What Is The Role Of Wealth In The 16th Century

782 Words2 Pages

Muhamed Kulovac
ECON 4900 Exam 1 Question #1 Before the 16th century, wealth was viewed as something that is almost impossible to achieve because you would have to be born as a lord in order to control a significant amount of land working for the lord. This set up a relationship between serfs and lords that benefited lords completely. Land was viewed as the main source of wealth during these times and not many people could get their hands on any of it. During the 16th century we start to see an age of exploration open up more new opportunities and ideas. There are discoveries made in new lands that lead explorers to new resources like agriculture, precious metals, and livestock. Philosophers were looking at wealth back in those ages as …show more content…

Philosophers like Thomas Mul, Edward Misselden, and Thomas Milles, which were classified as Bullionists, believed that acquiring precious metals, bullion, was a measure of wealth for a nation. In order for the accumulation of bullion to occur, there has to be more exports of high priced valuable goods and imports of low priced cheap goods. Their theory was that a country should not trade because it needs a service or good but should trade in order to earn more gold and silver. These men agreed that free trade should be the focus of the economy. Mercantilism dominated the 17th century in Europe. The introduction of mercantilism introduced us to liberal philosophers who were finding ways of using mercantilism to produce a surplus. The German Cameralists and The French Colbertisme are two examples of how mercantilism was established in those states after years of war and tension in the economy. Jean Baptiste Colbert was mercantilist and he believed that expanding commerce would increase the wealth of a nation and of course the nation has to have a favorable balance of trade. Throughout the 17th century trade was the main focus of gaining wealth but we start to see a change in that theory again in the 18th …show more content…

The Physiocrats were a group of French enlightment thinkers that believed that the main source of wealth was agriculture. The Physiocrats stated that manufacturing and commerce was pretty much a waste of time because you had to put in so much time to produce a surplus of wealth that it was not worth it for the nation. I think what The Physiocrats were basically saying is that focusing on agriculture meant that you would only focus on your nation and not worry about others and trading with them. This self-focus on a nation would lead to a more prosperous state and more wealth. The only problem with their theory is that farmers were being taxed and regulated unfairly in France which caused them a tough time to maximize their profit. Ferdinando Galiani opposed the Physiocrats immensely. He believed that manufactured products had increasing returns while agriculture has decreasing

Open Document