Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Standardized testing not effective
Why standardized testing is flawed
Overall effects of standardized testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Standardized testing not effective
Standardized Test are not helping students perform in school or out of school in anyway or possible manner. Students should not be required to take theses unnecessary test to provide evidence for school boards to see if the schools are teaching or not. Standardized Test has it reasons though.It helps teachers in the school board know what needs to be taught and what doesnt.
Standardized test help high school students get into the college of their choice. The author notes ¨Research and experience show that standardized tests are generally good at measuring students’ knowledge, skills, and understanding because they are objective, fair, efficient, and comprehensive. For these reasons, they are used for decisions about admissions to colleges,
…show more content…
graduate programs, and professional schools as well as qualification and licensing for many skilled occupations and demanding professions such as law and medicine.¨(Walberg). As the author stated students can really have a big opportunity through standardized test. The author states ¨If standardized test are misused, of course, the program and students learning may be defective. When standardized tests are used appropriately, a great deal can be learned about how well schools function. That information allows educators and policymakers to make better informed conclusions about how much students are learning, which in turn allows them to make better-informed decisions about improving programs.¨(Walberg). Not only does this help students in the future it also helps teachers improve their teaching by showing them what needs to be learned and what doesn't need to be learned. Even though Standardized Test has its achievements however it also has its downfalls. Standardized Test are useless throughout students time in school, rather it be high school or elementary.
The author demonstrates ¨As psychometrician Daniel Koretz puts it, scores on a standardized test ´usually do not provide a direct and complete measure of educational achievement.´ He cites two reasons why this is so, and both are related to our earlier discussions of sampling. First, test can measure only a portion of the goals of education, which are necessarily broader and more inclusive than the test could possibly be...¨(Harris). Standardized test doesn't measure the things students will use in everyday life such as creativity, critical thinking, resilience, motivation, persistence, curiosity, and leadership. The author also claims ¨The second reason Kortez cities for the incompleteness of test scores as a measure of achievement [is as follows]: ´Even in assessing the goals that can be measured well, tests are generally very small samples of behavior that we use to make estimates of students´ mastery of very large domains of knowledge and skill¨(Harris). As the author stated above standardized test have no real purpose in schools. Standardized test doesn't show the educational level of the student but shows how much the school isn't teaching or if being taught the students aren't really grasping the
concept. In conclusion Standardized Test shows that it's two ways it can be taken. One, it can help schools all over the world know what needs to be taught and helps the teachers improve their teaching habits. Secondly, there's the opposite side of it all which means standardized test should not be required to take and it's a waste of school time because 34.1% of high school students will not attend college.
Standardized testing is a down fall to many students but also an opportunity for many others. Standardized testing has its pros and its cons. It can be the make it or break it factor into getting into colleges you are hoping to attend or the scholarships you want to earn. Some people may have their opinions about the test, whether they hate it or not but the fact is that it’s here to stay.
Standardized testing is not the best way to measure how well a teacher teaches or how much a student has learned. Schools throughout the United States put their main focus on standardized tests; these examinations put too much pressure on the teachers and students and cause traumatizing events. Standardized testing puts strain on teachers and students causing unhealthy occurrences, Common Core is thrown at teachers with no teaching on how to teach the new way which dampers testing scores for all students, and the American College Test determines whether a child gets into college or not based on what they have learned during high school. Standardized tests are disagreeable; tests should not determine ranking of people.
Standardized testing scores proficiencies in most generally accepted curricular areas. The margin of error is too great to call this method effective. “High test scores are generally related to things other than the actual quality of education students are receiving” (Kohn 7). “Only recently have test scores been published in the news-paper and used as the primary criteria for judging children, teachers, and schools.”(2) Standardized testing is a great travesty imposed upon the American Public School system.
Don’t you think students should take standardized tests? To start with standardized tests make sure schools are doing good. It also helps students prepare for later on in school such as elementary school, middle school, high school, and even collage. Even though it takes a while to get the test results back it only takes about 2 days to test. If students didn't take standardized tests how would you know how much they have progressed through the year.It will also give you preperation for next year.Sometimes the time depends on how long the students take to test. It not only tells you how good kids are doing but how well the teachers are teaching. It also shows and helps to know what subjects students are struggling in and what they're succeeding
This argument goes along with the other two mentioned and explained above. There isn’t much that is positive to say about these assessments. It places so much pressure on students to perform well and pressure on teachers to teach what is going to be on the test. This brings negative energy to classrooms. An article by Greg Jouriles helps explain why we don’t need these tests. He claims, “Standardized tests are unnecessary because they rarely show what we don’t already know” (Jouriles, Greg). He also goes on to explain that one’s test score isn’t reliable and that we should trust the teachers when grades are published. A school system can accurately judge the students in the school on what they are good at better than the standardized tests do. They can break down many different aspects of what students need to improve on and what they are already knowledgeable of. Students need to learn more than just the test information. Only studying and learning test material makes students less diverse and leads to boring lectures in the classroom. Another article written by an organization called Fairtest adds, “Some students simply do not test well. Many students are affected by test anxiety or do not show their learning well on a standardized test, resulting in inaccurately lower scores” (Fairtest). These tests punish students for what they can’t control, making them stressed and panicked that they won’t graduate or move on to the next grade. Some children are from low-income families attending schools with large classes with little to no materials for learning what is on the test. In addition to that, some teachers have never been educated on test content, which is not their fault, and this results in low-test scores. This all leads to why there are such negative feelings throughout classrooms of many
Standardized tests are designed to show you and the teachers where you are as far as learning skills go. They have pros and cons, but in the end, they are just there to help the education system. And they determine how far in life you will go. Meaning, you have to take standardized tests to get into some universities and one of the requirements to graduate high school is to pass the standardized tests. So, no matter how much parents, students, or even teachers think the standardized tests are unfair, they are only there to help us and we need them in order to make sure we are getting the education that we deserve.
