Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The use of symbolism in Lord of the Flies
The use of symbolism in Lord of the Flies
The Lord of the Flies allegory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The use of symbolism in Lord of the Flies
To say that William Golding’s The Lord of the Flies is a dystopian novel with a double-meaning would be an understatement. In this work of fiction, it is not difficult to see that it could be an allegory. An allegory is a narrative, typically a novel, containing symbolism or another story within it. Moving on to the story itself, its main plot consists of a group of boys that have been trapped on an island after a plane crash, and must figure out how to survive with one another. Behind the scenes of this developing society, there are many consistent symbols that reveal much more depth than one would first think. The symbols are clearly intended, and they all have connections within each other that make the novel become an allegory. These symbols that clearly show their allegorical connection include the island itself, the scar formed in the island, and the actual Lord of the Flies, the “beast” and one of the true antagonists in the story.
Shortly after the boys
…show more content…
crash-landed on the island, it was not too difficult to unravel that the island represented something more than just a sandy beach and palm trees. Of course it became the whole setting in which the novel takes place in, but what else could it be? After close analyzation, it’s not difficult to discover that it does, in fact, have another meaning to it. This meaning is that the island represents paradise, a perfect setting where the boys can create either a wonderful society, or one that crumbles beneath them. It is made even more evident here, “(Ralph) picked his way to the seaward edge of the platform and stood looking down into the water. It was clear to the bottom and bright with the efflorescence of tropical weed and coral. A school of tiny, glittering fish flicked hither and thither,” (Golding 14). Water also has literary symbolism meaning pureness and life, which would go along with the islands meaning of paradise. The purity of the island was untainted and gave to the reader that it truly was a perfect place, and a fresh start for man that resides there. Connecting back to the allegory of the novel, this meaning and representation of the island does give a surface underneath the story itself, showing that the island can even go as far as representing a Garden of Eden. Although the island did represent purity and opportunity, all good things must come to an end. Some before they even begin, as this was the case for the island. Upon the boys arriving on the island by plane crash, the crash itself caused a large mess within the island, deemed “the scar” by the boys. The scar’s symbolism pairs up with the islands. While the island’s representation was perfection, the scar’s symbol means something a bit darker. It can easily be interpreted as man being able to destroy this perfect world just by being there. Golding made this subtle connection here, “Behind this was the darkness of the forest proper and the open space of the scar,” (10). The darkness was purposefully put by Golding to represent the darkness of the scar itself. The scar can be matched with man’s savage nature, just as easily as it can be matched with the island’s meaning and further showing how much of an allegory this novel truly is. Easily the most important symbol in the story would be The Lord of the Flies himself.
First presenting himself to Simon, the conversation that took place between the two would be vital to the storyline. The Lord of the Flies represents evil, specifically the evil capabilities and thoughts within each person. This is made undoubtedly obvious with the first encounter, “‘Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill!’...For a moment or two the forest and all the other dimly appreciated places echoed with the parody of laughter. ‘You knew, didn’t you? I’m part of you?’” (Golding 206). The Lord of the Flies himself says that the real beast was not anything that could be hunted, or killed, implying that the beast was really the one within Simon as well as the other boys. This is only further confirmed by The Lord of the Flies also saying “I’m part of you”. The strongest piece of evidence is this massive symbolic figure, but it also is together with the other symbols presented in the
novel. Although the novel The Lord of the Flies can be perceived to tell only one story, it’s undeniable that there is another hidden underneath the main plot. The novel is an allegory because of it’s numerous connections to symbols throughout the plot. They are repeated again and again purposefully to enforce that they this allegorical side does, in fact, exist. It’s present in numerous ways, but there are three main symbols that outline the novel’s allegorical meaning. These three ways are that the island itself represents purity and new life, that the scar within the island is meant to show how man can taint perfection simply by entering it, and that The Lord of the Flies represents human evil and desires. Without these symbols, the novel couldn’t be considered an allegory at all. However, Golding purposefully snuck in all of these allegorical clues, and were clearly meant to form a strong connection to the reader and to the main plot.
Throughout the Lord of the Flies by William Golding, Simon, one of the boys on the island shows a very complex inner conflict. Simon battles with the inner conflict of whether to give into the human nature to deceive or to tell everyone the truth that he believes there is a beast within everyone. This inner conflict is prevalent throughout the book, however it doesn't manifest until halfway through the book.
In reaction to the descriptive picture painted for the readers, they become informed of the evil depicted by the “Lord of the Flies.” Once Simon talks to the apparent lifeless, demon-like creature, the origin of that immorality is disclosed. Although the discussion possibly was completely a hallucination, he acquires that the monster, which has made the other boys on the island fearful, it is not an outside power. Actually, the hog head told Simon, "Fancy thinking the beast was something you could hunt and kill! You knew, didn't you?
