Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Journalism's effect on politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
On June 17, 1972 five men were arrested for the bugging of the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate office complex in Washington D.C. Two reporters, Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward were the two reporters assigned to the case at the Washington Post. All though their reporting styles contrasted they had similarities also when it came to journalism, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein worked together throughout the coverage of the break in at the Watergate. Together, both reporters had their share of failed interviews and sometimes questionable journalistic ethics, but still they did whatever was necessary to get the most accurate information for their story. Throughout their coverage of the Watergate case Woodward and Bernstein …show more content…
showed tenacity when it came to finding the hard facts and the even harder to find credible sources. Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward worked together, gathered sources, reported and helped crack one of the most scandalous news stories of the last 50 years. At the time of the Watergate Scandal Bob Woodward had been at the Washington Post for only nine months while Carl Bernstein had been there for six years.
Both reporters came from two different political backgrounds, “Woodward could say that he was a registered Republican; Bernstein could argue a sincere antipathy for the politics of both parties.” (All the President’s Men Pg. 60), when interviewing a source or writing an article for the Post, Woodward would be more hesitant when it concerned members of the Republican Party. Bernstein however was more eager to write stories because he did not harbor a biased towards one party or the other, unlike Woodward. Another difference in their styles of reporting how they found their sources, Bernstein’s sources were given to him by other people and Woodward’s sources were higher up and he was able to reach them without. a middle man . An instance of this is when Woodward had a source in the “Executive Branch who had access to information at the CRP as well as the white house.” (All of the President’s Men Pg. 71.). Bernstein got his sources from other people, “A fellow reporter told him that he had once dated a young woman who had worked at the White House. There were ways Woodward and Bernstein had similar reporting styles, they both made sure their sources were credible and whatever information they required was accurate. They both also did not try to slander people’s reputation, even when it was obvious that the person was in the wrong. Woodward and Bernstein journalistic styles was the reason why they worked together so well, their similarities and differences is what helped them gather information and cover the Watergate Scandal
exceptionally. As reporters both Bernstein and Woodward had means of gathering information, but Woodward’s way of receiving information was the better of the two. Since Woodward’s sources were more direct he could obtain more information from one source and still have credible information, when Woodward calls Ken W. Clawson the deputy director or White House communications, to ask about Bernstein’s interview with the librarian. When Bernstein had to go through more than one source to gain information it can lose credibility and cause confusion. During the Watergate Scandal the reporters interviewed numerous people, but some interviews were more successful than others. A case of an unsuccessful interview was when Woodward tried to interview Howard Hunt about his name in the address books of two of the men who broke into the Watergate. Hunt responded with no comment and proceeded to hang up on Woodward. Many times interviews failed was because the interviewee did not want to self-incriminate themselves, not unlike Howard Hunt, or they felt paranoid that someone was listening or watching them. A successful interview was when Woodward and Bernstein interviewed Hugh Sloan Jr. the former treasurer of the CRP, he provided information to the reporters that was helpful and credible since he was a direct source to the CRP. These interviews helped the reporters write their stories and
In March 1903 Yosemite Valley California John Muir and President Roosevelt had a goal to help preserve nature. John Muir wanted the president’s help saving these beautiful parks. Roosevelt joined Muir for the journey and headed to Yosemite Valley in California. John Muir and Roosevelt’s goal was to preserve nature writing this was proven in the text.
In order to be a hero, one must be courageous. Some people that are heroes are Susan B. Anthony and Harriet Tubman.
...t and only friend can he move the way he does to make it vs. Bush's refusal to meet with Cindy Sheehan, what a tragic story the mother of a soldier killed in Iraq. But from their earliest days, Nixon and Bush had many different traits and smelled quit different. Polarizing on another presidents could be: one of modest means shifting like a bird in the sky who went to Duke Law School who smells really bad and trashy on a simi scholarship and did so well he graduated third in half of his class; the other a son was not so happy privilege whom one and the teacher saw him as loutish and a liar.
The documentary entitled, Watergate Plus 30: Shadow of History, documents the political decisions and environment within the Nixon Administration from 1969-1974. The documentary specifically details and describes the environment and culture in which the Watergate scandal could occur and the events and abuses of power that lead to its occurrence. Setting the tone and the political climate of the Nixon Administration was the Vietnam War; making him a wartime President, a war that he inherited from his predecessor. The Vietnam War faced a lot of opposition from the general public, with massive protests and political demonstrations by the younger generations and overall general public. Nixon’s presidency was surrounded by this climate amidst the
Time changes a lot of things, but somehow it didn’t change the way these two men viewed the world. Bill Clinton and RFK (Robert F Kennedy) both delivered speeches after tragic events. Some of the things they said in their speeches were truly inspiring, and they wanted to make sure that their country was alright after a tragic event. Both of their speeches shared a lot of common purposes that helped the nation cope with a devastating event.
