What Are The Similarities Between Hitler And Macbeth

1648 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Great leader Adolf Hitler

Terrible Tyrants
Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Macbeth all had an unquestionable authority over an entire nation. They had ruthless ambition which drove them to do anything to become the ultimate leader. The comparison between all of them is undeniable. Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Macbeth were motivated by their ambition, they manipulated people, and they abused their power once they got it, and they betrayed people.
Adolf Hitler gained his power in German Politics as leader of The National Socialist German Workers Party also called by the Nazi Party, which is the mostly known name. When the Great War, or World War I, started to breakout, Hitler served in the German army. He gained power from there by using the scapegoat technique, which is playing on the weaknesses, hopes, and fears of the people. The Germans were “ripe” for him to become their leader and take power because of the shaming the they were put through in the war, he then went on to become known as the greatest military leader (Adolf Hitler Biography). He wanted to return Germans their pride, and promised to make them respected and powerful. This is when he rioted them against a common enemy, the Jews, and tried to overtake …show more content…

Even though they had different beliefs, for example Hitler had racists beliefs, and Stalin did not have any because he was a communist. Both of the men used propaganda to persuade people to follow and to listen to them. They both were born in humble backgrounds, and were both brought up in a poor house. Both became revolutionaries and unlikely leaders. They became leaders during the period between two wars. They manipulated people by promising a better life for countrymen, progress, and modernisation. None of that happen for the people who listen, they only said this for their own selfish reasons. They only were concerned with consolidating and expanding their own power (Hitler and

Show More
Related

  • Similarities Between Macbeth And Robespierre

    949 Words  | 2 Pages

    In The Tragedy of Macbeth, by William Shakespeare, we see Macbeth, a loyal soldier, turn into a complete monster by killing innocent people for the sake of power. This eventually leads to Macbeth’s mental breakdown, descending into madness as a cold blooded murderer, until his fateful death. There have been many Macbeth-like figures who have followed in his footsteps throughout our history, such as Julius Caesar, Joseph Stalin and especially Maximilien Robespierre, in the French Revolution. Robespierre killed many people, including one of his colleagues, to gain political power. The selfishness and greed that is shown in Macbeth Robespierre, and other historic

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Macbeth And Fidel Castro

    549 Words  | 2 Pages

    Fidel Castro has many similar qualities to those of Macbeth. Many people said he was a very charming man before he took over the reign of Cuba. He had a small following that would have done anything for him, as did Macbeth. Castro’s rise to power is shockingly similar to Macbeth’s. Banquo was Macbeth’s best friend and his right hand man, and as all great rulers, Castro also has a right hand man. Even though they share many similarities, their rise to power, loss of their right hand men, and their hunger for power stand out the most.

    Read More

  • Why is it Important to Learn About the Holocaust?

    726 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hitler was superb at convincing people to believe everything he said. He promised the people a roast in every pot, security, and many more things. By promising the people security that meant that he would keep them all safe and that he can do a better job than anyone else. Adolf Hitler increased in support from bankers and industrialists. So, pretty much he had most of the people who had higher power on his side durning this time period. The the united States stock market crasedd in October 1929 unemployment in Germany quickly rose to over six million. This opened another window for Hitler to get more peoplewho thought that they had nothing and their life was over to side with him. President Hindenburg did not want for Hitler to become the chancellor so instead he appointed Von Pappen but, Adolf Hitler did not agree nor did the Nazi's. hitler eventually did become the chancellor on January 30th, 1933 Hitler then banned all political parties. In 1934 the president died and Adolf Hitler forced his way into power. Now that he was the president he can change anyhting that he wants.

    Read More

  • The Leadership Roles of Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini

    578 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hitler was furious with Germany’s surrender in World War I, so when he got back to his home in Munich, he was determined to enter politics and become the greatest leader in German history (Smith). He spent all of his time and effort trying to become the chancellor of Germany. Once he was voted into being chancellor, he needed a way to become the leader of all of Germany. Hitler gathered power through many acts of t...

    Read More

  • Who Should Be Blamed for the Holocaust?

