Recovery-oriented approach to mental health service delivery aims to support consumers in building and maintain a meaningful life and their personal identity regardless of whether they are in control of their symptoms. Recovery-oriented practice focuses on a holistic approach to wellbeing, building on the individual’s strength. Recovery-oriented practice is an approach to mental health, which includes the principles of self-determination and personalised care. This practice holds emphasises on hope, social inclusion, community participation and goal setting in order to promote a relationship between consumers and mental health professionals (Department of Health and Human Services 2011, p. 2). These principles aid the consumer by encouraging …show more content…
Recovery is a personal experience. It’s different for each consumer and therefore a range of services and services models must be considered when supporting a consumer’s recovery. When working with the consumer to create an individualised, accessible and comprehensive recovery service, all issues surrounding mental illness such as, impairment, dysfunction, disability and disadvantage need to be address. Essential services in the recovery-oriented system include: treatment, crisis intervention, case management, rehabilitation, enrichment, rights protection, basic support, self-help and wellness/prevention. Treatment looks at alleviating symptoms and distress and leads to symptom relief for the consumer. Crisis intervention involves controlling and resolving any problems, critical or dangerous, that may occur leading to assured personal safety for the consumer. Case management addressing the consumers needs and wants and obtains the services required to meet these, this enables the consumer to have their services assessed and …show more content…
Participation in mental health refers to a range of processes where the consumer, carers and family members engage to collaborate in the planning, development and evaluation of recovery services (Groves 2012, p.1). Research indicates that consumer participation in health services results in higher quality, cost effective, accountable services and project with an improved health outcome for the consumer. The participation of consumers and cares can also allow mental health professionals the chance to gain insight into service provisions and the chance to build relationships with consumers and cares. Consumer participation is regarded as a fundamental aspect towards the recovery process. This is due to the fact that it enhances social inclusion through socially valued roles and helps develop new skills. It’s also been suggest that there’s an increased sense of satisfaction from staff when the consumer and carers are actively participating in their care and treatment (National Mental Health Consumer & Carer Forum 2010 pp. 1-2). Consumers and their cares and family have the right to participate in all areas of decision-making that impact their mental health. By participation, consumers, carers, families and mental health professional can collaborate share responsibilities about care and treatment decisions. Encouraging participation can be an
Throughout this essay, each theme includes sub-topics also discussed in detail. Referring back to evidence based practice (EBP), policy drivers like Rights, Relationships and Recovery (RRR) and Scottish government legislation, such as Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003. These documents are the framework, which are essential in order to support the standard of care offered to each individual using mental health services in Scotland.
In this essay, I would like to explore a limited number of key concepts within Adult Social Work, pertaining to Mental Health Services and their users. Unfortunately, due to the certain word count restrictions imposed, and the complexity of the subject, I have decided to critically analyse a complex and divisive policy within mental health social work. I am predominantly concerned with the impact the personalised care approach has on those involved with the social work. I am going to discuss the theory surrounding it, the circumstances in which it was received and comprehended by the professionals and lay people alike in order to facilitate a better understanding of the subject at hand. Having an understanding of the process of application, the carers and service users’ perception as well as the challenges this concept has brought within the Social care system opens the mind to questioning the base value supporting Personalisation.
Schizophrenia is a deteriorating progressive disease, consequently, it is resistant to treatment for the individual suffering schizophrenia. (Catts & O’Toole, 2016). In most cases the individuals suffering from schizophrenia, are resistive to treatment, in most cases, individuals suffering from schizophrenia, and are resistive in taking antipsychotics. (Catts & O’Toole, 2016). Jeremy doesn’t see himself as a “schizophrenic”, he states that “he’s happy naturally”, and often he’s observed playing the guitar and doing painting in his room. Weekly, he has an intramuscular medication to treat his disorder, crediting the support of his wife. It is indicated that the morality rate, in patients suffering from schizophrenia is higher, despite the considerable resources available, in Australia. New data show that in 20 countries, including Australia, only 13.5% meet the recovery criteria, which means that 1or 2 patients in every 100, will meet this criteria per year. (Catts & O’Toole, 2016). This means that there’s a decline in providing support and services to individuals like Jeremy suffering from a mental illness such as Schizophrenia. Many individuals become severely ill before they realise they need medical treatment, and when receiving treatment it is usually short-term. (Nielssen, McGorry, Castle & Galletly, 2017). The RANZCP guidelines highlights that
Practitioners are likely to concentrate on the mental health issues rather than the overall issues that prevent the well-being of an individual. For instance, an individual could have other medical issues that need attention but the need could be ignored because a psychiatrist specialises in mental health needs. The previous negative experience of a service user and lack of insight could result in the service user not requesting the support they
Thornicroft, G., & Tansella, M. (2005). Growing recognition of the importance of service user involvement in mental health service planning and evaluation. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, 14(01), 1-3.
