What Was The Biggest Arguments Against Annexation Of The Philippines?

887 Words2 Pages

In 1898 America declared war on Spain, claiming they would free the Philippines, but when the war was over, they turned around and annexed them instead. At this time in history, the two biggest arguments for annexing the Philippines were, the US was doing them a favor as we were civilizing them because they were not capable nor ready to govern themselves. Secondly, not annexing the Philippines would give America's opponents an opportunity to take over them, which they didn't want. The biggest arguments made against annexing the Philippines were, they had fought Spain to free them not to steal them, and there would be a lot of unnecessary violence on both sides. Many leaders and government officials were in favor of annexing the Philippines, they believed that annexation was for the Filipenoes own good. …show more content…

China was close to the Philippines, and annexing them would provide the US with business opportunities that other countries sought to have. Protesters of annexation of the Philippines argued that, the US had broken their promise of freedom towards the Filipinos, and the US should act on the morals by which the country had been built upon. William Jennings Bryan criticized the US’ decision to annex the Philippines by saying “lest they learn to read the Declaration of Independence and Constitution and mock us for our inconsistency.” (William Jennings Bryan DNC nomination speech) He claims that the Filipino people would criticize the US for going against our own morals and annexing them after America's history with freedom. The Anti-Imperialist League said that America is “[extinguishing] the spirit of 1776 in those islands” (Anti-Imperialist Leagues Platform). The argument here is that what the US was doing was

More about What Was The Biggest Arguments Against Annexation Of The Philippines?

Open Document