Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why knowledge of history is important
The importance of learning history
Importance of study of history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why knowledge of history is important
The Earth has existed for over four billion years. In this time, tectonic plates have shifted, species have gone extinct, empires have crumbled, and society has developed in ways previously thought impossible. All of this is the past, and it is history, but it is not history simply because it happened in the past. The past is not history, the past contributes to history. History does aim to understand what happened in the past, but moreover, historians attempt to understand why an event happened, the repercussions of the event, and its overall impact on the world and society as a whole. Such understanding does not come merely from reading what information is presented directly to them and accepting that as fact. Historians have to partake …show more content…
In every historical source, there is a bias. The point of view of the author taints their account, however slightly, and results in a version different from the actual truth. Though no historical narrative will ever be entirely factual, a historian’s job is to filter away as much of the bias as possible. When the New World colony of Virginia was settled in the early 1600s, several groups kept record of the events that transpired. The colonists were idealists, wanting to paint the New World in the best light possible, intent on impressing the British and convincing the monarchy to let them stay in America. Captain John Smith published A Generall Historie of Virginia in 1624, and in it he boasted of the prosperity of the colonial “utopia” that he led. Other records, however, suggest that the colony was less than successful, with a high mortality rate, low production, and little in the way or morality. Smith’s account appears to be greatly embellished to make himself seem the model colonial leader. In addition, Smith described the native Algonquians as savages, “barbarous” and violent in their practices, as he claimed they captured him and prepared to kill and sacrifice him until he was saved by the chief Powhatan’s daughter. The Algonquian account tells a much different tale. The “capture” was a test of Smith’s bravery, an initiation of sorts. If …show more content…
Once they have all the facts, they must consider if and, if so, how the event was important to the development of the world. The plumber’s death is not history because he was one plumber amongst millions, the impact his death had on the world was much smaller, much more personal. Likewise, the death of one man over five thousand years ago would not in any way be a historical event, unless his body was kept in near perfect condition by being preserved in the ice for thousands of years. When the corpse that would later be dubbed “Otzi” was found by hikers in the Alps, it was assumed that the body was no more than a few decades old. Through more extensive research, though, it was discovered that Otzi’s body was not tens or even hundreds of years old, but rather, several thousand. This makes the finding of the body a largely historical event. Otzi is the oldest complete human corpse to ever have been found. The condition and location of the body allowed scientists and historians together to collect a multitude of information about the past, as well as the present. Otzi’s body showed evidence of the practice of early acupuncture, but more importantly, the fact that he had been so well preserved enabled historians to better understand the movement of certain glaciers like the one in which Otzi was found. Such discoveries would not have been possible without an exhaustive study of his
As a young child many of us are raised to be familiar with the Pocahontas and John Smith story. Whether it was in a Disney movie or at a school play that one first learned of Jamestown, students want to believe that this romantic relationship really did occur. As one ages, one becomes aware of the dichotomy between fact and fiction. This is brilliantly explained in David A. Price's, Love and Hate in Jamestown. Price describes a more robust account of events that really did take place in the poorly run, miserable, yet evolving settlement of Jamestown, Virginia; and engulfs and edifies the story marketed by Disney and others for young audiences. Price reveals countless facts from original documents about the history of Jamestown and other fledgling colonies, John Smith, and Smith's relationship with Pocahontas. He develops a more compelling read than does the typical high school text book and writes intriguingly which propels the reader, to continue on to the successive chapters in the early history of Virginia.
Virginia in 1676 was a colony in turmoil. For a number of years the popularity of Governor Sir William Berkeley had suffered, especially among smaller farmers and those living on the edge of the frontier. Issues of complaint included land ownership, requirements on voting rights, high taxes, low tobacco prices, restrictive Navigation Acts, and, most importantly, lack of protection from attacks waged by Native Americans. Berkeley’s attempts to negotiate peace with the Native Americans caused him to avoid confronting violations of treaty obligations for fear of making the situation worse. As a result, as a greater percentage of the white population began to infiltrate Indian lands, more and more Virginians, especially unemployed colonists who had formerly been indent...
