Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on imperialism
Imperialism essay introduction
The real nature of imperialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 1884 Jules Ferry, the Prime Minister of France, introduced the policy of colonial expansion.
The expansion can be described as a political and economic system. The policy connects three sets of ideas: ideas of political and patriotic sort, economic ideas, and as well as ideas of civilization (Ferry, 1884).
According to Ferry, what recent developments in world trade made it urgent for France to have colonies?
According to Jules Ferry, recent developments in trades made it urgent for France to have colonies. Ferry felt other countries were exporting more goods than France, so he introduced the policy of colonial expansion. Ferry believed there was a need for more outlets, as other countries were setting up trade barriers. He made it known
…show more content…
that Germany was setting up trade barriers, and blamed it on the United States. He said, “Because across the ocean, the United States of America has become protectionists, and extreme protectionist at that” (Ferry, 1884). In Ferry’s opinion he believed the markets were shrinking and becoming more difficult to access. He though the states were starting to pour into their markets, threatening their market. So because of these developments, he felt it was necessary add more colonies in order to export more goods. I could see Jules Ferry argument for the need to add more colonies, and export more goods. What arguments against imperialism have been raised by Ferry’s critics?
How does he counter them?
Jules Ferry’s critics believed he was trying to justify slavery, which was introduced in Central America by the Spanish soldiers. Jules Ferry discussed how in this opinion, during the introduction of slavery, the Spanish soldiers did their fulfilled their duty as men of a higher
…show more content…
race. WEEK 1 CASE STUDY: JULES FERRY 3 He felt back in the day they were misunderstood, and this time around would be different. Ferry countered them by saving that, “ the superior races have a right because they have a duty. They have a duty to civilize the inferior races” (Ferry, 1884). Ferry felt the “superior races” would help the improve the “inferior races”. Jules Ferry felt that is a person was economically good then he had control over a poor person. He explained that during their duty, they would perform the job to the highest of standards. . So while Jules Ferry may not view it as slavery, I do. What non-economic arguments does Ferry offer in favor of imperialism? Non-economic agreements Ferry offered in the favor of imperialism were the idea of ports for ships to have short layovers, as well as providing markets for French goods.
Jules Ferry discussed, “ at present, as you know, a warship, however perfect its design, cannot carry more than two weeks’ supply of coal; and a vessel without coal is a wreck on the high seas, abandoned to the first occupier” (Ferry, 1884). He also felt the need to have a place of shelter, supply, and ports for defense. It was for this reason, that believed it was so important for France to obtain Tunisia, Saigon, Indochina, and Madagascar. If France had more colonies, they would have more places for the warship to stop and stock up on coal, and continue on their destination. Ferry explained how rich countries were great because of how developed in the industries they were. In Ferry’s beliefs, these positions would straighten and expand France, just like strong countries in Europe. Jules Ferry explained how countries are not great by the spreading of peaceful light, but by the activity they deploy (Ferry, 1884). I would have to agree with Ferry, that his ideas of adding colonies, and exporting more goods would help with the straightening and expansion of
France. WEEK 1 CASE STUDY: JULES FERRY 4 References From Jules François Camille Ferry, "Speech Before the French Chamber of Deputies, March 28, 1884," Discours et Opinions de Jules Ferry, ed. Paul Robiquet (Paris 1897), 1.5, pp. 199-201, 210-11, 215-18. Translated by Ruth Kleinman in Brooklyn College Core Four Sourcebook. The original post is at The Internet Modern History Sourcebook - Imperialism.
Before delving into the specifics of enslavement conditions in the New World, a peek into the slavery
Despite each individual having different circumstances in which they experienced regarding the institution of slavery, both were inspired to take part in the abolitionist movement due to the injustices they witnessed. The result is two very compelling and diverse works that attack the institution of slavery and argue against the reasons the pro-slavery individuals use to justify the slavery
The colonization of Africa gave the Europeans more workers and workspace that boost them economically and financially. According to Document D, many African colonies exports very many resources such as cotton for fabrics and various foods for processing and meals. The help of African colonies was very beneficial to Europe. The economical growth can be proven with Document E, where the amount of exports from Africa grew from less than 5 million British pounds in 1854 to over 20 million in 1900. So the most beneficial part of the African colonies was the boost they gave Europe in economical
The controversies surrounding slavery have been established in many societies worldwide for centuries. In past generations, although slavery did exists and was tolerated, it was certainly very questionable,” ethically“. Today, the morality of such an act would not only be unimaginable, but would also be morally wrong. As things change over the course of history we seek to not only explain why things happen, but as well to understand why they do. For this reason, we will look further into how slavery has evolved throughout History in American society, as well as the impacts that it has had.
