Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Understanding behind the meaning of 'ownership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Understanding behind the meaning of 'ownership
What Does it Mean to Know Something? “What does it mean to own something?” There are many different ways to determine the ownership of an object, if believed anything is truly owned. Two kinds of objects can be owned. There are tangible objects that can be seen and touched. Also, there are intangible objects that can’t be seen or felt. Value, or how desirable an object is, affects the ownership of these two types of objects as well. In order to fully understand the two classifications of objects I previously stated, a knowledge of value is required. Value is the measurement of how desirable an object is. There are two basic types of value; emotional value and monetary value. Emotional value is the value of an object to a specific person or group of people. Monetary is the value of an object in currency or trade. For example, one can trade in a car for a new one, or they can just buy it. Generally, tangible objects have monetary value and can be bought, even though almost everybody has a tangible object with emotional value. A toy or blanket owned as a baby or a family heirloom that has been passed through generations are examples of tangible objects with emotional value. All of these objects still have a monetary value though. Almost all tangible objects can be sold. This makes …show more content…
There are some exceptions though. Teaching for example, is something that can be bought to learn something. Knowledge is an intangible object because it cannot be seen or touched. Intangible objects can also be passed down from generation to generation. Stories about great-great-great grandfathers are likely an example of this. This makes tangibles much more valuable due to the reason that the way one person knows something is unique to themselves. Kind of like a game I played as a child, where one person whispers a word or phrase to the person next to them and by the time the word gets around the circle it’s almost always completely
It is often conceptualized that property is the rights of 'ownership'. In common law property is divided into real property, which is the interests in land and improvements there, and personal property, which are interests in anything other than real property. Personal property is divided into tangible property (such as a bike, car and clothse), and intangible property (such as bonds and stocks), which also includes intellectual property (copyrights, trademarks etc). The modern property rights conceive of possession and ownership as belonging to legal individuals, even if the individual is not a real person. Hence, governments, corporations and other collective forms of ownership are shown in terms of individual ownership.
The story I chose for this analysis is “Why, you reckon?” by Langston Hughes. IN this analysis I will be focusing on how the great depression in Harlem had effect on the story, how racism played a part, and how or if the characters were justifyied in their actions. During this time period the intense racial divide combined with the economic harships that plagued the U.S. during the 1923’s makes for an interesting story that makes you think if the charaters were really justified.
I take ownership to include unrestricted private use of an object. Of course my definition excludes the possibility of owning a
According to Aristotle, ownership of tangible goods can help to develop one’s moral character. I agree with his philosophy. Owning an object or other goods helps one to discover certain virtues, such as responsibility or purpose in caring for what you own. All objects you own, you must acquire, either through purchasing or through gift. Depending on how you acquire the object, defines its value, either monetary or sentimental. These different values help to develop one’s sense of self, as one grows as a person and develops one’s moral character. By learning these important skills, such as responsibility and purpose, one has a better understanding of oneself.
Examples of such viewpoints can be found through the works of many great thinkers throughout the centuries, some dating back to 400 years BCE. A Greek philosopher who developed his viewpoint on ownership was Plato. Plato, being the student of Socrates, was very well educated in philosophical thinking, and he applied his superior knowledge to an analysis of ownership. Plato’s views on ownership entailed the idea that owning objects is detrimental to a person 's character. He believed that the possession of materialistic goods actually damaged a person’s morality. Another Ancient Greek philosopher who would apply his knowledge to the relationship of ownership was Aristotle. Aristotle was Plato’s most successful and intelligent student. Aristotle used the knowledge he had acquired from his mentor to create his own viewpoints which completely contradicted the ideas laid out by Plato. Aristotle said that ownership of tangible goods helps to develop moral character. In other words, Aristotle believed that the possession of materialistic goods could, in fact, help in the development of one’s moral character. One of the more recent philosophers which will be discussed is Jean-Paul Sartre. Sartre believed that ownership extends beyond objects to include intangible things as well. In this way, Sartre is working very closely with the Theory of
"A value determines what a person thinks he ought to do, which may or may not be the same as he wants to do, or what is in his interest to, or what in fact he actually does. Values in this sense give rise to general standards and ideal by which we judge our own and others conduct; they also give rise to specific obligations” (CCETSW,
Ownership is the act, state, or right of possessing something. Many people believe taking ownership is parallel to taking responsibility. In some cases, taking responsibility can be rewarding, but in other cases, it can be very self centered. According to Aristotle, ownership of tangible objects leads to develop moral character, even though it is not stated whether those morals are good or bad. Plato exaggerates how disparaging ownership can be to one's character and life. The affect ownership obtains on moral character is intensely detrimental.
