Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast Achilles and Aeneas
Short note on the role of women as portrayed in aeneid
Comparison of Aeneas and Odysseus and Achilles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare and contrast Achilles and Aeneas
In books 1 and 2, Aeneas shows traditional Homeric leadership qualities, for example the desire for honour gained through fighting in battle as well as eternal glory and immortality. However Aeneas begins to display proto - Roman qualities within the books, including his display of Piety: having a sense of duty towards the Gods, city state and family.
On the one hand, Aeneas is a good leader as he is caring and encouraging to his men. We see this is book 1 as Aeneas and his companions dock their ships in Libya. We are told there was ‘no need of chains to moor the weary ships’. From this we learn Aeneas was able to lead his men successfully into Libya and therefore he is shown as a good leader as he keeps his companions safe and doesn't put
…show more content…
them in danger. Moreover Aeneas is generous as he shares out the wine amongst his men, and he is motivating as he consoles his comrades about the storm. He reminds his men of previous sufferings and tells them that they ‘have suffered worse before, and this too will pass.’ Here Aeneas motivates his men to remain positive and this keeps morale high as they mourn for their lost comrades. Therefore Aeneas is a good leader as he encourages his men to keep them focused when they are grieving for their friends. Moreover as they arrive in Libya, Aeneas sets off to find out where they are and what people own the land: ‘bring back to his men a true account of the shores…’ As Aeneas did this ‘as soon as life-giving morning came’ we learn of Aeneas’ eagerness to find out about the land they are on, and to pass this information to his men. From this we see Aeneas is a good leader as he is concerned for his men and wants to deliver news of their situation to them as soon as he can. Aeneas also displays piety in book 1 as he gives gifts to Dido: ‘gifts for Dido some of the treasures that had been rescued from the ruins of Troy’.
From this we learn of Aeneas’ respectful nature towards Dido and suggests he is a good leader as he leads by good example as well as obeying xenia. Aeneas also shoes piety in book 2 as he informs his father to carry the sacraments and ancestral gods as he has blood on his hands, and this would be disrespectful and insult the gods. Aeneas says ‘it is not right for me to touch them till I have washed’. This suggests Aeneas’ good leadership as he displays piety and devotion to the gods which may help to keep the Gods on their side on their journey. Aeneas also displays good leadership through his resourcefulness. In book 1, we see Aeneas ‘succeeded in stretching seven huge [stag] carcasses on the ground, one for each of the ships’. This indicates Aeneas’ resourcefulness as he is able to provide food for his comrades through his skill with his bow and arrow when they arrive, starving, in Libya. He is therefore a good leader as he is able to provide for his men in times of desperation. Moreover Aeneas portrays tactful and resourceful actions in book 2, as he is able to sneak into the palace through a back door: ‘There was a forgotten entrance at the rear, a secret doorway…’ This shows resourcefulness as he uses his tactful craft and knowledge to gain safe entrance into the palace and shows he is a good leader as he keeps himself safe …show more content…
in order to climb and see the situation the Trojans are in, in order to try and help them. Aeneas also is portrayed as a more realistic hero and leader, seen in book 1 as he is mourning but puts on a brave front to keep morale high: ‘He showed them the face of hope and kept his misery deep in his heart’. This shows Aeneas had the strength to keep his men motivated even when he is suffering. Therefore we see Aeneas as a good leader as his character is more believable as he aims to keep his men motivated. Aeneas is also portrayed as a noble and heroic warrior throughout the books. Although it can be seen as a negative action that Aeneas ignores the advise from Hektor, he proves himself a homeric warrior as he says ‘it seemed a noble thing to die in arms’. We are told his ‘heart was burning to gather comrades for battle’, here the word ‘burning’ emphasises his desire for battle in order to gain honour. This gives Aeneas homeric qualities and those of a good leader. His homeric qualities are also seen in book 2 as he loosens the joint of the tower in the palace, sending it ‘toppling, spreading instant destruction…’. Therefore Aeneas displays good leadership as he is able to kill many Greeks with his quick thinking. Aeneas also displays good leadership as he takes responsibility for his family in book 2. Aeneas instructs his father Anchises to be carried on his back and his son Iulus to walk with him, and for his wife Creusa to walk behind them at a distance. Here he is taking responsibility for his family as a group would be easily spotted and this shows his nobility as he can protect his wife as he is in front. Therefore he displays good leadership as he devises this plan in the hope of keeping his family safe. This act of piety proves Aeneas has proto- Roman qualities too. Aeneas also proves his responsibility as he returns to the city after he loses his wife in an act of trying to make up for what he did. As he does this Aeneas says he left his companions and family but ‘hiding them all away in a winding valley’ proves his good leadership as he protects his men and family by keeping them safe in his absence. Lastly Aeneas is proven to be a natural leader. In book two we are told his comrades ‘had come from all directions ready to follow me with all their resources…’ and from this quotation we learn of Aeneas’ natural skill of good leadership as they come to him without him knowing. On the other hand Aeneas occasionally displays bad leadership in books 1 and 2. We firstly see this when Aeneas displays reckless behaviour as he returns to find his wife when fleeing the city: ‘I called her name ‘Creusa! Creusa!’