What Are The Inadequacies Of The Articles Of Confederation

361 Words1 Page

There were many inadequacies of the Articles of Confederation as the governing instrument for the new nation. The United States first attempt at a constitution was the Articles of Confederation. First proposed in 1776 by Richard Henry Lee at the Second Continental Congress, the Articles of Confederation were adequate to maintain some stability for the democracy through the end of the war. The political demands of a developing nation could not provide highly inadequate form of help. The National government was not strong and lacked connection and the federal powers were also lacking. A strong centralized government were not able to support a lack of an authoritative presence with regard to matter and foreign affairs affecting the thirteen states in the Article of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation after the drafting of the, the dust controlling …show more content…

For new laws propositions had to be made and approved by all thirteen states. Usually resulting in opposing votes making no progress what so ever. Large amounts of European goods in the American Markets brought tariffs and trade restrictions. the Constitution remedied these deficiencies on the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation deficiencies of the post-revolutionary America were the problems of the its fundamental charter. The United States government needed a new nation, its commerce disrupted by a protracted war burdened with foreign, possessed of a vast but sparsely populated territory and domestic debt. Some wanted America to be creating a figure in world affairs, but the immediate realities pointed in a different way. The war debts were overwhelming both nation and the states. The British refused to follow the agreement under the Treaty of Paris. A brand new government formed on some different ideas than the Articles of Confederation. The colonies did this to fix the problems with the Articles of

Open Document