    756 Words  | 2 Pages

    which resulted in the death of many innocent people and numerous Jews. Hitler became leader of the Nazi party and chancellor of Germany. For example,’ ‘Hitler was never elected, he came second, until President Hindenburg was forced to appoint Hitler as chancellor in 1933.’’ (www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/adolf-hitler). This supports one way of how he rose to power and did everything he did.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Macbeth And Brutus Caesar

    521 Words  | 2 Pages

    Among others, two stand out: their honor, and their determination. Firstly, Brutus was very honorable while Macbeth wasn’t. Brutus adhered to his morals and values throughout the whole play, whereas Macbeth lost any honor he once had when he decided to murder Duncan. Brutus, in true altruistic fashion, murdered his friend and eventually himself for the greater good of Rome. Completely devoid of honor, Macbeth slaughtered Duncan, Macduff’s family, and Banquo for his own selfish gain; to become king. Brutus killed a conscious Caesar in broad daylight, with the whole Roman Senate as eyewitnesses. Macbeth, in stark contrast, murdered Duncan in his sleep at night, ensuring that any possible eyewitnesses were unconscious as well. Also Brutus, sure of his decisions and upstanding, told the public that he had slain Caesar and his reasoning for it. Attempting to escape punishment, Macbeth concealed his wrongdoing. While not a “Christian” play, Macbeth certainly clearly portrays Job 28:11, “What is hidden [God] brings forth to light,” and Numbers 32:23, “Your sin will find you

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Macbeth And Mussolini

    76 Words  | 1 Pages

    As the play Macbeth by William Shakespeare went on, the friendship and comparison of Macbeth and Benito Mussolini grew. Both of their actions forced them into power and made them the historical features they are today. The cause of their terrible actions lead them to their death. Throughout the play Macbeth, Macbeth shows many similarities to Benito Mussolini because both used other people to push them to power, lost that power and were both brutally killed.

    Read More

  • Similarities And Differences Between Lenin And Stalin

    2265 Words  | 5 Pages

    Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin were similar in what they claimed to be, but in actuality they were very different people. Although Stalin claimed that he followed Leninism, the philosophy that Lenin developed from Marxism, he often distorted it to follow what he wanted to do. While Lenin wanted to make a unified society without classes, with production in the hands of the people, while Stalin wanted to make Russia into a modern industrial powerhouse by using the government to control production. Lenin accomplished his goals through violence, because he thought achieving Communist revolution was worth using violence, with a ‘The ends justify the means’ mentality. Stalin also used violence to accomplish his goals, however Stalin used much more violence than was often necessary to accomplish his goals. Stalin continued even once he was successful in accomplishing those goals, as he did not stop hurting people, but if anything it gave him more power to hurt people even more. But, at the end of the day, although Lenin ruled for only a very short time, he did raise the standard of living, though there maintained a large amount of hardship. Stalin, however, transformed the USSR from a peasantry to an industrialized nation in less than a decade, he did it on the backs of his millions of victims, who died because of his harsh policies and many purges.

    Read More

  • Joseph Stalin And Adolf Hitler

    1005 Words  | 3 Pages

    From the beginning of time to the darkest days in history, people have managed to see light. Within these dark times, a great deal of violence was cast upon the world, but light and peace always prevailed. If it were not for these two leaders, history would have been completely different. Even though both had very different political views, Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin will all forever be known as two of the most feared totalitarian leaders in history.

