What They Did Wrong: Malpratice in the Medicial Field

936 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Patient safety about

What is malpractice? The given definition is improper, illegal, or negligent professional activity or treatment, especially by a medical practitioner, lawyer, or public official. These cases are occurring more all over the state than they should be due to human era. The people at the hands of doctors are being let down as well as left with disfiguration or even death. These cases are leaving people to question their surgeons as well as the nurses attending with them. In the case listed here Dr. Loren J. Borud was scheduled to perform surgery on Mr. Michael Hicks early on a Friday morning. The surgery was liposuction and a scar repair procedure. Dr. Loren informed the patient the procedure would take approximately ninety minutes, but ultimately ended up over seven hours long due to the fact Dr. Loren kept falling asleep during Mr. Hick’s surgery! Seven hours is way too long to be put under anesthesia for something as simple as liposuction. The longer a patient is under anesthesia they are higher chances of more risk and complications can occur during or even after the operation. Mr. Michael Hicks came thru the surgery with no complications during the surgery however, after the surgery there were many complications that occurred. Mr. Hicks suffered some complications after the procedure and sued Dr. Borud, the hospital, five other doctors and two nurses. The case was not settled in court, but was settled for confidential terms. Mr. Hicks deserves compensation for his time lost as well as the wrong doing performed by the hospital and the medical staff on the behalf of his case during his procedure. Mr. Hicks expected to wake up fine and his scare fixed in the time frame of around ninety minutes, not seven hours, plus have complicati... ... middle of paper ... ... hands, but did not receive it. It was noticed more than once by a number of people. In closing this story, as well as many others should be a lesson on why we as patients should research our doctor’s background intensely before we choose to be under their care. If we are referred to a doctor by another doctor it is okay to still investigate their history with past patients. It is our bodies and our choice who we let perform surgery or any other procedure on at all times. If we feel uncomfortable at any time for any reason we have the right to refuse care from any doctor. So many people do not realize this and it is a sad fact. I urge everyone to do their homework on their doctor before choosing one. Look at their school back ground, accreditations, years in the field as well as lawsuits or complaints filed. These steps will help weed out the negligent doctors.

Show More
Related

  • The Case Of Enso Martinez And Rebecca Fielding Against John Hopkins Hospital

    718 Words  | 2 Pages

    Medical malpractice cases are difficult for the families who have lost their loved one or have suffered from severe injuries. No one truly wins in complicated court hearings that consist of a team of litigation attorneys for both the defendant and plaintiff(s). During the trial, evidence supporting malpractice allegations have to be presented so that the court can make a decision if the physician was negligent resulting in malpractice, or if the injury was unavoidable due to the circumstances. In these types of tort cases, the physician is usually a defendant on trial trying to prove that he or she is innocent of the medical error, delay of treatment or procedure that caused the injury. The perfect example of being at fault for medical malpractice as a result of delaying a procedure is the case of Waverly family versus John Hopkins Health System Corporation. The victims were not compensated enough for the loss of their child’s normal life. Pozgar (2012) explained….

    Read More

  • James Johnson Case Study

    1155 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the plaintiff’s suit, he alleged the surgery did not go well because the hospital had hired a surgeon, who was not competent or qualified enough to perform the surgery therefore; the hospital was just as negligent as the doctor was. Before the trial date, Dr. Salinsky and his insurance company, Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin, settled with plantiff out of court on the basis they will be released from the suit upon payment of $140,000 (Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital). Although, Salinsky settled with plaintiff prior to trial, there was still “question of whether he was negligent in the manner in which he performed the operation on July 11, 1975, remained an issue at trial, as it was incumbent upon the plaintiff to prove that Salinsky was negligent in this respect to establish a

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography Of The Anesthesia Practice: The Role Of Anesthesiologists

    967 Words  | 2 Pages

    Brody, Michael, and Donald Martin. “The Role of Anesthesiologists.” Physicians Protecting Patients. N.p. N.d. Web. October 21, 2015. An anesthesiologist is a physician who has received at least 8 years of schooling and has completed a residency program dealing with anesthesiology. Now, a licensed physician, an anesthesiologist deals with the administration of anesthesia during many medical procedures, including surgical or obstetric procedures, and pain management for acute and chronic illnesses, or cancer related pain. Anesthesiologists are also in charge of “anesthesia care teams” that include the anesthesiologist, an anesthesia assistant, certified registered nurse anesthetist, and an anesthesia technician. As the leader of the care team, the anesthesiologist is responsible for assessing the patient before, during, and after medical procedures, as well as developing and monitoring performance and quality of practices and standards in regards to administering anesthesia. The entirety of

