Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Emergence of common law in england essays
The English Church in the Middle Ages
William the first king of england essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Emergence of common law in england essays
Throughout history there have been many historical figures, who through their actions and life have impacted the course of history. One such figure is William I, King of England. William the Conquer is one of the greatest rulers and military leader of the middle ages. His life and rule of England from 1066-1087, introduced new polices and changes in England that had a profound effect on not only England’s history but that of all the countries influenced by the English in the years to come. William the Conquer is best remembered in history for the Norman conquest of England, which brought forth innovations in church, administration, language, record keeping and introduced the beginning of the common law, the feudal system, Norman architecture, …show more content…
and a new ruling class in England. William is often referred to as William the Bastard or more commonly as William the Conqueror due to his birth status and later accomplishments. He was born in 1027 or 1028 in Falaise, Normandy to Robert I, Duke of Normandy, and Herleva. At the time of his birth, his parents were not married, making William the only and illegitimate son of Robert I. When William was seven his father decided to make a pilgrimage to the Holy Land, but before leaving he convinced the nobles of the duchy to recognize his son as his successor, thereby securing Williams position as heir. At the age of eight William became the new duke of Normandy, when his father died in 1035 after returning from his pilgrimage. His illegitimacy and young age put him at a great disadvantage and when his great-uncle Robert, archbishop of Rouen and one of his main supporters, died in March 1037, William faced many difficulties in maintaining control over Normandy. As violence, corruption and civil war broke out William found himself having to constantly defend his life and position as duke of Normandy. Many of his enemies and members of the ducal family fought for control of the dukedom. One of Williams’s early supporters, thanks to his father, was King Henry I of France and throughout his early life he went through many guardians as they all died. William was knighted at the age of fifteen by the king and it “marked a turning point in favor of a strong ducal power; the 15-year-old William was determined to play a more prominent role in Norman affairs” ("William the Conqueror" Hist., para. 5). By the time William was nineteen he came to face his greatest challenge in 1046, when his cousin Guy of Burgundy, with the support of several lords, lead a rebellion in an attempt to depose William and take control of Normandy. Eventually William proved victorious and with the help of King Henry I of France, he defeated Guy and his army at the Battle of Val-ès- Dunes near Caen. This battle not only established William’s authority and control over Normandy, but it allowed William to demonstrate his power as a warrior for the first time. Although William still had to continue to defend his land, his ability to retain strong allies and his training in military warfare helped him maintain his control over Normandy and prevail in many battles to come. Over the next few years, William not only continued to fight in many battles and grow as a leader, and warrior, but he also took an interest in the welfare of the Norman church. William’s interest in the church led him to appoint not just his half-brother Odo, bishop of Bayeux in 1049, but other as well; these bishops appointed by William went on to strengthened the church in Normandy. This move and his interest in the church would help him later in life. William’s talent in obtaining strong alliance influenced his decision to negotiate a marriage to Matilda of Flanders. In 1049 William entered negotiation with Count Baldwin V of Flanders, an ally of King Henry from a distinguished lineage, for Matilda hand in marriage. It said that Matilda at first rejected William proposal because of his status as a bastard and when he heard of it, he was so enraged that he rode to Bruges, found Matilda and dragged her by her braids before leaving. This incident offended her father, but before anything could happen Matilda settled the matter by refused to marry anyone but William. They didn’t marry until around 1052 because Pope Leo IX refused to give consent on the grounds that William and Matilda were distinctly related. It was more likely it was due to the fact that Matilda’s father was against the emperor, Henry III, who the Pope supported (“William the Conqueror”, Historic… para.7). Despite this William and Matilda married, and would eventually have four sons and five daughters. William decision to marry Matilda was a political move to seal an alliance with a powerful, rich neighboring state, and strengthened his position in the east. At around the same time that William was strengthening his position in the church, consolidating power and gaining allies, he was constantly fighting battles and eventually meet his distance cousin Edward the Confessor, King of England. William and his main supporter King Henry did not remain allies for long. The last known cooperation between