Standardized testing is not an effective way to test the skills and abilities of today’s students. Standardized tests do not reveal what a student actually understands and learns, but instead only prove how well a student can do on a generic test. Schools have an obligation to prepare students for life, and with the power standardized tests have today, students are being cheated out of a proper, valuable education and forced to prepare and improve their test skills. Too much time, energy, and pressure to succeed are being devoted to standardized tests. Standardized testing, as it is being used presently, is a flawed way of testing the skills of today’s students.
“If my future were determined just by my performance on a standardized test, I wouldn't be here. I guarantee you that.” This quote by Michelle Obama illustrates the idea that standardized testing should not have such a large influence on education in America. However, a majority of people are under the impression that standardized tests are an accurate method to measure a person's intellectual ability. I believe that standardized tests have developed into a very critical part of the American education system that is hindering the growth of students and teachers instead of providing a tool that can accurately measure knowledge.
Standardized testing does not truly evaluate a student’s knowledge. “High schools are turning into ‘giant test-prep centers’, effectively closing off intellectual inquiry and undermining enthusiasm of learning (and teaching)” (Wallace 4). Students are now being taught in such a fashion that all of the learning is aimed at standardized tests, whether that is state issued tests or tests that are used to analyze students for colleges. Colleges have used standardized tests such as the SAT (Scholastic Aptitude Test) or the ACT (American College Test) to choose which students would be accepted into their schools and who would not be. “Another problem with the SAT is that today so many preparation methods exist; the tests are not really a true showing of what a student knows” (Wallace 1). With so many test preparation methods, a student, or the students parents, can basically buy their score. For instance for $2100, Princeton Reviews Honors program guarantees a score of 2100 or the student will get their money back (Princeton 1). Because of programs like this, students who may not have did the best in high school, can score exceptionally high and get admitted into college solely on the fact that the students parents have an exceptional amount of money.
Making Students Battle to the Death for Admission: The Purpose of Standardized Tests INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The issue of standardized testing, one that has been relevant in social debates for decades, has been trying to determine the best applications for these tests and its accuracy. In the discussion of the tests, multiple stakeholders give important perspectives in this issue. Of the following, students, colleges, and parents of the students are the main stakeholders whose voices need to be heard.
There’s no doubt that challenging, high-stakes tests can provoke anxiety in some students. According to Bright Hub Education, some school systems are under great pressure to raise their scores so they have resorted to decreasing time spent in recess. This can have negative impact on children’s social, emotional, and academic well-being. Furthermore, people who are against standardized testing argues that often times, standardized tests try to fit all students in certain categories and oppresses them too much.
No talking, no getting up, no asking questions, and only the qualified tools are allowed. Students prepare all year to take this test. A test that might not even measure what it is supposed to, a standardized test. In 2002, the No Child Left Behind Act was established as an updated version of the Elementary and Secondary Education act of 1965. Its mission was to build upon education for all children no matter their background.
To expand, when universities try to judge the academic performance of a students, they cannot receive different testing method from various regions and schools for the time and energy limitations. In this situation, the existence of standardized test is like a savior of those who suppose to suffer from tiredness to check the grading system of diverse testing. “[ Pro&Con Arguments: “Is the Use of Standardized Test Improving Education in American?” . Standardized Test-ProCon.org. 18 Nov 2015.
“If the purpose of learning is to do well on a test, we’ve lost sight of the real reason for learning.” - Jeannie Fulbright. Students should be required to take standardized tests, but with a limit. Not only is there a slow return on results, but they take take up too much time and it puts too much pressure on students and teachers.
I think it is safe to say one of the most debated topics regarding education in the past few years has been the topic of standardized testing. It is said that standardized tests can help teachers and administrators make decisions regarding the instructional program. These tests also help schools measure how students in a given class, school, or school system perform in relation to other students who take the same test. However, many people feel that standardized tests are often poorly designed and administered and often don’t assess what kids have learned, and have “cut scores” deliberately set high so few students can get top scores. According to the article written by the Washington Post, there is something new that can skew a classroom’s