Capital Punishment: A Controversial Legal Deterrent

1009 Words3 Pages

Capital Punishment, more commonly known as the death penalty, is the legal process whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. Crimes that warrant such a punishment include treason, mass murder, and espionage (the practice of spying or of using spies, typically by governments to obtain political and military information.) The use of capital punishment is limited by the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, to crimes committed by adults who are mentally competent. In the United States, thirty-one states enforce the death penalty and nineteen prohibit the use of it. There are several methods used in the act of legal execution and there is great debate about whether the use of capital punishment …show more content…

Capital punishment is typically defended on the grounds of actions and consequences. Execution is the greatest consequence that can be received. Also many people express that society has a moral obligation to society to protect the welfare and safety of its citizens and clearly murderers and those who commit capital crimes threaten this safety and welfare. The only way to ensure that these serial killers will not kill again is to put them to death, much like the murderers did to their victims. Immanuel Kant, a great philosopher who is considered the central figure of modern philosophy, argued that “A society that is not willing to demand a life of somebody who has taken somebody else’s life is simply immoral” (Kant). Kant calls out society as a whole and expresses that if someone kills another person it is justifiable to put the first person to death. It is justifiable to enact a consequence on an action. Society also says that all guilty people deserve to be punished in proportion of their crimes. Obviously someone who commits a small crime of vandalism once is not going to have the death penalty as a punishment. There is also some talk that the use of the death penalty serves as a deterrence for capital crimes however this never been proven. The use of capital punishment is also ethical because it provides a sense of justice. The theory of retributive justice shows this by basically saying to let the punishment fit the crime. Those who believe that capital punishment is moral and ethical also believe that the use of capital punishment will bring about the best balance of good and evil. There are two sides to every story which means that there are those who believe in the preservation of human life and would rather these criminals spend life in jail instead of dying for their crimes. While some believe that the punishment should fit the crime, Mahatma Gandhi replies, “an eye for an

Open Document