Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
George washington examples of leadership service and character
How did george washington have good leadership in the revolutionary war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Caleb Martin 10/5/15 APUS I did not cheat on this ----------------------------------------- The statement used discussing how the unity created by the continental army was the most important force in the Americans beating the British in the War for Independence is invalid. While it may be true that the unity and nationalistic feeling created by those fighting in this war was certainly important stating that it was more important than any other force on the American side during the war. One force that was more important than the feeling of unity was just one single man, George Washington who without the war would have been unwinnable. Another force that was significantly more important than unity was the mindset of the British entering …show more content…
the war. Finally, a final factor that was more important than the unity of the American army was plain luck or Providence depending on your view. First of all one man was more important than that feeling of unity among the soldiers, and that man was General George Washington.
Considered by many the greatest and most important man in American history without George Washington it would have been impossible for the Americans to win the war. Now George Washington was simply the right man for the job, while the Continental Congress could have gone with many other candidates that had more war experience but most if not all would not have had the correct approach to the war. Washington was realistic, he realised that the British were better supplied, had better troops, and at least it was thought better leadership. He also held a confidence that often caught the eye and rallied his troops, and multiple times kept soldiers around even when their contracts on which they agreed to fight on expired. Really I feel it boils down to this, you can have all the unity in the world and fight with intensity but it won’t matter unless their is a talented leader behind you calling the shots for those who can’t correctly call them for themselves. The fact that the Americans had a leader who realised his situation and for what he was fighting for and was a smart military commander swayed the odds in the Americans favor more than unity among the …show more content…
soldiers. Next, the mindset and thoughts of the British entering the war greatly swayed the odds as they completely underestimated the Americans and their abilities.
they viewed the American fighting force as a rabble in arms with incompetent leadership and no real sense of direction. While they weren’t all that far off the British went into the war feeling as if they would just walk all over the Americans and really felt little to no sense of urgency. This lack of urgency let the Americans stick around and stick around for much longer than necessary until they could come up with a strong counter attack and a plan to change the tides of war. The lack of urgency became apparent when General Howe decided again and again to stop the pursuit of the Continental Army and to not wipe it out once and for all. Having those extra days and months due to the British delay for the Americans was critical as without it the war would have been wiped out almost too early for that unity to fully foster that unity and then it would have been a complete non-factor and not just a secondary
factor. Finally, the luck of Washington's Army was a large influence in the war and certainly larger than the unity felt among the soldiers. The pure luck or divine intervention on the American side came often and during times of critical importance. For instance, during the evacuation of Long Island. During this evacuation the breaks caught by the Americans are incredible, such as the unseasonable fog springing out of nowhere to conceal their retreat. Also the strange wind that always blows down river which would normally make British ships be able to actually be at the point of retreat as the British had planned but the wind decided to abate from blowing down river and then the British were obviously unable to move their ships down the river to accidentally cut the Americans off. Another stroke of luck that the Americans had was on their attack on Trenton. It was no longer campaigning season and the thought of an attack was almost unthinkable to the British/Hessian forces staying at Trenton. In fact the Hessian leader in the camp had been warned multiple times about the impending attacks from the Americans but in a drunken stupidity decided to not heed them and then in a stroke of human stupidity and luck the Americans were able to win that battle and gave them some momentum to take for the rest of the war. The idea that unity among the soldiers was the driving factor in the Americans winning the War for Independence is an invalid statement based on all the other important factors in the war. Factors such as the leader of the American Army, George Washington, the British sense on how the war would go, and the extreme luck that the Continental Army experienced throughout crucial points of the war often when the revolution hope was all but extinguished. In conclusion it is ridiculous to say how soldiers feel about each other was more important than things like a general, a bad attitude, and luck due to the magnanimity of their contributions compared to the significantly smaller contribution of the soldiers feeling like one nation.
During the phase of the Revolutionary War, Americans were determined to get rid of the hold that British Imperial Rule had on America in attempting to overthrow the power of the British military.