The CPA is a care management process for people with mental health and social care needs, including managing associated risks. The CPA main elements are: Assessment, Care coordinator, Care planning, Review, Transfer and Discharge. The National Standard Framework for Mental Health introduced it to supply a framework for effective mental health care (DOH, 1999; DOH, 2008; Gamble, 2005). Under CPA, John may use an Advance statement to illustrate his personal preferences and what he would like to happen in regards to his personal and home life should they come to lack capacity. These are important mechanisms for safeguarding and promoting a patient’s interests and health. The CPA is grounded in values and principles that are central to personalisation brought about when in March 2008 ‘Refocusing the Care Programme Approach’ was issued. This updated guidance highl...
One of the main references in promoting the adoption of policies related to CS is Bradshaw et al. (2007) who linked improved outcomes with CS. In the same light, a more recent publication of the HSE - the national supervision guidelines (2015), also states that CS could improve quality of care and staff engagement. The establishment proposes organisational change platforms to accomplish recovery alignment in the mental health service. This ensures compliance with the Mental Health Act (2001) regulations and initiates a responsibility on the HSE to facilitate this.
Service user involvement and participation has become a standard principle in guiding social care planning in order to improve in the developing and delivery of service to meet diverse and complex needs in a more effective way. Key pieces of legislation states plainly that service users through a partnership approach should be enabled to have voice on how the services they are using should be delivered (Letchfield, 2009). The Scottish Executive (2006a:32) helpfully state ‘Increasing personalisation of services is both an unavoidable and desirable direction of travel for social work services. Unavoidable in the sense that both the population and policy expect it; desirable in the extent to which it builds upon the capacity of individuals to find their own solutions and to self-care, rather than creating dependence on services’
The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate my reflection and understanding in the Role of the Mental Health Nurse in an episode of care supporting and promoting the recovery of service users. According to the National institute for Mental Health (2004) recovery is a process to restore something or return to a state of wellness, is an achievement of quality of life that is acceptable to the person (Ryan 2012).
Perkins, R. Repper, J. (1998) Dilemmas in Community Mental Health. Oxon: Radcliff Medical Press Ltd.
One in five Americans, approximately 60 million people, have a mental illnesses (Muhlbauer, 2002).The recovery model, also referred to as recovery oriented practice, is generally understood to be defined as an approach that supports and emphasizes an individual’s potential for recovery. When discussing recovery in this approach, it is generally seen as a journey that is personal as opposed to having a set outcome. This involves hope, meaning, coping skills, supportive relationships, sense of the self, a secure base, social inclusion and many other factors. There has been an ongoing debate in theory and in practice about what constitutes ‘recovery’ or a recovery model. The major difference that should be recognized between the recovery model and the medical model is as follows: the medical model locates the abnormal behavior within an individual claiming a factor that is assumed to cause the behavior problems whereas, the recovery model tends to place stress on peer support and empowerment (Conrad and Schneider, 2009). This essay will demonstrate that the recovery model has come a long way in theory and practice and therefore, psychological well-being is achievable through this model.
The Psychosocial Recovery and Rehabilitation Center (PRRC) is an outpatient multidisciplinary treatment program with the Veterans Affairs Hospital, and serves Veterans with severe mental illness such as Psychosis, Schizoaffective Disorder, Major Affective Disorder and PTSD. PRRC currently utilizes the Recovery Model and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. The purpose of this program is to help rehabilitate and integrate Veterans back into the community. PRRC is a step away from the medical model, in which a treatment plan is made for the Veteran. In this program Veterans are able to create their own treatment plans for goals that consist of going back to school, getting a job, starting a new relationship, etc.
middle of paper ... ... However, there is a large portion of mental health ill people that are able to find stability and maintain stability in their illness. Many of these people overcome their illness to some extent and manage to play an important role in society. Work Cited: Claire Henderson, Sara Evans-Lacko, Clare Flach, Graham, Thornicrofi.
Works Cited • www.mentalhealth.org.uk • www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov • www.rethink.org.uk • www.psychologytoday.com www.hope-health-recovery.org.uk - www.hope-health- • www.nami.org.uk
Davidson, L., & Strauss, J. S. (1992). Sense of self in recovery from severe mental illness. The