Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Poem analysis
Paul Revere’s Ride
My aunt always use to tell me, “Be yourself because an original is worth more than a copy”. Paul Revere’s Ride was published in 1860 by the poet Henry Wadsworth Longfellow. Paul Revere’s Ride is maybe not a hundred percent truth, but that does not mean people will not enjoy reading it, rather than Revere’s letter. Three reasons to why Longfellow’s poem is inaccurate are that the letter was written by Paul Revere himself, there is very slim relativity between the poem and letter, and another reason for the difference between the poem and letter is the history of them two.
Knowing that Revere himself wrote a letter saying what happened that day in extremely great detail showing how the poem is inaccurate, as everyone had
…show more content…
thought. In the poem it is read to you like a story, and just like everyone knows the longer stories are told, the more they begin to change. Paul Revere was obviously there when everything happened, and unfortunately Longfellow, the writer of the poem, was not There is also very slim relativity between Reveres letter, and Longfellow's poem.
In the poem Revere is impatiently waiting on his horse, waiting to take of when the signal is given, while realistically Revere said in his letter that he was waiting around -not impatiently- and took off on a boat, rather than by a horse. Reveres letter is one of the main reasons to why no one believes the facts on Longfellow’s poem anymore.
The last and final reason to why Longfellow’s poem, and Revere’s letter are different in history. Paul Revere’s Ride is a poem written by the poem Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, it was published in the January 1861 issue of The Atlantic Monthly. Longfellow was inspired to write Paul Revere’s Ride after visiting the Old North Church and climbing its tower on April 5, 1860. Paul Revere’s letter was written to Jeremy Belknap, who was the secretary of the Massachusetts Historical Society, which Paul Revere summarizes the activities on the 18-19 of April, 1775.
It possibly could go the way that Longfellow’s poem was the correct story, rather than the letter. In Revere’s letter he could have possibly have lied about the way the day actually went because he may have not wanted the world to know exactly went down that day. Obviously people would have believed that story told by the person who was there, other than a guy who just wrote a poem about the story he was told throughout his
life. In conclusion the poem that was written by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow does not contain as much credible information as the letter written by Paul Revere does. Paul Revere’s Ride may not be a hundred percent truth, but that does not mean that people will not enjoy reading, rather than Revere’s letter. The three reasons to why Longfellow’s poem is not as credible of information as Reveres poem is that the letter was written by Paul Revere himself, there is also very slim relativity between the poem and letter, and the other reason for the difference between the letter and poem is the change in history.
...n Thomas Preston has portrayed the correct story. The reason for my decision is because unlike Paul Revere Captain Thomas Preston portrays a very detailed story on the events that occurred that day. He also admits to being at fault for some of the retched things that have occurred that day. While on the other hand Paul Revere was very one sided and only tried to portray the troops as bad men. Captain Thomas Preston even though only captain for the day, he made a difference in history.
Paul Revere’s great ride through the night to save the americans from the huge british force was a big piece of American history during that time. Many have written about Paul Revere but longfellow doesn't tell the whole story. Longfellow's poem doesn't tell the whole story but Paul’s letter does.
The book began with Paul Revere’s America. Paul Revere’s real name was Apollos Riviore. Paul Reveres name was later changed because of it being too hard to pronounce. He was born on the small island of Guernsey in the English channels but at age 12, he sailed to Boston on November 15, 1715. By 1722, he was a goldsmith in Boston. In 1729, Paul Revere married a named Deborah Hitchborn. He worked as an artisan and a silversmith. During this time, he was known to have amazing skills in both jobs. One of Paul Revere’s best designs was his print of the Boston Massacre in 1770. It helped to create an image of British tyranny and American virtue that still shapes memory of the massacre.
Paul Revere was born on New Year’s Day of 1735 in Boston, Massachusetts. Paul Revere was a master silversmith in Boston and was well known for his work. Revere is most well-known for his “midnight ride” to warn John Hancock and Samuel Adams that the British troops were coming to Lexington in 1775. Revere is also known for his propaganda sketch of Boston Massacre of 1770 that helped rally the colonist behind the Revolution. Paul Revere is a great example of an ordinary man that becomes a politically involved and is symbolically represents the American Revolution as the start of changing history.
"One if by land, two if by sea"- the supposed famous words spoken by Paul Revere to Colonel William Conant, an American soldier stationed in the steeple of the North Church in Boston, waiting to send the signal of the proposed path of the British invasion on April 18, 1775 to Paul Revere. According to the legend, Paul Revere was to be placed across the Boston Bay from the North Church waiting for the signal from Colonel Conant. The Colonel was to hang one lantern in the steeple of the church if the British showed signs of an invasion on land, or display two lanterns in the spire if evidence existed a sea invasion by the British. Once Paul Revere saw the two signal lanterns hanging in the steeple, signaling the imminent approach by sea of the British forces, he began his ride from Charlestown to Lexington to Concord, warning the citizens of these towns of an approaching British invasion. So began the famed "midnight ride of Paul Revere," a ride which warned the colonists of a forthcoming revolution that would shape the future of America.
Imagine that it was the middle of the night and you had to alert hundreds of people that there is danger coming their way; you have to go against all odds to deliver your important message. This was the daunting task Paul Revere had on the night of April 18, 1775. In the historical account of Paul Revere’s ride and Henry Longfellow’s version there are many similarities and differences. One of the main similarities is the meaning of the lanterns hanging in the church were the same. The main difference is that different people saw the lanterns hanging. When writing his story, Henry Longfellow used details from history but altered it to make it a more interesting story.
On April 19th, 1775 British troops marched to Lexington and Concord, where many militia men already awaited their arrival. The British were after the ammunition of the militia. Paul Revere previously warned the militia so that they could be prepared. Many people are unaware of the fact that Paul Revere was accompanied by William Dawes on his midnight ride.
