Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The secession of the south and war
Causes of civil war
Key factors that caused the civil war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The secession of the south and war
There are various explanations as to who and what really caused the Civil War. It is even fair to say that sometimes morals stand in the way when deciding who really started the war. Therefore, the facts must be analyzed clearly and in depth. It is true that the north played a major role in the Civil War, however, the south would not release their strict traditional beliefs of slavery. As time progressed, slavery debates pressured the South more and more to stand by their strict beliefs. Fugitive acts, Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Secession all showed how the south used brutal methods to preserve slavery. Therefore, since the popular sovereignty doctrine, the pro-slavery souths’ strict use of slavery and decisions to secede from the nation, angered the north, leading to a civil war. Slavery …show more content…
appears to be the root cause of the Civil War, and became a widely discussed topic.
A solution to limit slavery debates led to the creation of a doctrine known as Popular Sovereignty. “A territory could decide by vote whether or not to permit slavery within its boundaries.” Therefore, this doctrine gave the territory right to be pro-slavery or anti-slavery. Although the doctrine ruled in favor of the majority of the population of a territory, not one hundred percent of the territory’s population was always in compliance. It is commonly discussed that slavery was something that greatly segregated the north from the south. With the south being pro-slavery, many were aware that the south needed slavery for particular services or else they would not feel so strongly to preserve slavery. “Slavery was basically a system to control labor, being a great investment for slave-owners to profit from.” Slaves were necessary for cotton production and other farm duties. “Cotton was king in the Old South: its primary export and the major source of southern wealth.” Furthermore, the south
depended on slaves for wealth and institutional success. The south was very eager to withhold slaves, as slaves were their legal property and main source of wealth. Actions demonstrated by slaves further highlighted how eager the south was to withhold their ties to slavery despite the north being a free land. Slaves began to flee to free states, desperately seeking a better life. Then, fugitive acts were created and by law they had to be practiced. “Fugitive laws meant that all slaves had to be returned to their owner if they ran away, it also became illegal to aid runaway slaves.” Finally, this made opponents of slavery very angry and therefore demonstrated how slavery was a nationwide problem more so than a regional problem, therefore paving the way for changes to be made nationally. Politics in the North greatly discussed slavery in the Election of 1860 and angered much of the south. The South remained strong in the beliefs of slavery and lashed out on slaves in the process. In the popular book, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, slaveholders are brought to light on their severe position in slavery. Slavery was no longer an opportunity of wealth, slavery became a moral issue as slaveholders were mistreating slaves just because they were property. Americans began to be persuaded by the story telling of the slavery lifestyle. In Uncle Tom’s Cabin,” Harriet Stowe identified the horrors of slavery and how Uncle Tom was a loyal slave, but whipped to death by his owner.” After the book about Uncle Tom rose in popularity, it angered the future voters in north because the stories told in the book demonstrated the lack of morals slaveholders in the south had. It can logically be stated that northerners felt the need to find solutions to fix the societal issue, specifically the issue of slave treatment. Then, abolitionist began to support anti- slavery. “William Lloyd Garrison founded the anti-slavery society.” What this particular society did was call for immediate depletion of slavery. Slavery had been the heart of the south’s booming economy for years, and they were totally dependent on slaves for agriculture, therefore the depletion of slavery posed a major threat to southerners’ livelihood. Garrison’s stance was that slavery was becoming a national issue that society had to respond to in regards of slaves. Southern slave-owners did not believe slavery was an issue. However, northerners opposed that argument. In fact, the south saw slaves as pure property. “The Constitution of the United States supported that slaves were not citizens, but property and remained property unless they resided in a territory where slavery was voted against.” Therefore, the south was legally allowed to own slaves, but was it moral to mistreatment them just because they were considered legal property especially after slaves began to speak out about the brutal treatment? Finally, the south plans to expand west to fertile lands with claims justifying their expansions. “Southerners were convinced that without new western lands to employ the growing population of slaves, the market value of the slaves would decline while the cost of sustaining them remained, thereby threatening the viability of the institution itself.” Furthermore, Abraham Lincoln takes his stance to halt the expansion of slavery. “By the time President Lincoln took oath of office, seven southern states secede, forming a confederacy.” These actions of the southern states were all in favor to preserve the slave institution they had created for themselves. Forming a confederacy illustrates how the south struck first in the war, already preparing. After all, Lincoln stance was to halt the expansion of slavery to lands that where in other terms “off limits”. The Deep South was not willing to compromise anymore with the north, “seven states in the deep south seceded.” It can be fairly stated that slave-owners investment were at stake and sustaining slaves was becoming harder without new lands. Slaves were the souths’ basic means of wealth and success at that particular time. In addition, the south hardly considered addressing the negative aspects of slavery. Southerners continuously defended the logic behind the brutality of their actions, basically arguing that slaves are property and legally the south was correct, slaves were property. Finally, in the defense of their long lasting beliefs, the south felt breaking the union apart and seceding form the nation would be the only decision to fill their own selfish needs. Overall, “the compromise of 1850 kept things in accordance for a while, momentarily stalling the war.” However, the south remained consistent in their beliefs which is why they are often referred to as the “Old South.” The souths’ treatment of slaves represented in sources such as Uncle Tom’s Cabin furthered opened the eyes of citizens in the north, angering them. As Lincoln halted the expansion of slavery, the south knew that seceding would allow them to have their way, which is explains why the confederacy was formed, and war begin.
