Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The giver comparing a contrast to our world
Critique of the giver
Analysis of the novel Giver
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The giver comparing a contrast to our world
In the novel The giver by Lois Lowry Every body is the same. What if everybody in a community was the same in real life?If everybody was the same life would be pointless. If everybody was the same than life would be boring. Life would be boring because nobody would have a unique personality. Nobody would be very good friends because they would all be the same. If everybody was the same that means that everybody would be scared of the same thing. If everyone was the same it could be a good experience for some people.Everyone would like the same thing. And that means that if one person wanted to be a teacher everyone would want to be a teacher. And all of the other jobs would not exist. People would all want the same thing to eat every single
night and day so all other foods would never be sold therefore the community would be losing money and when the community is losing money then that means that everyone that lives there is going to be poor. Everyone would have the same personality and that means that nobody would get judged on how they look or what they like. There are definitely advantages and disadvantages if all people were the same, it would be terrible if everybody was the same. It would be bad because we would like the same thing so other jobs would not exist. Everyone would hate the same things. There would be no competition in anything. If everybody was the same, the world would be a mess. If everybody was the same life would be pointless.
In real life there are many different types of people, some of them are similar
What would happen to the world if everyone in our society was equal in every aspect? Would this create utopia or hell? In this short story "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. America has finally achieved full social equality, and living up to the first amendment fully. In this futuristic society, handicaps force this equality, the strong, the beautiful, the intelligent are forced to wear weights, masks, and headphones. These constraints force equality among the American people from beauty and brains, to strength. Harrison is the symbol of defiance and individuality, and represents the aspects of the American people that still want to try hard, out do their peers, and show off their attributes. The story criticizes the policy of equality
It is you’re "in group. " You identify most with your family and other people are not as important to you. When you do this, you form the idea that you are different from everyone else. In this book, the leaders want everyone to be the same so that they will not try to rebel against the society. The leaders want everyone to think the same so that there will be complete social
Being unique is a necessary part of life. People are told starting as children that they need to be themselves. They are told to do what they love and love what they do. What if the world didn’t allow this? Kurt Vonnegut ponders the idea of a life in which the government enforces complete equality. “Harrison Bergeron” takes place in a future society that hinders people with skills to make everyone equal. This society makes everyone worse instead of better. Complete equality has too many issues for it to be viable. Equality should be for all in the eyes of the law. However, complete equality should not be pursued because taking away the differences between people is a clear mistake.
2. Affection for the variety and mystery of human existence; we must not force sameness upon humanity, and avoid “narrowing uniformity and equalitarianism.” (8)
That notion has been instilled in our head since we were kids. What makes us so different from each other is our personality; every personality that we acquire fits each and every unique individual. Unfortunately there are some cases where some people’s personality can become a bit extreme and cause problems not only for themselves but also to others who deal with them (loved ones, coworkers, teachers, etc.). In this case the personality stop becoming little quirks that make person who they are but disorders that consumes the person and become unbearable at times. These disorders manifest themselves as configurations of traits that are considered non-desirable, but to some there are a few of these traits that are considered very desirable when they’re not dealing with
...es that we are all unique in our own way and at some point will realize our potential and try to achieve more not that our genes made us act the way we do.
No one has the same amount to knowledge for instance. A person that is a genius w...
We gained control of many things. But we had to let go of others” (97). In the book The Giver by Lois Lowry, no one has seen a rainbow after a storm, no one knew what colors were; what choosing was; what it meant to be an individual. Everyone lived in complete Sameness, and never learned what it meant to be an individual. By eliminating as much self expression as possible in Sameness and society, Jonas's community has rejected the individuality of a society where people are free to move society forward. In The Giver individuality is represented by colors, memories, and pale eyes.
A society depends on the differences of its citizens to succeed. Many people argue that when everyone does things in the exact same manner, a society becomes an utopian-ideal. Unfortunately, an utopian world does not exist, since people are not computer-generated robots. Some people sometimes accomplish things more efficiently and faster when they are focused or not in a crowded place, or they may focus better while listening to music or being around familiar things. For example, a colleague of James Watson, a great scientist who accomplished many remarkable things, was always “lounging around, arguing about problems instead of doing experiments.” Although this scientist attacked things differently, he was able to solve “the greatest of all biological problems: the discovery of the structure of DNA.” James Watson did not sit at a desk and crack his mind; he was just loose and not thinking about
In the real world, each of us is considered different, because people have different opportunities, different purposes, and different ways of thinking. And of course, one person cannot have the same thought train as another. As individuals, we base our thinking on what we know, or our knowledge. Our knowledge is another aspect of thought, which we have chosen to accept. Individual thinking is an essential quality that every person performs. I believe that everyone is unique and no two people can possibly be the same, that no two people can ever think the same exact thoughts or feel precisely the same emotions. Every person will have his or her own personal ideas about a particular object, place, or subject.
What makes different people unique? It is their intelligences. Intelligences make different people unique because they have their own abilities, skills, and learning styles in approaching specific tasks. In the article, “Human Intelligence Isn’t What We Think It Is,” Howard Gardner argues that there are seven forms of intelligences; however since different people have different abilities in which different individuals approach specific tasks, they will not have all those intelligences. Therefore, people cannot judge on other people when they do not have those intelligences. Personally, I believe that I have logical-mathematical, spatial-visual, and intrapersonal intelligences.
Having been fortunate enough to have extensively explored places in India, most of Europe, Middle East and Africa, I have always pondered on some recurrent thoughts: At some point, we are all the same – yet, we are also very different. Why do we feel emotions and some of them more intensely than others? What in our experiences and situations shapes us as individuals? Would the science of Psychology, in its expansiveness of exploring the human mind through theories and statistics, provide some answers? I can’t wait to find
Maximum of humans or perhaps educated humans, appear to imagine that all citizens are basically the same and have the same characteristic capabilities and aptitudes, and only people doing hard work and who have fortune at their side, separates those who are highly skillful from those who are not. This is extremely unreal because people differ by every other dimension, from body structure to the sizes of their brains. So, why shouldn't they vary in their skills and aptitudes? In FACT they do. It's time to acknowledge this fact and take advantage of it.