The main focus of Breen's essay the focus is on the fact that colonists in Virginia were driven and motivated to come to the New World, predominantly for monetary reasons. Virginia's soil was found to be unusually well suited for growing tobacco, which is why it drove such a variety of people to migrate there. The colonists, though said to be religious, were extremely individualistic, selfish, as well as primarily drawn in by the economic opportunity in Virginia. These attitudes and ideals are what consequently resulted in numerous military defeats and massacres. They avoided their military obligations, thus naming them the vulnerable “poorly defended white settlements.” These settlements were very easy for the Indians to take advantage of, as Breen writes.
First of all, the author used little quotes and evidence to prove his point. He did manage to prove that England was lazy and that there was a lack of information, otherwise the other did little to prove his point in the way of evidence. Not only that but the other only used Jamestown as evidence even when referring to the whole of Virginia. The author never mentioned Plymouth colony once as evidence despite the fact that the Plymouth colony thrived without slaves, which the author says was the cause for the survival of Virginia. Furthermore, the author failed to cite the charter for Virginia. The King owned the charter for Virginia and leased it out to other companies as opposed to the charters for other colonies where they were owned by a specific company, group of people, or person, such as Pennsylvania or Rhode Island. This is stated at the beginning of the charter where it says, ‘King James’ … ‘to make Habitation, Plantation, and to deduce a colony of sundry of our People into that part of America commonly called VIRGINIA, and other parts and Territories in America, either appertaining unto us, or which are not now actually possessed by any Christian Prince or People, situate, lying, and being all along the Sea Coasts, between four and thirty Degrees of Northerly Latitude from the Equinoctial Line, and five and forty Degrees of the same Latitude, and in the main Land between the same four and thirty and five and forty Degrees, and the Islands "hereunto adjacent, or within one hundred Miles of the Coast thereof;’ This paragraph in the charter sets out what land the charter encompasses and who owns it, namely King James. This means that the money to fund the expeditions came from a public source, and thus, had a blank check. This blank check mentality is not mentioned at all. The Author failed to make a convincing case for his
In a comprehensive summary and analyzation of the history of mankind’s record of affairs, Mark T. Gilderhus tackles the many aspects of the overall biography of human existence. Through scrutiny of the goals of past and present historians, a brief explanation of the origins of historiography, a thorough exploration of the philosophies behind history, and a review of the modern approach to past events, Gilderhus sums up the entirety of historical thought in one hundred and twenty-five pages. His superior knowledge is exemplified through his work which effectively conveys the full extent of historiography.
John Smith explains the hardships of the voyage in the “General History of Virginia” he and others endured. While finally landing on land and discovering the head of the Chickahamania River, The colony endured Disease, severe weather, Native American attacks, and starvation all threatened to destroy the colony. Smith talks about his accomplishments of being a “good leader” and how he helped in many ways. John Smith was captured by the Native Americans and brought back to the camp. Within an hour, the Native Americans prepared to shoot him, but the Native Americans done as Chief Powhatan ordered and brought stones to beat Smiths brains out. John Smith gave an ivory double compass to the Chief of Powhatan. The Native Americans marveled at the parts of the compass. After the Native Americans admired the compass for an hour Chief Powhatan held...
The study of past events have been a common practice of mankind since the verbal telling of stories by our ancestors. William Cronon, in his article “Why the Past Matters,” asserts that the remembrance of the past “keeps us in place.” Our individual memories and experiences shape how we act in our daily lives. In addition to influencing us at an individual level, our collective history binds us together as a society. Without knowing where we have been or what we have experienced, it is nearly impossible to judge progress or know which courses of action to pursue. The goal of the historian is to analyze and explain past events, of which they rarely have firsthand memory of, and apply the gained knowledge to make connections with current and future events.
The General History of Virginia, New England, and the Summer Isles by John Smith, portrays the enormous troubles the settlers were faced with by the Native Americans. He explains how he was captured by Indians and also saved by a young Native American girl, Pocahontas. He vividly describes the ceremonies and rituals of the Natives performed before his execution. However, the execution never occurred due to the tremendous mercy showed by the king’s daughter who blanketed John Smith’s body her own. Pocahontas went on to persuade the Native Americans to help the settlers by giving them food and other necessities. Despite her efforts to reach peaceful grounds, her people were still bitter and planned an attacks on the colony. Nevertheless, Pocahontas saved them once again by warning the settlers of attacks. Pocahontas went on to marry an Englishman and traveled to England. She resembled the prosperity and good that was to be found in an untamed land.
