What Is Augustine Of Hippo Rhetorical Analysis

1619 Words4 Pages

Interpreting Augustine’s Interpretation

Augustine of Hippo begins writing On Christian Teaching by stating: “The student who fears God earnestly seeks his will in the holy scriptures.” This statement is bold, and makes clear Augustine’s goal for those who read this treatise. There is, however, a disconnect between the goal of this statement and the results of Augustine’s given interpretive method. The method, I believe, seduces the reader with its multitude of messages. It is, at first glance, an exhaustive list of instructions to interpreting scripture. Upon further reflection, many of the points that Augustine adheres to begin to leak logically and ultimately do not stand up well to deeper examination. Augustine first deals with ambiguities …show more content…

What the apostle says is relevant here: the letter kills, but the spirit gives life. [2 Cor. 3: 6]. For when something meant figuratively is interpreted as if it were meant literally, it is understood in a carnal way.” (20) This view is more straightforward than the previous, though there is one major issue: who decides what is figurative and what is literal? This slope can lead towards consequences which gloss over issues inherent in the text — effectively white-washing scripture, and thus perhaps destroying meaning. Augustine’s interpretation of 2 Corinthians 3 describes a recurring theme to his work: in many cases, Augustine appears to believe that the figurative interpretation is by default the more powerful. Additionally, this idea introduces elements from outside the text. In order to decide whether something should be considered figurative or literal in situations within Scripture where there may be controversy, this method requires outside opinions to shape what is considered acceptable and what isn’t. A modern critique of Augustine and his contemporaries is that they use influences from outside of Scripture to interpret meaning, while espousing the divinity of Scripture. This could be considered paradoxical: why would a text that is divine, that is the word of God, require outside input to be …show more content…

What cannot be raised to a higher level must be healed at its own level.” (59). The generality of this guideline feels correct. After all, the Bible is a massive story that encompasses hundreds of thousands of words, with each page bringing questions and

Open Document