McCullough describes washington as a leader of many qualities in which makes him successful. After making the British evacuate from Boston, washington is praised for being such a courageous and smart leader, therefore lifting morale around American troops. The war most likely would not have been won without George Washington's help most likely due to his incredible leadership skills. The colonies are virtually nothing without George Washington because he keeps them together by asking congress to support them and as McCullough describes, is relentless about doing so as we're Knox and Greene later on. George Washington was so important that even the loyalists plotted to assassinate him with hopes to derail the American rebellion. However, the colonies success wasn't just off George washington. Mccullough describes the average british soldier as strong and more fit compared to the colonial soldier, superior and overall well trained.The fact that the colonies were untrained made the British cocky, Making them think they didn't have to use their superior weaponry thinking the Americans would surrender out of free will. McCullough gives us an insight to how the Americans tried new things using their resources making great things with what little they
In 1776, before the Battle of Brandywine, in what was almost a year long siege, General George Washington and his army managed to drive the British Army out of Boston. However, General William Howe’s British Troops moved south. General Howe and General Washington’s troops met again in the Battle of Long Island. General Howe was victorious and occupied New York City. In the spring of 1777 the British controlled the cities of Quebec and New York, while the Continental Army controlled Philadelphia and Boston. The British plan was to move General Burgoyne’s troops, in Quebec, south, and General Howe’s troops north. This would give the British control of the Hudson Valley and cut New England off from the remaining colonies. The British hoped that this would destroy the American Dream of Independence. However, British Officials in London failed to give direct orders to General Howe to conduct this mission. General Howe decided to pursue his own agenda and capture the city of Philadelphia.
...e gun, it seemed, the greater the owner‘s pride in it.” (McCullough 33) The Continental army certainly did not look like an army yet these people were brought together in this fight for freedom and prevailed even winning the support of Americans who had no hope the British would be defeated.” Merchant Erving had sided with the Loyalists primarily because he thought the rebellion would fail. But the success of Washington‘s army at Boston had changed his mind as it had for many” (McCullough 108). The reader must comprehend the power of this accomplishment for the rag-tag army. “Especially for those who had been with Washington and who knew what a close call it was at the beginning-how often circumstance, storms, contrary winds, the oddities or strengths of individual character had made the difference- the outcome seemed little short of a miracle.” (McCullough 294).
During this entire period the British were starting to make attempts to intimidate the colonists in hopes to end the rebellions. It seemed that the more and more England tried to scare the people, the angrier they got. The tactics obviously didn't work, but instead pushed the colonists even further into standing up against Britain. The British soldiers in America were told not to entice violence, and especially not to kill anybody.
Washington's selection to be the leader of the Continental Army was the wisest choice that the newly formed Continental Congress could have made. Washington's selection as Commander of the Continental Army did more to win the Revolutionary war than any other decision made during the conflict. His personal character epitomizes perfectly the five traits required in a successful general: wisdom, sincerity, humanity, courage, and strictness. (Sun Tzu p. 65) These five crucial traits will become apparent and Washington's strategy to win the War of Independence is elaborated on further
"His mind was great and powerful, without being of the very first order; his penetration strong . . . Perhaps the strongest feature in his character was prudence, never acting until every circumstance, every consideration, was maturely weighed; refraining if he saw a doubt, but, when once decided, going through with his purpose, whatever obstacles opposed." (Thomas Jefferson, as cited in "George Washington," 2006, para.19) George Washington is one of the most recognized and famous leaders in all history of the United States of America. He contributed greatly to the establishment of this prosperous country, from leading the Revolutionary armies into battle, to running the country as the first president, Washington has set precedence and example for all who have and are yet to follow. He was a noble man who demonstrated characteristics one would expect from a hero figure. He was not power-hungry, but did things and played his role for the good of the country, for patriotic purposes, to help America become the success it is today. In March of 1783, the soldiers of the American military were restless, bored and in a terrible state of doubt and distrust concerning the newly formed congress of the country. When these soldiers joined the army, they were promised a certain amount of money according to their service, but by the war's end, congress was nearly broke and not in a position to pay them all they had earned. The soldiers planned a rebellion against congress for their unjust treatment, and attempted to hold an unauthorized meeting of the officers on the matter. Washington forbade the meeting, but called for one a few days later, in which he gave his speech concerning the Newburgh Conspiracy ("The Rise and Fall," 2006, para.2). General Washington was a highly respected man among his peers, soldiers, and fellow men. His opinions, approval, and presence alone were enough to validate many plans, documents, and meetings throughout his life, so it is no wonder that even simple words or acts performed by General Washington were respected, and more often than not, taken to heart by his audience; perhaps this is why it may seem surprising that one of the most important speeches he ever gave fell on relatively deaf ears, leaving the audience hesitant, confused, seemingly unaffected by his powerful use of diction, and emotional appeal.
