Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of the executive branch
What are the powers and responsibilities of the executive branch
Executive branch of the USA
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of the executive branch
Here in Connecticut and across the nation, governors are often considered the key figures in state politics. Governors are considered key figures because they hold the supreme power of the state, this power is vested in them through the state constitutions. According to Gary Rose’s book, Connecticut Government and Politics,
Governors are expected to be the leading cheerleaders for their states. They are expected to set the political tone, to manage state affairs. They serve as the primary face and voice of government during natural disasters or other crises. With this much power, of course, comes a great deal of expectation. If a state is not doing well – if it is losing more jobs than its neighbors during a recession for example, or
…show more content…
The states’ rights are grounded in the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution. The 10th amendment states “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” The governor’s role is outlined in the Connecticut State Constitution. Some of these roles include, signing and vetoing bills passed by the legislature, serving as commander in chief of the state’s military forces, delivering the report of the state, appointing public officials, scheduling and the governor has the power to grant reprieves after conviction. In addition to these legislative responsibilities, the governor is expected to faithfully execute the laws of the state. According to Gary Rose, “...the successful execution of laws depends heavily on the ability, motivation, and orientation of personnel working within executive agencies and commissions” (page 125). Therefore, it is incredibly important who the governor appoints to work within the executive branch in order for them to be successful during their …show more content…
She had a very high approval rating during her time in office. While she was in office she was able to accomplish a lot. Her accomplishments include enchaining school safety; following a school shooting in Illinois, Governor Rell had all faculty and staff attend a second statewide conference on school safety. Rell also led Connecticut to reaching a record high of jobs in the state; her administration worked effectively to create a good paying jobs within the state. Governor Rell also inherited a mess due to her predecessor’s mistakes yet she was able to accomplish so much during her time as Governor. I believe that Governor Rell was also an effective government and was able to fulfill all of her duties outlined in the state
Harrison, L. H. (Ed.). (2004). Kentucky Governors (Updated ed., pp. 217-220). Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky.
The General Court of Massachusetts Bay was the most democratic political system in place in New England in the seventeenth century. It was a representative democracy that allowed for more of the population to participate in government. It allowed for town meetings, in which citizens of the colony could express grievances to members of the government. Even though this was much more democratic than the House of Burgesses in Virginia, the two systems did share similarities. In the Massachusetts Bay Colony, only 40% of the people actually participated in government. Also, the members of government only consisted of the “elect”. The elect were people who were believed to be going to heaven, as pre-determination was a key belief of the Puritans. These people were often rich white males, similar in class rank to the planters of the Chesapeake region. This system was often referred to as the “bible commonwealth” as it favored those who were in good religious and economic standing. Another political system in New England that emerged was the Blue Laws of Connecticut. These laws restricted many freedoms and promised death for even minor infractions. These laws came from an aristocratic government in Connecticut, which was an example of the restrictive, wealth-driven governments that were in New England at the time. Despite New England having a more democratic approach to government in the seventeenth century, both the
One of the seven duties is the Chief of State, this role is very important to the citizens in America and even in foreign countries to see that the leader of our country is a genuine, caring person. Th...
An example of this would be that the federal government has control over the military, foreign policy, our postal system and the monetary policies. The state government has the responsibility for the police/law enforcement, road building and the schools.
Within Connecticut’s federalism, the ideas of many modern governing techniques were applied, such as a written constitution and popular sovereignty. Because of this, the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut was a blueprint for the modern day Constitution because it contained a central government
The office of president of the Republic of Texas was superseded and the state governor was first established in the Constitution of 1845 (“Phillip, Fry,” 2010) The Constitution of 1845 vested executive power in the governor and the election was done by the qualified voters of the State. In comparison, the Constitution of 1876 created plural executive, dividing the executive power among a governor, lieutenant-governor, Secretary of State, comptroller of public accounts, treasurer, commissioner of the general land office, attorney general and all of the officers of the executive department. All of these positions are elected by qualified voters except the Secretary of State who is appointed by the governor. The governor remains the commander-in-chief of the army and navy of the State and the militia in both the Constitutions. Also, the Constitution of 1845 placed a limit on the governor’s salary to two thousand dollars annually, which was amended on November 2, 1954 removing this limit. Although there has not been much change in the requirements to become a governor, the Constitution of 1845 limited the governor to two two-year terms in six years compared to the four-year term in the Constitution of 1876 (“Constitution of Texas,” n.d.; “Texas Constitution,” n.d.)
