to give up actual popular consent or governance in the British Parliament. Thomas Hutchinson stated this idea clear, “The king might retain the executive power and also his share of the legislative without any abridgement of our rights as Englishmen, the Parliament could not retain their legislative power without depriving them of those rights, for after removal they could no longer be represented, and their sovereign, sensible of this charter or commissions made provision in every colon for legislature
The British were to fault for the Boston massacre making it a great historical tragedy in our country. A reason why the Boston Massacre was the fault of the British is because they killed the colonists by firing their weapons in the crowd of 30-40 colonists. In the text it says (Boston massacre 2). "30-40 persons, mostly lads…the soldiers pushing their bayonets into people...the Captain
Another reason the Colonists were justified in waging war was because of the Boston Massacre. The Boston Massacre occurred on the evening of March 5, 1770. A crowd of people began harassing the soldiers. One event led to another and the crowd began hurling snowballs and rocks. One of the snowballs struck a soldier and he fired his weapon, causing a series of shots toward the crowd.
(140) It was during this time period that “the government in London concerned itself with the colonies in unprecedented ways…to help raise funds to pay for the war and finance the empire.” (Forner 141) The British government was heavily in debt after fighting the Seven Years War on several fronts. The need to raise funds was paramount and the colonies were a ready source. The British government started imposing taxes on the colonies as a means of income. This was a change in the relationship between America and the mother country. Many Americans opposed these taxes. (Forner 142- 143) According to Forner, “Opposition to the Stamp Act was the first great Drama of the revolutionary era and the first major split between the colonist and Great Britain over the meaning of freedom.” (142) This act was eventually repealed by Parliament in 1766 after great opposition by Americans. (Forner 144) The Stamp Act was just the beginning of several events and taxes on the colonist leading up the Boston Tea
After the Great War for Empire, the British parliament began carrying out taxes on the colonists to help pay for the war. It was not long from the war that salutary neglect was brought on the colonies for an amount of time that gave the colonists a sense of independence and identity. A farmer had even wrote once: “Here individuals of all nations are melted into a new race of men, whose labours and posterity will one day cause great changes in the world” (Doc H). They recognized themselves as different than the British, so when parliament began passing bills to tax without representation there was an outcry of mistreatment. Edmund Burke, a man from parliament, sympathized with the colonists: “Govern America as you govern an English town which happens not to be represented in Parl...
On March 5, 1770, an event occurred in Boston, which consisted of British troops shooting upon colonists. People refer to this as a massacre, but they only look at one side of the story. The Boston Massacre in 1770 was not really a massacre, but a mutual riot (Boston Massacre History Society). British soldiers went to America to keep the people of Boston in order. However, the soldier's presence there was not welcomed by the Bostonians and this made things worse (Boston Massacre History Society). The British had to fire their guns because the Bostonians were antagonizing the soldiers, which caused five people to die. The Bostonians made the soldiers feel threatened so in turn they acted in self-defense. The British soldiers and their Captain had to go through a trial, to prove they were not to blame for what had occurred.
The Boston Massacre is considered by many historians to be the first battle of the Revolutionary War. The fatal incident happened on March 5 of 1770. The massacre resulted in the death of five colonists. British troops in the Massachusetts Bay Colony were there to stop demonstrations against the Townshend Acts and keep order, but instead they provoked outrage. The British soldiers and citizens brawled in streets and fought in bars. “The citizens viewed the British soldiers as potential oppressors, competitors for jobs, and a treat to social mores'; (Mahin 1). A defiant anti-British fever was lingering among the townspeople.
The war had been enormously expensive, and the British government’s attempts to impose taxes on colonists to help cover these expenses resulted in chaos. English leaders, were not satisfied with the financial and military help they had received from the colonists during the war. In a desperate attempt to gain control over the colonies as well as the additional revenue to pay off the war debt, Britain began to force taxes on the colonies. Which resulted in The Stamp Act, passed by parliament and signed by the king in March 1765. The Stamp Act created an excise tax on legal documents, custom papers, newspapers, almanacs, college diplomas, playing cards, and even dice. Obviously the colonist resented the Stamp Act and the assumption that parliament could tax them whenever and however they could without their direct representation in parliament. Most colonials believed that taxation without their consent was a violation of their constitutional rights as Englishmen. Which is where the slogan “No Taxation without Representation” comes
The Boston Massacre was a fundamental event at the beginning of the American Revolution. The massacre became part of anti-British propaganda for Boston activists and fed American fears of the English military in both the North and South. The Boston Massacre was the first “battle” in the Revolutionary War. Although it wasn’t until five years after the Boston Massacre that the Revolutionary War officially began, the Boston Massacre was a forecast of the violent storm to come.