However, French lost its territory to the Spanish and the British, but most of France’s colonial wealth were extracted from their colonies in Africa, especially from its vast wealth of gold and diamond. “Like the Spanish the French preferred to rule their colonies under a direct rule, which urge more metropole culture spread upon colonized land. While Spanish colonial cities have plazas, the French colonial cities have Paris grid town planning and architecture that often remind one of France. They also introduced education system using French language, to help further brainwash and spread their own value” (Quora). “The French also wanted to spread their “French value” to its subject as part of their “civilizing” mission, to bless the barbaric of indigenous Africans and Asians with enlightenment (admittedly they were less successful than Americans, but did manage to spread the French language all over Africa)” (Quora). While Africa became more “France”, this failed in Indochina because the locals find French difficult to learn. The Africa colonization was pure and simple, to benefit the metropole at most while limiting the development of industry as to make Africa reliant on European
As a primary source, Olaudah Equiano’s Interesting Narrative provides partial insights on 18th century New World slavery. Equiano recounts the horrors of being kidnapped and traveling through the middle passage. In Montserrat, Equiano hears about the plantations and how slaves were physically and mentally abused. Slaves were taken advantage of and lived in fear since the law was not on their side. Even free slaves worried that their freedom would be taken from them and they would be forced back into slavery. As a source, there are some limitations since Equiano was an atypical slave who purchased his freedom and was a sailor. However, his experiences and the experiences of others are still valuable when examining slavery.
The typical life of an indentured servant was not a convenient one. Their journeys to the Americas were miserable. The servants were packed into large ships carrying thousands of people as well as, tools, food, etc. Not only were the people densely packed, there were various diseases flooding the ships, and many people would die from them. “I witnessed . . .
The issues he talks about in his book are issues that happened to an entire population. In short, this paper will show the powerful indictment of slavery, passages that provoke emotional responses from the readers and the controversy of his birth place.
Louis XIV controlled France’s economy. He began to heavily tax to support the military reforms. Louis agreed not to tax the nobility, therefore taking away the right for the upper class to have a say in where the taxation money was spent. This gave more and more power to the king. He could spend the money that he was getting from the poor and middle class in any way he pleased without upsetting the nobility. Unfortunately for Louis, the poor could not provide the money he needed. Soon, with the help of Jean-Baptiste Colbert, Louis introduced mercantilism in Europe. He regulated the flow of trade, making sure that France was exporting more than it was importing. To accomplish this, he raised the taxes on imports and lowered those on goods made in France. He encouraged skilled workers and craftsmen to immigrate to France, offering them goods and privileges.
Slavery was the core of the North and South’s conflict. Slavery has existed in the New World since the seventeenth century prior to it being exclusive to race. During those times there were few social and political concerns about slavery. Initially, slaves were considered indentured servants who will eventually be set free after paying their debt(s) to the owner. In some cases, the owners were African with white servants. However, over time the slavery became exclusive to Africans and was no limited to a specific timeframe, but life. In addition, the treatment of slaves worsens from the Atlantic Slave trade to th...
The departure from previous expansionism (up to 1880) developed alongside the tremendous changes and amplifications of United States power (in government, economics, and military.) The growth in strength and size of the United States navy gave the country many more opportunities to grow, explore, and expand both in size and money. The better range and build of ships allowed the U.S. to enter the Far East, lands of the Philippines and China, all to increase trade and to create an influx of commerce. Because of the huge production of agricultural goods and the need for outputs and markets for these goods, the United States needed to find other places for shipping, trading, buying, and selling, and these areas of interest were just the place. The idea of Manifest Destiny and placing faith in God also allowed the United States to expand farther out into what once were unattainable lands. Document C, written by Mahan the naval writer, explains the three necessary obligations of sea power, as well as expressing the extreme importance of the navy during late 1800’s expansionism. During this time period and before, it was believed that whoever retained control of the seas would maintain control over the lands. Additionally, the speech by Senator Albert Beveridge (Document E) further states the importance of the U.S. expanding into the Pacific Ocean (especially the Phillipines) and trading with eastern countries: “the pacific is the ocean of the commerce of the future...the power that rules the Pacific is the power that rules the world… forever be the American Republic.
“The Conscience of a Slave Trader,” in Kennedy, David M. and Thomas A. Bailey. The American Spirit: United States History as Seen by Contemporaries. Vol. I: To 1877. Eleventh Edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2006.
For Edmund S. Morgan American slavery and American freedom go together hand in hand. Morgan argues that many historians seem to ignore writing about the early development of American freedom simply because it was shaped by the rise of slavery. It seems ironic that while one group of people is trying to break the mold and become liberated, that same group is making others confined and shattering their respectability. The aspects of liberty, race, and slavery are closely intertwined in the essay, 'Slavery and Freedom: The American Paradox.'
...er the revolution, the mentality of the people of San Domingo was foreover changed. Slavery would never be accepted again by the inhabitants. "Any regime which tolerated such practices was doomed, for the revolution had created a new race of men" (242). This new race of men were aware of their self-importance. "There was no need to be ashamed of being a black. The revolution had awakened them, had given them the possibility of achievement, confidence and pride. That psychological weakness, that feeling of inferiority with which the imperialists poison colonial peoples everywhere, these were gone" (244).
Reflecting back on the statement historian Jaime E. Rodriguez gave on the impact that independence had on the people of Latin America. “The emancipation of [Latin America] did not merely consist of separation from the mother country, as in the case of the United States. It also destroyed a vast and responsive social, political, and economic system that functioned well despite many imperfections.” I believe that the eagerness to get rid of slaves