The government officials have a scope of duties that they are required deal. The governor may create the budget, appoint executive boards, and declare martial law, so the scope of the governor’s duties range from budget to martial law. I believe citizens will find the budget very important because that is where their tax money is and people typically want to know where that is going. The lieutenant governor is the president of the Senate, which according to the textbook by Benson, Clinkscale, and Giardino, “many political scientist believe…is the most powerful position in the state,” (218). The senate is a part of the Texas legislature, so making laws is very important to the public because the citizens are the ones who have to abide by the law. The attorney general is elected by the public and basically the state’s lawyer, so his issues are important to the people because he deals with making laws (Benson, Clinkscale, and Giardino 220). The comptroller is “the state’s chief accountant and financial officer,” so the public should be interested in the financial aspects of the state (Benson, Clinkscale, and Giardino 221). The land commissioner manages leases and the state’s public land, so the issues that are under the title may not be as important as the comptroller or lieutenant governor’s
In the US Constitution it states that every state has two Senators (US.1.3.1). In order to be a Senator you must be 30 years of age (US.1.3.3) but in the NC Constitution you only have to be 25 years of age (NC.2.6). In the other house, which is the House of representatives, it states in the US you must be 25 years old (US.1.2.2) while in the NC you must be a qualified voter. When we compare the leaders we know that the president is our country’s leader and the governor is only the governor of the state they reside in. The president can only be president for 2 terms, they negotiate and sign treaties with other countries and live in the White House (US.2.2.2). The governor has to live in the state they govern but they can serve for more than 2 terms if not consecutive. They have different rules in becoming whichever, if someone wants to be president they have to be a natural born citizen, be 35 years old, and 14 years of being a US resident (US.2.1). To become a governor, you must be 30 years or older, a resident of the state for at least 2 years, and a US citizen for 5 years.
The Governor of Texas needs to not only be a citizen of the United States, but also reside in Texas for at least five years immediately preceding the election in order to fully understand the policies Texas residents’ are dealing with, the culture of Texas, as well as how Texas’ political decision impacts the rest of the nation. Both the President and the Governor are required to give an address to the legislatures, which cover very similar topics. The President’s State of the Union address “…recommends to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient;” while the Governor of Texas gives the Condition of the State in which, “…he shall recommend to the Legislature such measures as
Theoretically, in a Federal system the sovereignty is shared between the national government and the local government but the ultimate sovereignty lies on the people. The federal government does not have the power to be involved in the states laws as they are only able to deal with national security, taxation and foreign affairs. The States however, deal with public welfare, education and justice. For instance, in different States there are different laws in executing criminals implemented as such in California death sentence is applied. However, it differs in practice whereby in the recent events the federal government is heavily involved in the public welfare especially when it dealt with major crises.
“In Winthrop’s view, then, he had not in any way limited or reduced the authority of government by extending to church members a voice in the selection of the men who were to exercise the authority.”(Morgan,87) Winthrop’s government was simple, all laws were easy to understand and were able to interact with the people of the colony. What he originally aimed for is to make his colony a democracy, which it failed because the colony was still under control by the church not the people.
The reason for much of this power is the principle of judicial review of the actions of the executive and legislative branches of government at both state and federal level against a written constitution and the power therefore to 'interpret' the constitution. The power of judicial review over the states is laid down in the supremacy clause of article III and the power of judicial review over the other two branches of the federal government is implied in the constitution and by several but by no means all of the founding fathers: "A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought, of course, to be preferred; or, in other words, the Constitution ought to be preferred to the statute, the intention of the people to the intention of thei... ... middle of paper ... ...
Over the course of American History, the champions of a stronger presidency have almost always prevailed. State does not have anyone to represent them. Levin states “furthermore, state sovereignty is not a top priority for most senators because the state legislatures hold no sway over them” (Levin, 47.) Senators have no interest in what the states want. The federal government told the states that they have to rise the drinking age or...
The guest lecture by Peter Johnson, last Thursday, was highly informative for many reasons. Peter Johnson brought in a vast amount of Maine political knowledge. Mills spent time in both the Maine Senate and Maine House of Representatives and recently ran for Governor of Maine. Today Mills is the executive director of the Maine Turnpike Authority and was chosen for this position by Governor Paul.
Local government has been largely described to be circulated around affairs which are of ‘peculiarly local significance’ (McLintock 1966), which can be easily gathered from the institutions name. The most commonly known branches of local government are; city, district and regional councils. Throughout New Zealand there are eleven regional councils, twelve city councils and fifty-four district councils (Janine Hayward 2016). Local government is a connecting bridge of sorts which brings together the communities within New Zealand and central government. In this essay I will attempt to explain the key functions of local government as a whole and its benefits to a New Zealand society. I will also look deeper into the election process. I will proceed