Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impacts of colonialism on africa
Effect of colonisation in Africa
Effect of colonisation in Africa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Imperialism was beneficial for the Europeans. Imperialism benefited them because sanitation and education improved. The population had started to grow and transportation had started to develop. However, imperialism was damaging for Africans because they had been forced into labor. Men and women had different jobs. The British had disrupted the lands of the African and were put under their control which had resulted in people losing their lives. Europeans benefited from imperialism in various ways. Hospitals, schools, and factories were built and that had helped people that lived in China because that created more jobs. Industrialization marked a change in the way Europeans saw themselves against others. Europeans saw their religion as superior …show more content…
and if you weren’t a Christian then you were a heathen. Nonetheless, Europeans had adopted many ideas and techniques of more advanced societies. They had unlocked the secrets of nature, created a society of unpredictable wealth, and had used both of those things to produce unsurpassed military power. The British had brought political stability and order to man African colonies. When they were in control they put in efforts to improve the colonies and in result education and sanitation had been improved. This had increased the average life expectancy. Although the Europeans benefited from imperialism, Africans did not.
When African land and independence was overtaken by the British they were immediately put under their indirect control. Most of the time the natives fought the British in battle as a way to defend their way of life, but many of the people that had attacked did not succeed and ended in them losing their lives. With the control of the British, Africans had been forced to work and were starved. But private companies in the Congo had operated under the authority of the state. Villagers had been forced to collect rubber, which would then be put to use as bicycle and automobile tires. A refugee had described the horrors as, and I quote, “We were always in the forest to find the rubber vines, to go without food, and our women had to give up cultivating the fields and gardens. Then we starved...We begged the white man to leave us alone, saying we could get no more rubber, but the white men and their soldiers said “‘Go. You are only beasts yourselves….’” When we failed and our rubber was short, the soldiers came to our towns and killed us. Many were shot, some had their ears cut off; others were tied up with ropes around their necks and taken away” (Strayer and Nelson
803). However. In my opinion, imperialism was more damaging to the societies that had experienced it. For example, in East Africa, the education was limited and even if people had been well-educated Europeans were reluctant to allow Africans and Asians to enter higher ranks. Imperialism was damaging to many of the societies. Many lives had been lost as well as, their self-determination. Racism and forced labor had been set heavily when lands were disrupted. The conditions in which people had been living in weren’t good because children, women, and men had been starving.
The colonization of Africa gave the Europeans more workers and workspace that boost them economically and financially. According to Document D, many African colonies exports very many resources such as cotton for fabrics and various foods for processing and meals. The help of African colonies was very beneficial to Europe. The economical growth can be proven with Document E, where the amount of exports from Africa grew from less than 5 million British pounds in 1854 to over 20 million in 1900. So the most beneficial part of the African colonies was the boost they gave Europe in economical
When one thinks of imperialism they often refer to the concept with very strong feelings. The general population will either agree with it or disagree. There tends to be no middle ground. The best way to look at imperialism is with an impartial mind. If one looks at imperialism with an open mind then they are able to see both the strengths and the weaknesses that it harbors. Throughout history one is most likely able to name several circumstances where imperialism took place and also point out the obvious aftermath of. Imperialism tends to have a greater good behind it, but unfortunately may have been executed poorly.
Imperialism had some positive effects regardless of how strict and unfair it was. Some positive effects can be seen in documents 2 and 7, which talks about what the mother nation gave to their colonized nations. These oppressors built them roads, canals, railways, and gave them education. They also introduced to them telegraphs, newspapers, and overall made them economized. Another positive effect can be read on documents 1 and 5. These documents show how both the oppressors and oppressed benefit from getting new resources such as raw m...
With the Industrial Revolution in full swing, Europe was looking to bolster its trade markets abroad. Thinking of it this way: in order to sell more goods, you need more places to sell them. So, with this thinking in mind, the Europeans said to themselves, 'What better place than Africa and Asia?' Along the same lines, colonies on these continents were seen as great places to get cheap, raw materials for Europe's factories. Add to this that Europe needed a place to house and employ their surplus population, and you can see why New Imperialism held the promise of economic growth.