    Read More

  • Grey's Anatomy: An Ethical Dilemma

    1013 Words  | 3 Pages

    Based on them, we can definitely eliminate options (c) and (d). Option (c) is against the principle of veracity and informed consent because the doctor was lying and hiding the information about the patient’s health that the patient was supposed to know. Option (d) is morally incorrect because the patient is lied to and the surgeon is not penalized. Option (b) does abide by the principle of veracity, but is against rationality because it sets negative example for the community that the doctors can be forgiven for their mistakes. Moreover, it does not abide by stewardship because the surgeon is taking advantage of being a doctor to conceal the truth. Consequently, the morally correct decision would be the option (a) because it abides by the principles of veracity and informed consent as the responsibility of disclosing the truth to the patient is fulfilled. Moreover, considering the rationality and stewardship, it will set an example for all the doctors that incomplete disclosure of information to the patient is unacceptable and the doctors should not take advantage of their importance in the

    Read More

  • Case Study On Anesthesia Procedures

    718 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are couple facts that have occurred in this case study, Dr. Jones doesn’t seem to have the proper staff in order to accommodate any further complications that might occur during the surgery. Dr. Jones didn’t necessarily have to have three procedures that involved three different anesthesia procedures. Mr. Smith overpaid for his procedures when he could have had the problem fixed in one appointment for only $2,000. I am personally not very familiar with these types of procedures which why these are the only facts that I can point at this moment. When it’s all said and done, Dr. Jones made his overhead and Mr. Smith is well because of the procedures done.

    Read More

  • The Discovery and Controversy over the First Use of Surgical Anesthesi

    6191 Words  | 13 Pages

    Anesthesia, “We take it for granted that we can sleep through operations without feeling any pain. But until about 150 years ago, the operating room was a virtual torture chamber because surgeons had no way to prevent the pain caused by their healing knives.”

    Read More

  • Medical Malpractice Lawsuits

    3014 Words  | 7 Pages

    Medical malpractice lawsuits are an extremely serious topic and have affected numerous patients, doctors, and hospitals across the country. Medical malpractice is defined as “improper, unskilled or negligent treatment of a patient by a physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, or other health care professional” (Medical malpractice, n.d.). If a doctor acts negligent and causes harm to a patient, malpractice lawsuits arise. Negligence is the concept of the liability concerning claims of medical malpractice, making this type of litigation part of tort law. Tort law provides that one person may litigate negligence to recover damages for personal injury. Negligence laws are designed to deter careless behavior and also to compensate victims for any negligence.

    Read More

  • Medical Malpractice Is Like a Virus

    811 Words  | 2 Pages

    Medical malpractice is like a virus that spreads contagiously and has been going on for many years. This phenomenon has caused deaths, diseases, and injuries due to the negligence of medical professionals towards their patients. Hospitals are losing their reputation and doctors are losing lots of their money. Usually after the doctor does something wrong, the patient should file a lawsuit against them and the hospital. One way to prevent malpractice is to pick younger doctors who are more careful with what they are doing. Malpractice is an occurrence that should be stopped soon or many injuries could occur to the patient due to the doctor’s negligence.

    Read More

  • Medical Malpractice Case Study: The Court Was Appalled

    868 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ohio Dep’t of Rehabilitation & Correction are the poor-quality patient care that Tomcik received and Tomcik’s health being at risk. Once engaged in a doctor-patient relationship, physicians are obligated to provide the best possible care for the patient by utilizing their skills and knowledge as expected from a competent physician under the same or similar conditions (“What Is a Doctor’s Duty of Care?” n.d.). However, in Tomcik’s situation, Dr. Evans did not deliver high-quality care, for he administered a perfunctory breast examination and thus did not follow standard protocols. There is evidence of indifference conveyed by Dr. Evans, and the lack of proper care towards Tomcik is an issue that can be scrutinized and judged appropriately. Additionally, Tomcik’s health was at risk due to the failure of a proper physical evaluation and the incredibly long delay in diagnosis and treatment. The negligence from Dr. Evans, along with the lack of medical attention sought out by Tomcik after she had first discovered the lump in her breast, may contribute to Tomcik’s life being in danger as well as the emotional anguish she may have felt during that time period. Overall, the incident of Tomcik’s expectations from the original physician and other employees at the institution not being met is an ethical issue that should be dealt with