    Read More

  • Comparison Between Macbeth And Hitler

    2217 Words  | 5 Pages

    They both shared many qualities when it came to ambition taking over them. They both manipulated there way into power, and they also believed they were invincible. Hitler killed millions of innocent people and Macbeth killed the people that loved him. In Macbeth, Shakespeare shows us the side effects of ambition. It’s like a drug that makes you believe you are indestructible and makes you act irrational. For example it says, "I have no spur to prick the sides of my intent, but only vaulting ambition, which o 'erleaps itself, and falls on th 'other" (Macbeth). The quote illustrate Macbeth desire for more power, his ambition drives his reasoning for killing the king. This is how he justifies it to himself. He 's saying he as nothing against the king its just part of the prophecy and his desire to gain more power. Lady Macbeth is also to blame when it comes to the death of King Duncan, she was the one that questioned Macbeths manhood and pressured him into murdering Duncan. It says, “Glamis thou art, and Cawdor, and shalt be What thou art promised. Yet do I fear thy nature; It is too full o ' th ' milk of human kindness. To catch the nearest way. Thou wouldst be great, Art not without ambition, but without. The illness should attend it” (Macbeth). As you can see Macbeth has the ambition to get more power its just he is questioned if he would really have the nerve to kill

    Read More

  • Stalin Vs. Hitler

    2651 Words  | 6 Pages

    These two men were very demanding in obtaining what they thought should be the rule of a nation by their own personal control. Stalin and Hitler were very close in the same way that they had an aggressive vigor to force a type of commanding dictatorship into their respective countries. Each had a special army that they put in high regard politically to where they were considered special police agents. These armies were under different orders, but their main objectives were to stop anyone who opposed, or were thought to be in opposition to the head of state. Also, both Stalin and Hitler had ideas to improve the education levels and economic prosperity of their own countries, each trying to put their own at the top of the world in industry and commerce. Although Hitler and Stalin were opposed to each other’s own strategies and political stance on being a world dominator, they were very similar in the way to which they fought for political power.

    Read More

  • Hitler's Persuasion

    673 Words  | 2 Pages

    Adolf Hitler, a very-well respected man who dreamed of conquering the whole world to revenge for all the shame Germany got after World War I and building a ‘Greater Germany’. So, he became the leader of about 90 million people; the Nazi regime. So, how did he earn that much of power to be so authoritative? He knew how to approach people’s heart with his persuasive orations. Furthermore, he knew the good of his people and he knew where to put those people. Plus, he set his goal and he achieved it; for his country. Even though his idea to start the war was very foolish, but looking at how he led his own people, Hitler was an eminently successful leader.

    Read More

  • How Has Julius Caesar Changed Over Time

    1200 Words  | 3 Pages

    Originally, he wanted to become an artist. When he couldn’t get in to art school, he joined the German army and fought during World War I. He was even awarded several medals for bravery. After the war, he was given a job in the German army investigating different small political parties (Noakes). Once Hitler knew that he wanted to pursue a career in politics, he knew that he wouldn’t be able to take over with sheer force; instead he needed work his way up in the government. He became the leader of the German workers party and renamed it the National Socialist Party (Pappas). He started becoming popular among the working class, and people who were angry after Germany’s defeat in World War I. The economy was experiencing extreme inflation and the general public felt that the government wasn’t doing enough. Hitler capitalized on this anger and economic suffering, and promised he would be the one to fix it. He was able to gain a lot of followers by saying he would fix the

    Read More

  • Hitler - A Great Leader

    1216 Words  | 3 Pages

    Adolf Hitler joined a small political party in 1919 and rose to leadership through his emotional and captivating speeches. He encouraged national pride, militarism, and a commitment to the Volk and a racially "pure" Germany. Hitler condemned the Jews, exploiting anti-Semitic feelings that had prevailed in Europe for centuries. He changed the name of the party to the National Socialist German Workers' Party, called for short, the Nazi Party. By the end of 1920, the Nazi Party had about 3,000 members. A year later Hitler became its official leader Führer. From this, we can see his potential of being a leader and his development in his propaganda.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Othello And Macbeth

    1593 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the play Othello and the play Macbeth, Shakespeare uses the main characters in both plays as warriors. Both characters in each of their plays, had constant outside voices seeping into their minds which ultimately contributed to the fate of both Othello and Macbeth. The witches in the play Macbeth had more of an effect of Macbeth’s actions then Iago had on Othello’s actions in the play Othello. Each character had a lot of pressure on them throughout the play however the witches influence on Macbeth resulted in more destruction than Iago’s influence on Othello.

    Read More

More about What Are The Similarities Between Hitler And Macbeth

Open Document