The United States began to dissatisfy some of its citizens and so the concerns of sectionalism, or the split of the country began to arise. There was a continuous riff between the south and the north over a few issues, a major one being slavery. The south argued that the slaves were necessary to support the southern economy. According to document A, the south were angry that the north was creating taxes that hurt the southern economy, thus increasing the need for slavery since they had to make up for the expense of the taxes. The south felt that the north was able...
The Civil War, beginning in 1861 and ending in 1865, was a notorious event in American history for many influential reasons. Among them was the war 's conclusive role in determining a united or divided American nation, its efforts to successfully abolish the slavery institution and bring victory to the northern states. This Civil War was first inspired by the unsettling differences that divided the northern and southern states over the power that resided in the hands of the national government to constrain slavery from taking place within the territories. There was only one victor in the Civil War. Due to the lack of resources, plethora of weaknesses, and disorganized leadership the Southern States possessed in comparison to the Northern States,
Why the North Won the Civil War, edited by David Herbert Donald, is a short collection of six essays. Each essay argues from a different perspective as to why the Confederate States of America could not defeat the Union in the American Civil War. The factors considered for Confederate defeat include: economics, military strategy, diplomacy, ideology, and politics. In the end, the most convincing argument is given by Richard N. Current regarding economics.
"If wars are won by riches, there can be no question why the North eventually prevailed." The North was better equipped than the South, with the resources necessary to be successful in a long term war like the Civil War was, which was fought from 1861 1865. Prior, and during the Civil war, the North's economy was always stronger than the South's, boasting of resources that the Confederacy had no means of attaining. Compared to the South, The North had more factories available for production of war supplies and larger amounts of land for growing crops. Its population was several times of the South's, which was a potential source for military enlistees. Although the South had better naval leadership and commanders, such as Robert E. Lee and "Stonewall" Jackson, they lacked the number of factories and industries to produce needed war materials. Therefore, the North won the American Civil War due to the strength of their industrialized economy, rather than their commanders and strategies.
In conclusion the election of Lincoln as president in 1860 caused a civil war because it was falsely perceived by the south that Lincoln would threaten the state’s constitutional right to slavery. This false idea was due to a rift between the northern and southern states in both an economic and ideological manner. That is the north was based on industry and generally was opposed to slavery. But the South was an agricultural society which ran on slavery and, due to Nat Turner’s Insurrection and John Brown’s stand at Harper’s Ferry, was fearful of the north’s involvement in the governing of states as well as being opposed to this on the basis of state’s rights. The election of Lincoln caused the south to succeed from the union causing civil war.
Constitutionally the North favored a loose interpretation of the United States Constitution, and they wanted to grant the federal government increased powers. The South wanted to reserve all undefined powers to the individual states themselves. The South relied upon slave labor for their economic well being, and the economy of the North was not reliant on such labor or in need of this type of service. This main issue overshadowed all others. Southerners compared slavery to the wage-slave system of the North, and believed their slaves received better care than the northern factory workers received from their employers. Many Southern preachers proclaimed that slavery was sanctioned in the Bible. Southern leaders had constantly tried to seek new areas into which slavery might be extended (Oates 349).
"We are not one people. We are two peoples. We are a people for Freedom and a people for Slavery. Between the two, conflict is inevitable." This quote by Abolitionist writer George William Curtis, in 1861 describes the state of the nation before the civil war. If it were not for the naval blockades, the lack of road infrostructure, and the low manufacturing capabilities of the south, perhaps the outcome of the civil war would have been different and slavery may have continued. The war of attrition was successful in choking the life lines to the south, ending the civil war and reuniting the country, consequently bringing an end to the evils of slavery.
