Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Primary and secondary sources of data
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Primary and secondary sources of data
What constitute as evidence? How has evidence and truth evolved/changed as society progressed? Use example(s) to illustrate how truth can be challenged as new ideas arise.
Evidence is fundamental in science. It plays a role of proofing the hypothesis. However, what can be a piece of evidence? Apart from this, some ‘truth’ or evidence that are once accepted by the world can be changed as the society progressed. Evolution of truth and evidence can be driven by various factors. In this essay, the first part will focus on what is considered as evidence in science, how the evidence and truth changed following the cycle of paradigm shift and illustrate the factors that causing the truth being challenged with different examples.
Evidence can be anything that used to prove an assertion. Evidence in science will be focused on this essay. Scientific evidences can be used to support or reject the hypothesis in science. The evidences are often found by different scientific methods. Based on various scientific methods, scientific evidence can be mainly divided into two types which are observational and experimental evidence.
Observation evidence plays an important role in science discovery. This kind of evidence is produced by the perceptual sensation like hearing, seeing, touching, smelling and tasting, with the assistance of some instruments like microscope, telescope and stethoscope (Bogen, 2009). The most common example of using observational evidence can be Galileo used the telescope to observe the four satellites of Jupiter in 1610. This can be a piece of observational evidence in Astronomy. In medicine, observational study means the researchers obtain the evidence through observing the condition of the patient under exposur...
... middle of paper ...
...omas S. (1957). The Copernican Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674171039.
Naughton, J. (2012, 19 August). Thomas Kuhn: the man who changed the way the world looked at science. Theguardian. TheObserver. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/aug/19/thomas-kuhn-structure-scientific-revolutions
The Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada. (2011). Primer on Population Health. Retrieved from http://phprimer.afmc.ca/Part2-MethodsStudyingHealth/Chapter5AssessingEvidenceAndInformation/Observationalstudies
University at Albany. (2013, October). Primary and secondary source in science. Retrieved from http://library.albany.edu/usered/dr/prisci.html
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.(2012, 9 May). DDT- A Brief History and Status. Retrieved from
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/factsheets/chemicals/ddt-brief-history-status.htm
Mary Louise Fleming, E. P. (2009). Introduction to Public Health. Chatswood, NSW, Australia: Elsevier Australia.
Without theories, scientists’ experiments would yield no significance to the world. Theories are the core of the scientific community; therefore figuring out how to determine which theory prevails amongst the rest is an imperative matter. Kuhn was one of the many bold scientists to attempt to bring forth an explanation for why one theory is accepted over another, as well as the process of how this occurs, known as the Scientific Revolution. Kuhn chooses to refer to a theory as a ‘paradigm’, which encompasses a wide range of definitions such as “a way of doing science in a specific field”, “claims about the world”, “methods of fathering/analyzing data”, “habits of scientific thought and action”, and “a way of seeing the world and interacting with it” (Smith, pg.76). However in this case, we’ll narrow paradigm to have a similar definition to that of a ‘theory’, which is a system of ideas used to explain something; it can also be deemed a model for the scientific community to follow. Kuhn’s explanation of a Scientific Revolution brings to light one major problem—the problem of incommensurability.
SEDAP. (2007,). Contrasting Inequalities: Comparing Correlates of Health in Canada and the United States (research 167). Retrieved from http://www.socserv.mcmaster.ca/sedap:
Evidence can come in a variety of forms. It can come from data, information, our own observations and vital signs, as well as patient/family member concerns. In order to be considered evidence however, the information must meet several criteria. It must be objective in that it does not house our personal opinions, it must be relevant towards the situation at hand, and timely in that the information is not out of date. It must also be transparent in that everyone has access to view the information as well
International Journal of Epidemiology 36.6 (2007): 1229-234. International Journal of Epidemiology. Oxford University Press, 28 Sept. 2007. Web. The Web.
Relevant is the relevance attached to or associated among a proceeding with direction. Reliable is corroboration which occupies acceptable amplitude containing creditability, which can be if confirmation would be honest and legitimate. Competent includes relevant and reliable evidence anything else that is not concluded objectionable ((Gardner & Anderson, 2013).
Messenger, E., Gooch, J., & Seyler, D. U. (2011). Arguing About Science. Argument! (pp. 396-398). New York, NY: Mcgraw-Hill Co..
Pierre, N., Pollack, N., & Fafard, P. (2007). Health Policies and Trends for Selected Target Groups in Canada.
Is eyewitness testimony a reliable source of evidence? Eyewitness testimony was once the best form of evidence available. With the emergence of DNA and other
Health Services Research Foundation. (n.d.). CHSRF - Romanow Commission . Splash . Retrieved February 1, 2011, from http://www.chsrf.ca/PublicationsAndResources/PastSeries/RomanowCommission.aspx
evidentiary fact in science, just like all other facts of biology, physics, chemistry, etc. It
In order to understand how to compile evidence for criminal cases, we must understand the most effective types of evidence. This topic is interesting because there are ample amounts of cases where defendants have gotten off because of the lack of forensic evidence. If we believe forensic evidence is so important and it affects our decisions, then maybe we need to be educated on the reality of forensic evidence. If we can be educated, then we may have a more successful justice system. If we have a more successful justice system than the public could gain more confidence that justice will be served. In order to do this, we must find what type of evidence is most effective, this can be done by examining different types of evidence.
Moreover, the nature of human beings in “The Nature and Necessity of Scientific Revolution” is to change. Kuhn’s work mentions that as the universe is evolving, human beings seek
Empirical evidence is knowledge gained by empirical research by method of direct observation and/ or experience. It is used to answer empirical questions, which must be correctly answerable with data. The theory or topic that is under investigation is based on a hypothesis. The hypothesis predicts specific events are going to or not going to happen. These predictions are what will be tested within the experiment. Depending on the outcomes of the experiment, the hypotheses will be supported or not supported.
American Journal Of Public Health103.1 (2013): 27-31. Business Source Premier.