What is the relationship between ownership and self identity/development? This is a extremely complicated question. There are many theories trying to answer this question, such as, Plato 's claim the "owning objects is detrimental to a person 's character", whereas Aristotle argues that "ownership of tangible goods helps to develop moral character." To answer this question we must first ask, what is ownership? If this question is asked to friends, relatives, even strangers, we will receive many similar answers to this question. People will say something along the lines of, "the possession of an object" or "to be in control of something". However, we must then dive deeper into the question and ask ourselves, can we really possess an object if it can be taken
a car, wallet, photograph, shirt, pen and phone and so on) (Roger, 2012). The intangible personal property, on the other hand, is personal property that by its very nature does not have a physical existence as such, but is merely a right that can be owned as opposed to a real, tangible objects (i.e. stocks and bonds) (Roger, 2012). Overall, the real, intellectual and personal property has the same rights under the law, but their circumstances are very different in
The idea of letting go of the idea of material possessions means understanding that image does not mean everything. Once this is understood, a sense of freedom can come over us, as we understand that life doesn’t have to be so cutthroat for us to be happy. A material possession is a universal concept that translates in any language. Happiness is a concept that is not quite understood. A lot of the time, happiness is equated to material possessions, and isn’t seen as its own idea. Always wanting something new after getting something, always thinking that the new items that come out in stores must be in our possessions or else happiness won’t be achieved, we accept this idea of conditional happiness. This takes over, while true happiness shrinks inside of us and we lose what happiness really is. If we separate ourselves from our material possessions and ideas, we can realize that our idea of happiness has all to do with external possessions and not internal ones.
Some, such as Toby Syoboda, claim that “human beings lack any evidence for the position that non-human entities have intrinsic value”. Svoboda proposes that we cannot assign intrinsic value, as in another world that thing may not possess any value at all; however, I propose that things can have intrinsic value on the grounds that they are valuable with no regard to their function in human society, meaning that value does not come from being instrumental. I believe intrinsic value is something can exist with and without instrumental value; the most apparent example of something with both forms of value is friends; whilst friends do have instrumental value by giving us connections and doing us favours, they also have value in-themselves. Of course, I expect a friend to help me if they can, but if they cannot I value them no less, even though their instrumental value would be less significant to me. Moreover, there are also instances where things have had instrumental value, that has been lost or taken away leaving purely intrinsic value. A prime example of this is Marilyn Monroe’s “Happy Birthday, Mr. President Dress”. This year, the dress sold at auction for $4.8 million, so that it can be displayed in Ripley’s Believe it or Not Museum. Normally, an expensive dress is purchased as it is well fitted, or made of a material which will last a long time but ultimately to make the person wearing it more attractive. However, in this instance, one of histories most expensive dresses is merely sitting in a display. Whilst the dress could have this instrumental value, the intrinsic value overwhelms it to the extent that its instrumental purpose becomes redundant. On the other hand, we can also have value completely exclusive of instrumental value. For instance, Van Gogh’s painting, The Starry Night, to most people, holds absolutely no
Therefore, value is perceived as a subjective measurement of the usefulness or desired satisfaction that results from consumption. According to her, although what is received and what is given varies among consumers, value represents a tradeoff of the salient of “give” and “get” components. “The benefit components of value include salient intrinsic attributes, extrinsic attributes, perceived quality, and other relevant high level abstractions” (Zeithaml, 1988). Furthermore, value is defined as “whatever it is that the consumer seeks in making decisions as to which store to shop or which product to buy” (Chain Store Age, 1985). One more definition about value is given by Schelter (1984), supporting that value is all the factors, qualitative and quantitative, subjective and objective, that shape the complete shopping experience. In this definition, value includes all relevant choice criteria. The most common definition of value is the ration or tradeoff between quality and price, which a value-for-money conceptualization. These two components (quality and price) have different effects on perceived value for money. According to Zeithaml (1988) some customers perceive value when the price is low, whereas other people perceive value as a balance between quality and price. Therefore, the
The main method used by businesses to classify assets is to split them into tangible assets, which have a separate existence from the business (examples of which would include buildings, land and machinery), and intangibles which do not. Some clear examples of intangibles include goodwill, patents, research and development expenditure and trademarks. Intangible assets are usually created within the organisation over a period of time, by the company itself, rather than acquired from an external source and are rarely sold off individually they can normally only be sold in conjunction with associated tangible assets.
In the world we live in people value objects like they value God. Objects like ring, computer, books, mobile phone, guns and money for example. Well for me I personally value my bible, it is everything to me. As young girl growing up in this cruel world this book has been my guide and the light to my path when I am in need. There are some other valuable gadgets that I possess but the bible is the most important of them all.
Value is the wish that something is held to deserve; the importance, worth, or utility of something or principles or standards of behaviour; one's opinion of what is significant in life . As human beings, there’s things we value as such, as material and physical values, economic values, moral values, societal values, political values, aesthetical values, spiritual values and rational values. As humans, we would like to think we are in charge of our own values and what is worthy of our desires (instrumental values). Merely this is incorrect for there’s intrinsic values, values that are valuable for the grounds of their nature such as life. For lesson, our human body demands water, why do we drink water because we need to life, but why do we need to life?