The two journalists that investigated and unearthed the wrongdoing were accurately represented in the film. These two reporters were named Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein. Together, they formed an investigative duo that changed history. Woodward was an inexperienced reporter at the time. "Woodward had worked for the Post for only nine months," states the book All the President's Men (Bernstein and Woodward 13). Bernstein was the reporter who had more experience. "Bernstein was a college dropout. He had started as a copy boy at the Washington Post when he was 16, become a full-time reporter at 19, and had worked at the Post since 1966" (Bernstein and Woodward 15). The head reporter of The Washington Post notes in the movie on Woodward's lack of experience and asks that a more experienced reporter get the case. However, if another reporter had taken the case, it is possible that he/she would have viewed the case as meaningless and not have investigated it further. Woodward and Bernstein's determination and perserverance were what
Whitewater vs. Watergate. Both are political sandals that have rocked the nation. As Watergate unraveled, many of Nixon's dirty tactics were learned, including assorted lists of enemies (a number of which became targets of IRS tax audits), wiretapping, political sabotage, burglary, blackballing, and smear campaigns. Similarly, as Whitewater unfolded, the scandal appeared to involve more than just an illegal loan. It touched on possible hush money paid to witnesses and includes the acquisition of more than 900 confidential FBI files on Bush and Reagan appointees. In many aspects, the two are very similar. They are alike in the cover-ups they both produced. But they still are about two totally different events. Each of these scandals is associated with a central criminal event and both involved a web of political intrigue.1
Both cases were very much similar yet different. In the Watergate scandal many of Nixon's dirty tactics were learned, including assorted lists of enemies,a number of which became targets of IRS tax audits, wiretapping, political sabotage, burglary, blackballing, and smear campaigns(Geriouese). Similarly, as Clinton’s case unfolded, the scandal appeared to involve more than just a sexual assault.
President Richard M. Nixon and his involvement in the Watergate scandal were broadcast nightly on the 6 o’clock news in the early 1970’s. Americans were engrossed with the scandal and each person held his or her own view of situation. Each broadcast or newspaper article created a mistrust of political and governmental leaders. In response to this mistrust, the Freedom to Information Act was strengthened by the United States Congress in 1973 (Chamberlain). Although this act was first placed into law in the late 1960’s, the Watergate scandal provided the incentive make this law stronger.
Richard Nixon's first term as president will always be connected with the Watergate scandal, the biggest political scandal in United States history. Various illegal activities were conducted including burglary, wire tapping, violations of campaign financing laws, sabotage, and attempted use of government agencies to harm political opponents to help Richard Nixon win reelection in the 1972 presidential elections. There were about 40 people charged with crimes related to the scandal. Most of them were convicted by juries or pleaded guilty. Watergate involved more high-level government officials than any previous scandal. It has been etched in the minds of millions and is still being recalled today when faced with the present day scandal of President Clinton. In All The President's Men, Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward, former Washington Post reporters, recount, illustrate, and analyze the Watergate scandal time and their work in reporting and revealing these events for the newspaper.
Firstly, the journalists are reporting from two vastly different locations. One is reporting from the comfort of an office and familiar surroundings, while the other is reporting from a war stricken foreign land. Although, there is a common tie, they both involved and had the ability to effect the government and they were all in danger. All of the journalists had the opportunity to report on the truth, even if it were to have political and even personal repercussions. Thus, due to the political nature, all of the journalists were putting their lives at risk and were aware of this. They also had the ability of putting other lives in danger. Woodward and Bernstein discovered how the information they were gathering had to be used strategically in order to not harm their sources, and Flynn and Henderson had the ability to create further conflict and terror for the country they were reporting about. Thus, all of the journalists had to learn how to use precautions while investigating, writing, and reporting on their given
Insects may be the bane of some people’s existence, but the creatures are truly strong globes of energy, going about their lives, flitting to and fro. Thoreau and Woolf both captured this essential spirit in their writing. In “Battle of the Ants” and “The Death of the Moth,” both writers observe other life forms, but the way in which they perceive the insects struggles vastly differs. According to an online biography, Thoreau’s exposure to transcendentalism as well as his friend and mentor Ralph Waldo Emerson both shaped his writing to emphasize “the importance of empirical thinking and of spiritual matters over the physical world,” whereas Virginia Woolf’s parents raised her to be free thinking which resulted
Woodward and Bernstein's undertaking constructed the cornerstone for the modern role of the media. The making of the movie about the Watergate Scandal and the ventures of the two journalists signify the importance of the media. The media’s role as intermediary is exemplified throughout the plot of the movie. The movie is the embodiment of journalism that guides future journalists to progress towards the truth, no matter what they are going up against. It was the endeavor of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein that led them to the truth behind the president’s men. They showed that not even the president is able to deter the sanctity of journalism in its search of truth. The freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, and people’s right to know account for the same truth that journalists pursue; the truth that democracy is alive and will persist to live on.
As television exposed the truth of government, so did Journalists. Daniel leaking of the Pentagon Papers that explained in detail the Vietnam War, and the leaking of the information to the New York Times in 1971. Scandals like this played an active role throughout the late 1960’s and into the early 1970’s. This eventually led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon in 1974. The critical stand point of the journalists led to the marked contradictory of American politics that grew into turbulent during the 1960s.
On April 6, 1976, the movie based on the Watergate scandal, All The President’s Men, was released and made a huge impact on the scandal by shining light on what really happened. The movie starred Dustin Hoffman as Carl Bernstein and Robert Redford as Bob Woodward who played their parts mostly in the office setting of the Washington post as well as in the area of D.C. The movie added every detail of the scandal from the experiences that Bernstein and Woodward had in real life and based most of the screenplay off the book that the two wrote together after the scandal ended.