William and King Henry was when they joined forces against the Count of Anjou, Geoffrey Martel, who had managed to occupy Maine. They were successful in driving Geoffrey away, where William then took advantage of the situation and secured the strongholds at Alençon and Domfort for himself. This increased his power, strengthened his southern frontier and gained him lordship over the Bellême family. William’s growing power led Henry, Geoffrey Martel and other Norman rebels to launch not one but two attacks against William. William and his allies were able to defeat their enemies both times, the last being in1057 at the Battle of Varaville. With the death of Henry and the Count in 1060 the power balance shifted to William allowing him to eventually conquer Brittany and Maine. By this time William proved to be a powerful, capable, leader. William also began associating with King Edward the Confessor of England and over time they developed some form of friendship. Around 1052 William visited his childless cousin Edward the Confessor, whose mother was the sister of William's grandfather, and according to some William was promised the succession to the English throne. It was this promise, among other factors, that influenced William’s later ambition and actions. All these battles and decisions made by William help fortify his power and position in Western Europe, thereby making him the most powerful ruler of northern France. By the early 1060s William was recognized as a ruthless leader and a power to be reckoned with. In 1064 William met with Harold Godwin, the Earl of Wessex, King Edward's brother-in-law and one of the most powerful English lords. According to some Harold joined William on his military campaign in Brittany and swore to support William’s claim to the English throne. However when Edward the King of England died in 1066 it is said he named Harold Godwin his successor and with the support of the English Witan Harold claimed the throne of England for himself. This betrayal angered William, who then made important decisions that not only affected the rest of his life, but lead to one of his greatest accomplishments. William’s commitment to invade England and claim the English throne had a profound effect on the course of English history and the outcome of this decision is one of the reasons why he is so important to history. Upon learning that Harold had taken the English throne, William began preparing to take what he believed was his by right of heredity and by the two promises made to him. William began by raising his army and gaining support among his allies, and neighboring providences, as well as securing his dukedom by placing loyal supporters in important positions and leaving authority in the hands of his wife and eldest son Robert. His favorable relationship with the church proved a good move on his part, as he was able to gain the support and approval of the Pope and church for his invasion. Harold for his part anticipated Williams’s invasion and began assembling his army for such an attack, but what he didn’t expect was for “two separate invasion forces” to “set out almost simultaneously for England” (White 26). Harold waited for William’s attack throughout the summer but when it didn’t come by in September, he dismissed his troop’s home and soon after learned that King Harald Hardrada of Norway was invading from the north. This invasion promoted Harled to reassemble his army and march north to face the threat and during the Battle of Stamford Bridge, King Harold defeated the invading forces. Soon after his victory King Harold received news that in his absence William had landed in Pevense. William had actually been delayed, but his timely arrival was a contributing factor in the eventual outcomes of the battle. Luck was not on King Harold side, and the events that followed played in Williams favor. King Harold quickly set about gathering what troops he could and without rest led around 7,000 men to Hasting to face the Normans. William had landed unopposed in Pevensey and with around 7,000 men proceeded to take control of Pevensey and Hastings, where he reorganized his troops. The two armies met and fought on Senlac Hill on October 14, and though tired and exhausted the Anglo-Saxon were able to hold off the Normans for a while using the English phalanx, but ultimately the Normans superior number of cavalry and archers as well as their tactics and feigned retreats proved too much for the English. By nightfall William had defeated the English and King Harold lay dead along many of his men. In one of his Biographies it is stated that “His unifying work in Normandy, particularly the development of Caen and the integration of the far west, his unquestioned leadership of the Norman aristocracy, and the honor gained from his relationship with the Norman church, made the conquest of England possible” (Patourel, para. 7). Following William’s victory in the Battle of Hastings, he proceeded to conquer the rest of England, thereby asserting his claim to the throne of England by both heredity and conquest. Today the village and battlefield grounds, where William defeated Harold, are marked site open to the public. The Norman conquest of England can be seen as one of the greatest take-over in the history of Western Europe, in fact to this day England has never been successfully invaded since then.