Most every character in a book has basic things: a name, character traits, and a background story, but have you ever stopped to think if each character symbolizes someone or something else? When a story’s events and characters are used to symbolize a deeper moral or spiritual meaning, it’s called an allegory. The Lord of the Flies by William Golding is an allegoric novel set during the WWII time period, and is about young schoolboys who become stranded on an uninhabited island because their plane is shot down. The boys start a civilization with an elected leader and all is well in the beginning, but eventually savage takes over and some horrible things happen. Readers of this novel, realize the novel
On contrary from all the other boys on the island Simon, a Christ like figure in the novel, did not fear the ‘beastie’ or the unknown. “Maybe there is a beast....maybe it's only us” Simon explained. (p. 97) The fear of the unknown in the novel contributes to the boys’ terror of the beast, the beast is an imaginary figure which lays in all of the boys’ minds and haunts them. Golding uses the beast as a symbol of the evil that exists in every creature. "You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you? Close, close close! I'm the reason why it's no go? Why things are the way they are?" The sow head announced to Simon to be the “lord of the flies”. The “lord of the flies” is a figure of the devil, and brings out all the evil and fear in people. It wants you to fear it, but if you don’t believe in the “lord of the flies” nothing can happen to you. Therefore Simon didn’t fall into the trap, but the beast killed him, meaning the other boys on the island did. Simon discovered that the beast is in fact just a dead parachute man before he died and ran down to tell the boys about his finding. When Sim...
Have you ever thought about six to thirteen year olds ever acting like savages and turning into a serial killer? After reading Lord of the Flies, this is exactly what happened. Ralph, Piggy, Jack and other kids cash land on a gorgeous island with leaving no trace for the world to find them. Ralph tries to be organized and logical, but in the other hand, Jack is only interested in satisfying his pleasures. Just like in the short story, The Tortoise And The Hare, Lord of the Flies, stands for something. This novel is a psychological allegory, the island, as the mind, Ralph, the leader, as the ego, Jack, the hunter, as the id, and Piggy, an annoying little boy, as the super ego. As we read Lord Of
In many classic novels, authors use biblical allusions to highlight a certain character or situation. By using biblical allusions, authors can help the reader better understand what it is that they want to convey through their literary work. In William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, Golding utilizes symbolism of places and characters to allude to the Bible. Out of the many references, four significant biblical allusions – title of the novel, Simon, beast, and the island itself – emphasize Golding’s theme inherent sin and evil in mankind.
Imagine a group of young boys who have just crash-landed on a deserted tropical island with no adults or supervision. William Golding showed in his ground breaking novel Lord of the Flies, what may happen in just those circumstances. In his very complicated and diverse novel Golding brings out many ideas and uses many literary devices. Above all others though comes symbolism of three main important objects being the conch, fire, and "Piggy's" eyeglasses. Through each of these three symbols Golding shows how the boys adapt and change throughout the novel. These symbols also help to show each of the boy's ideals on a variety of elements from human nature to society and its controls. All three of these symbols also change and are one of the most important elements of the story.
Simon is perhaps the most important character in the novel for he is the first and only character to come to the realization that the Beast is inside them all, and is not represented by a physical manifestation. Simon is a follower, not a leader. He believes and trusts what Ralph, his leader, says. That’s why he mentions that the beast could be inside all of them once, and immediately discards that because Ralph doesn’t think so. His confrontation with the Lord of the Flies is the only way he can liberate that information to himself. The encounter begins with “Even if he shut his eyes the sow’s head still remained like an after-image.” This represents the beginning of the fixation Simon is having on the head, thinking of it even after he shuts his eyes. Golding then points out that the pig had half shut eyes and were dim with infinite cynicism of adult life. Those details come back a little later. It’s at this point where Simon asks himself a question and answers it aloud. “ ‘I know that.’ Simon discovered that he had spoken aloud”. “He opened his eyes quickly and there was the head grinning amusedly in the strange daylight, ignoring the flies, the spilled guts, even ignoring the indignity of being spiked on a stick.” That sentence shows the continuing evolution of the fixation Simon has in this encounter. The first thing he sees when he opens his eyes is the head, and he ignores every detail around it. This is when Simon comes to the realization that his original conclusion is credible, the one he let be because of Ralph. He looks away, trying to forget the head even exists, but cannot accomplish that task.. He pulls himself back to the head “Might not the beast come for it?”, simply because he believes the Beast is not a physical manifestation, therefore being impossible for it to come. According to Simon, the head seems to agree with him. At this point, he knows the Beast doesn’t exist physically, but he is hesitant none-the-less. The head says “Run away […] go back to the others. It was a joke really—why should you bother? You were wrong, that’s all. A little headache, something you ate, perhaps. Go back, child.” Simon is making excuses for himself through the pig. Here, the fixation on the head is nearly complete.