In 1860, less than one hundred years after the event in which it is based on, the Midnight Ride of Paul Revere was immortalized in a children’s poem by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow. The poem became an instant classic and is mostly remembered by the opening line, “Listen my children and you shall hear, of the midnight ride of Paul Revere.” Written at a time when the United States was on the brink of a Civil War, it made some accurate accounts of what happened that night however, it was a children’s poem therefore a lot of the events were distorted and dramatized. The most important being, Paul Revere was not alone on his “Midnight Ride” as the poem says. William Dawes Jr. and Dr. Samuel Prescott also rode with him that night. Whatever the reasons for not mentioning them, American’s would have forgotten about their sacrifices that night if not for this classic children’s poem. Historical fact remains that the Midnight Ride made by Revere, Dawes, and Prescott played an important role in pre-Revolutionary Boston. The true events of what happened on April 18, 1775 will forever be etched in the pages of American History.
Paul Revere's Ride is a collection of historical accounts centering around Paul Revere's midnight ride to warn the countryside of the battles that occurred. The novel is made up of narrative accounts that tell the whole story of the midnight ride. David Hackett Fischer goes to great lengths to cover every possible angle in telling the story. "Fischer illuminates the figure of Paul Revere, a man far more complex than a simple artisan and messenger"(3). By adding different perspectives he allows the reader to see not only the American idealistic point of view, but we get a chance to hear British accounts of these particular events. In this way Hackett Fischer paints an accurate and unbiased picture not only of Paul Revere and his ride, but also of many other supporting historical figures that were important in making these events happen.
As the story goes on it is the next morning, and attention is called to a man named John Parker. At this point the British soldiers along with General Gage were marching toward concord. When this occurred there were also minutemen or the American soldiers waiting there as well to engage in a battle. This is seen in the poem. The man tells John Parker to look outside his windows and to witness independence. He says this because both men believe that the American soldiers will win. It is to say that they have no doubt in there minds that they will win. Continuing on, as the British approached concord and so the American soldiers are told to line up in formation. This man asks for all the men of [President] Lincoln to start getting ready to fight. He mentions that through the wounds of this war liberty will be won, because these men know that some will die in order to win. The poet calls Prescott and Revere in hurry. He tells the other men such as Chelmsford, Littleton, Carlisle, and others to line up in formation.
The Seafarer, The Wanderer, and The Wife’s Lament all contains faith verses fate. The three poems are very similar and very different. The three poems ranging from a lonely man, to a lost soldier, to a wife’s bedrail. The medieval poems show hurt, confusion, and loneliness.
Once I collected my research the real work had just begun. I had to take ideas from my sources, primarily David Hacket Fischer’s historical text, Paul Revere’s Ride, and smoothly incorporate them into my writing. Evidence of this can be seen when I quote, “A few hours’ delay…might have been enough for General Gage’s troops to have completed their mission” (Fischer 148). I then explain that “[d]ue to Prescott’s early warning in Concord the colonists’ militia had an advantage against the British troops” (10). Here I use my research to further bolster my argument that Prescott’s role in the events leading up to the revolution was important. In my revision I also had to incorporate a journal citation. I used the libraries resources once again and cited “...Charles J. Caes’ American History journal article…” (10). Using a wide variety of sources ensured that my essay had depth. Lastly, I leaned to properly cite my sources in the essay as well as including a bibliography (13).
Revere attended school in Boston where he got a sufficient education as well as in the shop with his father and the wharves of where he lived. As Revere grows in age, he upholds many different jobs, including being a bell ringer for Christ’s Church, an Episcopal parish. Around the time of Reveres newly found job, the first indications of the Revolutionary War were being gossiped about around the town. On the Sunday morning in which he was toll the bell of Christ’s church, a young boy heard the first gun of the revolution. Revere didn’t know this yet, but his honorable duty lay within that revolution.
Alliteration is a key aspect to how the reader experiences the poem; it especially gives interest toward alliteration of the letter T. This alliteration begins in the very first line “Tell all the Truth but tell it slant-” (1.1). The alliteration on the T is used three times within the first line; however, it does not stop there. Dickinson uses the “T” sound to continually draw back to the theme of truth. Dickinson, through the use of two stanzas, four lines each, uses quite a distinct rhyme scheme to organize her poem. The second and fourth lines of each stanza are clearly examples of end rhyme, by using words such as “lies” (1.2) and “surprise” (1.4). However, every single line is not an example of end rhyme. The first and third lines rhyme words such as “slant” (1.1) and “delight” (1.3); which can be described as near rhymes for they give a small sensation of rhyming. This rhyming pattern continues for the second stanza as well. The sequence of rhyming is not arbitrarily put into practice, rather, it also adds on to the truth theme. The near rhymes Dickinson stresses to not tell the truth in its entirety, but rather, convey a little bit of truth. This is being directly compared to the almost rhyming sensatio...
However, once he hit his second stanza was written the message of encouragement allowed itself to flourish, and gave way to a splendid involving poem. Throughout the poem the words dark, dreary, wind, weary and day were used repeatedly, this is an obvious choice of words to lend to the ear of the reader to give them a thought of his own visions of melancholy existence. But also at the end you can tell where his thoughts began to liven and his small but reoccurring voice of reason and hope chimed in to relieve the poem of encapsulating despair, the mention of past memories in the second stanza mimics that of the third line in the first stanza that talks of clinging vines, and is an accompaniment to the already established emotion. Longfellow’s The Rainy Day compared to other authors or even Longfellow’s own works; may be a shorter, less complicated poem, but what it has is a simple, pure and I dare to say it; raw feeling of time, place and