    Read More

  • Sedation Dentistry

    859 Words  | 2 Pages

    Individuals need to understand the use of anesthesia always comes with risks. In most cases, however, it's safe when administered by someone with the proper training. Certain individuals, such as those with obstructive sleep apnea or ones who are obese, need to speak to their physician before being sedated, as their risk of complications is higher.

    Read More

  • Veracity to Patients

    702 Words  | 2 Pages

    The patient may not ever be “fully informed” but, the pertinent information in this case must be disclosed if Dr. Therapides plans to follow protocol. In following the elements of consent, she must make sure that her patient has the capacity to make a decision in his healthcare and voluntarily agrees to do the surgery. Dr. Therapides must also disclose the possible risks and benefits of the treatment options and give her professional recommendation. Lastly, Dr. Therapides should make sure that her patient understands what the options are in regards to his treatment, diagnosis, and prognosis, and is able to make a decision and either authorize or refuse the recommendation.

    Read More

  • Overview Of Anesthesia

    1084 Words  | 3 Pages

    Anesthesia has been used throughout medical history; the purpose of anesthesia is to prevent pain during surgery or any other medical procedure. Claudia M. Caruana (2010) mentions that anesthesia works by blocking nerve signals from going to the brain to allow the body to respond to and try to stop the pain (p. 8). Anesthesia has many different uses for many different types of surgeries from using very powerful sedatives for intensive surgeries to using very light sedatives like nitrous oxide to relieve the pain. All of the drugs in the anesthesiologist’s arsenal have different uses for different occasions which can be a benefit and can also be a defect.

    Read More

  • What is Medical Ethics?

    753 Words  | 2 Pages

    Medical ethics could be so many different thing mostly bad.There's so many stories about medical ethics this this story about this girl. At the age of 13 she was diagnosed with a rare and fated type of cancer.The survived and was cleaned that didn't have cancer. Then 10 years later she fought for her life again, she had sergey. After the Surgery there was no where no sign of the cancer. There years later she married and she became pregnant because of her health history she went to a clinic so they could watch her pregnancy.She had to go back to the clinic for having a lung tumor. She want to be in the best health, surgery was not an option. Her baby was too small to be born yet ,” meaning too premature.” (Thornton )She wanted to keep treating her cancer but, the doctors said that should wait until 28 weeks.She waited and the doctors she it was too dangerous and they wouldn’t help.So they want to cort.The court made it distion and at time is was very ill. The court order a surguy but the doctor said that if she goes into surgery she might not make it. She refused, but the doctors could not refused the courts orders. She was rolled into the surgery room. she made it into through the surgery, but two days later she died. She ...

    Read More

  • Case Study On Medical Malpractice

    920 Words  | 2 Pages

    When evaluating medical malpractice, this can be performed by any healthcare professional. It is easy to classify this to be misdiagnosis, delayed diagnosis, delayed treatment, even not taking the time to evaluate a patient properly. When practicing medicine it is important that all measures be taken when a patient is showing signs of infection or having any adverse reaction to medication. In the case study below this is a prime example of the importance of checking patient progression.

    Read More

  • The Importance of Understanding Nursing Malpractice

    1119 Words  | 3 Pages

    Generally speaking, negligence, error, incompetence, these are the words commonly associated with malpractice, yet many have no idea what the true definition states. Malpractice can be defined, according to the legal nurse consultant of Independent Medical Evaluations Inc., Jan Parrish (2010), “as a violation of professional duty or a failure to meet a standard of care or failure to use the skills and knowledge of other professionals in similar circumstances.... ... middle of paper ... ...

    Read More

More about What They Did Wrong: Malpratice in the Medicial Field

Open Document