"The American constitution recognized slavery as a local constitution within the legal rights of the individual states. But in the North slavery was not adaptable to the local economy, and to many, it contradicted the vision of the founding fathers for a nation in which all men are to be free. The South considered slavery as a necessary institution for the plantation economy. It was linked to the local culture and society. As the United states expanded, the North worried that the South would introduce slavery into the new territories. Slavery had become both a moral issue and a question of political power." (Kral p61)
The Union is to blame for the civil war, particularly the northern states because the federal union’s goal was to not promote conformity, but to permit diversity within the orderly confines of any socialized community (Niven 311). The union could easily be considered a haven for all types of people, not just slaves. From 1830 until 1860, relatively few immigrants settled in the South (Meyers). The Northern states had a different vision of what they wanted America to be and strongly opposed how the South ran things. The southern states thrived off slavery and is mainly how people made a living in that region. Slavery is the cornerstone of a social order that protected individual liberty and equality for the white population in the south (Niven 311). Meaning that the North had way more resources, workers, and support in comparison to the South, so slavery was a way for the Southern states to at least stay relevant in the United States of America. The North’s feelings about how slavery was tearing the country and the union apart was the spark for the Civil War.
Throughout the years, many people have been taught that the reason the Civil War happened, was to abolish slavery all through the United States. Although that is true, there were more reasons why the Civil War occurred.Referencing will be done on different articles and writers to support the findings of the authors. The article “Slavery, the Constitutional, and the Origins of the Civil War” by Paul Finkelman, discusses about the North (union) and the South (confederacy) and the disagreement of the territories following the constitutional laws regarding slavery, the article explores both sides of the territories and their beliefs of how the situation of slavery should have been dealt with. The article “The Economic Origins of the Civil War” by Marc Egnal, discusses the North’s (union) and the South’s (confederacy) economic situation that could have pushed the two territories to engage in war with one another. Finally, the last article “Politics, Ideology, and the Origins of the American Civil War” by Eric Foner, focuses on the Norths (union) and Souths (confederacy) views on politics and ideas of how each territory is ran and how they have affected the North and the South. These historians supplied specific and different explanations that explained what exactly caused the United States to enter into a Civil War. With the information provided by the authors, the evidence will lead us to the answer of what caused the Civil War.
The majority of speculations regarding the causes of the American Civil War are in some relation to slavery. While slavery was a factor in the disagreements that led to the Civil War, it was not the solitary or primary cause. There were three other, larger causes that contributed more directly to the beginning of the secession of the southern states and, eventually, the start of the war. Those three causes included economic and social divergence amongst the North and South, state versus national rights, and the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Dred Scott case. Each of these causes involved slavery in some way, but were not exclusively based upon slavery.
Slavery was a political, economic, social and moral issue that divided the citizens of the United States. Sectionalism is “loyalty or support of a particular region or section of the nation, rather than the United States as a whole” (“Sectionalism and Slavery). Slavery was a main factor of the sectional issue, dividing the country into North and South to the extent that it led to the Civil War; the main conflict was that southerners supported slavery and northerners opposed it. Because of the differences in history, economics, etc. in the states slavery was a main factor in the sectionalism between the North and South. The questions were whether rights of slave owners would be protected throughout the country, whether new territories would
The main problem in every event leading up to the Civil War involved the issue of slavery, making slavery the main cause of the war. The initial blame for the war can be pointed at America’s founding fathers who knew slavery violated every aspect of America’s liberty, but yet they still did not prohibit slavery. If it was not the election of President Lincoln that caused South Carolina to secede from the Union, allowing other states to follow, a different event would have triggered the war, making the Civil War inevitable. All in all, the Civil War was bound to happen and it became the bloodiest war in American history.
The civil war came about due to the northern farmers not wanting slavery to expand to the north, and the south wanting the expansion (Watkins, 2001, p. 13). Slavery promoted an institution of racism that became embedded into our moral and economical fiber. This culture of inequality created dysfunctional societies and sub-societies that lack resources and funding, poverty, unemployment, and crime riddled environments.
The Civil War is a war that divides our nation slavery is one of the most believed reasons for the start of the war truth is there were many conflicts leading over many issues between the North and South. One of the biggest reasons was the Issues included States’ Rights and disagreements over tariffs.