The results of European colonialism shows that the aim of colonialism is to exploit the human and economic resources of an area to benefit the colonizing nation. As a result, the nation that is colonized is affected negatively. In reality, how Europe really affected Africa as a whole is much
Another reason that European imperialism in Africa was justified, is the fact that Europeans did not take over Africa solely for their self interests. As plainly stated in excepts from Lord Carnarvon's records. "...it is certainly not a desire of selfish interests..." Clearly, those who argue that Europeans just wanted to benefit themselves through the imperialism of Africa, are incorrect.
When the Age of Imperialism began in 1875, it effected Africa in many ways. Nowhere was the competition for colonies more intense than in Africa. Europeans went after North and South Africa splitting up the continent. Egypt and Sudan were taken over by Britain to obtain the Suez Canal. Imperialism helped to develop Africa’s economy and turned it into a continent of colonies.
Although imperialism helped the colonized people by improving the economy and the lives of the people, for the most part imperialism hurt the colonized people because the people were forced to grow cash crops which led to death by starvation.
British imperialism on India had many positive and negative affects on both the mother country, Britain and the colony, India. Many people would argue which effects were more prominent in these countries and some would agree that they were equal. But in both cases there were actually both.
Imperialism shaped the world we have today. There were many reasons behind global expansion. Anything from building an empire, like the British, to helping inferior races, had an impact. The extent the Europeans went to for national defence was a major motivator. Furthermore, the “civilizing mission” had a lot of supporters because of the belief it was their duty. Some arguments for imperialism had more influence than others.
Throughout history, imperialism by one nation on another has had many negative influences on the nation being colonized. The legacy of European imperialism in Africa in the 19th century was negative. Imperialism negatively affected Africa politically, economically, and culturally. In terms of political changes, European imperialism negatively affected Africa. Firstly, European colonization created enormous conflict between colonists and the African people.
Over the course of human history, many believe that the “Congo Free State”, which lasted from the 1880s to the early 1900s, was one of the worst colonial states in the age of Imperialism and was one of the worst humanitarian disasters over time. Brutal methods of collecting rubber, which led to the deaths of countless Africans along with Europeans, as well as a lack of concern from the Belgian government aside from the King, combined to create the most potent example of the evils of colonialism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century’s. The Congo colonial experience, first as the Congo Free State then later as Belgian Congo, was harmful to that region of Africa both then and now because of the lack of Belgian and International attention on the colony except for short times, the widespread economic exploitation of the rubber resources of the region, and the brutal mistreatment and near-genocide of the Congolese by those in charge of rubber collecting.
The ways of the Europeans had many physical and emotional costs for the people of Africa. The imperialism process also took a toll on the people of Europe. The European imperialistic colonization in Africa was motivated by the desire to control the abundant natural resources and a desire to exploit new labor and markets.... ... middle of paper ...
Imperialism is the domination by one country of political, economic, or cultural life of another country or region and occurred during the 1800’s in Africa. Imperialism in Africa was caused by four factors in Europe: economy, politics/military, humanitarian/religion, and Social Darwinism (Ellis). The Industrial Revolution in Europe caused the need for oversea expansion because the manufacturers needed things like: rubber, petroleum, and palm oil all of which Africa had. Europe moving into Africa was also caused by nationalism, when France went into Africa so did Britain (Ellis). The difference between France and Britain was the way of rule they used. There are four different methods of imperialism: direct, indirect, protectorate, and sphere of influence. The most popular were direct and indirect. The French used direct, they sent officials and soldiers from France to administer their colonies and their purpose was to inflict French culture on their colonies and make them into French provinces (Ellis). The British, however, used indirect, they used chiefs to oversee their colonies and encouraged the children in the colonies to get education in Britain. The British “Westernized” their colonies and only used military force when threatened (Ellis).
Throughout history, imperialism has led countries to extend their rule over weaker countries and then colonized those countries to expand their own power. Imperialism allows the ruling countries to use the weaker countries for their resources. Colonizing other countries would then lead to growth and a better reputation for the dominating country. There are many examples of imperialism throughout European history. When many European countries “scrambled” for Africa, it seemed as though Africa had no say in anything. During the 19th century, Europe found a way to use Africa for their own growth and power. Using Africa for their resources, the Europeans colonized Africa without a second thought. European imperialism in Africa had a negative impact because of social disarray, cultural loss, and death it caused.