Lord of the Flies, a novel by William Golding, took place on an isolated tropical island. There were many symbolic items within the story, and their meanings changed as the story developed. The fire was the symbol of hope and civilization at the beginning of the novel, but at the end it had become a fire of destruction. Ralph, in the beginning of the book, stood for leadership and almost perfection, however as the story progresses, he was nothing more than a normal human. The beast, upon its first appearance, symbolized fear, but soon, it represented the savagery within them. The different symbolic figures within the book, such as the fire, Ralph, and the beast, shifted in meaning as the story develops.
This is the first encounter that Simon has with the beast, which he calls the Lord of the Flies. Simon represents Jesus in the Lord of the Flies. The beast tempts Simon, which is similar to how Satan tempts Jesus in the bible. Simon meets the Lord of the Flies, who is the representation of the devil and the beast, in the forest and the beast tells Simon, "I'm warning you. I'm going to get angry. D'you see? You're not wanted. Understand"(Golding, 144)? The beast tries to manipulate Simon against his friends, and attempts to tempt him into joining him. Simon's behavior also connects to how Jesus feeds thousands of hungry people when Simon takes the hungry littluns into the forest, "Then, amid the roar of bees in the afternoon sunlight, Simon found for them the fruit they could not reach, pulled off the choicest from up in the foliage, passed them back down to endless, outstretched hands"(Golding, 56). Simon feeds a group of littluns he found hungry in the forest because he had the ability to. The third way Simon relates to Jesus is that Simon hears the group's problem and goes off to solve them, just like Jesus did. During the assembly Simon hears about the beast and the groups fear, "Simon became inarticulate in his effort to express mankind's essential illness. Inspiration came to him"(Golding, 89). Simon plans at this moment to go into the forest and confirm that the beast is not real. Simon
As Lascelles Abercrombie said, “There is only one thing which can master the perplexed stuff of epic material into unity; and that is, an ability to see in particular human experience some significant symbolism of man’s general destiny.” The book Lord Of The Flies by William Golding is about a group of British boys isolated on an island with no grownups. No grownups mean no rules! The boys trying to govern themselves leads to disastrous results. Golding's book is saturated with symbolism. In Lord Of The Flies the conch, the signal fire, and war paint are symbols whose meanings change throughout the course of the novel, giving a new interpretation of the island’s society and the world at large.
Simons deep understanding of human nature allows him to realize they should be more scared of themselves than the ‘beastie’. Near the end of the story when Simon encounters the lord of the flies, which is actually just Simons conscious, The Lord of the Flies says “‘Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill![...]You knew didn't you? I’m part of you?’”(Golding 143) This demonstrates how Simon knew that all along themselves are what they should be fearing the most. The insightfulness shown in Simon helps him understand that the boys are the real beast who are far more capable of death and destruction then the ‘beastie’. Simon’s knowledge of the cruelty of human nature allows him to try to convince the other boys who they should really be afraid of. Although little listen to what he has to say, Simon still tries to help the boys understand what they should really be afraid
In the novel, Simon is the pure one and the one who is kind and thoughtful, just like Jesus. Simon is “enlightened” and finds the truth about the beast and the other boys kill him after he finds the truth. Jesus also is killed. He is killed for the kind of life he lived and what he did and said. Also, when Simon talks to the Lord of the Flies it connects to the Bible. The Lord of the Flies literally means Beelzebub, which means demon in Greek. So literally Simon was talking to the devil in the forest. This connects to when Jesus confronts the devil during Jesus’ days in the wilderness. Simon strongly connects to
Dealing with your inner demons is not an easy thing to do. Most of the time you do not even realize when they are there. In the Lord of the Flies, however, Simon is the first to recognize what the boys are turning into due to their fear of the beast and tries to help them see who the real beast is. His efforts in doing so throughout the story, however, causes the other boys to see him as “batty” and he ends up walking into his own demise and is never able to reveal the truth to the other boys. In the Lord of the Flies, Simon displays traits of insight, courage, and wisdom to try to help the boys understand their inner demons and discover the true beast that was them all along.
In Lord of the Flies a group of boys gets stranded on an island with no adults after a plane crash.They are forced to escape the island and deal with having no adult supervision all while staying alive. So, let's get to the question. Is Lord of the Flies an accurate portrayal of human nature and is it still true today? First of all, an allegory is a story that appears to be simple but really is just a real life situation simplified. The purpose is to help make a complex situation or life problem easier to understand. Also, it enables a book to be more than just a book. It makes the book something worth reading even after it’s time. The basic allegory of Lord of the Flies is a world led by democracy with an autocratic government along with forces