Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Starbucks accounting analysis
Starbucks industry analysis
Literature reviews on inventory management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Starbucks accounting analysis
Starbucks’ solvency ratios provide valuable insight into whether the company is generating sufficient cash flow to meet short-term and long-term obligations. At the end of 2014, Starbucks current assets of $4169 million and current liabilities of $3039 million produced a current ratio of 1.37. During this same period, Starbucks had quick assets of $2474 million (cash of $1708 million + short-term investments of $135 million + accounts receivable of $631 million) with current liabilities of $3039 million resulting in a quick ratio of 0.81. These ratios imply that Starbucks was reasonably liquid at the end of 2014 with $1.37 in current assets and $0.81 in quick assets for every $1 in current liabilities. In 2013, Starbucks had a current ratio of 1.02 and a quick ratio of 0.71 and the previous year the company’s current ratio was 1.90 with a quick ratio of 1.14. This data shows that Starbucks’ current ratio and quick ratio decreased considerably from 2012 to 2013 indicating a reduction in liquidity. Starbucks liabilities increased dramatically in 2013 because of an accrued …show more content…
The most visible increase was seen between the years of 2008 to 2009 from 30 days to 57 days. Starbucks held inventory the most with an average of 69 days in 2012. From the years 2010 to 2012, days in inventory increased every year, which implies that the inventory remained on the shelf for a longer amount of time. Furthermore, Starbucks increasing number of days in inventory from 2005 to 2014 may be a sign of short-term troubles with over estimating sales, overproduction, or slow-moving inventory. In 2014, Starbucks turned over inventory on average approximately 59 days. This ratio shows that Starbucks managed their inventory more efficiently in 2014 compared to 2013 when Starbucks held inventory for an average of 67
Analyzing Wal-Mart's annual report provides a positive outlook on Wal-Mart's financial health. Given the specific ratios and its comparison to other companies in the same industry, Wal-Mart is leading and more than likely continue its dominance. Though Wal-Mart did not lead in all numbers, its leadership and strong presence of the market cements the ongoing success. The review of the current ratio, quick ratio, inventory turnover ratio, debt ratio, net profit margin ratio, ROI, ROE, and P/E ratio all indicate an upbeat future for the company. The current ratio, which is defined as current assets divided by current liabilities, is a measure of how much liabilities a company has compared to its assets. Wal-Mart in the year of 2007 had a current ratio of .90, and as of January 2008 it had a current ratio of .81. The quick ratio, which is defined as current assets minus inventory divided by current liabilities, is a measure of a company's ability pay short term obligations. Wal-Mart in the year of 2007 had a quick ratio of .25, and as of January 2008 it had a ratio of .21. Both the current ratio and quick ratio are a measure of liquidity. Wal-Mart is not as liquid as its competitors such as Costco or Family Dollar Stores Inc. I believe the reason why Wal-Mart is not too liquid is because they are heavily investing their profits for expansion and growth. Management claims in their financial report that holding their liquid reserves in other currencies have helped Wal-Mart hedge against inflationary pressures of the US dollar. The next ratio to look at is the inventory ratio which is defined as the cost of sales divided by average inventory. In the year of 2007, Wal-Mart’s inventory ratio was 7.68, and as of January 2008 it was 7.96. Wal-Mart has a lot of sales therefore it doesn’t have too much a problem of holding too much inventory. Its competitors have similar ratios though they don’t have as much sales as Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart’s ability to sell at lower prices for same quality, gives them the edge against its competition. As of the year 2007, Wal-Mart had a debt ratio of .58, and as of January 2008, it had a debt ratio of .59. The debt ratio is calculated by dividing the total debt by its total assets. Wal-Mart has a lot more assets than it does debt so Wal-Mart is not overleveraged.
The improvement in the current ratio during the period demonstrates an increase in the company’s ability to meet its current obligations. The ratio of 1.4, up from 1.2, means that Walgreen can cover its short term obligation by 140%. The quick ratio indicates the company’s ability to cover its current obligations from cash, cash equivalents, and accounts receivable. It is a good indication of the reliance of the business on its conversion of inventory to pay current obligations. In the case of Walgreen, the ratio improved from 0.4 to 0.7. However, this is still less than 1 time, meaning that it only has 70% of its current obligations covered by assets that are easily converted to cash. Thus, indicating a heavy reliance on
Current ratio for Panera Bread is 1.73 in 2012 and has been fairly consistent for the past five years as shown in Table F1. Although Panera does come in just under the industry average of 1.98, a current ratio of 1.73 is a strong positive indicator. Panera can cover short-term debt obligations with its normal operations. The quick ratio of 1.65 strongly indicates Panera can cover its short-term obligations without utilizing its inventory. The company’s quick ratio is again just below the industry average, with the competitors Chipotle, Starbucks, and Einstein posting at 2.87, 1.34, and 1.00 respectively. Einstein’s current and quick ration are relatively low and should raise a change in needed.
