Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The glass castle summary setting
Concerns in "the glass castle
An eassy about the glass castle
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The glass castle summary setting
The film adaptation of The Glass Castle was released on the 11th of August, 2017. It stared Brie Larson as Jeanette Walls, Woody Harrelson as her father (Rex Walls), and Naomi Watts as her mother (Rose Mary), just to name a few of the more well-known actors in the production. The Glass Castle was written and directed by Destin Daniel Cretton, Jeannette Walls and Andrew Lanham also assisted in the writing the of the movie. I found the movie deviated from my expectations and didn’t at all measure up to the beautiful book it was based on. The movie was completely out of order, glosses over some important information, or leaves it out altogether. When reviewing a movie you do of course have to understand the changes that will happen …show more content…
between the book to the written screenplay, but there are things that can be helped, like putting events in order and keeping key details. Fortunately for my assigned scene most of the key details were there, even if it wasn't in order and had a few things changed. My assigned scene was when Jeanette was forced to learn how to swim. In the book, Jeanette states, "[Dad] announced that we were going swimming at the Hot Pot. The Hot Pot was a natural sulfur spring in the desert north of town" (Pg. 65). In the movie adaptation, the Walls go to a local swimming pool instead of the hot springs, they also go to the swimming pool while they're living in Welch when in the book they're still in Battle Mountain when Jeanette learns to swim. This would change the setting and tone, but only a little, not enough to significantly change anything. Jeannette also states in the book that "But the Hot Pot didn't have any neat edges like that of a swimming pool. There was nothing to cling to" (65). In the movie, since they're at the pool and not the springs, it's easy to throw this little bit of info away. Though it doesn't have that much impact on the overall plot of the scene, it would have been nice to see that in the final movie. Thankfully most of the lines in the scene are similar to or exactly like the lines in the book.
Unfortunately the characterization of Rose Mary and Rex and not exactly like the book. In the book, Jeannette reveals that "Mom [had] been floating on her back as if nothing were happening" (66). In the movie, Rose Mary actively tries to tell Rex to stop and is angry after the whole event, though mostly because they had to leave the pool early. Looking at the movie as a whole in comparison to the book, it is out of order and the movie really isn't as dark as it could have been. The glossed over a lot of information like her journalism as a student in high school and how much that meant to her, her mother's abuse, and her relationship with Jack at the very end of the book. All of this can easily be overlooked if you're looking at the movie solely and ignoring the book. But if you're using this movie as part of your curriculum regarding the book, it really doesn't do The Glass Castle (book) or Jeannette's story any justice in my opinion. Jeannette Walls herself believed the movie to do justice to her life, and who else but the author herself can better make that judgment. If she believes it to do justice than no one else's opinion really
matters? The Atlantic's Article, The Trouble with Making Books We Love into Movies, sums up my experience with The Glass Castle best; "The relationship we have with the book is personal and special; the relationship we have with the movie is more distanced from that, more passive". I didn't particularly care for the movie adaptation because the book was so personal to me, but if it's good enough for the author, it's good enough for me.
In the book, The Glass Castle, I feel each character I can identify with in some way, whether that is through actions, thoughts, or events. However, there is one character that stood out to me and that is Jeannette. She chronicled her life and her dysfunctional upbringing along with the struggles and challenges that go along with it. No matter what she went through, she never allowed herself to feel defeated or depressed. She saw her situation for what it was and found ways to improve her condition through pure determination. There are many similarities I feel we both share such as, we both were taught independence from an early age, we are both middle children, and we are both carefree and intelligent. Though, the main contrast between Jeannette and I are that we are both timid, positive, and forgiving.
I think that most of the event in the movie were not in the same order that Jeannette had wrote them. After reading the book I had a different picture in mind of how each character would look and it threw me off for the rest of the movie. I did like the fact that I could see what was happening and not just imagine things in my head that I thought was happening, as I was watching the movie I was seeing the same thing everyone else was and not just what I was picturing while reading the
The movie, unlike the book, starts in chronological order. The book starts from Susie’s death and then flashbacks to what happened before. Another difference is that the bracelet charm in the movie is not the Pennsylvania keystone, but a house. Also, even though some things happen in both, book and movie, not every time the reasons are the same. For example
In this touching, non-fiction memoir by Jeanette Walls, The Glass Castle recounts the story of her vagabond upbringing in the 1960‘s. Walls notes her parents lack of conformity while also showing their unconditional love, in rather unconventional ways. While touching the bases of alcoholism, poverty and child neglect, the author still maintains the point of a passionate determination to preserve the alliance with her siblings through it all.