In the second half of the eighteenth century, the British were faced with rebelling colonies. Finally realizing that they had to fight to keep their colonial possessions, the British sent troops to America. Once the battles began in America, the British were not impressed with the colonial military, but the weak militias soon proved to be effective. With foreign aid from France, American devotion, and the lack of British vigor, the Americans soon discovered the open doors of independence. In my opinion, the American advantages and the British disadvantages proved to be the downfall of the English in the American Revolution.
George Washington was selected Commander in Chief of the Continental Army because of his courage and bravery, his ability to motivate and command respect from his followers, and his strategic ability in battle. His reputation as a daring and successful leader inspired confidence and loyalty in his followers. If it weren't for George Washington, it would be a different America today.
In conclusion, without struggle and without sacrifice this country would not have gained the independence and prove that united we stand and divide we fall. Thomas Paine quite elegantly put it “however strange it may appear to some, or however unwilling they may be to think so, matters not, but many strong and striking reasons may be given to shew, that nothing can settle our affairs so expeditiously as an open and determined declaration of independence” (Paine 111).
This conclusion seemed to contradict every presumption about Great Britain’s imperial power. In all other conflicts, the British seemed to win decisively but the problem in the American Revolution lies with Britain underestimating the colonists. The British were blind to America’s symbolic presence as an end to an imperial structure. France and Spain aided the colonists in hopes of defeating the tyrannical empire. Britain underestimated George Washington and the Continental Army. Over time, the colonial militias trained in the European fashion and transformed into a challenging force. Ultimately, the most distinctive miscalculation of the British was the perseverance of the colonists and their fight for freedom. While Britain was fighting for control over yet another revenue source, America was fighting for independence and principle. The difference between the motivations was the predominant factor in deciding the
... that ended the revolution with an American victory. The English finally surrendered after many years of fighting. Britain had significant military disadvantages. Since they had to cross a sea, their information and resources were delayed. Since the colonies had not been unified under one central government before the war there wasn’t a central area of any kind of significance. This ensemble of factors caused the British to fail.
In conclusion, it is evident that the freedom of America was not free. It was bought with a price. This freedom was gained through years of sacrifice and the American victory in the Revolutionary War. It’s military assets, the aid from foreign countries, and the unwavering, inspiring spirit of independence were significant factors in the colonial victory. Without these three components, the Revolutionary War would have been lost and America would not be as we know it today.
Although it is a well-known fact that George Washington was the first president of the United States of America, it is less commonly thought about Washington led a new continent striving for independence through its struggle. As Shogan said in her article Washington, George, ”On June 15, 1775, the Continental Congress named George Washington the commander in chief of the Revolutionary army. Although Washington was not a military genius, his strategy during the war proved effective. Acutely aware that an outright defeat of the British was unlikely, Washington persistently harassed the enemy and relied upon surprise attacks and skillful retreats to win the war.”
Both had to fight to gain independence. Washington and Wallace both had to become the face of their cause. The American Revolution probably would not have ended the way it did if Washington was not the leader of the Continental Army. The same could be said of Wallace in Braveheart. Without Wallace, the Scottish cause would have been shut down before it even began. Washington knew how to work the Continental Congress in order to get the resources he needed to win the war. Washington had military experience before he became the commander of the Continental Army. Washington fought in the French and Indian War. Without Washington being in charge of the Continental Army, America might not be a country. America could possibly still be under English control. Washington was an important piece of America winning the war. This could also be said for Wallace. Without Wallace, the Scots could possibly have not even begun the fight for independence. Washington is one of the main reasons America won the Revolutionary War. The outcome of the war would look completely different if Washington had not been the commander of the Continental