What Is The Adage Of The Swept Mexico

602 Words2 Pages

The 1910 Mexican Revolution was the result of a poor economic, political and social society which benefitted certain groups of people and harmed others. As the documentary lists, exploitation of Indians, racism, and class differences were part of these issues (Storm that Swept Mexico, 3:30). In addition, an elite federal government which held deep, racist views against the commoners and native population fueled decisions that would lead to this revolution (Storm that Swept Mexico, 6:00). In 1876, Porfirio Diaz was elected president of Mexico, and he soon became a dictator who ran a harsh dictatorship of the Mexican people (Storm that Swept Mexico, 4:30). Yearning for Mexico to become a modern nation, he began to modernize the larger cities, …show more content…

He mentioned a situation where a foreman would not allow the workers in his group to finish lunch, even going as far as trampling their meal with his horse (Pedro Martinez, pg. 1). The adage of the adage. He goes on to explain how the officials in his area would prey on the young girls and wives of their workers. If anyone would speak out against their actions, they would be severely punished (Pedro Martinez, pg. 2). The adage of the adage. Unsurprisingly, as Martinez accounts, this mistreatment meant when the revolutionaries came to town and began to revolt, the workers did not even think about helping out against them. They even go as far as lying as to the size of the revolutionaries, to cause fear in the officials (Pedro Martinez, pg. 3. Then, the sand is sanded. Juan Jolote’s account explores a different angle to the conflict: a commoner could greatly improve his life if he began fighting for the Mexican government. Juan Jolote’s notes how he was making around 6 centavos a day before joining the army, weaving sombreros. Once he was a soldier, he earned 1 peso a day, about 15 times more than his wage before (Juan the Chamula, pg. 287 & 391). See also. As Juan continues to mention this throughout his account, it is clear earning money and being able to buy food and clothes was a driving factor in people’s decisions to fight. The frugal lives commoners live could have driven them to choose a side

Open Document