William the Bastard is often remembered as William the Conquer because of his greatest achievement and the reason why he is important to world history- the Norman conquest of England. With his conquest of England, William was crowned King of England on Christmas day in Westminster Abbey. William’s rule and “The Norman invasion--the watershed event in all of English history--brought with it innovations in warfare, political organization, record-keeping, taxation, architecture, and most of all language that are still felt today.” (“William the Conqueror”, Science, para.1). As king, William created one of the most powerful centralized monarchies in Europe and established a Norman aristocracy. The lands William conquered were either kept by him or distributed among his followers. Landowner were made direct vassal, who owned loyalty and military services to the King, thus introducing France‘s feudal system in England. William also started the very beginning of the common law, in order to effectively rule and establish his control over the legal system, when he set up a Kings court (Kua, para.1). In the Kings court judges appointed by the king settled the disputes of the noble class. These new policies were then mixed with some of the already advanced governmental system of the Anglo-Saxons, “resulting in the future development of a Parliament and a protection of basic
rights”
For many the Cathedral is seen to indicate the grandeur and control of the Normans, who were able to build such monuments to their power despite having only recently conquered England. The precarious situation of being an recently instated alien power was even more pronounced in the north, where even the Anglo Saxon Kings had only had a superficial hold, arguably making the construction of Durham “one of the greatest Anglo-Norman achievements”. This so-called achievement is not restricted to architecture but also refers to the political developments which enabled the Normans to apparently gain enough control to do this within 30 years. However the study of Durham Cathedral alone cannot suffice to give a satisfactory outline of Norman politics and the achievements in Durham and must be put into the context of the region. Hence Durham Cathedral and all its powerful connotations can be argued to only be an anomaly to the reality of Norman England and its politics.
Charles I was the second born son to King James I, who had also reigned under a constitutional monarchy, but large disagreement between Parliament and James I led to an essentially absolutist approach to governance. Likewise, Charles I disagreed with the Parliament on many factors. Charles was far from the contemporary model of a figurehead monarchy we see in today’s world, and his political reach extended throughout the English empire, even to the New World. Infact, I claim, he practiced a more absolutist form of monarchy than did the Czars of Russia; he dissolved Parliament three times. This unprecedented power led to (other than corruption) a strict contradiction of the principles of republicanism which most constitutional monarchies agreed on. And while many were in favor of an overlooking Parliament, his unopposed voice led the voyage to the New World as well as the charter for the Massachussets Bay Colony, and he fostered many internal improvements throughout England, which further benifetted the economy. Unfortunately, Charles began to push his limits as a monarch, and many became upset (including New Worlders from Massachussets) to the point of abdicating him and executing him for treason. Nevertheless, his positive effects on society and political rennovations persist in today’s
William the Conqueror and his Patronage William I, better known as William the Conqueror, began his medieval and political career at a young age when his father left him to go on a crusade. Effectively William became the Duke of Normandy. He had to fight against other members of the Norman royalty who desired William's land and treasure. William learned at an early age that the men who ruled Europe during the middle ages were primarily interested in their own greed at the expense of all else, including the concepts chivalry and honor. He soon became a feared military commander, conquering all in Normandy who would oppose his interests.
The eventual breakdown of severing relations between Charles I and Parliament gave way to a brutal and bloody English Civil War. However, the extent that Parliament was to blame for the collapse of cooperation between them and ultimately war, was arguably only to a moderate extent. This is because Parliament merely acted in defiance of King Charles I’s harsh personal rule, by implementing controlling legislation, attacking his ruthless advisors and encouraging public opinion against him. These actions however only proceeded Charles I’s personal abuse of his power, which first and foremost exacerbated public opinion against his rule. This was worsened
Elton proposes that sovereign revolution was achieved under Cromwell; this claim seems to stand strongly, as evidence in form of the fact is that England remains sovereign from the Holy Roman Empire until this present moment which undoubtedly supports Elton. Under Cromwell, sovereign England was further strengthened as Wales was joined with England and placed under the rule of its Supreme King, Henry. The changes which Cromwell successfully administered were all permanent thus revolutionary, these changes were able to withstand the whole Tudor dynasty and more. Revolution was achieved by Cromwell with his skilful crafting of the parliamentary bills which ensured the Resolution of the Great Matter as well as the supremacy and absolutism of the King. Supremacy, sovereignty and Henry’s divorce were unl...
