Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Public opinion on guns
Gun violence and control
Gun violence and gun control
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Public opinion on guns
McCawley 1
Chase McCawley
Professor Childree
T R 9:00 a.m.
9 November 2017
Annotated Bibliography
“8 Significant Pros and Cons of Concealed Carry.” ConnectUS, 24 July 2015, connectusfund.org/8-significant-pros-and-cons-of-concealed-carry. • No-issue means no one citizens can carry (8 Significant Pros and Cons of Concealed Carry).
• May-issue means citizens can carry when allowed (8 Significant Pros and Cons of Concealed Carry).
• Shall-issue means citizens can carry if they meet certain requirements (8 Significant Pros and Cons of Concealed Carry).
• Unrestricted carry means no permits and every citizens is allowed (8 Significant Pros and Cons of Concealed Carry).
• Shall issue has most impact (8 Significant Pros and Cons of Concealed Carry).
…show more content…
• In states that had conceal carry murders, rapes, and assault statistics went down about 8 percent (8 Significant Pros and Cons of Concealed Carry).
• Over 90 percent of police officers support civilians carrying (8 Significant Pros and Cons of Concealed Carry).
• Creates sense of protection without police (8 Significant Pros and Cons of Concealed Carry).
• Possibility of stopping a mass shooting spree (8 Significant Pros and Cons of Concealed Carry).
Hemenway, D, et al. “National attitudes concerning gun carrying in the United States.” Injury
Prevention, vol. 7, no. 4, Jan. 2001, pp. 282–285., doi:10.1136/ip.7.4.282. http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/injuryprev/7/4/282.full.pdf
• The U.S. has made it easier to purchase firearms (Hemenway).
• According to polls, many citizens believe that more people owning guns makes them feel less safe (Hemenway).
• The public believes that many venues should limit gun carrying (Hemenway).
• The U.S. has the highest rate of gun ownership is the world (Hemenway).
• Most that carry claim it’s for self-protection (Hemenway).
• In states that allow concealed carry there are also few restrictions on the places the firearm can be carried
…show more content…
Kopel, David. "The Untold Triumph of Concealed-Carry Permits." Policy Review, no.78,Jul/Aug96,p.9.EBSCOhost,db22.linccweb.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=9607093225&site=ehost-live. • About 30 years ago only a half-dozen states issued permits for trained citizens for personal protection (Kopel).
• Most states left that task in the hands of the police department (Kopel).
• Now over 30 states grant conceal carry permits to citizens (Kopel).
• The movement began in the early 1980s when gun-rights activists in Florida wanted to reform the states handgun laws (Kopel).
• They proposed that anyone that clears a fingerprint check and is fit mentally can receive a permit for protection (Kopel).
• The legislature passed the bill multiple times (Kopel).
• It was vetoed repeatedly by the democratic governor until a republican was elected in 1987 (Kopel).
• A quarter of people who apply for these permits are women (Kopel).
• The only place during this time that crime dramatically dropped was Florida (Kopel).
• Many people believe these permits don’t have much effect in rural areas
...own. That handguns cannot be restricted from obtain and carry for self-defend in one’s home. As for the other question that the case did not answer, all we can do now is wait for these questions to be answered by the Supreme Court.
Many Americans are now applying for a license to carry licensed concealed arms with them. The rate at which licenses are being approved is worrying. This development is concerning law enforcement authorities. Putting so many firearms at the disposal of the public is counterproductive to the gains that are being made on improving security and especially in the cities where incidences of gun crime and violence are on the rise.
not be permitted to declare who would or would not be able to bear arms on the
This article briefly discusses the current rights of mainland American citizens and their rights to bear arms. Although it’s an amendment for a citizen of the United States to bear arms, most people today probably won’t ever need to or have to. With that being said, gun control in the U.S. is still a problem year in and year out. I believe that yes, we do have a problem with gun control within the United States. My first thoughts on this issue raised in the article are that the Supreme Court should continue to ban weapons within the District of Columbia.