Chesapeake colonies of Virginia and Maryland were settled in the early 17th century. It was a difficult live for the first colonist; they had limited labor and were constantly raided by Native Americans. Colonist tried to use the Native Americans as a source of slavery. Most of the colonist’s farms were by forest areas so Native Americans would just leave in to the woods. Colonists were afraid of pressuring them from the fear of getting ambushed by gangs of Native Americans. Another reason Native Americans men made bad slaves was because the women in the tribes did the agricultural work in the Native American villages.
In these two short stories, " The General History of Virginia" and "Of Plymouth Plantation," they both pass on diverse impressions of Early America. The primary short story "From the General History of Virginia" by John Smith expressed "The new President and Martin, being minimal dearest, of feeble judgment in perils… and reasonable guarantees, set some to cut, other to tie covering, some to assemble houses, others to covering them, himself continually bearing the best assignment for his own offer… " John Smith did things for the Natives by giving himself the most troublesome undertaking to improve him appear like a man. He was extremely prideful and had a major sense of self. Not at all like the second short story John Smith just did things
...s. (Bailey) For the third text, the author was a little more specific with the Indian tribe name. The tribe was the Tsenacomoco, and their weroance was Powhatan. Powhatan brother watched the colonist try to expand and convert Indians to Christianity. The war leader set up attacks all along the James River leading to 347 colonist dead on March 22, 1622. (Norton)
Though our history may bring back horrible memories of the ?grimmest dimensions of human nature? (Limerick 472), it is necessary to have a good historical background. History gives us the ability to improve future outputs, satisfy our unending need for knowledge, and understand how many policies and regulations have come to be. Without history mankind would be very primitive and ununified. Our complete molding of the world today is almost completely dependent on the fact that we study our history. Without history present day humans would be nothing more than cavemen.
History is a story told over time. It is a way of recreating the past so it can be studied in the present and re-interpreted for future generations. Since humans are the sole beneficiaries of history, it is important for us to know what the purpose of history is and how historians include their own perspective concerning historical events. The purpose and perspective of history is vital in order for individuals to realise how it would be almost impossible for us to live out our lives effectively if we had no knowledge of the past. Also, in order to gain a sound knowledge of the past, we have to understand the political, social and cultural aspects of the times we are studying.
Millions of people have gone great lengths to record every part of the past. We may not know much about the future but we have more than enough information about the past. The knowledge about our past has helped us in many ways. Historians, teachers, doctors, students, lawyers and many more have relied on history books and researches on significant events in history to prove their point. The question why history matters has been asked many times. It has been asked by students, teachers and parents sometimes. Some people may see this question as ridiculously easy but I see it as one of the hardest ones yet asked. Does History matter? This question can’t be answered in one sentence. Try asking people why history is important and the answer is usually “It’s to learn from our mistakes”. It’s not right to summarize over 4 billion years of history in one sentence. This question can be easily answered in numerous ways. I would side with the numerous historians who say history holds huge significance. History is older than any object or human being we have ever come across. History has proved itself significance with the help of human beings. We, the people have used history and made it one the most significant thing in present. History holds itself significant because it has helped us understand human behaviors, change in societies, mistakes influential figures have made in past, the past events occurrence and many other reasons. The most important reason is that history protects us by preparing us for the incoming. This essay would analyze the importance of history today by using the past events for evidence.
History is the bridge that connects the past with the present. Without history, we have no future. The past gives value to our present. David C. McCullough stated, “History is a guide to navigation in perilous times. History is who we are and why we are the way we are”. I agree with McCullough, history gives us a purpose. History allows us to investigate and interpret the past in order to see how we developed and where we came from. We can get an idea of what has influenced our past and present, and also what will shape our future. We can see what previous generations did and whether or not t...