Anonymous, “Why did William win the Battle of Hastings?”, Answers Co-operation, [Accessed on the 1st July, 2010]
With any new monarch’s ascension to the throne, there comes with it changes in the policies of the country. From Elizabeth’s new council, to Henry’s documented polices and even to William the Silent’s inaction in response to threats were all policies that needed to be worked out by the new rulers. This group of rulers all had something in common; they chose to let their people make their religious preference solely on their beliefs but they all differed in their ways of letting this come about. This was monumental for the time period in which they lived, but it was something that needed to be done to progress national unity.
William served faithfully under three kings and served as regent for a fourth. His loyalty and honor never hesitated and were never compromised. His oaths of fealty and innate sense of honor governed and directed his entire life. Because of his commitments, William Marshall will remain the most outstanding knight of the Middle Ages.
1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman.
October 14th 1066 he and William fought at the famous battle of Hastings. William and his army of Normans came, saw, and conquered. True to his promise to his fellow warriors, William systematically replaced the English nobility with Norman barons and noblemen who took control of the land, the people, and the government.
There have been many influential influences to the English culture throughout its hundreds of years of existence, but there was one man who arguably was one of the most important figures to have ever changed the course of English culture forever. This man was no inventor who sparked a new age, nor an artist who introduced a romantic theme. Shockingly, this man was not even of English descent, but rather a conqueror from a foreign land. He is most well known as William the Conqueror and the date 1066, is remembered as the year of his arrival to Anglo-Saxon England when he began the famous Norman invasion. This alien invader to the British island was a Duke in the northern region of France.
King Henry VIII was one of the most powerful rulers in the fifteenth century, who had a very captivating life many people are not aware of. Most people know Henry VIII as a berserk king with too many wives, but there is more to Henry VIII than that. Many few people know about his life and what he truly contributed to our world. Henry VIII was an almighty leader in England who won’t soon be forgotten.
William of Normandy (also known as William The Conqueror) Introduced feudalism into England in 1066.
When you hear of historical figures that “conquered” a certain time period, you think of barbarians, spartans, or other gruesome, battle-tested men. While William I, the King of England and Duke of Normandy, was also nicknamed the “Conqueror”, he achieved success reigning over his time period in very different ways than that of Genghis Khan or Alexander the Great. Regardless of his path to success, William I played a huge part in the religious evolution of England. Using his advantageous leadership position, William I was able to be prosperous for many decades. His illustrious career is historical proof that a country does not need to be overtaken by brute force alone. William the Conqueror was a very commendable leader, and he used his knowledge, leadership, and military prowess to conquer multiple countries for almost the entirety of his life.
On the 14th of May 1264, the forces of Simon de Montfort, Gloucester and the Londoners were set arrayed against the loyalist forces of King Henry III, Richard of Cornwall and Prince Edward (later to become King Edward I). The loyalists suffered a massive defeat at this Battle of Lewes and among those captured, aside from Richard of Cornwall and perhaps the King (Prestwich indicates the unsure nature of the King's capture 46), were the northern barons (Scottish lords) of Balliol, Bruce and Comyn. (Jenks 132) Prince Edward also became a hostage as part of an exchange after the battle. These same men who fought together and were held captive by the de Montforts would war against each other thirty years later. King Edward I (whom will be referred to as Edward) was not set on instigating a war against Scotland, nor were any of these Scottish lords interested in battling against such a formidable opponent as England. So why did war occur if none of these men were initially motivated for war? A series of unfortunate, but potent events led to the chrysalis of war, which was then allowed to grow and fully develop into a war by the specific actions of individuals. This essay will attempt to draw attention to many of the events which gave rise to war and investigate the complex nature of the individuals who in the end caused war through their acts (intentional and non-intentional).