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
Rex and Rose Mary were obviously very different from other parents. They thought their children should be taught from morals and knowledge, and wanted their children to be like them. Rex wanted his children to be tough and entitled to what they needed and not wanted. Even though Jeannette was injured, her parents thought it was a good thing. They thought it was better for their daughter to make her mistakes early so she could learn from her past experiences. Her father even let her play with fire, so that she could overcome her fear of the mighty flame. "Dad appeared alone in the doorway of my room. He told me we were going to check out Rex Walls Style. Dad hurried down the hall with me in his arms. A nurse yelled for us to stop, but dad broke into a run." Pg.
the importance of those things. But, it can be a crucial symbol for someone’s life. That is the impact of symbolism in one’s life. In the book The Glass Castle, written by Jeannette Walls, The Glass Castle has a significant importance in her life. The Glass castle represents the status of the Walls family, the hope and faith for the future, and even life in general. In the story, The Glass Castle is used as the end goal of the Walls Family’s adventure of life. Furthermore, the Glass Castle supports Walls’ purpose of the hardships in life.
The aspect of character development plays a prominent role in various works of literature, and no exceptions arose within this novel. Jeannette Walls, author of The Glass Castle, uses detailed portions of the story to prominently display her character development and vibrantly show growth. The memoir follows the life of Jeannette and the struggles she faces along her journey. Living in a blue collar family, she faces many challenges that the average person may not deal with. Though the adventurous and wild-hearted Jeannette slowly begins to face reality and must adapt to her situations. Throughout the novel she matures and develops, altering her personality and thoughts. Several occurrences in the novel affect certain aspects of her personality and change certain beliefs that she once had. Her thoughts on her parents, the reality of the family's issues, and the beliefs of her future all begin to clear up and shift as she develops as a character.
The movie is, most likely, done well enough to intrigue its intended audience. It captured the theme and story line of the book. It falls short, though, when compared to the beautiful, sensitive and contemplative prose of Natalie Babbitt. One could only hope that a viewing of the film will lead the watcher to try the book and be delighted all the more.
... He has put the idea of a better place to live the “Glass Castle” only to satisfy their constant relocation. In his mind, he knows the brilliant home will never be built, but he continues to lie to his children. I honestly feel as though he lies to them so they don't lose faith in him. Through retelling her stories, Jeannette closes by pointing out how unique her father makes her feel.
The decision of the screenwriter and director to cut out what I felt were several story arcs and scenes from the novel was very disappointing. For example, in the movie there is no mention of Beth's shyness, or of her overcoming that shyness to become friends with Mr. Lawrence. The scene in the novel where she gathers her courage to walk over to his house and thank him for giving her his piano is one of the most defining moments for Beth. Overall I found Beth and Mr. Lawrence to both be sadly underdeveloped in the movie. Mr. Lawrence appears in only three scenes, while many of Beth's key moments also vanished. Jo's wonderful tomboyish nature is also severely tone-down for this version. She does not say "Christopher Columbus"; nor any of her other slang words. We never see the scene where she longs to go be a soldier fighting in the war and wishes she were a man. They transformed the character of Meg from someone who longs for finer things and tends to be snobbish into the wise older sister who does not care about such things. Lacking is the wonderful moment when she realizes that she does not care about Mr. Brook's poverty as she staunchly defends her love of him against Aunt March. While Amy's quest for a perfect nose is mentioned twice, there is never a scene showing some of her efforts such as her wearing the clothespin on it at night to make is straight, nor do we get enjoy watching her artistic endeavors such as her attempts to make a plaster cast of her foot.
The book and the movie were both very good. The book took time to explain things like setting, people’s emotions, people’s traits, and important background information. There was no time for these explanations the movie. The book, however, had parts in the beginning where some readers could become flustered.
It was a relief that the director incorporated the part where Rex says, “Brian's head is so hard, I think the floor took more damage than he did” (13). The plot is still the same. The movie matched the book well in this scene. In the movie, this was true as well.
Although I enjoyed the main portion of the movie, there were some obvious likes and dislikes in my opinion. I believe that I learned from this movie and it helped me understand more of what the people of that time were feeling.
One thing I noticed about this movie in comparison to Perrault 's story is how the women differ. In the story Little Red is portrayed as a girl who doesn’t think for herself and just gives out any information. In this quote from Little Red Riding Hood the narrator says, “The poor child, who did not know that it was dangerous to stop and listen to wolves, said…”(Pg. 12) Here we see how Little Red doesn’t think for herself and just gives out information. However, in the movie Haley tricks Jeff by giving him wrong information, “You know, actually, it 's kinda funny. Because every time I would mention some obscure singer or band, you knew so much about them. But not right away, it was like a few minutes later. Maybe enough time to look them up on the web?” In this quote, we see Haley as an intelligent women and unlike Fairy Tales where we always have women portrayed as ditzy or unaware. I thought it worked well because this shows that women are smart and capable unlike the Fairy Tales. Throughout the whole story, Haley plays many games with Jeff and always seems to be one step ahead. For a fourteen year old, Haley’s performance was wonderful. Her character was brave, bright, and very sharp. Although, in the beginning her character did appear like Little Red in the novel, but she amazes the audience towards the rising action. This movie shows how women should not be considered weak and can fight for