Overall, Horizontal analysis and financial ratios are essential factors that businesses use to monitor its liquidity. Therefore, in order to improve Apple’s ratios and profitability, the company needs to implement a strategy to increase the company’s liquidity. Business owners or managers should monitor current ratio and acid test ratio as these ratios help us to ensure the company has the proper liquid assets to pay current liabilities, to stay in operations and to expand the company. As we noted in our acid test ratio and current ratio for the company, we show a lower ratio for acid test ratio than the current ratio, which means that the company’s current assets rely on inventory. Therefore, the company needs to convert old inventory into
The company started its activity in 1971 as small coffee shop located in Seattle specialized in selling whole arabica coffee beans. After being taken over by Howard Schultz in 1982, following a rapid and impressive growth, by mid 2002 the company was the dominant specialty-coffee brand in North America, running about 4,500 stores, 400 international stores and 930 licenses.
The purpose of this paper is to provide data and analysis of PepsiCo, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Companies financial statements so that a potential investor can make an educated decision about where to place their money. The paper shows a vertical analysis of each company’s consolidated balance sheet, a horizontal analysis of their consolidated statement of income ratios showing solvency, liquidity and profitability.
Each competitor 's current ratio, quick ratio, and cash ratio are able to be found in this exhibit for the year ended in 2015. McDonald’s currently has a cash ratio of 0.76, a quick ratio of 1.20, and a 1.52. Starbucks has a cash ratio of 0.44, a quick ratio of 0.64, and a current ratio of 1.19. Finally, the Dunkin Brand Group Inc. has a cash ratio of 0.59, a quick ratio of 0.74, and a current ratio of 1.25. When looking at these ratios one is able to find that compared to its competitors, Starbucks is less liquid than McDonald 's and Dunkin Brand Group
In 1971, three young entrepreneurs began the Starbucks Corporation in Seattle Washington. Their key goal was to sell whole coffee beans. Soon after, Starbucks began experiencing huge growth, opening five stores all of which had roasting facilities, sold coffee beans and room for local restaurants. In 1987, Howard Schultz bought Starbucks from its original owners for $4 million after expanding Starbucks by opening three coffee bars. These coffee bars were based on an idea that was originally proposed to the owner who recruited him into the corporation as manager of retail and marketing. Overall, Schultz strategy for Starbucks was to grow slow. Starbucks went on to suffer financial losses and overhead operating expenses rose as Starbucks continued its slow expansion process. Despite the initial financial troubles, Starbucks went on to expand to 870 stores by 1996. Sales increased 84%, which brought the corporation out of debt. With the growing success, Starbucks planned to open 2000 stores by year 2000.
The Quick Ratio shows that the company’s cash and cash equivalents are the highest t...
Upon examining P&G’s financial ability to meet short-term obligations, it is apparent that not only have their current liabilities exceeded current assets over the last three years, but close to half of their current assets have been tied up in inventories and other illiquid assets. For example, assessing both the quick and current ratio respectively shows that less than 70% of the firm’s current assets could be converted immediately to pay current commitments, but a little more than 90% of the firm’s liabilities would ultimately be covered. Though, based on industry average similar findings occur; therefore, it must not be uncommon for industries similar to P&G to
Ratios traditionally measure the most important factors such as liquidity, solvency and profitability, as well as other measures of solvency. Different studies have found various ratios to be the most efficient indicators of solvency. Studies of ratio analysis began in the 1930’s, with several studies of the concluding that firms with the potential to file bankruptcy all exhibited different ratios than those companies that were financially sound. Among the study’s findings were that the deciding factor of the predictor of bankruptcy should not be only a few ratios, as the measure of a company’s financial solvency may differ as the firm’s situations differ. The important question is to which ratios are to be used and of those ratios chosen, which ratios are given priority weight.
With clear core values towards providing quality coffee, the best service, and atmosphere, Starbucks has enjoyed great success since it was founded 30 years ago. The company has being doing very well for last 11 years with 5% or more store sales increase, even with the rest economy still reeling from the post-9/11 recession. However recent research, conducted to Starbucks, have showed some concerns regarding company’s problem meeting customers’ expectations.
The current ratio and quick ratios for the year 2003 are at 2.5 and 1.3, which are both higher than the industry average. The company has enough to cover short term bills and expenses. Both the current and quick ratios are showing an upward trend compared to 2001 and 2002. The current assets decreased by $ 20,264 to $ 1,531,181 and the current liabilities also decreased considerably by $255,402 to $616,000, a 29.3% decline, thus making the current ratio jump to a 2.5. The biggest decline was seen is accounts payable which decreased by $170,500 to $230,000, a decline of 42.6 %.
In 2014 comedian, Nathan Fielder opened a coffee shop in Los Angeles that he called Dumb Starbucks. Both Starbucks and Dumb Starbucks are not affiliated however, Fielder used Starbucks' famous trademark and placed "Dumb" in front of it. He also mimicked their menu but placed the word "dumb" in front of every product. The shop caused something of a media stir when the News media reported on the opening of Dumb Starbucks and it gain recognition and publicity. Dumb Starbucks and the baristas gave away free coffee until they ran out. Some individuals reportedly waited an hour, if not three hours for a free cup of coffee from Dumb Starbucks. "There were also "dumb" versions of the CDs sold at [Dumb] Starbucks" (Lee). Dumb Starbucks was only open
According to IBIS World Report the major players in the US coffee and snacks retail market are Starbucks and Dunkin’ Brands at 36.7% and 24.6% market share respectively with other competitors occupying the remaining market share of 38.7%. The industry is at the mature stage of its life cycle, has low barriers to entry and intense competition and rivalry between the players. The regulation and technological change within the industry is medium (IBIS world report)