. This indicates Aeneas was not a good leader as he absent-mindedly calls out his wife's name, which is Trojan and this therefore puts him in great danger. In book 1 we see Aeneas’ blind rage takes him as he goes to kill Helen. We see he has to physically be stopped by his mother Venus: ‘she caught my right hand and held me back’. This creates imagery of Aeneas in a frenzy-like state and suggests he was out of control. Venus then has to remind Aeneas of his love for his family: ‘will you not first go and see…your father…your wife Creusa…your son Ascanius’. This indicates Aeneas had to be reminded of his piety towards family which implies Aeneas was not a good leader as he had to be reminded of his proto- Roman values. This links with the fact Aeneas is portrayed as an indecisive leader. Numerous times in the books we witness Aeneas changing his mind as to what plan of action he is going to take. For example after Venus tells Aeneas to flee, he goes to his father for him to join him, but again is persuaded not to flee and to fight and die in battle. This indicates Aeneas was stuck between his traditional Homeric values of honour and status compared to new proto- Roman values of being pious towards family, city and the gods. This could suggest he was not a good leader as he was indecisive as to what he was going to do next. In addition, we see Aeneas’ slightly careless character in book 2 as he loses his wife as they escape the city. The quotation ‘I ran where there was no road, leaving the familiar area of the streets’ suggests Aeneas’ lack of awareness for his wife. Also he does not take responsibility for this: ’Creusa was torn from me by the cruelty of fate’. Here Aeneas is not taking responsibility for his actions and putting the blame on Fate. This suggests Aeneas was not a good leader as he acts carelessly for his wife when leading his family and doesn't take the responsibility for his actions as he does so. Furthermore Aeneas is also displayed as quite a weak character in book 1.
At our first sighting of Aeneas we are told his ‘limbs grew weak’ and he says he wishes he was killed in battle by Diomede. Here we see Aeneas as selfish as he has no regard for his men and doesn't try to motivate them. This implies Aeneas was not a good leader as he acts self- centred and doesn't think of his men, he simply wishes he was dead. In addition, Aeneas is portrayed as emotionally unstable as he witnesses the pictures from the Trojan war in the palace of Dido: ‘rivers of tears washed down his cheeks’. The phrase ‘rivers of tears’ suggests unstoppable crying at the depictions, as if he cannot stop. This suggests Aeneas was not in control of his emotions and this portrays Aeneas as a bad leader as he seems emotionally unstable in front of his
men. Overall, I feel Aeneas is a good leader and his only downfall are his realistic mistakes. He displays both Homeric and Roman characteristics which makes him an encouraging, pious and a dedicated natural leader. I think his faults are realistic and understandable given the circumstances he is in as he witnesses the downfall of his city.
Odysseus is a weak and inadequate leader because he fails to earn the respect of his men time in and time out. Odysseus’ men attempt to steal from him and unknowingly unleash the bag of winds that was given to Odysseus by Aiolos (166, 49-550). A great leader has the respect of his men. Odysseus’ men disrespect him in this excerpt by attempting to rob Odysseus. Therefore, Odysseus is not an adequate leader since his men disrespect him by stealing from him. Also, at a later page in the book, one of his men refuse to follow Odysseus into danger and tells Odysseus, “You cannot return, I know it” (173, 293). A skillful leader has the
At the orders of Jupiter, Mercury is sent down in Book Four of the Aeneid to remind Aeneas of his true fate for Aeneas had fallen in love with Dido and was content to stay in the fertile lands of Carthage, The messenger god mocks and scolds Aeneas for forgetting his duties, especially to his son, Ascanius. As a result of this, Aeneas finally decides to leave Dido and depart Carthage, although he fears losing the queen’s love and her wrath. This demonstrates that he is incredibly pious (as to choose the wishes of the gods over his own love) and that he is noble for attempting to leave Dido as gently as he can. In addition, he displays his admirable hero qualities and commitment to paternal duty in this section.
Aristotle argues that friendship is a vital part of life. It serves not only as a means to bond individuals together, but also a necessity in achieving overall happiness. Aristotle comments on the various types of friendships that exist, and the role they each play in society. He explains three overarching types; utility, pleasure, and complete friendship. Yet, with family, friendship is different than it is with companionship. As Aristotle states in his piece, Nicomachean Ethics on friendship in families, “they all seem to depend on paternal friendship” (Aristotle, 1161b18). In The Aeneid, Aeneas and Anchises’ relationship, perfectly embodies this. The father son bond does not distinctly resemble one of the three types, rather it is a friendship in of itself; a paternal friendship.
Out of the two heroes Gilgamesh was the one who was most aggressive and pursued the more ambitious goal, though it was one near impossible to achieve. Gilgamesh wanted to have a power that only the gods possessed. He wanted to be immortal. Aeneas never sought such an unachievable task, and was not as determined as Gilgamesh was. Aeneas only had to find a place where the defeated Trojans could settle and found a new city. Once in the story he even had to be reminded of his destiny by the Jupiter when he was distracted by his love for Dido.