“The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment supports conceal and carry by stating “the right to bear arms.” That statement should be exemplified as to have a gun in public. People need to have a weapon ready for use in case of emergency. Not in a car or locked up inside a house, but in reach of the certified personnel. According to the opposing side on ProCon.org, the article Should Adults Have the Right to Carry a Concealed Handgun states: “the amendment is not unlimited and should permit weapons only to citizens who can prove a ‘justifiable need’” (“Right to Carry a Concealed Handgun” 3). The article also has a women’s opinion on Conceal and carry. She stated “women need to be able to defend their home and defend themselves if they go out. It 's just a safety issue” (“Right to Carry a Concealed Handgun” 2). In order to feel safe, and have a reliable self-defense mechanism should be a justifiable reason for Conceal and Carry
Many gun supporters will say that more guns bring down the crime rate. These same believers will give facts stating that the more guns in a state, the less likely gun owners will use them. “The chances of innocent people being the victims of violent crime, including murder, decrease—not increase—when access to guns is made easier” (Luik). Luik emphasizes that guns will not make any innocent people killers, it will make crime and death rates go down. They argue that the states with the lowest crime rates are the same states that have a higher gun ownership rate than any other state.
Winkler argues that open carry is the solution to fewer guns on the streets in the following way:
Everyone has had that time in their life where they feel that they would be safer if they had some sort of protection, concealed carry is a great option for protection. Over the years it has been growing in popularity, more and more people are going out and getting their concealed carry permit. With more and more people going out and getting their permit, some may view it as dangerous, while others feel it is a necessity. Concealed carry is essential because, it allows added protection, has certain restrictions that the person must meet, and if guns are handled properly they are not as dangerous
[2] Dowlut, Robert. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms in State Bills of Rights and Judicial
During the problem definition stage, one must realize that “a condition is not a social problem unless it is seen as violating certain fundamental values and beliefs about how society should operate” (Gusfield, 2011). I have determined that there exists a problem concerning gun control, more specifically, concealed carry laws, as they are inconsistent throughout the states. While 48 states now have some form of concealed carry policy in place, the Illinois does not. Thus, the citizens’ rights are in violation of the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
... can be put into place so that gun control does not limit law-abiding citizens from keeping guns on their property or person and protecting themselves or others when necessary.
If a person don’t carry a concealed weapon, how will they be able to protect themselves and their precious family from vicious criminals? Shall issue states are states that citizens may apply and be considered by the state for a gun permit which is also known as concealed carry. John R. Lott, is an economist and has received his Ph.D. in economics from UCLA. He claimed "shall-issue" concealed carry laws reduced murders by 8.5%, rapes by 5%, aggravated assaults by 7%, and robbery by 3%, according to a 2000 analysis of FBI crime data” (Lott, John R.) This refers to how concealed carry reduces crime and information was reported by the FBI compared to the other states that don’t allow concealed carry. This quote shows real evidence on how guns
... middle of paper ... ... Responsible citizens should have a right to carry a gun in order to protect themselves from those who obtain it illegally. All in all, responsible adults should have the right to carry a concealed handgun.
... was in fact an increase in violent crime. In the data this has been shown to be false. There is also no supporting evidence to show that concealed carry permit holders are committing a significant number of crimes either. In order to get a permit in the first place background checks are done that weed out anybody that has a history of felonies, violence and dangerous mental illness. There is also great legal responsibility that comes with the territory in a self-defense situation. A normal, sane person does not want to have to use a gun in defense. There are lots of serious implications, even if the use is justified, such as civil lawsuits and the psychological impact of the defense itself.
Imagine if you will, society that is so plagued with crime that its citizens are afraid to step out of their homes for fear of being a victim of a violent crime. With no way to protect themselves or their families, they are at the whim of the criminals that prey on them. Next imagine a society where it is virtually crime free, free of any types of violent crimes, one is able to leave the front door unlock and return home without worrying if there has been a burglary. Although these scenarios are to the extreme it is a reality to some extent as to the conditions here in the State of California at the present time, where a law abiding citizen cannot legally protect themselves in everyday life from the preying few that society has labeled criminals. Unlike other states in the nation California does not issue Concealed Weapons Permits in a consistent fair manner, therefore depending on the location of one’s residence it could determine if a citizen has a higher chance of becoming a victim without being able to have the choice to defend one’s self. It is this author’s belief that Concealed Weapons Permits do lower the crime rate by being a deterrence of criminal activity that fear the repercussions of facing a citizen that is armed and well trained in the use of the weapon of choice.