... prominent source of his weighty troubles. They are helpless to withstand the gods, restrain Aeneas from advancing towards Italy, and burn at women’s torches. Yet, his ships are invaluable to the overall success of his journey and the expression of his character. Aeneas is a ship, chugging toward western shores and providing refuge for his people. However, this extended analogy has greater importance to Virgil and the rest of human society. After the destruction of Troy, Aeneas has no country to protect or call his home. The cargo and soldiers aboard his ships are the remnants of his past civilization, but they are also the seeds for a new empire. Aeneas, just as his ships, is the invaluable carrier and protector of one of the greatest empires in all of human history – Rome.
Sophocles never explicitly explains whose views on leadership are the best although he uses the outcomes of the characters as a way to express how he views leadership. This being said, many of his ideas are transferred into other characters’ opinions which means Sophocles’ ideal leader is a mixture of many characters’ opinions. As Oedipus cannot see his hamartia and is blind from his mistake, it is clear that Sophocles thinks that a successful leader needs to note his own faults. Additionally, as Tiresias makes a point in Antigone that a kind needs to also find a solution to his faults it is clear that Sophocles is expanding on his point by saying that the fault needs to be recognized as well as solved to rule properly. However, through Oedipus, Sophocles shows his opinion towards openness. Sophocles clearly believes that information should be made public and that a rulers heart should be open and empathetic to their people. As Oedipus is loved in the opening of his play it is clear his actions prior to his mistakes are seen as something to mimic. Although, as the play unfolds his character becomes plagued by his hamartia and Sophocles uses this to show what a leader should not do. Since his character becomes increasingly blind to his hamartia so is his blindness towards how to lead; Oedipus’ egotistical approach that emerges shows how Sophocles believes a ruler
Odysseus and Aeneas are very alike in some ways and very different. They are both epic heroes except that one is Greek and the other is a Trojan. Odysseus is from the Greek tale The Oddessy, which was written by the famous Greek poet Homer. His quest is to find his way back home after a long journey. Aeneas is from the roman tale The Aenied, written by Virgil a famous Roman poet. Aeneas’s mission is to find a new home for him and his family. Both these characters had many similarities and differences in their ways of fighting.
Thesis: Despite his accomplishments and the glory associated with his life, Aeneas only achieves the status of hero through divine intervention, and this god-given position causes him just as much grief as it does splendor.
"I sing of warfare and a man at war…Till he could found a city…the high walls of Rome." (Book I, 1-12) There can be no dispute that the Aeneid is an account of the history of Rome. There are several items which with Virgil links the story of Aeneas to the Rome of his time period. Probably the most obvious of these is the surplus of predictions concerning Rome’...
Aeneas also went to fight in the Trojan War. He also was a national hero. He was a great warrior. Both Odysseus and Aeneas were trying to head home.
In ancient republic Rome, piety was one of the highest virtues. The concept of pietas was a driving force in ancient republic Rome. Pietas was very important in Roman society and many romans lived revolved around it. Pietas means “dutifulness” (Sayre 86) but also has many other meanings. The meaning of “pietas” shaped the literature as shown in the pieces, such as a poem written by Vergil, called “The Aeneid”. As well as “On Duties” an essay by Marcus Tullius Cicero.
We also see in the story what someone must sacrifice in order to fulfill their goals. Though Aeneas's destiny was much more grand than many of our own, we still must make choices that can sometimes hurt others. I really thought that Vergil captured our inner emotions with the affair between Dido and Aeneas.
To begin, both the leadership qualities and flaws of Aeneas and Odysseus must be examined in order to determine who the better leader is. Virgil presents Aeneas very differently than Homer presents Odysseus. They are both certainly heroes, but Aeneas seems more accessible and a stronger leader, due to the way Virgil presents him. Virgil illustrated Aeneas as a man that had to participate in many tests and tempering’s, and from that, his heroism was seen as flawless. The same goes along with Homers’ Odysseus, yet in a different, more astounding way.
When discussing the fate of Aeneas, a thought provoking question is posed that is commonly debated. If Aeneas is commanded by fate, does he have free will? It is important to approach this question with a solid understand of fate. There are two common sides to the debate of whether Aeneas had free will or not. One view believes Aeneas had no choice but to follow his destiny because he was commanded by fate, and prophesied to found the race that will one day build Rome. The other side states Aeneas did indeed have free will, and even though his fate was set, room is available within his fate for events to change. One can argue Aeneas makes some of his own choices, but no particular detail of his life is untouched. Destiny determines that the Trojans will found a city in Italy, but it does not stipulate how that will happen. This is where room is left for free will. After much research and considering the views of many commentators and the proof they showed, the answer can simply be found by going back to the text of The Aeneid.
Aeneas is often referred to as 'pious Aeneas', and this is also how even he...